Summary:
When renaming a class with template constructors, we are missing the
occurrences of the template constructors, because getUSRsForDeclaration doesn't
give USRs of the templated constructors (they are not in the normal `ctors()`
method).
Reviewers: kbobyrev
Subscribers: jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74216
Summary:
when renaming a typedef decl, we used to rename the underlying decl of the
typedef, we should rename the typedef itself.
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68322
llvm-svn: 373440
local-rename action
This commit introduces the clang-refactor tool alongside the local-rename action
which uses the existing renaming engine used by clang-rename. The tool
doesn't actually perform the source transformations yet, it just provides
testing support. This commit also moves only one test from clang-rename over to
test/Refactor. I will continue to move the other tests throughout
development of clang-refactor.
The following options are supported by clang-refactor:
-v: use verbose output
-selection: The source range that corresponds to the portion of the source
that's selected (currently only special command test:<file> is supported).
Please note that a follow-up commit will migrate clang-refactor to
libTooling's common option parser, so clang-refactor will be able to use
the common interface with compilation database and options like -p, -extra-arg,
etc.
The testing support provided by clang-refactor is described below:
When -selection=test:<file> is given, clang-refactor will parse the selection
commands from that file. The selection commands are grouped and the specified
refactoring action invoked by the tool. Each command in a group is expected to
produce an identical result. The precise syntax for the selection commands is
described in a comment in TestSupport.h.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36574
llvm-svn: 313244
Summary:
The use case is that renaming multiple symbols in a large enough codebase is
much faster if all of these can be done with a single invocation, but
there will be multiple translation units where one or more symbols are
not found.
Old behavior was to exit with an error (default) or exit without
reporting an error (-force). New behavior is that -force results in a
best-effort rename: rename symbols which are found and just ignore the
rest.
The existing help for -force sort of already implies this behavior.
Reviewers: cfe-commits, klimek, arphaman
Reviewed By: klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37634
llvm-svn: 312942
clang-apply-replacements tests
The ClassReplacements.cpp test in the clang-rename tests uses
clang-apply-replacements. I moved it back to the clang-tools-extra repository
for now to ensure that the clang-rename tests can pass when clang is compiled
without clang-tools-extra.
llvm-svn: 306843
Haojian Wu