Introduce llvm.test.set.loop.iterations which sets the loop counter
and also produces an i1 after testing that the count is not zero.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63809
llvm-svn: 364628
This adds the first few patterns for MVE code generation, adding simple integer
add and sub patterns.
Initial code by David Sherwood
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63255
llvm-svn: 364627
This patch adds necessary shuffle vector and buildvector support for ARM MVE.
It essentially adds support for VDUP, VREVs and some VMOVs, which are often
required by other code (like upcoming patches).
This mostly uses the same code from Neon that already generated
NEONvdup/NEONvduplane/NEONvrev's. These have been renamed to ARMvdup/etc and
moved to ARMInstrInfo as they are common to both architectures. Most of the
selection code seems to be applicable to both, but NEON does have some more
instructions making some parts specific.
Most code originally by David Sherwood.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63567
llvm-svn: 364626
Summary: This patch changes fs::setPermissions to optionally set permissions while respecting the umask. It also adds the function fs::getUmask() which returns the current umask.
Reviewers: jhenderson, rupprecht, aprantl, lhames
Reviewed By: jhenderson, rupprecht
Subscribers: sanaanajjar231288, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63583
llvm-svn: 364621
The new switch lowering code that tries to generate jump tables and range checks
were tested at -O0 on arm64, but on -O3 the generic switch lowering code goes to
town on trying to generate optimized lowerings, e.g. multiple jump tables, range
checks etc. This exposed bugs in the way PHI nodes are handled because the CFG
looks even stranger after all of this is done.
llvm-svn: 364613
This patch intends to fix ASAN stack-use-after-scope error.
This is at least a short-term fix to unbreak LLVM's mainline.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63905
llvm-svn: 364611
This shaves an instruction (and a GOT entry in PIC code) off prologues of
functions with stack variables.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63472
llvm-svn: 364608
Summary:
I'm submitting a new revision since i don't understand how to reclaim/reopen/take over the existing one, D50222.
There is no such action in "Add Action" menu...
This implements an optimization described in Hacker's Delight 10-17: when `C` is constant,
the result of `X % C == 0` can be computed more cheaply without actually calculating the remainder.
The motivation is discussed here: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35479.
This is a recommit, the original commit rL364563 was reverted in rL364568
because test-suite detected miscompile - the new comparison constant 'Q'
was being computed incorrectly (we divided by `D0` instead of `D`).
Original patch D50222 by @hermord (Dmytro Shynkevych)
Notes:
- In principle, it's possible to also handle the `X % C1 == C2` case, as discussed on bugzilla.
This seems to require an extra branch on overflow, so I refrained from implementing this for now.
- An explicit check for when the `REM` can be reduced to just its LHS is included:
the `X % C` == 0 optimization breaks `test1` in `test/CodeGen/X86/jump_sign.ll` otherwise.
I hadn't managed to find a better way to not generate worse output in this case.
- The `test/CodeGen/X86/jump_sign.ll` regresses, and is being fixed by a followup patch D63390.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel, hermord, xbolva00
Reviewed By: RKSimon, xbolva00
Subscribers: dexonsmith, kristina, xbolva00, javed.absar, llvm-commits, hermord
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63391
llvm-svn: 364600
FeatureFusion bits was first introduced in
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL253724. for add/load integer fusion for P8.
The only use of `hasFusion` was https://reviews.llvm.org/rL255319.
However, this was removed later in https://reviews.llvm.org/rL280440.
So, there is NO any reference to fusion in code now.
Leaving it there is misleading and confusing, so remove it for now.
We can alwasy add back if we ever support fusion in the future.
llvm-svn: 364581
The `willreturn` function attribute guarantees that a function call will
come back to the call site if the call is also known not to throw.
Therefore, this attribute can be used in
`isGuaranteedToTransferExecutionToSuccessor`.
Patch by Hideto Ueno (@uenoku)
Reviewers: jdoerfert, sstefan1
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: hiraditya, jfb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63372
llvm-svn: 364580
The previous output was next to useless if *any* exit was not computable. If we have more than one exit, show the exit count for each so that it's easier to see what's going from with SCEV analysis when debugging.
llvm-svn: 364579
Summary:
- Match the syntax output by InstPrinter.
- Fix it always emitting 0 for align. Had to work around fact that
opcode is not available for GetDefaultP2Align while parsing.
- Updated tests that were erroneously happy with a p2align=0
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40752
Reviewers: aheejin, sbc100
Subscribers: jgravelle-google, sunfish, jfb, llvm-commits, dschuff
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63633
llvm-svn: 364570
We already had the infrastructure for this, but were waiting for the fix for a number of regressions which were handled by the recent shuffle(extract_subvector(),extract_subvector()) -> extract_subvector(shuffle()) shuffle combines
llvm-svn: 364569
Summary:
The new test case led to incorrect code.
Change-Id: Ief48b227e97aa662dd3535c9bafb27d4a184efca
Reviewers: arsenm, david-salinas
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63871
llvm-svn: 364566
Summary:
I'm submitting a new revision since i don't understand how to reclaim/reopen/take over the existing one, D50222.
There is no such action in "Add Action" menu...
Original patch D50222 by @hermord (Dmytro Shynkevych)
This implements an optimization described in Hacker's Delight 10-17: when `C` is constant,
the result of `X % C == 0` can be computed more cheaply without actually calculating the remainder.
The motivation is discussed here: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35479.
Original patch author: @hermord (Dmytro Shynkevych)!
Notes:
- In principle, it's possible to also handle the `X % C1 == C2` case, as discussed on bugzilla.
This seems to require an extra branch on overflow, so I refrained from implementing this for now.
- An explicit check for when the `REM` can be reduced to just its LHS is included:
the `X % C` == 0 optimization breaks `test1` in `test/CodeGen/X86/jump_sign.ll` otherwise.
I hadn't managed to find a better way to not generate worse output in this case.
- The `test/CodeGen/X86/jump_sign.ll` regresses, and is being fixed by a followup patch D63390.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel, hermord, xbolva00
Reviewed By: RKSimon, xbolva00
Subscribers: xbolva00, javed.absar, llvm-commits, hermord
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63391
llvm-svn: 364563
This patch introduces a new function attribute, willreturn, to indicate
that a call of this function will either exhibit undefined behavior or
comes back and continues execution at a point in the existing call stack
that includes the current invocation.
This attribute guarantees that the function does not have any endless
loops, endless recursion, or terminating functions like abort or exit.
Patch by Hideto Ueno (@uenoku)
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, lebedev.ri, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62801
llvm-svn: 364555
Emit replacements for clobbered parameters location if the parameter
has unmodified value throughout the funciton. This is basic scenario
where we can use the debug entry values.
([12/13] Introduce the debug entry values.)
Co-authored-by: Ananth Sowda <asowda@cisco.com>
Co-authored-by: Nikola Prica <nikola.prica@rt-rk.com>
Co-authored-by: Ivan Baev <ibaev@cisco.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58042
llvm-svn: 364553
There is existing bitcode that we need to support where the structured nature
of pointer types is used to derive the result type of some operation. For
example a GEP's operation and result will be based on its input Type.
When pointers become opaque, the BitcodeReader will still have access to this
information because it's explicitly told how to construct the more complex
types used, but this information will not be attached to any Value that gets
looked up. This changes BitcodeReader so that in all places which use type
information in this manner, it's derived from a side-table rather than from the
Value in question.
llvm-svn: 364550
This was reported in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41751
llvm-mc aborted when disassembling tabortdc.
This patch try to clean up TM related DAGs.
* Fixes the problem by remove explicit output of cr0, and put it as implicit def.
* Update int_ppc_tbegin pattern to accommodate the implicit def of cr0.
* Update the TCHECK operand and int_ppc_tcheck accordingly.
* Add some builtin test and disassembly tests.
* Remove unused CRRC0/crrc0
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61935
llvm-svn: 364544
We saw a 70% ThinLTO link time increase in Chromium for Android, see
crbug.com/978817. Sounds like more of PR42210.
> Recommit of D32530 with a few small changes:
> - Stopped recursively walking through aggregates in
> the verifier, so that we don't impose too much
> overhead on large modules under LTO (see PR42210).
> - Changed tests to match; the errors are slightly
> different since they only report the array or
> struct that actually contains a scalable vector,
> rather than all aggregates which contain one in
> a nested member.
> - Corrected an older comment
>
> Reviewers: thakis, rengolin, sdesmalen
>
> Reviewed By: sdesmalen
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63321
llvm-svn: 364543
Add the IR and the AsmPrinter parts for handling of the DW_OP_entry_values
DWARF operation.
([11/13] Introduce the debug entry values.)
Co-authored-by: Ananth Sowda <asowda@cisco.com>
Co-authored-by: Nikola Prica <nikola.prica@rt-rk.com>
Co-authored-by: Ivan Baev <ibaev@cisco.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60866
llvm-svn: 364542
Handle call instruction replacements and deletions in order to preserve
valid state of the call site info of the MachineFunction.
NOTE: If the call site info is enabled for a new target, the assertion from
the MachineFunction::DeleteMachineInstr() should help to locate places
where the updateCallSiteInfo() should be called in order to preserve valid
state of the call site info.
([10/13] Introduce the debug entry values.)
Co-authored-by: Ananth Sowda <asowda@cisco.com>
Co-authored-by: Nikola Prica <nikola.prica@rt-rk.com>
Co-authored-by: Ivan Baev <ibaev@cisco.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61062
llvm-svn: 364536
The code to generate register move instructions in and out of VPR and
FPSCR_NZCV had assertions checking that the other register involved
was a GPR _pair_, instead of a single GPR as it should have been.
Reviewers: miyuki, ostannard
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63865
llvm-svn: 364534
The BF and WLS/WLSTP instructions have various branch-offset fields
occupying different positions and lengths in the instruction encoding,
and all of them were decoded at disassembly time by the function
DecodeBFLabelOffset() which returned SoftFail if the offset was zero.
In fact, it's perfectly fine and not even a SoftFail for most of those
offset fields to be zero. The only one that can't be zero is the 4-bit
field labelled `boff` in the architecture spec, occupying bits {26-23}
of the BF instruction family. If that one is zero, the encoding
overlaps other instructions (WLS, DLS, LETP, VCTP), so it ought to be
a full Fail.
Fixed by adding an extra template parameter to DecodeBFLabelOffset
which controls whether a zero offset is accepted or rejected. Adjusted
existing tests (only in error messages for bad disassemblies); added
extra tests to demonstrate zero offsets being accepted in all the
right places, and a few demonstrating rejection of zero `boff`.
Reviewers: DavidSpickett, ostannard
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63864
llvm-svn: 364533
Different versions of the Arm architecture disallow the use of generic
coprocessor instructions like MCR and CDP on different sets of
coprocessors. This commit centralises the check of the coprocessor
number so that it's consistent between assembly and disassembly, and
also updates it for the new restrictions in Arm v8.1-M.
New tests added that check all the coprocessor numbers; old tests
updated, where they used a number that's now become illegal in the
context in question.
Reviewers: DavidSpickett, ostannard
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63863
llvm-svn: 364532
In the `CSEL Rd,Rm,Rn` instruction family (also including CSINC, CSINV
and CSNEG), the architecture lists it as CONSTRAINED UNPREDICTABLE
(i.e. SoftFail) to use SP in the Rd or Rm slot, but outright illegal
to use it in the Rn slot, not least because some encodings of that
form are used by MVE instructions such as UQRSHLL.
MC was treating all three slots the same, as SoftFail. So the only
reason UQRSHLL was disassembled correctly at all was because the MVE
decode table is separate from the Thumb2 one and takes priority; if
you turned off MVE, then encodings such as `[0x5f,0xea,0x0d,0x83]`
would disassemble as spurious CSELs.
Fixed by inventing another version of the `GPRwithZR` register class,
which disallows SP completely instead of just SoftFailing it.
Reviewers: DavidSpickett, ostannard
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63862
llvm-svn: 364531
Sam Parker