Previously we failed to convert 'p' from array/function to pointer type,
and to represent the load of 'p' in the AST. The latter causes problems
for constant evaluation.
scope.
There are a few contexts in which we assume a name is a template name;
if such a context is one where we should perform an unqualified lookup,
and lookup finds nothing, we would form a dependent template name even
if the name is not dependent. This happens in particular for the lookup
of a pseudo-destructor.
In passing, rename ActOnDependentTemplateName to just ActOnTemplateName
given that we apply it for non-dependent template names too.
Also add extension warnings for the cases that are disallowed by the
current rules for destructor name lookup, refactor and simplify the
lookup code, and improve the diagnostic quality when lookup fails.
The special case we previously supported for converting
p->N::S<int>::~S() from naming a class template into naming a
specialization thereof is subsumed by a more general rule here (which is
also consistent with Clang's historical behavior and that of other
compilers): if we can't find a suitable S in N, also look in N::S<int>.
The extension warnings are off by default, except for a warning when
lookup for p->N::S::~T() looks for T in scope instead of in N (or N::S).
That seems sufficiently heinous to warn on by default, especially since
we can't support it for a dependent nested-name-specifier.
When used as qualified names, pseudo-destructors are always named as if
they were members of the type, never as members of the namespace
enclosing the type.
When handling a member access into a non-class, non-ObjC-object type, we
would perform a lookup into the surrounding scope as if for an
unqualified lookup. If the member access was followed by a '<' and this
lookup (or the typo-correction for it) found a template name, we'd treat
the member access as naming that template.
Now we treat such accesses as never naming a template if the type of the
object expression is of vector type, so that vector component accesses
are never misinterpreted as naming something else. This is not entirely
correct, since it is in fact valid to name a template from the enclosing
scope in this context, when invoking a pseudo-destructor for the vector
type via an alias template, but that's very much a corner case, and this
change leaves that case only as broken as the corresponding case for
Objective-C types is.
This incidentally adds support for dr2292, which permits a 'template'
keyword at the start of a member access naming a pseudo-destructor.
llvm-svn: 368940
Printing typedefs or type aliases using clang_getTypeSpelling() is missing the
namespace they are defined in. This is in contrast to other types that always
yield the full typename including namespaces.
Patch by Michael Reiher!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29944
llvm-svn: 297465
This commit improves the mismatched destructor type error by detecting when the
destructor call has used a '.' instead of a '->' on a pointer to the destructed
type. The diagnostic now suggests to use '->' instead of '.', and adds a fixit
where appropriate.
rdar://28766702
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25817
llvm-svn: 292615
type-name is looked up in the context of the complete postfix-expression. Don't
forget to pass the scope into this lookup when the type-name is a template-id;
it might name an alias template which can't be found within the class itself.
Bug spotted by Johannes Schaub on #llvm.
llvm-svn: 168011
too. Fixes PR7900.
While I'm in this area, improve the diagnostic when the type being
destroyed doesn't match either of the types we found.
llvm-svn: 127041
pseudo-destructor expressions, and builds the CXXPseudoDestructorExpr
node directly. Currently, this only affects pseudo-destructor
expressions when they are parsed, but not after template
instantiation. That's coming next...
Improve parsing of pseudo-destructor-names. When parsing the
nested-name-specifier and we hit the sequence of tokens X :: ~, query
the actual module to determine whether X is a type-name (in which case
the X :: is part of the pseudo-destructor-name but not the
nested-name-specifier) or not (in which case the X :: is part of the
nested-name-specifier).
llvm-svn: 97058
C++98/03 and C++0x, since the '0x semantics break valid C++98/03
code. This new mess is tracked by core issue 399, which is still
unresolved.
Fixes PR6358 and PR6359.
llvm-svn: 96836
typedef int Int;
int *p;
p->Int::~Int();
This weakens the invariant that the only types in nested-name-specifiers are tag types (restricted to class types in C++98/03). However, we weaken this invariant as little as possible, accepting arbitrary types in nested-name-specifiers only when we're in a member access expression that looks like a pseudo-destructor expression.
llvm-svn: 96743
figure out how not to break lots of code using this. See PR6358 and PR6359 for
motivating examples. FIXME's left in the code and the test.
llvm-svn: 96733
now cope with the destruction of types named as dependent templates,
e.g.,
y->template Y<T>::~Y()
Nominally, we implement C++0x [basic.lookup.qual]p6. However, we don't
follow the letter of the standard here because that would fail to
parse
template<typename T, typename U>
X0<T, U>::~X0() { }
properly. The problem is captured in core issue 339, which gives some
(but not enough!) guidance. I expect to revisit this code when the
resolution of 339 is clear, and/or we start capturing better source
information for DeclarationNames.
Fixes PR6152.
llvm-svn: 96367
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
name 'T' is looked up in the expression
t.~T()
Previously, we weren't looking into the type of "t", and therefore
would fail when T actually referred to an injected-class-name. Fixes
PR5530.
llvm-svn: 89493
formed without a trailing '(', diagnose the error (these expressions
must be immediately called), emit a fix-it hint, and fix the code.
llvm-svn: 81015
expressions, e.g.,
p->~T()
when p is a pointer to a scalar type.
We don't currently diagnose errors when pseudo-destructor expressions
are used in any way other than by forming a call.
llvm-svn: 81009
Richard Smith