The current statement domain derivation algorithm does not (always)
consider that different exit blocks of a loop can have different
conditions to be reached.
From the code
for (int i = n; ; i-=2) {
if (i <= 0) goto even;
if (i <= 1) goto odd;
A[i] = i;
}
even:
A[0] = 42;
return;
odd:
A[1] = 21;
return;
Polly currently derives the following domains:
Stmt_even_critedge
Domain :=
[n] -> { Stmt_even_critedge[] };
Stmt_odd
Domain :=
[n] -> { Stmt_odd[] : (1 + n) mod 2 = 0 and n > 0 };
while the domain for the odd case is correct, Stmt_even is assumed to be
executed unconditionally, which is obviously wrong. While projecting out
the loop dimension in `adjustDomainDimensions`, it does not consider
that there are other exit condition that have matched before.
I don't know a how to fix this without changing a lot of code. Therefore
This patch rejects loops with multiple exist blocks to fix the
miscompile of test-suite's uuencode.
The odd condition is transformed by LLVM to
%cmp1 = icmp eq i64 %indvars.iv, 1
such that the project_out in adjustDomainDimensions() indeed only
matches for odd n (using this condition only, we'd have an infinite loop
otherwise).
The even condition manifests as
%cmp = icmp slt i64 %indvars.iv, 3
Because buildDomainsWithBranchConstraints() does not consider other exit
conditions, it has to assume that the induction variable will eventually
be lower than 3 and taking this exit.
IMHO we need to reuse the algorithm that determines the number of
iterations (addLoopBoundsToHeaderDomain) to determine which exit
condition applies first. It has to happen in
buildDomainsWithBranchConstraints() because the result will need to
propagate to successor BBs. Currently addLoopBoundsToHeaderDomain() just
look for union of all backedge conditions (which means leaving not the
loop here). The patch in llvm.org/PR35465 changes it to look for exit
conditions instead. This is required because there might be other exit
conditions that do not alternatively go back to the loop header.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45649
llvm-svn: 330858
In the following loop:
int i;
for (i = 0; i < func(); i+=1)
;
SCoP:
for (int j = 0; j<n; j+=1)
S(i, j)
The value i is synthesizable in the SCoP that includes only the j-loop.
This is because i is fixed within the SCoP, it is irrelevant whether
it originates from another loop.
This fixes a strange case where a PHI was synthesiable in a SCoP,
but not its incoming value, triggering an assertion.
This should fix MultiSource/Applications/sgefa/sgefa of the
perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-before-vectorizer-unprofitable buildbot.
llvm-svn: 309109
We add CHECK lines to this test case to make it easier to see the difference
between affine and non-affine memory accesses. We also change the test case to
use a parameteric index expression as otherwise our range analysis will
understand that the non-affine memory access can only access input[1],
which makes it difficult to see that the memory access is in-fact modeled as
non-affine access.
llvm-svn: 287623
Index calculations can use the last value that come out of a loop.
Ideally, ScalarEvolution can compute that exit value directly without
depending on the loop induction variable, but not in all cases.
This changes isAffine to not consider such loop exit values as affine to
avoid that SCEVExpander adds uses of the original loop induction
variable.
This fix is analogous to r262404 that applies to general uses of loop
exit values instead of index expressions and loop bouds as in this
patch.
This reduces the number of LNT test-suite fails with
-polly-position=before-vectorizer -polly-unprofitable
from 10 to 8.
llvm-svn: 262665
Michael Kruse