In recent versions of Solaris 11.4 (previously 12), ld -V output went to
stdout instead of stderr. Since AddLLVM.cmake only expects it on stderr,
Solaris ld wasn't properly detected and options not understood by it are
passed during the build.
The following patch fixes this, allowing for both variants.
Tested on i386-pc-solaris2.11.4 (on top of D35755 which is needed for
proper Solaris support).
Patch by Rainer Orth.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39601
llvm-svn: 318532
Fix linker not being correctly detected when a custom one is specified
through LLVM_USE_LINKER CMake variable.
In particular,
cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_USE_LINKER=gold ../llvm
resulted into
Linker detection: GNU ld
instead of
Linker detection: GNU Gold
due to the construction not accounting for such variable. It led to the general
confusion and prevented setting linker-specific flags inside functions defined
in AddLLVM.cmake.
Thanks Oleksii Vilchanskyi for the patch!
llvm-svn: 316956
gtest depends on this #define to determine whether it can
use various classes like std::tuple, or whether it has to fall
back to experimental classes in the std::tr1 namespace. The
check in the current version of gtest relies on the value of
the `__cplusplus` macro, but MSVC provides a non-conformant
value of this macro, making it effectively impossible to detect
C++11. In short, LLVM compiled with MSVC has been silently
using the tr1 versions of several classes since the beginning of
time.
This would normally be pretty benign, except that in the latest
preview of MSVC they have marked all of the tr1 classes
deprecated, so it spews thousands of warnings.
llvm-svn: 316798
Summary:
It appears polly makes use of the `CMAKE_RUNTIME_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY` variable
when configuring its lit test suite. Reverting this for now.
llvm-svn: 314551
Summary:
Three `CMAKE_.*_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY` variables used to be set in CMake and
referenced in various other parts of the project. However, in r198205
chapuni added a note to "don't set them anymore", and any remaining
references to them were subsequently removed in r198316 and r199592.
Now that the variables are no longer used anywhere, remove them, along
with the comments advising against using them any longer.
Test Plan:
I ran `check-all` and confirmed the tests built and passed.
Reviewers: beanz, chapuni
Reviewed By: beanz
Subscribers: mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38389
llvm-svn: 314550
Config map is not exposed through the command line, so testing this
is somewhat tricky. But basically we need a test that if a custom
driver builds a config map and passes it to main, it gets respected.
A config map allows config files in the source tree to be mapped
to alternate config files in the build tree. This particular test
works by having two config files in separate directories, and
setting up a config map to have that redirects A/lit.site.cfg
to B/altconfig. Then, we print a message in A/lit.site.cfg
and B/altconfig and check that we do see the output from B
but don't see the output from A. Additionally we test that
the test suite specified by A's config map is properly discovered.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38105
llvm-svn: 313887
Many editors and Python-related diagnostics tools such as
debuggers break or fail in mysterious ways when python files
don't end in .py. This is especially true on Windows, but
still exists on other platforms. I don't want to be too heavy
handed in changing everything across the board, but I do want
to at least *allow* lit configs to have .py extensions. This
patch makes the discovery process first look for a config file
with a .py extension, and if one is not found, then looks for
a config file using the old method. So for existing users, there
should be no functional change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37838
llvm-svn: 313849
Despite a strong CMake warning that this is an unsupported
libcxx build configuration, some bots still rely on being
able to check out lit and libcxx independently with no
LLVM sources, and then run lit against libcxx.
A previous patch broke that workflow, so this is making it work
again. Unfortunately, it breaks generation of the llvm-lit
script for libcxx, but we will just have to live with that until
a solution is found that allows libcxx to make more use of
llvm build pieces. libcxx can still run tests by using the
ninja check target, or by running lit.py directly against the
build tree or source tree.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38057
llvm-svn: 313763
After speaking with the libcxx owners, they agreed that this is
a bug in the bot that needs to be fixed by the bot owners, and
the CMake changes are correct.
llvm-svn: 313643
This reverts commit 4ad71811d45268d81b60f27e3b8b2bcbc23bd7b9.
There is a bot that is checking out libcxx and lit with nothing
else and then running lit.py against the test tree. Since there's
no LLVM source tree, there's no LLVM CMake. CMake actually
reports this as a warning saying unsupported libcxx configuration,
but I guess someone is depending on it anyway.
llvm-svn: 313607
It looks like this is going to be non-trivial to get working
in both Py2 and Py3, so for now I'm reverting until I have time
to fully test it under Python 3.
llvm-svn: 313429
This is a resubmission of r313270. It broke standalone builds of
compiler-rt because we were not correctly generating the llvm-lit
script in the standalone build directory.
The fixes incorporated here attempt to find llvm/utils/llvm-lit
from the source tree returned by llvm-config. If present, it
will generate llvm-lit into the output directory. Regardless,
the user can specify -DLLVM_EXTERNAL_LIT to point to a specific
lit.py on their file system. This supports the use case of
someone installing lit via a package manager. If it cannot find
a source tree, and -DLLVM_EXTERNAL_LIT is either unspecified or
invalid, then we print a warning that tests will not be able
to run.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37756
llvm-svn: 313407
This patch is still breaking several multi-stage compiler-rt bots.
I already know what the fix is, but I want to get the bots green
for now and then try re-applying in the morning.
llvm-svn: 313335
To further reduce duplicate code, this patch introduces a module
that configs can simply import and get access to a lot of useful
functionality such as setting up paths, adding features that are
useful across all projects, and other utility-type functions.
For now this only updates llvm's suite to use this new library,
but subsequent patches will update other projects.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37778
llvm-svn: 313325
This patch simplifies LLVM's lit infrastructure by enforcing an ordering
that a site config is always run before a source-tree config.
A significant amount of the complexity from lit config files arises from
the fact that inside of a source-tree config file, we don't yet know if
the site config has been run. However it is *always* required to run
a site config first, because it passes various variables down through
CMake that the main config depends on. As a result, every config
file has to do a bunch of magic to try to reverse-engineer the location
of the site config file if they detect (heuristically) that the site
config file has not yet been run.
This patch solves the problem by emitting a mapping from source tree
config file to binary tree site config file in llvm-lit.py. Then, during
discovery when we find a config file, we check to see if we have a
target mapping for it, and if so we use that instead.
This mechanism is generic enough that it does not affect external users
of lit. They will just not have a config mapping defined, and everything
will work as normal.
On the other hand, for us it allows us to make many simplifications:
* We are guaranteed that a site config will be executed first
* Inside of a main config, we no longer have to assume that attributes
might not be present and use getattr everywhere.
* We no longer have to pass parameters such as --param llvm_site_config=<path>
on the command line.
* It is future-proof, meaning you don't have to edit llvm-lit.in to add
support for new projects.
* All of the duplicated logic of trying various fallback mechanisms of
finding a site config from the main config are now gone.
One potentially noteworthy thing that was required to implement this
change is that whereas the ninja check targets previously used the first
method to spawn lit, they now use the second. In particular, you can no
longer run lit.py against the source tree while specifying the various
`foo_site_config=<path>` parameters. Instead, you need to run
llvm-lit.py.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37756
llvm-svn: 313270
This was intended to be a generic CMake solution to a problem
shared across several projects. It turns out it doesn't interact
very well certain CMake configurations, and furthermore the
"problem" is actually not a problem, as the problematic code
is never executed to begin with. So this really isn't solving
anything.
llvm-svn: 313191
Some projects need to add conditional dependencies on other projects.
compiler-rt is already doing this, and I attempted to add this to
debuginfo-tests when I ran into the ordering problem, that you can't
conditionally add a dependency unless that dependency's CMakeLists.txt
has already been run (which would allow you to say if (TARGET foo).
The solution to this seems to be to determine very early on the entire
set of projects which is enabled. This is complicated by the fact that
there are multiple ways to enable projects, and different tree layouts
(e.g. mono-repo, out of -tree, external, etc). This patch attempts to
centralize all of this into one place, and then updates compiler-rt to
demonstrate as a proof of concept how this can simplify code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37637
llvm-svn: 313091
FuzzMutate might not be the best place for these, but it makes more
sense than an entirely new library for now. This will make setting up
fuzz targets with consistent CLI handling easier.
llvm-svn: 312425
Summary:
Move version control macros, find_first_existing_file and
find_first_existing_vc_file to AddLLVM.cmake so they can be reused by sub projects
like clang.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36971
llvm-svn: 312419
This adds a dummy main so we can build and run the llvm-isel-fuzzer
functionality when we aren't building LLVM with coverage. The approach
here should serve as a template to stop in-tree fuzzers from
bitrotting (See llvm.org/pr34314).
Note that I'll probably move most of the logic in DummyISelFuzzer's
`main` to a library so it's easy to reuse it in other fuzz targets,
but I'm planning on doing that in a follow up that also consolidates
argument handling in our LLVMFuzzerInitialize implementations.
llvm-svn: 312338
This moves the cmake configuration for fuzzers in LLVM to a new macro,
add_llvm_fuzzer. This will make it easier to keep things consistent
while implementing llvm.org/pr34314.
I've also made a couple of minor functional changes here:
- the fuzzers now use add_llvm_executable rather than add_llvm_tool.
This means they won't create install targets and stuff like that,
because those made little sense for these fuzzers.
- I've grouped these under "Fuzzers" rather than in with "Tools" for
people who build with IDEs.
llvm-svn: 312200
Solaris ld is not the only linker available on Solaris.
Introducing linker detection and using LLVM_LINKER_IS_SOLARISLD to
select Solaris-ld specific handling.
Patch by: Fedor Sergeev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35325
llvm-svn: 307852
Summary:
This is like the LLVM_TOOLS_INSTALL_DIR option, but for the utils
that are installed when the LLVM_INSTALL_UTILS. This option
defaults to 'bin' to remain consistent with the current behavior, but
distros may want to install these to libexec/llvm.
Reviewers: beanz
Reviewed By: beanz
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30655
llvm-svn: 307150
No behavior is changed if LLVM_TARGET_TRIPLE_ENV is blank or undefined.
If LLVM_TARGET_TRIPLE_ENV is "TEST_TARGET_TRIPLE" and $TEST_TARGET_TRIPLE is not blank,
llvm::sys::getDefaultTargetTriple() returns $TEST_TARGET_TRIPLE.
Lit resets config.target_triple and config.environment[LLVM_TARGET_TRIPLE_ENV] to change the default target.
Without changing LLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE nor rebuilding, lit can be run;
TEST_TARGET_TRIPLE=i686-pc-win32 bin/llvm-lit -sv path/to/test/
TEST_TARGET_TRIPLE=i686-pc-win32 ninja check-clang-tools
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33662
llvm-svn: 305632
Summary:
This patch adds a very simple linker script to version the lib's symbols
and thus trying to avoid crashes if an application loads two different
LLVM versions (as long as they do not share data between them).
Note that we deliberately *don't* make LLVM_5.0 depend on LLVM_4.0:
they're incompatible and the whole point of this patch is
to tell the linker that.
Avoid unexpected crashes when two LLVM versions are used in the same process.
Author: Rebecca N. Palmer <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com>
Author: Lisandro Damían Nicanor Pérez Meyer <lisandro@debian.org>
Author: Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre@debian.org>
Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/848368
Reviewers: beanz, rnk
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31524
llvm-svn: 300496
X86EvexToVex machine instruction pass compresses EVEX encoded instructions by replacing them with their identical VEX encoded instructions when possible.
It uses manually supported 2 large tables that map the EVEX instructions to their VEX ideticals.
This TableGen backend replaces the tables by automatically generating them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30451
llvm-svn: 297127
LLVM defines `PTHREAD_LIB` which is used by AddLLVM.cmake and various projects
to correctly link the threading library when needed. Unfortunately
`PTHREAD_LIB` is defined by LLVM's `config-ix.cmake` file which isn't installed
and therefore can't be used when configuring out-of-tree builds. This causes
such builds to fail since `pthread` isn't being correctly linked.
This patch attempts to fix that problem by renaming and exporting
`LLVM_PTHREAD_LIB` as part of`LLVMConfig.cmake`. I renamed `PTHREAD_LIB`
because It seemed likely to cause collisions with downstream users of
`LLVMConfig.cmake`.
llvm-svn: 294690
Update SOVERSION to use just the major version number rather than
major+minor, to match the new versioning scheme where only major is used
to indicate API/ABI version.
Since two-digit SOVERSIONs were introduced post 3.9 branching, this
change does not risk any SOVERSION collisions. In the past,
two-component X.Y SOVERSIONs were shortly used but those will not
interfere with the new ones since the new versions start at 4.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28730
llvm-svn: 292255
I have two immediate motivations for adding this:
1) It makes writing expectations in tests *dramatically* easier. A
quick example that is a taste of what is possible:
std::vector<int> v = ...;
EXPECT_THAT(v, UnorderedElementsAre(1, 2, 3));
This checks that v contains '1', '2', and '3' in some order. There
are a wealth of other helpful matchers like this. They tend to be
highly generic and STL-friendly so they will in almost all cases work
out of the box even on custom LLVM data structures.
I actually find the matcher syntax substantially easier to read even
for simple assertions:
EXPECT_THAT(a, Eq(b));
EXPECT_THAT(b, Ne(c));
Both of these make it clear what is being *tested* and what is being
*expected*. With `EXPECT_EQ` this is implicit (the LHS is expected,
the RHS is tested) and often confusing. With `EXPECT_NE` it is just
not clear. Even the failure error messages are superior with the
matcher based expectations.
2) When testing any kind of generic code, you are continually defining
dummy types with interfaces and then trying to check that the
interfaces are manipulated in a particular way. This is actually what
mocks are *good* for -- testing *interface interactions*. With
generic code, there is often no "fake" or other object that can be
used.
For a concrete example of where this is currently causing significant
pain, look at the pass manager unittests which are riddled with
counters incremented when methods are called. All of these could be
replaced with mocks. The result would be more effective at testing
the code by having tighter constraints. It would be substantially
more readable and maintainable when updating the code. And the error
messages on failure would have substantially more information as
mocks automatically record stack traces and other information *when
the API is misused* instead of trying to diagnose it after the fact.
I expect that #1 will be the overwhelming majority of the uses of gmock,
but I think that is sufficient to justify having it. I would actually
like to update the coding standards to encourage the use of matchers
rather than any other form of `EXPECT_...` macros as they are IMO
a strict superset in terms of functionality and readability.
I think that #2 is relatively rarely useful, but there *are* cases where
it is useful. Historically, I think misuse of actual mocking as
described in #2 has led to resistance towards this framework. I am
actually sympathetic to this -- mocking can easily be overused. However
I think this is not a significant concern in LLVM. First and foremost,
LLVM has very careful and rare exposure of abstract interfaces or
dependency injection, which are the most prone to abuse with mocks. So
there are few opportunities to abuse them. Second, a large fraction of
LLVM's unittests are testing *generic code* where mocks actually make
tremendous sense. And gmock is well suited to building interfaces that
exercise generic libraries. Finally, I still think we should be willing
to have testing utilities in tree even if they should be used rarely. We
can use code review to help guide the usage here.
For a longer and more complete discussion of this, see the llvm-dev
thread here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-January/108672.html
The general consensus seems that this is a reasonable direction to start
down, but that doesn't mean we should race ahead and use this
everywhere. I have one test that is blocked on this to land and that was
specifically used as an example. Before widespread adoption, I'm going
to work up some (brief) guidelines as some of these facilities should be
used sparingly and carefully.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28156
llvm-svn: 291606
Some GCC versions will accept any warning flag name after a '-Wno-',
which would cause us to try to disable warnings with names GCC didn't
understand. This will silently succeed unless there is some other output
from GCC in which case we get weird cc1plus warnings about the warning
name being bogus.
There is still the issue that gtest sets warning flags for building
gtest-all.cc using weird 'add_definitions' and the fact that there is
a GCC version which warns on the variadic macro usage in gtest under
-pedantic, but has no flag analogous to Clang's
-Wgnu-zero-variadic-macro-argumnets to suppress this warning. I haven't
been able to come up with any good solution here. The closest is to turn
off -pedantic for those versions of GCC, but that seems really nasty.
For now, those versinos of GCC aren't warning clean. If anyone is broken
by this, I'll work on CMake logic to detect and disable -pedantic in
these cases.
llvm-svn: 291299
Canonicalize all CMake booleans to 0/1 before passing them to lit, to
ensure that the Python side handles all of them consistently
and correctly. 0/1 is a safe choice of values that trigger the same
boolean interpretation in CMake, Python and C++.
Furthermore, using them without quotes improves the chance Python will
explicitly fail when an incorrect value (such as ON/OFF, TRUE/FALSE,
YES/NO) is accidentally passed, rather than silently misinterpreting
the value.
This replaces a lot of different logics spread around lit site files,
attempting to partially reproduce the boolean logic used in CMake
and usually silently failing when an uncommon value was used instead.
In fact, some of them were never working correctly since different
values were assigned in CMake and checked in Python.
The alternative solution could be to create a common parser for CMake
booleans in lit and use it consistently throughout the site files.
However, it does not seem like the best idea to create redundant
implementation of the same logic and have to follow upstream if it ever
is extended to handle more values.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28294
llvm-svn: 291284
I somehow wrote this fix and then lost it prior to commit. Really sorry
about the noise. This should fix some issues with hacking add_definition
to do things with warning flags.
llvm-svn: 291033
If OUTPUT_DIR is not specified we can assume the symlink is linking to a file in the same directory, so we can use $<TARGET_FILE_NAME:${target}> to create a relative symlink.
In the case of LLDB, when we build a framework, we are creating symlinks in a different directory than the file we're pointing to, and we don't install those links. To make this work in the build directory we can use $<TARGET_FILE:${target}> instead, which uses the full path to the target.
llvm-svn: 289840
This fix, while a bit complicated, preserves the reusability while fixing the issues reported on llvm-commits with visual studio generators.
llvm-svn: 288679
The old implementation of add_llvm_tool_symlink could fail in odd ways when building out of tree. This version solves that problem by not using the LLVM_* variables, and instead reaeding the target's properties.
llvm-svn: 288632
Add an optional parameter to `llvm_install_symlink` which allows the symlink
installation to be placed into a specific component rather than the default
value.
llvm-svn: 288600
Michal Gorny