These tests fail if you build without the x86 llvm backend.
Either because they use an x86 triple or try to backtrace which
requires some x86 knowledge to see all frames.
Reviewed By: labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100194
Update the "image show-unwind" command output to show if the function
being shown is listed as a user-setting or platform trap handler.
Update the individual UnwindPlan dumps to show whether the unwind plan
is registered as a trap handler.
Summary:
Normally, on linux we retrieve the process ID from the LinuxProcStatus
stream (which is just the contents of /proc/%d/status pseudo-file).
However, this stream is not strictly required (it's a breakpad
extension), and we are encountering a fair amount of minidumps which do
not have it present. It's not clear whether this is the case with all
these minidumps, but the two known situations where this stream can be
missing are:
- /proc filesystem not mounted (or something to that effect)
- process crashing after exhausting (almost) all file descriptors (so
the minidump writer may not be able to open the /proc file)
Since this is a corner case which will become less and less relevant
(crashpad-generated minidumps should not suffer from this problem), I
work around this problem by hardcoding the PID to 1 in these cases.
The same thing is done by the gdb plugin when talking to a stub which
does not report a process id (e.g. a hardware probe).
Reviewers: jingham, clayborg
Subscribers: markmentovai, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70238
Extend EmulateMOVRdRm to identify "mov r11, sp" in thumb mode as
setting the frame pointer, if r11 is the frame pointer register.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70797
Summary:
The permissions in a memory region have ternary states (yes, no, don't
know), but the memory region command only prints in binary, treating
"don't know" as "yes", which is particularly confusing as for instance
the unwinder will treat an unknown value as "no".
This patch makes is so that we distinguish all three states when
printing the values, using "?" to indicate the lack of information. It
is implemented via a special argument to the format provider for the
OptionalBool enumeration.
Reviewers: clayborg, jingham
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69106
Summary:
Not all minidumps contain information about memory permissions. However,
it is still important to know which regions of memory contain
potentially executable code. This is particularly important for
unwinding on win32, as the default unwind method there relies on
scanning the stack for things which "look like" code pointers.
This patch enables ProcessMinidump to reconstruct the likely permissions
of memory regions using the sections of loaded object files. It only
does this if we don't have a better source (memory info list stream, or
linux /proc/maps) for this information, and only if the information in
the object files does not conflict with the information in the minidump.
Theoretically that last bit could be improved, since the permissions
obtained from the MemoryList streams is also only a very rough guess,
but it did not seem worthwhile to complicate the implementation because
of that because there will generally be no overlap in practice as the
MemoryList will contain the stack contents and not any module data.
The patch adds a test checking that the module section permissions are
entered into the memory region list, and also a test which demonstrate
that now the unwinder is able to correctly find return addresses even in
minidumps without memory info list streams.
There's one TODO left in this patch, which is that the "memory region"
output does not give any indication about the "don't know" values of
memory region permissions (it just prints them as if they permission bit
was set). I address this in a follow up.
Reviewers: amccarth, clayborg
Subscribers: mgrang, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69105
The architecture enum contains two kinds of contstants: the "official" ones
defined by Microsoft, and unofficial constants added by breakpad to cover the
architectures not described by the first ones.
Up until now, there was no big need to differentiate between the two. However,
now that Microsoft has defined
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/sysinfoapi/ns-sysinfoapi-system_info
a constant for ARM64, we have a name clash.
This patch renames all breakpad-defined constants with to include the prefix
"BP_". This frees up the name "ARM64", which I'll re-introduce with the new
"official" value in a follow-up patch.
Reviewers: amccarth, clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69285
The goal of this refactor is to enable ProcessMinidump to take into
account the loaded modules and their sections when computing the
permissions of various ranges of memory, as discussed in D66638.
This patch moves some of the responsibility for computing the ranges
from MinidumpParser into ProcessMinidump. MinidumpParser still does the
parsing, but ProcessMinidump becomes responsible for answering the
actual queries about memory ranges. This will enable it (in a follow-up
patch) to augment the information obtained from the parser with data
obtained from actual object files.
The changes in the actual code are fairly straight-forward and just
involve moving code around. MinidumpParser::GetMemoryRegions is renamed
to BuildMemoryRegions to emphasize that it does no caching. The only new
thing is the additional bool flag returned from this function. This
indicates whether the returned regions describe all memory mapped into
the target process. Data obtained from /proc/maps and the MemoryInfoList
stream is considered to be exhaustive. Data obtained from Memory(64)List
is not. This will be used to determine whether we need to augment the
data or not.
This reshuffle means that it is no longer possible/easy to test some of
this code via unit tests, as constructing a ProcessMinidump instance is
hard. Instead, I update the unit tests to only test the parsing of the
actual data, and test the answering of queries through a lit test using
the "memory region" command. The patch also includes some tweaks to the
MemoryRegion class to make the unit tests easier to write.
Reviewers: amccarth, clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69035
LLDB has three major testing strategies: unit tests, tests that exercise
the SB API though dotest.py and what we currently call lit tests. The
later is rather confusing as we're now using lit as the driver for all
three types of tests. As most of this grew organically, the directory
structure in the LLDB repository doesn't really make this clear.
The 'lit' tests are part of the root and among these tests there's a
Unit and Suite folder for the unit and dotest-tests. This layout makes
it impossible to run just the lit tests.
This patch changes the directory layout to match the 3 testing
strategies, each with their own directory and their own configuration
file. This means there are now 3 directories under lit with 3
corresponding targets:
- API (check-lldb-api): Test exercising the SB API.
- Shell (check-lldb-shell): Test exercising command line utilities.
- Unit (check-lldb-unit): Unit tests.
Finally, there's still the `check-lldb` target that runs all three test
suites.
Finally, this also renames the lit folder to `test` to match the LLVM
repository layout.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68606
llvm-svn: 374184
David Spickett