This reverts commit 52aeacfbf5.
There isn't full agreement on a path forward yet, but there is agreement that
this shouldn't land as-is. See discussion on https://reviews.llvm.org/D105338
Also reverts unreviewed "[clang] Improve `-Wnull-dereference` diag to be more in-line with reality"
This reverts commit f4877c78c0.
And all the related changes to tests:
This reverts commit 9a0152799f.
This reverts commit 3f7c9cc274.
This reverts commit 329f8197ef.
This reverts commit aa9f58cc2c.
This reverts commit 2df37d5ddd.
This reverts commit a72a441812.
Following r363007, which reverted r362998, r362996, and r362994,
reapply with adjustments for the CRLF differences encountered with
Windows. Namely, the `-b` option of `diff` is employed, and the `grep`
patterns have `$` replaced with `[[:space:]]*$`.
llvm-svn: 363069
Reverts r362998, r362996, and r362994 because the tests do not pass on
Windows due to CRLF changes. Adding back `-w` to diff is not enough, the
new grep substitution doesn't work on Windows, and fixing it is
non-trivial.
llvm-svn: 363007
Summary:
The `%diff_plist` lit substitution invokes `diff` with a non-portable
`-I` option. The intended effect can be achieved by normalizing the
inputs to `diff` beforehand. Such normalization can be done with
`grep -Ev`, which is also used by other tests.
This patch applies the change (adjusted for review comments) described
in http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-April/061904.html
mechanically to the cases where the output file is piped to
`%diff_plist` via `cat`.
The changes were applied via a script, except that
`clang/test/Analysis/NewDelete-path-notes.cpp` and
`clang/test/Analysis/plist-macros-with-expansion.cpp` were each adjusted
for the line-continuation on the relevant `RUN` step.
Reviewers: NoQ, sfertile, xingxue, jasonliu, daltenty
Subscribers: xazax.hun, baloghadamsoftware, szepet, a.sidorin, mikhail.ramalho, Szelethus, donat.nagy, dkrupp, Charusso, jsji, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62950
llvm-svn: 362996
The current argument order has "expected" and "actual" the wrong way around,
so that the diff shows the change from expected to actual, not from actual to expected.
Namely, if the expected diagnostics contains the string "foo", but the analyzer emits "bar",
we really want to see:
```
- foo
+ bar
```
not
```
- bar
+ foo
```
since adapting to most changes would require applying that diff to the expected output.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56340
llvm-svn: 350866
This patch defines a new substitution and uses it to reduce
duplication in the Clang Analyzer test cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52036
llvm-svn: 342365
Some of the analyzer tests check the exact plist output, in order to
verify that the diagnostics produced is correct.
Current testing setup has many issues:
plist output clobbers tests, making them harder to read
it is impossible to debug test failures given error messages from FileCheck.
The only recourse is manually creating the files and using the diff
again, it is impossible to update the tests given the error message:
the only process is a tedious manual one,
going from a separate plist file to CHECK directives.
This patch offers a much better approach of using "diff" directly in place of FileCheck,
and moving tests to separate files.
Generated using the following script:
```
import os
import glob
import re
import subprocess
diagnostics_key = "// CHECK: <key>diagnostics</key>"
def process_file(f, data):
idx = data.index(diagnostics_key)
plist_out_f = 'ExpectedOutputs/plists/%s.plist' % f
plist_out_folder = os.path.join('ExpectedOutputs/plists/', os.path.dirname(f))
plist_data = data[idx:]
plist_data = plist_data.replace('// CHECK: ', '')
plist_data = plist_data.replace('// CHECK-NEXT: ', '')
plist_data += "</dict>\n</plist>\n"
data = data[:idx]
ptn = re.compile("FileCheck --?input-file(=| )(%t|%t\.plist) %s")
if not ptn.findall(data):
print "none found =/ skipping..."
return
data = ptn.sub(lambda m: "tail -n +11 %s | diff -u -w - %%S/../%s" % (m.group(2), plist_out_f), data)
with open(f, 'w') as out_f:
out_f.write(data)
subprocess.check_call(["mkdir", "-p", plist_out_folder])
with open(plist_out_f, 'w') as out_f:
out_f.write(plist_data)
def main():
files = glob.glob("**/*.*")
for f in files:
with open(f) as f_handler:
data = f_handler.read()
if diagnostics_key in data:
print "Converting %s" %f
process_file(f, data)
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50545
llvm-svn: 339475
Rename AlternateExtensive to Extensive.
In 2013, five years ago, we have switched to AlternateExtensive
diagnostics by default, and Extensive was available under unused,
undocumented flag.
This change remove the flag, renames the Alternate
diagnostic to Extensive (as it's no longer Alternate), and ports the
test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47670
llvm-svn: 334524
Since the range-based constraint manager (default) is weak in handling comparisons where symbols are on both sides it is wise to rearrange them to have symbols only on the left side. Thus e.g. A + n >= B + m becomes A - B >= m - n which enables the constraint manager to store a range m - n .. MAX_VALUE for the symbolic expression A - B. This can be used later to check whether e.g. A + k == B + l can be true, which is also rearranged to A - B == l - k so the constraint manager can check whether l - k is in the range (thus greater than or equal to m - n).
The restriction in this version is the the rearrangement happens only if both the symbols and the concrete integers are within the range [min/4 .. max/4] where min and max are the minimal and maximal values of their type.
The rearrangement is not enabled by default. It has to be enabled by using -analyzer-config aggressive-relational-comparison-simplification=true.
Co-author of this patch is Artem Dergachev (NoQ).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41938
llvm-svn: 329780
Logical short-circuit operators now act like other branch conditions.
If the symbolic value of the left-hand side is not known to be true or false
(based on the previous execution path), the "Assuming" event piece is added
in order to explain that the analyzer is adding a new assumption.
Additionally, when the assumption is made against the right-hand side of
the logical operator (i.e. when the operator itself acts as a condition
in another CFG terminator), the "Assuming..." piece is written out for the
right-hand side of the operator rather than for the whole operator.
This allows expression-specific diagnostic message text to be constructed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25092
llvm-svn: 283302
In the analyzer's path-sensitive reports, when a report goes through a branch
and the branch condition cannot be decided to be definitely true or false
(based on the previous execution path), an event piece is added that tells the
user that a new assumption is added upon the symbolic value of the branch
condition. For example, "Assuming 'a' is equal to 3".
The text of the assumption is hand-crafted in various manners depending on
the AST expression. If the AST expression is too complex and the text of
the assumption fails to be constructed, the event piece is omitted.
This causes loss of information and misunderstanding of the report.
Do not omit the event piece even if the expression is too complex;
add a piece with a generic text instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23300
llvm-svn: 283301
This patch adds hashes to the plist and html output to be able to identfy bugs
for suppressing false positives or diff results against a baseline. This hash
aims to be resilient for code evolution and is usable to identify bugs in two
different snapshots of the same software. One missing piece however is a
permanent unique identifier of the checker that produces the warning. Once that
issue is resolved, the hashes generated are going to change. Until that point
this feature is marked experimental, but it is suitable for early adoption.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10305
Original patch by: Bence Babati!
llvm-svn: 251011
to the plist output. This check_name field does not guaranteed to be the
same as the name of the checker in the future.
Reviewer: Anna Zaks
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6841
llvm-svn: 228624
We could certainly be more precise in many of our diagnostics, but before we
were printing "Assuming x is && y", which is just ridiculous.
<rdar://problem/15167979>
llvm-svn: 193455
Nico Weber