Summary:
Now that ubsan does function interception (for signals), we
need to ensure that ubsan is initialized before any library
constructors are called. Otherwise, if a constructor calls
sigaction, ubsan will intercept in an unitialized state, which
will cause a crash.
This patch is a partial revert of r317757, which removed
preinit arrays for ubsan.
Reviewers: vitalybuka, eugenis, pcc
Subscribers: kubamracek, mgorny, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42389
llvm-svn: 323249
...when such an operation is done on an object during con-/destruction.
(This adds a test case to compiler-rt/test/ubsan/TestCases/TypeCheck/vptr.cpp
that, unlike the existing test cases there, wants to detect multiple UBSan
warnings in one go. Therefore, that file had to be changed from globally using
-fno-sanitize-recover to individually using halt_on_error only where
appropriate.)
This is the compiler-rt part of a patch covering both cfe and compiler-rt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40295
llvm-svn: 321518
At least <http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-android/
builds/6013/steps/annotate/logs/stdio> complains about
__ubsan::__ubsan_handle_function_type_mismatch_abort (compiler-rt
lib/ubsan/ubsan_handlers.cc) returning now despite being declared 'noreturn', so
looks like a different approach is needed for the function_type_mismatch check
to be called also in cases that may ultimately succeed.
llvm-svn: 320981
As discussed in the mail thread <https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/forum/
#!topic/std-discussion/T64_dW3WKUk> "Calling noexcept function throug non-
noexcept pointer is undefined behavior?", such a call should not be UB.
However, Clang currently warns about it.
There is no cheap check whether two function type_infos only differ in noexcept,so pass those two type_infos as additional data to the function_type_mismatch
handler (with the optimization of passing a null "static callee type" info when that is already noexcept, so the additional check can be avoided anyway). For
the Itanium ABI (which appears to be the only one that happens to be used on
platforms that support -fsanitize=function, and which appears to only record
noexcept information for pointer-to-function type_infos, not for function
type_infos themselves), we then need to check the mangled names for occurrence
of "Do" representing "noexcept".
This is the compiler-rt part of a patch covering both cfe and compiler-rt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40720
llvm-svn: 320977
Summary:
This is the first mostly working version of the Sanitizer port to 32-bit Solaris/x86.
It is currently based on Solaris 11.4 Beta.
This part was initially developed inside libsanitizer in the GCC tree and should apply to
both. Subsequent parts will address changes to clang, the compiler-rt build system
and testsuite.
I'm not yet sure what the right patch granularity is: if it's profitable to split the patch
up, I'd like to get guidance on how to do so.
Most of the changes are probably straightforward with a few exceptions:
* The Solaris syscall interface isn't stable, undocumented and can change within an
OS release. The stable interface is the libc interface, which I'm using here, if possible
using the internal _-prefixed names.
* While the patch primarily target 32-bit x86, I've left a few sparc changes in. They
cannot currently be used with clang due to a backend limitation, but have worked
fine inside the gcc tree.
* Some functions (e.g. largefile versions of functions like open64) only exist in 32-bit
Solaris, so I've introduced a separate SANITIZER_SOLARIS32 to check for that.
The patch (with the subsequent ones to be submitted shortly) was tested
on i386-pc-solaris2.11. Only a few failures remain, some of them analyzed, some
still TBD:
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos :: TestCases/Posix/concurrent_overflow.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos :: TestCases/init-order-atexit.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos :: TestCases/log-path_test.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos :: TestCases/malloc-no-intercept.c
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos-dynamic :: TestCases/Posix/concurrent_overflow.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos-dynamic :: TestCases/Posix/start-deactivated.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos-dynamic :: TestCases/default_options.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos-dynamic :: TestCases/init-order-atexit.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos-dynamic :: TestCases/log-path_test.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos-dynamic :: TestCases/malloc-no-intercept.c
SanitizerCommon-Unit :: ./Sanitizer-i386-Test/MemoryMappingLayout.DumpListOfModules
SanitizerCommon-Unit :: ./Sanitizer-i386-Test/SanitizerCommon.PthreadDestructorIterations
Maybe this is good enough the get the ball rolling.
Reviewers: kcc, alekseyshl
Reviewed By: alekseyshl
Subscribers: srhines, jyknight, kubamracek, krytarowski, fedor.sergeev, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40898
llvm-svn: 320740
Previously ubsan_standalone used the GetEnv function to read the
environment variables UBSAN_OPTIONS and UBSAN_SYMBOLIZER_PATH. The
problem with GetEnv is that it does not respect changes to the
environment variables made using the libc setenv function, which
prevents clients from setting environment variables to configure
ubsan before loading ubsan-instrumented libraries.
The reason why we have GetEnv is that some runtimes need to read
environment variables while they initialize using .preinit_array,
and getenv does not work while .preinit_array functions are being
called. However, it is unnecessary for ubsan_standalone to initialize
that early. So this change switches ubsan_standalone to using getenv
and removes the .preinit_array entry. The static version of the runtime
still ends up being initialized using a C++ constructor that exists
to support the shared runtime.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39827
llvm-svn: 317757
Fuchsia doesn't support signals, so don't use interceptors for signal or
sigaction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38669
llvm-svn: 315227
As a follow-up to r315142, this makes it possible to use ubsan with a
static runtime on Darwin. I've also added a new StandaloneStatic testing
configuration so the new setup can be tested.
llvm-svn: 315143
Summary:
This change moves cxx-abi library in asan/ubsan/dd link command line
ahead of other libraries, such as pthread/rt/dl/c/gcc. Given that
cxx-abi may be the full libstdc++/libc++, it makes sense for it to be
ahead of libc and libgcc, at least.
The real motivation is Android, where in the arm32 NDK toolchain
libstdc++.a is actually a linker script that tries to sneak LLVM's
libunwind ahead of libgcc's. Wrong library order breaks unwinding.
Reviewers: srhines, danalbert
Subscribers: aemerson, kubamracek, mgorny, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38520
llvm-svn: 314948
Summary:
Link everything, including the C++ bits, in the single
ubsan_standalone SHARED library. This matches ASan setup.
Reviewers: vitalybuka
Subscribers: kubamracek, llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38340
llvm-svn: 314369
Summary:
Part of https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/637
Standalone ubsan needs signal and sigaction handlers and interceptors.
Plugin mode should rely on parent tool.
Reviewers: eugenis, alekseyshl
Subscribers: kubamracek, llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37895
llvm-svn: 314052
Summary:
On Linux we may need preinit_array in static lib and
ubsan_standalone_initializer in shared lib.
Reviewers: eugenis
Subscribers: kubamracek, llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38013
llvm-svn: 313851
Summary:
1. Update ubsan_interface.inc to make the test happy.
2. Switch interface_symbols_linux and interface_symbols_darwin to C++ to import __ubsan_handle_dynamic_type_cache_miss
3. Switch interface_symbols_windows to C++ for consistency.
Reviewers: rnk, zturner
Subscribers: llvm-commits, kubamracek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37986
llvm-svn: 313551
This was originally broken by r258744 which introduced a weak reference
from ubsan to ubsan_cxx. This reference does not work directly on
Windows because COFF has no direct concept of weak symbols. The fix is
to use /alternatename to create a weak external reference to ubsan_cxx.
Also fix the definition (and the name, so that we drop cached values)
of the cmake flag that controls whether to build ubsan_cxx. Now the
user-controllable flag is always on, and we turn it off internally
depending on whether we support building it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37882
llvm-svn: 313391
Summary: To parser "include" we may need to do binary name substitution.
Reviewers: eugenis, alekseyshl
Subscribers: llvm-commits, kubamracek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37658
llvm-svn: 312953
Summary: To parser "include" we may need to do binary name substitution.
Reviewers: eugenis, alekseyshl
Subscribers: llvm-commits, kubamracek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37658
llvm-svn: 312933
Remove the explicit i686 target that is completely duplicate to
the i386 target, with the latter being used more commonly.
1. The runtime built for i686 will be identical to the one built for
i386.
2. Supporting both -i386 and -i686 suffixes causes unnecessary confusion
on the clang end which has to expect either of them.
3. The checks are based on wrong assumption that __i686__ is defined for
all newer x86 CPUs. In fact, it is only declared when -march=i686 is
explicitly used. It is not available when a more specific (or newer)
-march is used.
Curious enough, if CFLAGS contain -march=i686, the runtime will be built
both for i386 and i686. For any other value, only i386 variant will be
built.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26764
llvm-svn: 311924
Remove the explicit i686 target that is completely duplicate to
the i386 target, with the latter being used more commonly.
1. The runtime built for i686 will be identical to the one built for
i386.
2. Supporting both -i386 and -i686 suffixes causes unnecessary confusion
on the clang end which has to expect either of them.
3. The checks are based on wrong assumption that __i686__ is defined for
all newer x86 CPUs. In fact, it is only declared when -march=i686 is
explicitly used. It is not available when a more specific (or newer)
-march is used.
Curious enough, if CFLAGS contain -march=i686, the runtime will be built
both for i386 and i686. For any other value, only i386 variant will be
built.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26764
llvm-svn: 311842
Summary:
Part of the code inspired by the original work on libsanitizer in GCC 5.4 by Christos Zoulas.
Sponsored by <The NetBSD Foundation>
Reviewers: joerg, vitalybuka, kcc, filcab, fjricci
Reviewed By: fjricci
Subscribers: srhines, kubamracek, mgorny, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36483
llvm-svn: 310412
This change adds sanitizer support for LLVM's libunwind and libc++abi
as an alternative to libstdc++. This allows using the in tree version
of libunwind and libc++abi which is useful when building a toolchain
for different target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34501
llvm-svn: 309362
This change adds support for compiler-rt builtins as an alternative
compiler runtime to libgcc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35165
llvm-svn: 309361
This change adds sanitizer support for LLVM's libunwind and libc++abi
as an alternative to libstdc++. This allows using the in tree version
of libunwind and libc++abi which is useful when building a toolchain
for different target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34501
llvm-svn: 309074
This change adds support for compiler-rt builtins as an alternative
compiler runtime to libgcc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35165
llvm-svn: 309060
The dynamic type check needs to inspect vtables, but could crash if it
encounters a vtable pointer to inaccessible memory. In the first attempt
to fix the issue (r304437), we performed a memory accessibility check on
the wrong range of memory. This should *really* fix the problem.
Patch by Max Moroz!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34215
llvm-svn: 305489
Francis Ricci