This reapplies: 8ff85ed905
Original commit message:
As a follow-up to my initial mail to llvm-dev here's a first pass at the O1 described there.
This change doesn't include any change to move from selection dag to fast isel
and that will come with other numbers that should help inform that decision.
There also haven't been any real debuggability studies with this pipeline yet,
this is just the initial start done so that people could see it and we could start
tweaking after.
Test updates: Outside of the newpm tests most of the updates are coming from either
optimization passes not run anymore (and without a compelling argument at the moment)
that were largely used for canonicalization in clang.
Original post:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-April/131494.html
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65410
This reverts commit c9ddb02659.
This change doesn't include any change to move from selection dag to fast isel
and that will come with other numbers that should help inform that decision.
There also haven't been any real debuggability studies with this pipeline yet,
this is just the initial start done so that people could see it and we could start
tweaking after.
Test updates: Outside of the newpm tests most of the updates are coming from either
optimization passes not run anymore (and without a compelling argument at the moment)
that were largely used for canonicalization in clang.
Original post:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-April/131494.html
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65410
Tests that use -O1, -O2 and -O3 would often produce different results
with the new pass manager which makes these tests fail. Disable new PM
explicitly for these tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58375
llvm-svn: 362580
This reverts commit https://reviews.llvm.org/rL344150 which causes
MachineOutliner related failures on the ppc64le multistage buildbot.
llvm-svn: 344526
This is currently a clang extension and a resolution
of the defect report in the C++ Standard.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46441
llvm-svn: 344150
This reverts commit r220169 which reverted r220153. However, it also
contains additional changes:
- We may need to add padding *after* we've packed the struct. This
occurs when the aligned next field offset is greater than the new
field's offset. When this occurs, we make the struct packed.
*However*, once packed the next field offset might be less than the
new feild's offset. It is in this case that we might further pad the
struct.
- We would pad structs which were perfectly sized! This behavior is
immensely old. This behavior came from blindly subtracting
NextFieldOffsetInChars from RecordSize. This doesn't take into
account the fact that the struct might have a greater overall
alignment than the last field.
llvm-svn: 220175
or a class derived from T. We already supported this when initializing
_Atomic(T) from T for most (and maybe all) other reasonable values of T.
llvm-svn: 214390
in general (such an atomic has boolean representation) and
specifically for IR generation of __c11_atomic_init. The latter also
means actually using initialization semantics for this initialization,
rather than just creating a store.
On a related note, make sure we actually put in non-atomic-to-atomic
conversions when performing an implicit conversion sequence. IR
generation is far too kind here, but we still want the ASTs to make
sense.
llvm-svn: 154612
Eric Christopher