r326249 wasn't quite enough because we often run out of inlining stack depth
limit and for that reason fail to see the atomics we're looking for.
Add a more straightforward false positive suppression that is based on the name
of the class. I.e. if we're releasing a pointer in a destructor of a "something
shared/intrusive/reference/counting something ptr/pointer something", then any
use-after-free or double-free that occurs later would likely be a false
positive.
rdar://problem/38013606
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44281
llvm-svn: 328066
Throw away MallocChecker warnings that occur after releasing a pointer within a
destructor (or its callees) after performing C11 atomic fetch_add or fetch_sub
within that destructor (or its callees).
This is an indication that the destructor's class is likely a
reference-counting pointer. The analyzer is not able to understand that the
original reference count is usually large enough to avoid most use-after-frees.
Even when the smart pointer is a local variable, we still have these false
positives that this patch suppresses, because the analyzer doesn't currently
support atomics well enough.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43791
llvm-svn: 326249
Artem Dergachev