This was leading to bad formatting, e.g.:
Before:
f(^{
@autoreleasepool {
if (a) {
g();
}
}
});
After:
f(^{
@autoreleasepool {
if (a) {
g();
}
}
});
llvm-svn: 203777
Before:
auto aaaaaaaa = [](int i, // break
int j)
-> int {
return fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff(i * j);
};
After:
auto aaaaaaaa = [](int i, // break
int j) -> int {
return fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff(i * j);
};
llvm-svn: 203562
init list formatting. This suggestion has now gone into the LLVM coding
standards, and is particularly relevant now that we're using C++11.
Updated a really ridiculous number of tests to reflect this change.
llvm-svn: 202637
This does;
- clang_tablegen() adds each tblgen'd target to global property CLANG_TABLEGEN_TARGETS as list.
- List of targets is added to LLVM_COMMON_DEPENDS.
- all clang libraries and targets depend on generated headers.
You might wonder this would be regression, but in fact, this is little loss.
- Almost all of clang libraries depend on tblgen'd files and clang-tblgen.
- clang-tblgen may cause short stall-out but doesn't cause unconditional rebuild.
- Each library's dependencies to tblgen'd files might vary along headers' structure.
It made hard to track and update *really optimal* dependencies.
Each dependency to intrinsics_gen and ClangSACheckers is left as DEPENDS.
llvm-svn: 201842
Generally people seem to prefer wrapping the first function parameter
over wrapping the trailing tokens "const", "override" and "final". This
does not extend to function-like annotations and probably not to other
non-standard annotations.
Before:
void someLongFunction(int SomeLongParameter)
const { ... }
After:
void someLongFunction(
int SomeLongParameter) const { ... }
llvm-svn: 201504
Before:
auto result = SomeObject
// Calling someFunction on SomeObject
.someFunction();
After:
auto result = SomeObject
// Calling someFunction on SomeObject
.someFunction();
llvm-svn: 201138
It seems like most people see unary operators more like part of the
subsequent identifier and find relative indentation odd.
Before:
aaaaaaaaaa(!aaaaaaaaaa( // break
aaaaa));
After:
aaaaaaaaaa(!aaaaaaaaaa( // break
aaaaa));
llvm-svn: 200840
Before:
typedef NS_ENUM(NSInteger, MyType) {
/// Information about someDecentlyLongValue.
someDecentlyLongValue,
/// Information about anotherDecentlyLongValue.
anotherDecentlyLongValue,
/// Information about aThirdDecentlyLongValue.
aThirdDecentlyLongValue};
After:
typedef NS_ENUM(NSInteger, MyType) {
/// Information about someDecentlyLongValue.
someDecentlyLongValue,
/// Information about anotherDecentlyLongValue.
anotherDecentlyLongValue,
/// Information about aThirdDecentlyLongValue.
aThirdDecentlyLongValue
};
llvm-svn: 200469
Mozilla and WebKit seem to use a space after @property (verified by
grepping their codebases) so we turn this on there as well.
Change by Christian Legnitto. Thank you!
llvm-svn: 200320
This was done when we were not able to parse lambdas to handle some
edge cases for block formatting different in return statements, but is
not necessary any more.
llvm-svn: 199982
Before:
std::unique_ptr<int[]> foo() {}
After:
std::unique_ptr<int []> foo() {}
Also, the formatting could go severely wrong after such a function
before.
llvm-svn: 199817
The author might be missing the "#" or these might be protocol buffer
definitions. Either way, we should not break the line or the string.
There don't seem to be other valid use cases.
llvm-svn: 199501
We cannot simply change the start column to accomodate for the @ in an
ObjC string literal as that will make clang-format happily violate the
column limit.
Use a different workaround instead. However, a better long-term
solution might be to join the @ and the rest of the literal into a
single token.
llvm-svn: 199198
Before:
SomeThing // break
.SomeFunction( // break
param);
After:
SomeThing // break
.SomeFunction( // break
param);
Seems to be more common in editors and codebases I have looked at.
llvm-svn: 199105
Before:
SomeMap[std::pair(aaaaaaaaaaaa, bbbbbbbbbbbbbbb)]
.insert(ccccccccccccccccccccccc);
After:
SomeMap[std::pair(aaaaaaaaaaaa, bbbbbbbbbbbbbbb)].insert(
ccccccccccccccccccccccc);
This seems to be about 3:1 more common in Google and Chromium style and I found
only a handful of instances inside the LLVM codebase.
llvm-svn: 198924
Alexander Kornienko