If we're going to assume references are dereferenceable, we should also
assume they're aligned: otherwise, we can't actually dereference them.
See also D80072.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80166
This reverts commit https://reviews.llvm.org/rL344150 which causes
MachineOutliner related failures on the ppc64le multistage buildbot.
llvm-svn: 344526
This is currently a clang extension and a resolution
of the defect report in the C++ Standard.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46441
llvm-svn: 344150
Summary:
Support for this option is needed for building Linux kernel.
This is a very frequently requested feature by kernel developers.
More details : https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/4/601
GCC option description for -fdelete-null-pointer-checks:
This Assume that programs cannot safely dereference null pointers,
and that no code or data element resides at address zero.
-fno-delete-null-pointer-checks is the inverse of this implying that
null pointer dereferencing is not undefined.
This feature is implemented in as the function attribute
"null-pointer-is-valid"="true".
This CL only adds the attribute on the function.
It also strips "nonnull" attributes from function arguments but
keeps the related warnings unchanged.
Corresponding LLVM change rL336613 already updated the
optimizations to not treat null pointer dereferencing
as undefined if the attribute is present.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, efriedma, jyknight, chandlerc, rnk, srhines, void, george.burgess.iv
Reviewed By: jyknight
Subscribers: drinkcat, xbolva00, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47894
llvm-svn: 337433
Essentially, as a base class constructor does not construct virtual bases, such
a constructor for an abstract class does not need the corresponding base class
construction to be valid, and likewise for destructors.
This creates an awkward situation: clang will sometimes generate references to
the complete object and deleting destructors for an abstract class (it puts
them in the construction vtable for a derived class). But we can't generate a
"correct" version of these because we can't generate references to base class
constructors any more (if they're template specializations, say, we might not
have instantiated them and can't assume any other TU will emit a copy).
Fortunately, we don't need to, since no correct program can ever invoke them,
so instead emit symbols that just trap.
We should stop emitting references to these symbols, but still need to emit
definitions for compatibility.
llvm-svn: 296275
With this patch we output the in the order
C2
C1
D2
D1
D0
Which means that a destructor or constructor that call another is output after
the callee. This is a bit easier to read IHMO and a tiny bit more efficient
as we don't put a decl in DeferredDeclsToEmit.
llvm-svn: 196784
Remove -faccess-control from -cc1; add -fno-access-control.
Make the driver pass -fno-access-control by default.
Update a bunch of tests to be correct under access control.
llvm-svn: 100880
1) emit base destructors as aliases to their unique base class destructors
under some careful conditions. This is enabled for the same targets that can
support complete-to-base aliases, i.e. not darwin.
2) Emit non-variadic complete constructors for classes with no virtual bases
as calls to the base constructor. This is enabled on all targets and in
theory can trigger in situations that the alias optimization can't (mostly
involving virtual bases, mostly not yet supported).
These are bundled together because I didn't think it worthwhile to split them,
not because they really need to be.
llvm-svn: 96842
Eli Friedman