Summary:
This patch introduces the skeleton of the constexpr interpreter,
capable of evaluating a simple constexpr functions consisting of
if statements. The interpreter is described in more detail in the
RFC. Further patches will add more features.
Reviewers: Bigcheese, jfb, rsmith
Subscribers: bruno, uenoku, ldionne, Tyker, thegameg, tschuett, dexonsmith, mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64146
llvm-svn: 370839
Summary:
This patch introduces the skeleton of the constexpr interpreter,
capable of evaluating a simple constexpr functions consisting of
if statements. The interpreter is described in more detail in the
RFC. Further patches will add more features.
Reviewers: Bigcheese, jfb, rsmith
Subscribers: bruno, uenoku, ldionne, Tyker, thegameg, tschuett, dexonsmith, mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64146
llvm-svn: 370636
Summary:
This patch introduces the skeleton of the constexpr interpreter,
capable of evaluating a simple constexpr functions consisting of
if statements. The interpreter is described in more detail in the
RFC. Further patches will add more features.
Reviewers: Bigcheese, jfb, rsmith
Subscribers: bruno, uenoku, ldionne, Tyker, thegameg, tschuett, dexonsmith, mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64146
llvm-svn: 370584
Summary:
This patch introduces the skeleton of the constexpr interpreter,
capable of evaluating a simple constexpr functions consisting of
if statements. The interpreter is described in more detail in the
RFC. Further patches will add more features.
Reviewers: Bigcheese, jfb, rsmith
Subscribers: bruno, uenoku, ldionne, Tyker, thegameg, tschuett, dexonsmith, mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64146
llvm-svn: 370531
Summary:
This patch introduces the skeleton of the constexpr interpreter,
capable of evaluating a simple constexpr functions consisting of
if statements. The interpreter is described in more detail in the
RFC. Further patches will add more features.
Reviewers: Bigcheese, jfb, rsmith
Subscribers: bruno, uenoku, ldionne, Tyker, thegameg, tschuett, dexonsmith, mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64146
llvm-svn: 370476
Summary:
Adding is_anonymous the ASTDump for CXXRecordDecl. This turned out to be useful when debugging some problems with how LLDB creates ASTs from DWARF.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66028
llvm-svn: 368591
This patch adds the SVE built-in types defined by the Procedure Call
Standard for the Arm Architecture:
https://developer.arm.com/docs/100986/0000
It handles the types in all relevant places that deal with built-in types.
At the moment, some of these places bail out with an error, including:
(1) trying to generate LLVM IR for the types
(2) trying to generate debug info for the types
(3) trying to mangle the types using the Microsoft C++ ABI
(4) trying to @encode the types in Objective C
(1) and (2) are fixed by follow-on patches but (unlike this patch)
they deal mostly with target-specific LLVM details, so seemed like
a logically separate change. There is currently no spec for (3) and
(4), so reporting an error seems like the correct behaviour for now.
The intention is that the types will become sizeless types:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-June/062523.html
The main purpose of the sizeless type extension is to diagnose
impossible or dangerous uses of the types, such as any that would
require sizeof to have a meaningful defined value.
Until then, the patch sets the alignments of the types to the values
specified in the link above. It also sets the sizes of the types to
zero, which is chosen to be consistently wrong and shouldn't affect
correctly-written code (i.e. code that would compile even with the
sizeless type extension).
The patch adds the common subset of functionality needed to test the
sizeless type extension on the one hand and to provide SVE intrinsic
functions on the other. After this patch, the two pieces of work are
essentially independent.
The patch is based on one by Graham Hunter:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59245
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62960
llvm-svn: 368413
Summary:
This is the first part of work announced in
"[RFC] Adding lifetime analysis to clang" [0],
i.e. the addition of the [[gsl::Owner(T)]] and
[[gsl::Pointer(T)]] attributes, which
will enable user-defined types to participate in
the lifetime analysis (which will be part of the
next PR).
The type `T` here is called "DerefType" in the paper,
and denotes the type that an Owner owns and a Pointer
points to. E.g. `std::vector<int>` should be annotated
with `[[gsl::Owner(int)]]` and
a `std::vector<int>::iterator` with `[[gsl::Pointer(int)]]`.
[0] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2018-November/060355.html
Reviewers: gribozavr
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63954
llvm-svn: 367040
This adds a new vectorize predication loop hint:
#pragma clang loop vectorize_predicate(enable)
that can be used to indicate to the vectoriser that all (load/store)
instructions should be predicated (masked). This allows, for example, folding
of the remainder loop into the main loop.
This patch will be followed up with D64916 and D65197. The former is a
refactoring in the loopvectorizer and the groundwork to make tail loop folding
a more general concept, and in the latter the actual tail loop folding
transformation will be implemented.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64744
llvm-svn: 366989
The "line" attribute is now the physical line within the source file for the location. A "presumedLine" attribute is printed when the presumed line number does not match the given source line number. We continue to not print repeated line information in subsequent source locations, but we track presumed and actual lines separately.
llvm-svn: 365919
This fixes a bug where we would have an invalid JSON attribute (e.g., "value": inf). It also increases the precision of the values because they're not represented as approximate doubles with the host architecture's floating-point model.
llvm-svn: 365900
Ignore trailing NullStmts in compound expressions when determining the result type and value. This is to match the GCC behavior which ignores semicolons at the end of compound expressions.
Patch by Dominic Ferreira.
llvm-svn: 365498
This patch introduces support of hip_pinned_shadow variable for HIP.
A hip_pinned_shadow variable is a global variable with attribute hip_pinned_shadow.
It has external linkage on device side and has no initializer. It has internal
linkage on host side and has initializer or static constructor. It can be accessed
in both device code and host code.
This allows HIP runtime to implement support of HIP texture reference.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62738
llvm-svn: 364381
Rather than create JSON objects for source locations and ranges, we instead stream them out directly. This allows us to elide duplicate information (without JSON field reordering causing an issue) like file names and line numbers, similar to the text dump. This also adds token length information when dumping the source location.
llvm-svn: 364226
This also details what filters, if any, were used to generate the test output. Updates all the current JSON testing files to include the automated note.
llvm-svn: 364055
Previously, we attempted to write out template parameters and specializations to their own array, but due to the architecture of the ASTNodeTraverser, this meant that other nodes were not being written out. This now follows the same behavior as the regular AST dumper and puts all the (correct) information into the "inner" array. When we correct the AST node traverser itself, we can revisit splitting this information into separate arrays again.
llvm-svn: 363819
Summary:
When using ConstantExpr we often need the result of the expression to be kept in the AST. Currently this is done on a by the node that needs the result and has been done multiple times for enumerator, for constexpr variables... . This patch adds to ConstantExpr the ability to store the result of evaluating the expression. no functional changes expected.
Changes:
- Add trailling object to ConstantExpr that can hold an APValue or an uint64_t. the uint64_t is here because most ConstantExpr yield integral values so there is an optimized layout for integral values.
- Add basic* serialization support for the trailing result.
- Move conversion functions from an enum to a fltSemantics from clang::FloatingLiteral to llvm::APFloatBase. this change is to make it usable for serializing APValues.
- Add basic* Import support for the trailing result.
- ConstantExpr created in CheckConvertedConstantExpression now stores the result in the ConstantExpr Node.
- Adapt AST dump to print the result when present.
basic* : None, Indeterminate, Int, Float, FixedPoint, ComplexInt, ComplexFloat,
the result is not yet used anywhere but for -ast-dump.
Reviewers: rsmith, martong, shafik
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: rnkovacs, hiraditya, dexonsmith, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62399
llvm-svn: 363493
regenerate the test expectations.
(Only two tests change, as a result of no longer matching the 0x in a
pointer; the other tests were already excluding that.)
llvm-svn: 362316
and returned to the context in which 'this' should be captured.
This means we now always mark 'this' referenced from the context in
which it's actually referenced, rather than potentially from some
context nested within that.
llvm-svn: 362182
capturing expression or statement.
No functionality change yet. The intent is that we will also delay
building the initialization expression until the enclosing context, so
that:
a) we build the initialization expression in the right context, and
b) we can elide captures that are not odr-used, as suggested by P0588R1.
This also consolidates some duplicated code building capture fields into
a single place.
llvm-svn: 361893
This patch adjusts `PragmaOpenMPHandler` to set the location of
`tok::annot_pragma_openmp` to the `#pragma` location instead of the
`omp` location so that the former becomes the start location of the
OpenMP AST node. This can be useful when, for example, rewriting a
directive using Clang's Rewrite facility. Most of this patch updates
tests for changes to locations in diagnostics and `-ast-dump` output.
Reviewed By: ABataev, lebedev.ri, Meinersbur, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61509
llvm-svn: 361867
This adds tests for dumping expressions in C. It also updates a comment to note an issue to be fixed with printing character literals discovered as part of this testing.
llvm-svn: 361193
This adds the -ast-dump=json cc1 flag (in addition to -ast-dump=default, which is the default if no dump format is specified), as well as some initial AST dumping functionality and tests.
llvm-svn: 360622
Summary:
currently for:
```
template<typename ... T>
void f(T... t) {
auto l = [t...]{};
}
```
`clang -ast-print file.cpp`
outputs:
```
template <typename ...T> void f(T ...t) {
auto l = [t] {
}
;
}
```
notice that there is not `...` in the capture list of the lambda. this patch fixes this issue. and add test for it.
Patch by Tyker
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61556
llvm-svn: 359980
The FIXME of this test case has been addressed in r335084/r338800. Its
execution still does not succeed because of multiple syntax errors.
First, the "clang" namespace is missing on each of the 4 pragmas.
Second, the pragma for defining the vector width is "vectorize_width(4)"
instead of "vectorize(4)". Third, the pragma for defining the interleave
factor is "interleave_count(8)" instead of "interleave(8)".
The file was already using the wrong syntax when added in
r210925 2014-06-13. The file ast-print-pragmas.cpp already checks for
the correct pragma order, making this test redundant even if fixed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60749
llvm-svn: 358507
Fails on MSVC buildbot (but not locally).
Not important as it is 'testing' something that isn't supported yet anyway:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41022
llvm-svn: 356577
Summary:
https://www.openmp.org/wp-content/uploads/OpenMP-API-Specification-5.0.pdf, page 3:
```
structured block
For C/C++, an executable statement, possibly compound, with a single entry at the
top and a single exit at the bottom, or an OpenMP construct.
COMMENT: See Section 2.1 on page 38 for restrictions on structured
blocks.
```
```
2.1 Directive Format
Some executable directives include a structured block. A structured block:
• may contain infinite loops where the point of exit is never reached;
• may halt due to an IEEE exception;
• may contain calls to exit(), _Exit(), quick_exit(), abort() or functions with a
_Noreturn specifier (in C) or a noreturn attribute (in C/C++);
• may be an expression statement, iteration statement, selection statement, or try block, provided
that the corresponding compound statement obtained by enclosing it in { and } would be a
structured block; and
Restrictions
Restrictions to structured blocks are as follows:
• Entry to a structured block must not be the result of a branch.
• The point of exit cannot be a branch out of the structured block.
C / C++
• The point of entry to a structured block must not be a call to setjmp().
• longjmp() and throw() must not violate the entry/exit criteria.
```
Of particular note here is the fact that OpenMP structured blocks are as-if `noexcept`,
in the same sense as with the normal `noexcept` functions in C++.
I.e. if throw happens, and it attempts to travel out of the `noexcept` function
(here: out of the current structured-block), then the program terminates.
Now, one of course can say that since it is explicitly prohibited by the Specification,
then any and all programs that violate this Specification contain undefined behavior,
and are unspecified, and thus no one should care about them. Just don't write broken code /s
But i'm not sure this is a reasonable approach.
I have personally had oss-fuzz issues of this origin - exception thrown inside
of an OpenMP structured-block that is not caught, thus causing program termination.
This issue isn't all that hard to catch, it's not any particularly different from
diagnosing the same situation with the normal `noexcept` function.
Now, clang static analyzer does not presently model exceptions.
But clang-tidy has a simplisic [[ https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/bugprone-exception-escape.html | bugprone-exception-escape ]] check,
and it is even refactored as a `ExceptionAnalyzer` class for reuse.
So it would be trivial to use that analyzer to check for
exceptions escaping out of OpenMP structured blocks. (D59466)
All that sounds too great to be true. Indeed, there is a caveat.
Presently, it's practically impossible to do. To check a OpenMP structured block
you need to somehow 'get' the OpenMP structured block, and you can't because
it's simply not modelled in AST. `CapturedStmt`/`CapturedDecl` is not it's representation.
Now, it is of course possible to write e.g. some AST matcher that would e.g.
match every OpenMP executable directive, and then return the whatever `Stmt` is
the structured block of said executable directive, if any.
But i said //practically//. This isn't practical for the following reasons:
1. This **will** bitrot. That matcher will need to be kept up-to-date,
and refreshed with every new OpenMP spec version.
2. Every single piece of code that would want that knowledge would need to
have such matcher. Well, okay, if it is an AST matcher, it could be shared.
But then you still have `RecursiveASTVisitor` and friends.
`2 > 1`, so now you have code duplication.
So it would be reasonable (and is fully within clang AST spirit) to not
force every single consumer to do that work, but instead store that knowledge
in the correct, and appropriate place - AST, class structure.
Now, there is another hoop we need to get through.
It isn't fully obvious //how// to model this.
The best solution would of course be to simply add a `OMPStructuredBlock` transparent
node. It would be optimal, it would give us two properties:
* Given this `OMPExecutableDirective`, what's it OpenMP structured block?
* It is trivial to check whether the `Stmt*` is a OpenMP structured block (`isa<OMPStructuredBlock>(ptr)`)
But OpenMP structured block isn't **necessarily** the first, direct child of `OMP*Directive`.
(even ignoring the clang's `CapturedStmt`/`CapturedDecl` that were inserted inbetween).
So i'm not sure whether or not we could re-create AST statements after they were already created?
There would be other costs to a new AST node: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40563#c12
```
1. You will need to break the representation of loops. The body should be replaced by the "structured block" entity.
2. You will need to support serialization/deserialization.
3. You will need to support template instantiation.
4. You will need to support codegen and take this new construct to account in each OpenMP directive.
```
Instead, there **is** an functionally-equivalent, alternative solution, consisting of two parts.
Part 1:
* Add a member function `isStandaloneDirective()` to the `OMPExecutableDirective` class,
that will tell whether this directive is stand-alone or not, as per the spec.
We need it because we can't just check for the existance of associated statements,
see code comment.
* Add a member function `getStructuredBlock()` to the OMPExecutableDirective` class itself,
that assert that this is not a stand-alone directive, and either return the correct loop body
if this is a loop-like directive, or the captured statement.
This way, given an `OMPExecutableDirective`, we can get it's structured block.
Also, since the knowledge is ingrained into the clang OpenMP implementation,
it will not cause any duplication, and //hopefully// won't bitrot.
Great we achieved 1 of 2 properties of `OMPStructuredBlock` approach.
Thus, there is a second part needed:
* How can we check whether a given `Stmt*` is `OMPStructuredBlock`?
Well, we can't really, in general. I can see this workaround:
```
class FunctionASTVisitor : public RecursiveASTVisitor<FunctionASTVisitor> {
using Base = RecursiveASTVisitor<FunctionASTVisitor>;
public:
bool VisitOMPExecDir(OMPExecDir *D) {
OmpStructuredStmts.emplace_back(D.getStructuredStmt());
}
bool VisitSOMETHINGELSE(???) {
if(InOmpStructuredStmt)
HI!
}
bool TraverseStmt(Stmt *Node) {
if (!Node)
return Base::TraverseStmt(Node);
if (OmpStructuredStmts.back() == Node)
++InOmpStructuredStmt;
Base::TraverseStmt(Node);
if (OmpStructuredStmts.back() == Node) {
OmpStructuredStmts.pop_back();
--InOmpStructuredStmt;
}
return true;
}
std::vector<Stmt*> OmpStructuredStmts;
int InOmpStructuredStmt = 0;
};
```
But i really don't see using it in practice.
It's just too intrusive; and again, requires knowledge duplication.
.. but no. The solution lies right on the ground.
Why don't we simply store this `i'm a openmp structured block` in the bitfield of the `Stmt` itself?
This does not appear to have any impact on the memory footprint of the clang AST,
since it's just a single extra bit in the bitfield. At least the static assertions don't fail.
Thus, indeed, we can achieve both of the properties without a new AST node.
We can cheaply set that bit right in sema, at the end of `Sema::ActOnOpenMPExecutableDirective()`,
by just calling the `getStructuredBlock()` that we just added.
Test coverage that demonstrates all this has been added.
This isn't as great with serialization though. Most of it does not use abbrevs,
so we do end up paying the full price (4 bytes?) instead of a single bit.
That price, of course, can be reclaimed by using abbrevs.
In fact, i suspect that //might// not just reclaim these bytes, but pack these PCH significantly.
I'm not seeing a third solution. If there is one, it would be interesting to hear about it.
("just don't write code that would require `isa<OMPStructuredBlock>(ptr)`" is not a solution.)
Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40563 | PR40563 ]].
Reviewers: ABataev, rjmccall, hfinkel, rsmith, riccibruno, gribozavr
Reviewed By: ABataev, gribozavr
Subscribers: mgorny, aaron.ballman, steveire, guansong, jfb, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #openmp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59214
llvm-svn: 356570
Summary:
Split off from D59214.
Not a fully exhaustive test coverage, but better than what there currently is.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59306
llvm-svn: 356569
Found by `git grep '\/\/ CHECK-[^: ]* ' clang/test/ | grep -v RUN:`.
Also tweak CodeGenCXX/arm-swiftcall.cpp to still pass now that it checks more.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58061
llvm-svn: 353744
This allows substantially simplifying the expression evaluation code,
because we don't have to special-case lvalues which are actually string
literal initialization.
This currently throws away an optimization where we would avoid creating
an array APValue for string literal initialization. If we really want
to optimize this case, we should fix APValue so it can store simple
arrays more efficiently, like llvm::ConstantDataArray. This shouldn't
affect the memory usage for other string literals. (Not sure if this is
a blocker; I don't think string literal init is common enough for this
to be a serious issue, but I could be wrong.)
The change to test/CodeGenObjC/encode-test.m is a weird side-effect of
these changes: we currently don't constant-evaluate arrays in C, so the
strlen call shouldn't be folded, but lvalue string init managed to get
around that check. I this this is fine.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40430 .
llvm-svn: 353569
There is currently no way to distinguish implicit from explicit
CXXThisExpr in the AST dump output.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57649
Reviewed By: steveire
llvm-svn: 353003
Further reviews (D57594, D57615) have revealed that this was not reviewed,
and that the differential's description was not read during the review,
thus rendering this commit invalid.
This reverts commit r352882.
llvm-svn: 352933
Summary:
I'm working on a clang-tidy check, much like existing [[ http://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/bugprone-exception-escape.html | bugprone-exception-escape ]],
to detect when an exception might escape out of an OpenMP construct it isn't supposed to escape from.
For that i will be using the `nothrow` bit of `CapturedDecl`s.
While that bit is already correctly set for some constructs, e.g. `#pragma omp parallel`: https://godbolt.org/z/2La7pv
it isn't set for the `#pragma omp sections`, or `#pragma omp section`: https://godbolt.org/z/qZ-EbP
If i'm reading [[ https://www.openmp.org/wp-content/uploads/OpenMP-API-Specification-5.0.pdf | `OpenMP Application Programming Interface Version 5.0 November 2018` ]] correctly,
they should be, as per `2.8.1 sections Construct`, starting with page 86:
* The sections construct is a non-iterative worksharing construct that contains a set of **structured blocks**
that are to be distributed among and executed by the threads in a team. Each **structured block** is executed
once by one of the threads in the team in the context of its implicit task.
* The syntax of the sections construct is as follows:
#pragma omp sections [clause[ [,] clause] ... ] new-line
{
[#pragma omp section new-line]
**structured-block**
...
* Description
Each **structured block** in the sections construct is preceded by a section directive except
possibly **the first block**, for which a preceding section directive is optional.
* Restrictions
• The code enclosed in a sections construct must be a **structured block**.
* A throw executed inside a sections region must cause execution to resume within the same
section of the sections region, and the same thread that threw the exception must catch it.
Reviewers: ABataev, #openmp
Reviewed By: ABataev
Subscribers: guansong, openmp-commits, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #openmp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57585
llvm-svn: 352882
Summary:
Was trying to understand how complicated it would be to write
a clang-tidy `openmp-exception-escape`-ish check once D57100 lands.
Just so it happens, all the data is already there,
it is just conveniently omitted from AST dump.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, steveire, ABataev
Reviewed By: ABataev
Subscribers: ABataev, guansong, cfe-commits
Tags: #openmp, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57452
llvm-svn: 352631
As Discussed here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-January/129543.html
There are problems exposing the _Float16 type on architectures that
haven't defined the ABI/ISel for the type yet, so we're temporarily
disabling the type and making it opt-in.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57188
Change-Id: I5db7366dedf1deb9485adb8948b1deb7e612a736
llvm-svn: 352221
This is a fix for https://reviews.llvm.org/D51229 where we pass the
address_space qualified type as the modified type of an AttributedType. This
change now instead wraps the AttributedType with either the address_space
qualifier or a DependentAddressSpaceType.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55447
llvm-svn: 351997
Summary: Only an obscure case is moved.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56829
llvm-svn: 351637
Summary:
Removal of the child node makes it easier to separate traversal from
output generation.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56752
llvm-svn: 351600
Summary:
This makes it easier to separate traversal of the AST from output
generation.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56751
llvm-svn: 351597
Output all content which is local to the FunctionDecl before traversing
to child AST nodes.
This is necessary so that all of the part which is local to the
FunctionDecl can be split into a different method.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55083
llvm-svn: 351269
Summary:
Use it to add optional label nodes to Stmt dumps. This preserves
behavior of InitExprList dump:
// CHECK-NEXT: `-InitListExpr {{.+}} <col:13, col:15> 'U [3]'
// CHECK-NEXT: |-array_filler: InitListExpr {{.+}} <col:15> 'U' field Field {{.+}} 'i' 'int'
// CHECK-NEXT: `-InitListExpr {{.+}} <col:14> 'U' field Field {{.+}} 'i' 'int'
// CHECK-NEXT: `-IntegerLiteral {{.+}} <col:14> 'int' 1
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55488
llvm-svn: 350957
Summary:
Currently the Clang AST doesn't store information about how the callee of a CallExpr was found. Specifically if it was found using ADL.
However, this information is invaluable to tooling. Consider a tool which renames usages of a function. If the originally CallExpr was formed using ADL, then the tooling may need to additionally qualify the replacement.
Without information about how the callee was found, the tooling is left scratching it's head. Additionally, we want to be able to match ADL calls as quickly as possible, which means avoiding computing the answer on the fly.
This patch changes `CallExpr` to store whether it's callee was found using ADL. It does not change the size of any AST nodes.
Reviewers: fowles, rsmith, klimek, shafik
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, riccibruno, calabrese, titus, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55534
llvm-svn: 348977
Summary: Don't add a child just for the label.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55495
llvm-svn: 348794
This adds tests for struct and union declarations in C. It also points out a bug when dumping anonymous record types -- they are sometimes reported as being contained by something of the wrong tag type. e.g., an anonymous struct inside of a union named X reports the anonymous struct as being inside of 'struct X' rather than 'union X'.
llvm-svn: 348033
This moves everything primarily testing the functionality of -ast-dump and -ast-print into their own directory, rather than leaving the tests spread around the testing directory.
llvm-svn: 348017
Nandor Licker