CXXCtorInitializers to the point where we perform the questionable lifetime
extension. This exposed a selection of false negatives in the warning.
llvm-svn: 183869
C++1y, so stop adding the 'const' there. Provide a compatibility warning for
code relying on this in C++11, with a fix-it hint. Update our lazily-written
tests to add the const, except for those ones which were testing our
implementation of this rule.
llvm-svn: 179969
have a direct mismatch between some component of the template and some
component of the argument. The diagnostic now says what the mismatch was, but
doesn't yet say which part of the template doesn't match.
llvm-svn: 174039
partially-substituted parameter pack in a template, forget about the
partially-substituted parameter pack: it is now completed. Fixes
<rdar://problem/12176336>.
llvm-svn: 172859
ActOnFinishFullExpr that some of its checks only apply to discarded-value
expressions. This adds missing checks for unexpanded variadic template
parameter packs to a handful of constructs.
llvm-svn: 172485
Don't require that, during template deduction, a template specialization type
as a function parameter has at least as many template arguments as one used in
a function argument (not even if the argument has been resolved to an exact
type); the additional parameters might be provided by default template
arguments in the template. We don't need this check, since we now implement
[temp.deduct.call]p4 with an additional check after deduction.
llvm-svn: 169475
and defined within the current instantiation, but which are not part of the
current instantiation. Previously, it would look at bases which could be
specialized separately from the current template.
llvm-svn: 168477
warning to an error. C++ bans it, and both GCC and EDG diagnose it as
an error. Microsoft allows it, so we still warn in Microsoft
mode. Fixes <rdar://problem/11135644>.
llvm-svn: 163831
unexpanded parameter pack is a pack expansion. Thus, as with a non-type template
parameter which is a pack expansion, it needs to be expanded early into a fixed
list of template parameters.
Since the expanded list of template parameters is not itself a parameter pack,
it is permitted to appear before the end of the template parameter list, so also
remove that restriction (for both template template parameter pack expansions and
non-type template parameter pack expansions).
llvm-svn: 163369
things going on here that were problematic:
- We were missing the actual access check, or rather, it was suppressed
on account of being a redeclaration lookup.
- The access check would naturally happen during delay, which isn't
appropriate in this case.
- We weren't actually emitting dependent diagnostics associated with
class templates, which was unfortunate.
- Access was being propagated incorrectly for friend method declarations
that couldn't be matched at parse-time.
llvm-svn: 161652
and a function template instantiation, if there's a parameter pack in the
declaration and one at the same place in the instantiation, don't assume that
the pack wasn't expanded -- it may have expanded to nothing. Instead, go ahead
and check whether the parameter pack was expandable. We can do this as a
side-effect of the work we'd need to do anyway, to find how many parameters
were produced.
llvm-svn: 160416
Update the two function overloads
void TemplateSpecializationType::PrintTemplateArgumentList(raw_ostream &OS,....
to behave like
std::string TemplateSpecializationType::PrintTemplateArgumentList(const TemplateArgument *Args,...
hence making sure that clang consistently adds a space between two '>' at the end of nested template arguments.
llvm-svn: 159412
are otherwise too short to try to correct.
The TODOs added to two of the tests are for existing deficiencies in the
typo correction code that could be exposed by using longer identifiers.
llvm-svn: 158109
Moves the bool bail-out down a little in SemaChecking - so now
-Wnull-conversion and -Wliteral-conversion can fire when the target type is
bool.
Also improve the wording/details in the -Wliteral-conversion warning to match
the -Wconstant-conversion.
llvm-svn: 156826
so that we actually accumulate all the delayed diagnostics. Do
this so that we can restore those diagnostics to good standing
if it turns out that we were wrong to suppress, e.g. if the
tag specifier is actually an elaborated type specifier and not
a declaration.
llvm-svn: 156291
exception specifications on member functions until after the closing
'}' for the containing class. This allows, for example, a member
function to throw an instance of its own class. Fixes PR12564 and a
fairly embarassing oversight in our C++98/03 support.
llvm-svn: 154844
This diagnostic seems to be production ready, it's just an oversight that it
wasn't turned on by default.
The test changes are a bit of a mixed bag. Some tests that seemed like they
clearly didn't need to use this behavior have been modified not to use it.
Others that I couldn't be sure about, I added the necessary expected-warnings
to.
It's possible the diagnostic message could be improved to make it clearer that
this warning can be suppressed by using a value that won't lose precision when
converted to the target type (but can still be a floating point literal, such
as "bool b = 1.0;").
llvm-svn: 154068
concerning qualified declarator-ids. We now diagnose extraneous
qualification at namespace scope (which we had previously missed) and
diagnose these qualification errors for all kinds of declarations; it
was rather uneven before. Fixes <rdar://problem/11135644>.
llvm-svn: 153577
scoped enumeration members. Later uses of an enumeration temploid as a nested
name specifier should cause its instantiation. Plus some groundwork for
explicit specialization of member enumerations of class templates.
llvm-svn: 152750
functions that includes an explicit template argument list, perform
an inner deduction against each of the function templates in that list
and, if successful, use the result of that deduction for the outer
template argument deduction. Fixes PR11713.
llvm-svn: 152575
structural comparison of non-dependent types. Otherwise, we end up
rejecting cases where the non-dependent types don't match due to
qualifiers in, e.g., a pointee type. Fixes PR12132.
llvm-svn: 152529
instead of having a special-purpose function.
- ActOnCXXDirectInitializer, which was mostly duplication of
AddInitializerToDecl (leading e.g. to PR10620, which Eli fixed a few days
ago), is dropped completely.
- MultiInitializer, which was an ugly hack I added, is dropped again.
- We now have the infrastructure in place to distinguish between
int x = {1};
int x({1});
int x{1};
-- VarDecl now has getInitStyle(), which indicates which of the above was used.
-- CXXConstructExpr now has a flag to indicate that it represents list-
initialization, although this is not yet used.
- InstantiateInitializer was renamed to SubstInitializer and simplified.
- ActOnParenOrParenListExpr has been replaced by ActOnParenListExpr, which
always produces a ParenListExpr. Placed that so far failed to convert that
back to a ParenExpr containing comma operators have been fixed. I'm pretty
sure I could have made a crashing test case before this.
The end result is a (I hope) considerably cleaner design of initializers.
More importantly, the fact that I can now distinguish between the various
initialization kinds means that I can get the tricky generalized initializer
test cases Johannes Schaub supplied to work. (This is not yet done.)
This commit passed self-host, with the resulting compiler passing the tests. I
hope it doesn't break more complicated code. It's a pretty big change, but one
that I feel is necessary.
llvm-svn: 150318
template without a corresponding parameter pack, don't immediately
substitute the alias template. This is under discussion in the C++
committee, and may become ill-formed, but for now we match GCC.
llvm-svn: 149697
template. Such pack expansions can easily fail at template
instantiation time, if the expanded parameter packs are of the wrong
length. Fixes <rdar://problem/10040867>, PR9021, and the example that
came up today at Going Native.
llvm-svn: 149685
Explicit instantiations following specializations are no-ops and hence have
no PointOfInstantiation. That was done correctly in most cases, but for a
specialization -> instantiation decl -> instantiation definition chain, the
definition didn't realize that it was a no-op. Fix that.
Also, when printing diagnostics for these no-ops, get the diag location from
the decl name location.
Add many test cases, one of them not yet passing (but it failed the same way
before this change). Fixes http://llvm.org/pr11558 and more.
llvm-svn: 147225
part of template argument deduction is ill-formed, we mark it as
invalid and treat it as a deduction failure. If we happen to find that
specialization again, treat it as a deduction failure rather than
silently building a call to the declaration.
Fixes PR11117, a marvelous bug where deduction failed after creating
an invalid specialization, causing overload resolution to pick a
different candidate. Then we performed a similar overload resolution
later, and happily picked the invalid specialization to
call... resulting in a silent link failure.
llvm-svn: 141809
We'd also like for "C++11" or "c++11" to be used for the warning
groups, but without removing the old warning flags. Patches welcome;
I've run out of time to work on this today.
llvm-svn: 141801
and DefaultFunctionArrayLvalueConversion. To prevent
significant regression for should-this-be-a-call fixits,
and to repair some such regression from the introduction of
bound member placeholders, make those placeholder checks
try to build calls appropriately. Harden the build-a-call
logic while we're at it.
llvm-svn: 141738
This makes the code duplication of implicit special member handling even worse,
but the cleanup will have to come later. For now, this works.
Follow-up with tests for explicit defaulting and enabling the __has_feature
flag to come.
llvm-svn: 138821
template<typename T> struct S { } f() { return 0; }
This case now produces a missing ';' diagnostic, since that seems like a much more likely error than an attempt to declare a function or variable in addition to the class template.
Treat this
llvm-svn: 135195
arithmetic into a couple of common routines. Use these to make the
messages more consistent in the various contexts, especially in terms of
consistently diagnosing binary operators with invalid types on both the
left- and right-hand side. Also, improve the grammar and wording of the
messages some, handling both two pointers and two (different) types.
The wording of function pointer arithmetic diagnostics still strikes me
as poorly phrased, and I worry this makes them slightly more awkward if
more consistent. I'm hoping to fix that with a follow-on patch and test
case that will also make them more helpful when a typedef or template
type parameter makes the type completely opaque.
Suggestions on better wording are very welcome, thanks to Richard Smith
for some initial help on that front.
llvm-svn: 133906
deducing template parameter types. Recently Clang began enforcing the
more strict checking that the argument type and the deduced function
parameter type (after substitution) match, but that only consideres
qualification conversions.
One problem with this patch is that we check noreturn conversions and
qualification conversions independently. If a valid conversion would
require *both*, perhaps interleaved with each other, it will be
rejected. If this actually occurs (I'm not yet sure it does) and is in
fact a problem (I'm not yet sure it is), there is a FIXME to implement
more intelligent conversion checking.
However, this step at least allows Clang to resume accepting valid code
we're seeing in the wild.
llvm-svn: 133327
checks that the deduced argument type for a function call matches the
actual argument type provided. The only place we've found where the
consistency checking should actually cause template argument deduction
failure is due to qualifier differences that don't fall into the realm
of qualification conversions (which are *not* checked when we
initially perform deduction). However, we're performing the full
checking as specified in the standard to ensure that no other cases
exist.
Fixes PR9233 / <rdar://problem/9039590>.
llvm-svn: 133163
specializations within an explicit instantiation to default to off
(enabled by -pedantic). Nobody else seem to implement C++
[temp.explicit]p3. Fixes PR10093.
llvm-svn: 132704
specializing a member of an unspecialized template, and recover from
such errors without crashing. Fixes PR10024 / <rdar://problem/9509761>.
llvm-svn: 132677
the template parameter, perform the checking as a "specified" template
argument rather than a "deduced" template argument; the latter implies
stricter type checking that is not permitted for default template
arguments.
Also, cleanup our handling of substitution of explicit template
arguments for a function template. We were actually performing some
substitution of default arguments at this point!
Fixes PR10069.
llvm-svn: 132529
nested-name-specifier, re-evaluate the nested-name-specifier as if we
were entering that context (which we did!), so that we'll resolve a
template-id to a particular class template partial
specialization. Fixes PR9913.
llvm-svn: 131383
nested of an out-of-line declaration, only require a 'template<>'
header for each enclosing class template that hasn't been previously
specialized; previously, we were requiring 'template<>' for enclosing
class templates and members of class templates that hadn't been
previously specialized. Fixes <rdar://problem/9422013>.
llvm-svn: 131207
the semantic context referenced by the nested-name-specifier rather
than the syntactic form of the nested-name-specifier. The previous
incarnation was based on my complete misunderstanding of C++
[temp.expl.spec]. The latest C++0x working draft clarifies the
requirements here, and this rewrite is intended to follow that.
Along the way, improve source location information in the
diagnostics. For example, if we report that a specific type needs or
doesn't need a 'template<>' header, we dig out that type in the
nested-name-specifier and highlight its range.
Fixes: PR5907, PR9421, PR8277, PR8708, PR9482, PR9668, PR9877, and
<rdar://problem/9135379>.
llvm-svn: 131138
parameters on the floor in certain cases:
class X {
template <typename T> friend typename A<T>::Foo;
};
This was parsed as a *non* template friend declaration some how, and
received an ExtWarn. Fixing the parser to actually provide the template
parameters to the freestanding declaration parse triggers the code which
specifically looks for such constructs and hard errors on them.
Along the way, this prevents us from trying to instantiate constructs
like the above inside of a outer template. This is important as loosing
the template parameters means we don't have a well formed declaration
and template instantiation will be unable to rebuild the AST. That fixes
a crash in the GCC test suite.
llvm-svn: 130772
weak linkage. Also, fix a problem where global weak variables
with non-trivial initializers were getting guard variables, or at
least were checking for them and then crashing.
llvm-svn: 129342
overload, so that we actually do the resolution for full expressions
and emit more consistent, useful diagnostics. Also fixes an IRGen
crasher, where Sema wouldn't diagnose a resolvable bound member
function template-id used in a full-expression (<rdar://problem/9108698>).
llvm-svn: 127747
of a C++0x inline namespace within enclosing namespaces, as noted in
C++0x [namespace.def]p8.
Fixes <rdar://problem/9006349>, a libc++ failure where Clang was
rejected an explicit specialization of std::swap (since libc++ puts it
into an inline, versioned namespace std::__1).
llvm-svn: 127162
of an expansion, and we have a paramameter that is not a parameter
pack, don't suppress substitution of parameter packs within this
context.
llvm-svn: 126819
parameter type to see what's behind it, so that we don't end up
printing silly things like "float const *" when "const float *" would
make more sense. Also, replace the pile of "isa" tests with a simple
switch enumerating all of the cases, making a few more obvious cases
use prefix qualifiers.
llvm-svn: 125729
it's okay for the following template parameters to not have default
arguments (since those template parameters can still be
deduced). Also, downgrade the error about default template arguments
in function templates to an extension warning, since this is a
harmless C++0x extension.
llvm-svn: 124855
argument but doesn't (because previous template parameters had default
arguments), clear out all of the default arguments so that we maintain
the invariant that a template parameter has a default argument only if
subsequence template parameters also have default arguments.
Fixes a crash-on-invalid <rdar://problem/8913649>.
llvm-svn: 124345
T) when taking the address of an overloaded function or matching a
specialization to a template (C++0x [temp.deduct.type]p10). Fixes
PR9044.
llvm-svn: 124197
call (C++0x [temp.deduct.call]p3).
As part of this, start improving the reference-binding implementation
used in the computation of implicit conversion sequences (for overload
resolution) to reflect C++0x semantics. It still needs more work and
testing, of course.
llvm-svn: 123966
together. In particular:
- Handle the use of captured parameter pack names within blocks
(BlockDeclRefExpr understands parameter packs now)
- Handle the declaration and expansion of parameter packs within a block's
parameter list, e.g., ^(Args ...args) { ... })
- Handle instantiation of blocks where the return type was not
explicitly specified. (unrelated, but necessary for my tests).
Together, these fixes should make blocks and variadic templates work
reasonably well together. Note that BlockDeclRefExpr is still broken
w.r.t. its computation of type and value dependence, which will still
cause problems for blocks in templates.
llvm-svn: 123849
a pack expansion, e.g., the parameter pack Values in:
template<typename ...Types>
struct Outer {
template<Types ...Values>
struct Inner;
};
This new implementation approach introduces the notion of an
"expanded" non-type template parameter pack, for which we have already
expanded the types of the parameter pack (to, say, "int*, float*",
for Outer<int*, float*>) but have not yet expanded the values. Aside
from creating these expanded non-type template parameter packs, this
patch updates template argument checking and non-type template
parameter pack instantiation to make use of the appropriate types in
the parameter pack.
llvm-svn: 123845
non-variadic function template over a variadic one. This matches GCC
and the intent of the C++0x wording, in a way that I think is likely
to be acceptable to the committee.
llvm-svn: 123581
template template parameter pack that cannot be fully expanded because
its enclosing pack expansion could not be expanded. This form of
TemplateName plays the same role as SubstTemplateTypeParmPackType and
SubstNonTypeTemplateParmPackExpr do for template type parameter packs
and non-type template parameter packs, respectively.
We should now handle these multi-level pack expansion substitutions
anywhere. The largest remaining gap in our variadic-templates support
is that we cannot cope with non-type template parameter packs whose
type is a pack expansion.
llvm-svn: 123521
that captures the substitution of a non-type template argument pack
for a non-type template parameter pack within a pack expansion that
cannot be fully expanded. This follows the approach taken by
SubstTemplateTypeParmPackType.
llvm-svn: 123506
expansion in it, we may end up instantiating to an empty
expression-list. In this case, the variable is uninitialized; tweak
the instantiation logic to handle this case. Fixes PR8977.
llvm-svn: 123449
expansion, when it is known due to the substitution of an out
parameter pack. This allows us to properly handle substitution into
pack expansions that involve multiple parameter packs at different
template parameter levels, even when this substitution happens one
level at a time (as with partial specializations of member class
templates and the signatures of member function templates).
Note that the diagnostic we provide when there is an arity mismatch
between an outer parameter pack and an inner parameter pack in this
case isn't as clear as the normal diagnostic for an arity
mismatch. However, this doesn't matter because these cases are very,
very rare and (even then) only typically occur in a SFINAE context.
The other kinds of pack expansions (expression, template, etc.) still
need to support optional tracking of the number of expansions, and we
need the moral equivalent of SubstTemplateTypeParmPackType for
substituted argument packs of template template and non-type template
parameters.
llvm-svn: 123448
involve template parameter packs at multiple template levels that
occur within the signatures members of class templates (and partial
specializations thereof). This is a work-in-progress that is deficient
in several ways, notably:
- It only works for template type parameter packs, but we need to
also support non-type template parameter packs and template template
parameter packs.
- It doesn't keep track of the lengths of the substituted argument
packs in the expansion, so it can't properly diagnose length
mismatches.
However, this is a concrete step in the right direction.
llvm-svn: 123425
when we're actually matching a template template argument to a
template template parameter. Otherwise, use strict matching.
Fixes <rdar://problem/8859985> clang++: variadics and out-of-line definitions.
llvm-svn: 123385
matching of variadic template template parameters to template
arguments. This paragraph was the subject of ISO C++ committee
document N2555: Extending Variadic Template Template Parameters.
llvm-svn: 123348
another pack expansion type. This can happen when rebuilding types in
the current instantiation.
Fixes <rdar://problem/8848837> (Clang crashing on libc++ <functional>).
llvm-svn: 123316
and function templates that contain variadic templates. This involves
three small-ish changes:
(1) When transforming a pack expansion, if the transformed argument
still contains unexpanded parameter packs, build a pack
expansion. This can happen during the substitution that occurs into
class template partial specialiation template arguments during
partial ordering.
(2) When performing template argument deduction where the argument
is a pack expansion, match against the pattern of that pack
expansion.
(3) When performing template argument deduction against a non-pack
parameter, or a non-expansion template argument, deduction fails if
the argument itself is a pack expansion (C++0x
[temp.deduct.type]p22).
llvm-svn: 123279
number of explicit call arguments. This actually fixes an erroneous
test for [temp.deduct.partial]p11, where we were considering
parameters corresponding to arguments beyond those that were
explicitly provided.
llvm-svn: 123244
parameters it expanded to, map exactly the number of function
parameters that were expanded rather than just running to the end of
the instantiated parameter list. This finishes the implementation of
the last sentence of C++0x [temp.deduct.call]p1.
llvm-svn: 123213
sentence of [temp.deduct.call]p1, both of which concern the
non-deducibility of parameter packs not at the end of a
parameter-type-list. The latter isn't fully implemented yet; see the
new FIXME.
llvm-svn: 123210
expression kinds. This is (indirectly) a test verifying that the
recursive AST visitor is visiting the children of these expression
nodes.
llvm-svn: 123198
pack expansions in template argument lists and function parameter
lists. The implementation of this paragraph should be complete
*except* for cases where we're substituting into one of the unexpanded
packs in a pack expansion; that's a general issue I haven't solved yet.
llvm-svn: 123188
allows an argument pack determines via explicit specification of
function template arguments to be extended by further, deduced
arguments. For example:
template<class ... Types> void f(Types ... values);
void g() {
f<int*, float*>(0, 0, 0); // Types is deduced to the sequence int*, float*, int
}
There are a number of FIXMEs in here that indicate places where we
need to implement + test retained expansions, plus a number of other
places in deduction where we need to correctly cope with the
explicitly-specified arguments when deducing an argument
pack. Furthermore, it appears that the RecursiveASTVisitor needs to be
auditied; it's missing some traversals (especially w.r.t. template
arguments) that cause it not to find unexpanded parameter packs when
it should.
The good news, however, is that the tr1::tuple implementation now
works fully, and the tr1::bind example (both from N2080) is actually
working now.
llvm-svn: 123163
tuple class template. This implementation is boosted directly from the
variadic templates proposal. N2080.
Note that one section is #ifdef'd out. I'll implement that aspect of
template argument deduction next.
llvm-svn: 123016
parameters into parameter types, so that substitution of
explicitly-specified function template arguments uses the same
path. This enables the use of explicitly-specified function template
arguments with variadic templates.
llvm-svn: 122986
template whose last parameter is a parameter pack. This allows us to
form a call to, e.g.,
template<typename ...Args1, typename ...Args2>
void f(std::pair<Args1, Args2> ...pairs);
given zero or more instances of "pair".
llvm-svn: 122973
1) Declaration of function parameter packs
2) Instantiation of function parameter packs within function types.
3) Template argument deduction of function parameter packs when
matching two function types.
We're missing all of the important template-instantiation logic for
function template definitions, along with template argument deduction
from the argument list of a function call, so don't even think of
trying to use these for real yet.
llvm-svn: 122926
expansions with something that is easier to use correctly: a new
template argment kind, rather than a bit on an existing kind. Update
all of the switch statements that deal with template arguments, fixing
a few latent bugs in the process. I"m happy with this representation,
now.
And, oh look! Template instantiation and deduction work for template
template argument pack expansions.
llvm-svn: 122896
for template template argument pack expansions. This allows fun such
as:
template<template<class> class ...> struct apply_impl { /*...*/ };
template<template<class> class ...Metafunctions> struct apply {
typedef typename apply_impl<Metafunctions...>::type type;
};
However, neither template argument deduction nor template
instantiation is implemented for template template argument packs, so
this functionality isn't useful yet.
I'll probably replace the encoding of template template
argument pack expansions in TemplateArgument so that it's harder to
accidentally forget about the expansion. However, this is a step in
the right general direction.
llvm-svn: 122890
Larisse Voufo