When passing SVE types as arguments to function calls we can run
out of hardware SVE registers. This is normally fine, since we
switch to an indirect mode where we pass a pointer to a SVE stack
object in a GPR. However, if we switch over part-way through
processing a SVE tuple then part of it will be in registers and
the other part will be on the stack.
I've fixed this by ensuring that:
1. When we don't have enough registers to allocate the whole block
we mark any remaining SVE registers temporarily as allocated.
2. We temporarily remove the InConsecutiveRegs flags from the last
tuple part argument and reinvoke the autogenerated calling
convention handler. Doing this prevents the code from entering
an infinite recursion and, in combination with 1), ensures we
switch over to the Indirect mode.
3. After allocating a GPR register for the pointer to the tuple we
then deallocate any SVE registers we marked as allocated in 1).
We also set the InConsecutiveRegs flags back how they were before.
4. I've changed the AArch64ISelLowering LowerCALL and
LowerFormalArguments functions to detect the start of a tuple,
which involves allocating a single stack object and doing the
correct numbers of legal loads and stores.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90219
Reduce to forward declaration, add the Register.h include that we still needed, move CCState::ensureMaxAlignment into CallingConvLower.cpp as it was the only function that needed the full definition of MachineFunction.
Fix a few implicit dependencies further down.
Summary: This is a followup on D81196.
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81362
Summary: Note to downstream target maintainers: this might silently change the semantics of your code if you override `TargetLowering::HandleByVal` without marking it `override`.
This patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: sdardis, hiraditya, jrtc27, atanasyan, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81365
Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: arsenm, dschuff, jyknight, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Jim, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73885
This reduces the number of SGPRs due to some concerns about running
out of SGPRs if you make all the SGPRs that aren't reserved available
for the calling convention.
Change-Id: Idb4ca4dc72f5b6808cb524ff7270915a8de5b4c1
llvm-svn: 370215
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
All these headers already depend on CodeGen headers so moving them into
CodeGen fixes the layering (since CodeGen depends on Target, not the
other way around).
llvm-svn: 318490
The vectorcall calling convention specifies that arguments to functions are to be passed in registers, when possible.
vectorcall uses more registers for arguments than fastcall or the default x64 calling convention use.
The vectorcall calling convention is only supported in native code on x86 and x64 processors that include Streaming SIMD Extensions 2 (SSE2) and above.
The current implementation does not handle Homogeneous Vector Aggregates (HVAs) correctly and this review attempts to fix it.
This aubmit also includes additional lit tests to cover better HVAs corner cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27392
llvm-svn: 290240
The X86 musttail implementation finds register parameters to forward by
running the calling convention algorithm until a non-register location
is returned. However, assigning a vector memory location has the side
effect of increasing the function's stack alignment. We shouldn't
increase the stack alignment when we are only looking for register
parameters, so this change conditionalizes it.
llvm-svn: 258442
alignment requirements, for example in the case of vectors.
These requirements are exploited by the code generator by using
move instructions that have similar alignment requirements, e.g.,
movaps on x86.
Although the code generator properly aligns the arguments with
respect to the displacement of the stack pointer it computes,
the displacement itself may cause misalignment. For example if
we have
%3 = load <16 x float>, <16 x float>* %1, align 64
call void @bar(<16 x float> %3, i32 0)
the x86 back-end emits:
movaps 32(%ecx), %xmm2
movaps (%ecx), %xmm0
movaps 16(%ecx), %xmm1
movaps 48(%ecx), %xmm3
subl $20, %esp <-- if %esp was 16-byte aligned before this instruction, it no longer will be afterwards
movaps %xmm3, (%esp) <-- movaps requires 16-byte alignment, while %esp is not aligned as such.
movl $0, 16(%esp)
calll __bar
To solve this, we need to make sure that the computed value with which
the stack pointer is changed is a multiple af the maximal alignment seen
during its computation. With this change we get proper alignment:
subl $32, %esp
movaps %xmm3, (%esp)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12337
llvm-svn: 248786
Otherwise we'll attempt to forward ECX, EDX, and EAX for cdecl and
stdcall thunks, leaving us with no scratch registers for indirect call
targets.
Fixes PR22052.
llvm-svn: 225729
Previously I tried to plug musttail into the existing vararg lowering
code. That turned out to be a mistake, because non-vararg calls use
significantly different register lowering, even on x86. For example, AVX
vectors are usually passed in registers to normal functions and memory
to vararg functions. Now musttail uses a completely separate lowering.
Hopefully this can be used as the basis for non-x86 perfect forwarding.
Reviewers: majnemer
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6156
llvm-svn: 224745
to get the subtarget and that's accessible from the MachineFunction
now. This helps clear the way for smaller changes where we getting
a subtarget will require passing in a MachineFunction/Function as
well.
llvm-svn: 214988
Otherwise we can end up with an argument frame size that is not a
multiple of stack slot size, which is very awkward.
This fixes PR20547, which was a bug in x86_64 Sys V vararg handling.
However, it's much easier to test this with x86 callee-cleanup
functions, which previously ended in "retl $6" instead of "retl $8".
This does affect behavior of all backends, but it presumably fixes the
same bug in all of them.
llvm-svn: 214980
Now even the small structures could be passed within byval (small enough
to be stored in GPRs).
In regression tests next function prototypes are checked:
PR15293:
%artz = type { i32 }
define void @foo(%artz* byval %s)
define void @foo2(%artz* byval %s, i32 %p, %artz* byval %s2)
foo: "s" stored in R0
foo2: "s" stored in R0, "s2" stored in R2.
Next AAPCS rules are checked:
5.5 Parameters Passing, C.4 and C.5,
"ParamSize" is parameter size in 32bit words:
-- NSAA != 0, NCRN < R4 and NCRN+ParamSize > R4.
Parameter should be sent to the stack; NCRN := R4.
-- NSAA != 0, and NCRN < R4, NCRN+ParamSize < R4.
Parameter stored in GPRs; NCRN += ParamSize.
llvm-svn: 181148
into their new header subdirectory: include/llvm/IR. This matches the
directory structure of lib, and begins to correct a long standing point
of file layout clutter in LLVM.
There are still more header files to move here, but I wanted to handle
them in separate commits to make tracking what files make sense at each
layer easier.
The only really questionable files here are the target intrinsic
tablegen files. But that's a battle I'd rather not fight today.
I've updated both CMake and Makefile build systems (I think, and my
tests think, but I may have missed something).
I've also re-sorted the includes throughout the project. I'll be
committing updates to Clang, DragonEgg, and Polly momentarily.
llvm-svn: 171366
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
Stack is formed improperly for long structures passed as byval arguments for
EABI mode.
If we took AAPCS reference, we can found the next statements:
A: "If the argument requires double-word alignment (8-byte), the NCRN (Next
Core Register Number) is rounded up to the next even register number." (5.5
Parameter Passing, Stage C, C.3).
B: "The alignment of an aggregate shall be the alignment of its most-aligned
component." (4.3 Composite Types, 4.3.1 Aggregates).
So if we have structure with doubles (9 double fields) and 3 Core unused
registers (r1, r2, r3): caller should use r2 and r3 registers only.
Currently r1,r2,r3 set is used, but it is invalid.
Callee VA routine should also use r2 and r3 regs only. All is ok here. This
behaviour is guessed by rounding up SP address with ADD+BFC operations.
Fix:
Main fix is in ARMTargetLowering::HandleByVal. If we detected AAPCS mode and
8 byte alignment, we waste odd registers then.
P.S.:
I also improved LDRB_POST_IMM regression test. Since ldrb instruction will
not generated by current regression test after this patch.
llvm-svn: 166018
ensureAlignment() in MachineFunction). Also, drop setMaxAlignment() in
favor of this new function. This creates a main entry point to setting
MaxAlignment, which will be helpful for future work. No functionality
change intended.
llvm-svn: 158758
No functional change intended.
Sorry for the churn. The iterator classes are supposed to help avoid
giant commits like this one in the future. The TableGen-produced
register lists are getting quite large, and it may be necessary to
change the table representation.
This makes it possible to do so without changing all clients (again).
llvm-svn: 157854
David Sherwood