Previously, the `SValBuilder` could not encounter expressions of the
following kind:
NonLoc OP Loc
Loc OP NonLoc
Where the `Op` is other than `BO_Add`.
As of now, due to the smarter simplification and the fixedpoint
iteration, it turns out we can.
It can happen if the `Loc` was perfectly constrained to a concrete
value (`nonloc::ConcreteInt`), thus the simplifier can do
constant-folding in these cases as well.
Unfortunately, this could cause assertion failures, since we assumed
that the operator must be `BO_Add`, causing a crash.
---
In the patch, I decided to preserve the original behavior (aka. swap the
operands (if the operator is commutative), but if the `RHS` was a
`loc::ConcreteInt` call `evalBinOpNN()`.
I think this interpretation of the arithmetic expression is closer to
reality.
I also tried naively introducing a separate handler for
`loc::ConcreteInt` RHS, before doing handling the more generic `Loc` RHS
case. However, it broke the `zoo1backwards()` test in the `nullptr.cpp`
file. This highlighted for me the importance to preserve the original
behavior for the `BO_Add` at least.
PS: Sorry for introducing yet another branch into this `evalBinOpXX`
madness. I've got a couple of ideas about refactoring these.
We'll see if I can get to it.
The test file demonstrates the issue and makes sure nothing similar
happens. The `no-crash` annotated lines show, where we crashed before
applying this patch.
Reviewed By: martong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115149
Balazs Benics