typeid (and a couple other non-standard places where we can transform an
unevaluated expression into an evaluated expression) is special
because it introduces an an expression evaluation context,
which conflicts with the mechanism to compute the current
lambda mangling context. PR12123.
I would appreciate if someone would double-check that we get the mangling
correct with this patch.
llvm-svn: 164658
enough information so we can mangle them correctly in cases involving
dependent parameter types. (This specifically impacts cases involving
null pointers and cases involving parameters of reference type.)
Fix the mangler to use this information instead of trying to scavenge
it out of the parameter declaration.
<rdar://problem/12296776>.
llvm-svn: 164656
There are very few tests here because SValBuilder is fairly aggressive
about not building SymExprs that we can't evaluate, which saves memory
and CPU but also makes it very much tied to the current constraint
manager. We should probably scale back here and let things decay to
UnknownVal later on.
bitwise-ops.c tests that for the SymExprs we do create, we persist our
assumptions about them. traversal-path-unification.c tests that we do
clean out constraints on arbitrary SymExprs once they have actually died.
llvm-svn: 164623
Previously, we'd just keep constraints around forever, which means we'd
never be able to merge paths that differed only in constraints on dead
symbols.
Because we now allow constraints on symbolic expressions, not just single
symbols, this requires changing SymExpr::symbol_iterator to include
intermediate symbol nodes in its traversal, not just the SymbolData leaf
nodes.
This depends on the previous commit to be correct. Originally applied in
r163444, reverted in r164275, now being re-applied.
llvm-svn: 164622
Summary: Passes all tests (+ the new one with code completion), but needs a thorough review in part related to modules.
Reviewers: doug.gregor
Reviewed By: alexfh
CC: cfe-commits, rsmith
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D41
llvm-svn: 164610
specific module (__building_module(modulename)) and to get the name of
the current module as an identifier (__MODULE__).
Used to help headers behave differently when they're being included as
part of building a module. Oh, the irony.
llvm-svn: 164605
Currently Sema/wchar.c fails because WCHAR_T_TYPE is defined as int,
however on ARM wchar_t is unsigned int.
This patch changes that, so this test passes for ARM.
Patch by Joey Gouly!
llvm-svn: 164598
be sure to delete the complete object pointer, not the original
pointer. This is necessary if the base being deleted is at a
non-zero offset in the complete object. This is only required
for objects with virtual destructors because deleting an object
via a base-class subobject when the base does not have a virtual
destructor is undefined behavior.
Noticed while reviewing the last four years of cxx-abi-dev
activity.
llvm-svn: 164597
into the enclosing scope; this is a more accurate model but is
(I believe) unnecessary in my test case due to other flaws.
However, one of those flaws is now intentional: blocks which
appear in return statements can be trivially observed to not
extend in lifetime past the return, and so we can allow a jump
past them. Do the necessary magic in IR-generation to make
this work.
llvm-svn: 164589
function being instantiated. An error recovery codepath was recursively
performing name lookup (and triggering an unbounded stack of template
instantiations which blew out the stack before hitting the depth limit).
Patch by Wei Pan!
llvm-svn: 164586
deprecation attribute ('deprecated', 'availability' or 'unavailable').
This warning is under a separate flag, -Wdocumentation-deprecated-sync, so it
can be turned off easily while leaving other -Wdocumentation warnings on.
llvm-svn: 164467
This is a heuristic intended to greatly reduce the number of false
positives resulting from inlining, particularly inlining of generic,
defensive C++ methods that live in header files. The suppression is
triggered in the cases where we ask to track where a null pointer came
from, and it turns out that the source of the null pointer was an inlined
function call.
This change brings the number of bug reports in LLVM from ~1500 down to
around ~300, a much more manageable number. Yes, some true positives may
be hidden as well, but from what I looked at the vast majority of silenced
reports are false positives, and many of the true issues found by the
analyzer are still reported.
I'm hoping to improve this heuristic further by adding some exceptions
next week (cases in which a bug should still be reported).
llvm-svn: 164449
Rather than saying "Null pointer value stored to 'foo'", we now say
"Passing null pointer value via Nth parameter 'foo'", which is much better.
The note is also now on the argument expression as well, rather than the
entire call.
This paves the way for continuing to track arguments back to their sources.
<rdar://problem/12211490>
llvm-svn: 164444
Like with struct fields, we want to catch cases like this early,
so that we can produce better diagnostics and path notes:
PointObj *p = nil;
int *px = &p->_x; // should warn here
*px = 1;
llvm-svn: 164442
We want to catch cases like this early, so that we can produce better
diagnostics and path notes:
Point *p = 0;
int *px = &p->x; // should warn here
*px = 1;
llvm-svn: 164441
fatal error. Previously, if a fatal error was followed by a diagnostic which
was suppressed due to a SFINAETrap, we'd forget that we'd seen a fatal error.
llvm-svn: 164437
Argyrios Kyrtzidis