Commit Graph

11 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Fangrui Song 9c371309f3 [ELF][X86] Allow PT_LOAD to have overlapping p_offset ranges on EM_386
Ported the D64906 technique to EM_386.

If `sh_addralign(.tdata) < sh_addralign(.tbss)`,
we can potentially make `p_vaddr(PT_TLS)%p_align(PT_TLS) != 0`.

ld.so that are known to have problems if p_vaddr%p_align!=0:

* FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT rtld-elf
* glibc https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24606

New test i386-tls-vaddr-align.s checks our workaround makes p_vaddr%p_align = 0.

Reviewed By: ruiu

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65865

llvm-svn: 369347
2019-08-20 08:43:47 +00:00
Fangrui Song b159906a9a [test] Change llvm-readobj -long-option to --long-option or well-known short options. NFC
Also change some options that have different semantics (cause confusion) in llvm-readelf mode:

-s => -S
-t => --symbols
-sd => --section-data

llvm-svn: 359651
2019-05-01 05:49:01 +00:00
Fangrui Song e8710ef1fb [ELF] Split RW PT_LOAD on the PT_GNU_RELRO boundary
Summary:
Based on Peter Collingbourne's suggestion in D56828.

Before D56828: PT_LOAD(.data PT_GNU_RELRO(.data.rel.ro .bss.rel.ro) .bss)
Old:           PT_LOAD(PT_GNU_RELRO(.data.rel.ro .bss.rel.ro) .data .bss)
New:           PT_LOAD(PT_GNU_RELRO(.data.rel.ro .bss.rel.ro)) PT_LOAD(.data. .bss)

The new layout reflects the runtime memory mappings.
By having two PT_LOAD segments, we can utilize the NOBITS part of the
first PT_LOAD and save bytes for .bss.rel.ro.

.bss.rel.ro is currently small and only used by copy relocations of
symbols in read-only segments, but it can be used for other purposes in
the future, e.g. if a relro section's statically relocated data is all
zeros, we can move it to .bss.rel.ro.

Reviewers: espindola, ruiu, pcc

Reviewed By: ruiu

Subscribers: nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, javed.absar, kbarton, emaste, arichardson, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58892

llvm-svn: 356226
2019-03-15 01:29:57 +00:00
Fangrui Song 07f8daf05e [ELF] Simplify RelRo, TLS, NOBITS section ranks and make RW PT_LOAD start with RelRo
Old: PT_LOAD(.data | PT_GNU_RELRO(.data.rel.ro .bss.rel.ro) | .bss)
New: PT_LOAD(PT_GNU_RELRO(.data.rel.ro .bss.rel.ro) | .data .bss)

The placement of | indicates page alignment caused by PT_GNU_RELRO. The
new layout has simpler rules and saves space for many cases.

Old size: roundup(.data) + roundup(.data.rel.ro)
New size: roundup(.data.rel.ro + .bss.rel.ro) + .data

Other advantages:

* At runtime the 3 memory mappings decrease to 2.
* start(PT_TLS) = start(PT_GNU_RELRO) = start(RW PT_LOAD). This
  simplifies binary manipulation tools.
  GNU strip before 2.31 discards PT_GNU_RELRO if its
  address is not equal to the start of its associated PT_LOAD.
  This has been fixed by https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=f2731e0c374e5323ce4cdae2bcc7b7fe22da1a6f
  But with this change, we will be compatible with GNU strip before 2.31
* Before, .got.plt (non-relro by default) was placed before .got (relro
  by default), which made it impossible to have _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_
  (start of .got.plt on x86-64) equal to the end of .got (R_GOT*_FROM_END)
  (https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36555). With the new ordering, we
  can improve on this regard if we'd like to.

Reviewers: ruiu, espindola, pcc

Subscribers: emaste, arichardson, llvm-commits, joerg, jdoerfert

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56828

llvm-svn: 356117
2019-03-14 03:47:45 +00:00
Fangrui Song 3d87323a7e [ELF] Make non-writable non-executable PROGBITS sections closer to .text
This generalizes the old heuristic placing SHT_DYNSYM SHT_DYNSTR first in the readonly SHF_ALLOC segment.

Reviewers: espindola

Subscribers: emaste, arichardson, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48406

llvm-svn: 335674
2018-06-26 22:13:32 +00:00
Han Shen b56030ee9e [lld] Mitigate relocation overflow [part 1 of 2].
This CL places .dynsym and .dynstr at the beginning of SHF_ALLOC
sections. We do this to mitigate the possibility that huge .dynsym and
.dynstr sections placed between ro-data and text sections cause
relocation overflow.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45788

llvm-svn: 332374
2018-05-15 17:02:35 +00:00
George Rimar 4c9ae67bb7 [ELF] - Revert of: r332038, r332054, r332060, r332061, r332062, r332063
This reverts "Mitigate relocation overflow [part 1 of 2]." and the following commits which
were trying to fix the bots.

At the moment of r332082, bots are still failing and we need to find the reason of test case breakages first of all.
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-scei-ps4-windows10pro-fast/builds/17042/steps/test/logs/stdio
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-scei-ps4-ubuntu-fast/builds/29845/steps/test/logs/stdio

llvm-svn: 332085
2018-05-11 08:11:25 +00:00
Han Shen 6c0881c3cd Mitigate relocation overflow [part 1 of 2].
This CL is to mitigate R_X86_64_PC32 relocation overflow problems for huge binaries that has near 4G allocated sections.

By examining those binaries, there're 2 issues contributes to the problem:
1). huge ".dynsym" and ".dynstr" stands in the way between .rodata and .text
2). _init_array_start/end are placed at 0 if no ".init_array" presents, this causes .text relocation against them become more prone to overflow.

This CL addresses 1st problem (the 2nd will be addressed in another CL.) by assigning a smaller sortrank to .dynsym and .dynstr thus they no longer stand in between.

llvm-svn: 332038
2018-05-10 20:44:42 +00:00
Peter Collingbourne 628ec9f193 ELF: Place relro sections after non-relro sections in r/w segment.
This is in preparation for my next change, which will introduce a relro
nobits section. That requires that relro sections appear at the end of the
progbits part of the r/w segment so that the relro nobits section can appear
contiguously.

Because of the amount of churn required in the test suite, I'm making this
change separately.

llvm-svn: 291523
2017-01-10 01:21:30 +00:00
Rafael Espindola ac95264d62 Don't depend on dynamic relocatinos in ro sections.
Currently we don't check when creating relative relocations if the
section is read only or not. I am about to fix that, so first update the
patches that depend on the current behavior.

llvm-svn: 268542
2016-05-04 20:25:19 +00:00
Rafael Espindola da99df366d Fix handling of addends on i386.
Because of merge sections it is not sufficient to just add them while
applying a relocation.

llvm-svn: 264863
2016-03-30 12:40:38 +00:00