Add preconditions to `TestBase.expect()` that catch semantically invalid calls
that happen to succeed anyway. This also fixes the broken callsites caught by
these checks.
This prevents the following incorrect calls:
1. `self.expect("lldb command", "some substr")`
2. `self.expect("lldb command", "assert message", "some substr")`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88792
This updates the errors reported by expect()
to something like:
```
Ran command:
"help"
Got output:
Debugger commands:
<...>
Expecting start string: "Debugger commands:" (was found)
Expecting end string: "foo" (was not found)
```
(see added tests for more examples)
This shows the user exactly what was run,
what checks passed and which failed. Along with
whether that check was supposed to pass.
(including what regex patterns matched)
These lines are also output to the test
trace file, whether the test passes or not.
Note that expect() will still fail at the first failed
check, in line with previous behaviour.
Also I have flipped the wording of the assert
message functions (.*_MSG) to describe failures
not successes. This makes more sense as they are
only shown on assert failures.
Reviewed By: labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86792
Dave Lee