WG14 has elected to remove support for K&R C functions in C2x. The
feature was introduced into C89 already deprecated, so after this long
of a deprecation period, the committee has made an empty parameter list
mean the same thing in C as it means in C++: the function accepts no
arguments exactly as if the function were written with (void) as the
parameter list.
This patch implements WG14 N2841 No function declarators without
prototypes (http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2841.htm)
and WG14 N2432 Remove support for function definitions with identifier
lists (http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2432.pdf).
It also adds The -fno-knr-functions command line option to opt into
this behavior in other language modes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123955
C89 had a questionable feature where the compiler would implicitly
declare a function that the user called but was never previously
declared. The resulting function would be globally declared as
extern int func(); -- a function without a prototype which accepts zero
or more arguments.
C99 removed support for this questionable feature due to severe
security concerns. However, there was no deprecation period; C89 had
the feature, C99 didn't. So Clang (and GCC) both supported the
functionality as an extension in C99 and later modes.
C2x no longer supports that function signature as it now requires all
functions to have a prototype, and given the known security issues with
the feature, continuing to support it as an extension is not tenable.
This patch changes the diagnostic behavior for the
-Wimplicit-function-declaration warning group depending on the language
mode in effect. We continue to warn by default in C89 mode (due to the
feature being dangerous to use). However, because this feature will not
be supported in C2x mode, we've diagnosed it as being invalid for so
long, the security concerns with the feature, and the trivial
workaround for users (declare the function), we now default the
extension warning to an error in C99-C17 mode. This still gives users
an easy workaround if they are extensively using the extension in those
modes (they can disable the warning or use -Wno-error to downgrade the
error), but the new diagnostic makes it more clear that this feature is
not supported and should be avoided. In C2x mode, we no longer allow an
implicit function to be defined and treat the situation the same as any
other lookup failure.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122983
A randomized structure needs to use a designated or default initializer.
Using a non-designated initializer will result in values being assigned
to the wrong fields.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123763
A randomized structure needs to use a designated or default initializer.
Using a non-designated initializer will result in values being assigned
to the wrong fields.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123763
Given the declaration:
typedef void func_t(unsigned);
__attribute__((noreturn)) func_t func;
we would incorrectly determine that `func` had no prototype because the
`noreturn` attribute would convert the underlying type directly into a
FunctionProtoType, but the declarator for `func` itself was not one for
a function with a prototype. This adds an additional check for when the
declarator is a type representation for a function with a prototype.
When emitting a "conflicting types" warning for a function declaration,
it's more clear to diagnose the previous declaration specifically as
being a builtin if it one.
This catches places where a function without a prototype is
accidentally used, potentially passing an incorrect number of
arguments, and is a follow-up to the work done in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D122895 and described in the RFC
(https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-enabling-wstrict-prototypes-by-default-in-c).
The diagnostic is grouped under the new -Wdeprecated-non-prototypes
warning group and is enabled by default.
The diagnostic is disabled if the function being called was implicitly
declared (the user already gets an on-by-default warning about the
creation of the implicit function declaration, so no need to warn them
twice on the same line). Additionally, the diagnostic is disabled if
the declaration of the function without a prototype was in a location
where the user explicitly disabled deprecation warnings for functions
without prototypes (this allows the provider of the API a way to
disable the diagnostic at call sites because the lack of prototype is
intentional).
This patch enables shift operators on SVE vector types, as well as
supporting vector-scalar shift operations.
Shifts by a scalar that is wider than the contained type in the
vector are permitted but as in the C standard if the value is larger
than the width of the type the behavior is undefined.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123303
Undefined behaviour is just passed on to extract_element when the
index is out of bounds. Subscript on svbool_t is not allowed as
this doesn't really have meaningful semantics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122732
Currently, clang crashes with i386 target on the following code:
```
void f() {
f + 0xdead000000000000UL;
}
```
This problem is similar to the problem fixed in D104424, but that fix can't handle function pointer case, because `getTypeSizeInCharsIfKnown()` says that size is known and equal to 0 for function type.
This patch prevents bounds checking for function pointer, thus fixes the crash.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/50463
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122748
We did not implement C99 6.7.5.3p15 fully in that we missed the rule
for compatible function types where a prior declaration has a prototype
and a subsequent definition (not just declaration) has an empty
identifier list or an identifier list with a mismatch in parameter
arity. This addresses that situation by issuing an error on code like:
void f(int);
void f() {} // type conflicts with previous declaration
(Note: we already diagnose the other type conflict situations
appropriately, this was the only situation we hadn't covered that I
could find.)
This patch changes `EmitPPCBuiltinExpr` in `CGBuiltin.cpp` to remove
the loop at the beginning of the function that emits the arguments and
to delay emitting the arguments until inside the switch statement. These
changes will put `EmitPPCBuiltinExpr` in line with the strategy of the
target independent function `EmitBuiltinExpr`. Also, this patch
ensures that arguments are only emitted once.
Tests that included builtins affected by these changes have been
modified to match expected behaviour.
Reviewed By: #powerpc, nemanjai, amyk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121637
Make 16-byte atomic type aligned to 16-byte on PPC64, thus consistent with GCC. Also enable inlining 16-byte atomics on non-AIX targets on PPC64.
Reviewed By: hubert.reinterpretcast
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122377
Functions without prototypes in C (also known as K&R C functions) were
introduced into C89 as a deprecated feature and C2x is now reclaiming
that syntax space with different semantics. However, Clang's
-Wstrict-prototypes diagnostic is off-by-default (even in pedantic
mode) and does not suffice to warn users about issues in their code.
This patch changes the behavior of -Wstrict-prototypes to only diagnose
declarations and definitions which are not going to change behavior in
C2x mode, and enables the diagnostic in -pedantic mode. The diagnostic
is now specifically about the fact that the feature is deprecated.
It also adds -Wdeprecated-non-prototype, which is grouped under
-Wstrict-prototypes and diagnoses declarations or definitions which
will change behavior in C2x mode. This diagnostic is enabled by default
because the risk is higher for the user to continue to use the
deprecated feature.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122895
This patch changes `EmitPPCBuiltinExpr` in `CGBuiltin.cpp` to remove
the loop at the beginning of the function that emits the arguments and
to delay emitting the arguments until inside the switch statement. These
changes will put `EmitPPCBuiltinExpr` in line with the strategy of the
target independent function `EmitBuiltinExpr`. Also, this patch
ensures that arguments are only emitted once.
Tests that included builtins affected by these changes have been
modified to match expected behaviour.
Reviewed By: #powerpc, nemanjai, amyk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121637
This adds -no-opaque-pointers to clang tests whose output will
change when opaque pointers are enabled by default. This is
intended to be part of the migration approach described in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/enabling-opaque-pointers-by-default/61322/9.
The patch has been produced by replacing %clang_cc1 with
%clang_cc1 -no-opaque-pointers for tests that fail with opaque
pointers enabled. Worth noting that this doesn't cover all tests,
there's a remaining ~40 tests not using %clang_cc1 that will need
a followup change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123115
Add support for builtin_[max|min] which has below prototype:
A builtin_max (A1, A2, A3, ...)
All arguments must have the same type; they must all be float, double, or long double.
Internally use SelectCC to get the result.
Reviewed By: qiucf
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122478
As statement expression makes no sense in the default argument,
this patch tries to disable it in the all cases.
Please note that the statement expression is a GNU extension, which
means that Clang should be consistent with GCC. However, there's no
response from GCC devs since we have raised the issue for several weeks.
In this case, I think we can disallow statement expressions as a default
parameter in general for now, and relax the restriction if GCC folks
decide to retain the feature for functions but not lambdas in the
future.
Related discussion: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104765
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53488
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119609
Comparison operators on SVE types return a signed integer vector
of the same width as the incoming SVE type. This matches the existing
behaviour for NEON types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122404
compiler is allowed to use optimizations that allow reassociation and
transformations that don’t guaranty accuracy.
For example (x+y)+z is transformed into x+(y+z) . Although
mathematically equivalent, these two expressions may not lead to the
same final result due to errors of summation.
Or x/x is transformed into 1.0 but x could be 0.0, INF or NaN. And so
this transformation also may not lead to the same final result.
Setting the eval method 'ffp-eval-method' or via '#pragma clang fp
eval_method' in this mode, doesn’t have any effect.
This patch adds code to warn the user of this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122155
A significant number of our tests in C accidentally use functions
without prototypes. This patch converts the function signatures to have
a prototype for the situations where the test is not specific to K&R C
declarations. e.g.,
void func();
becomes
void func(void);
We started diagnosing this situation with a more clear diagnostic
message, but it was pointed out that unevaluated contexts don't really
have the undefined behavior property as there is no runtime access
involved.
This augments the changes in https://reviews.llvm.org/D122656 to not
diagnose in an unevaluated context.
Member access for an atomic structure or union is unconditional
undefined behavior (C11 6.5.2.3p5). However, we would issue a confusing
error message about the base expression not being a structure or union
type.
GCC issues a warning for this case. Clang now warns as well, but the
warning is defaulted to an error because the actual access is still
unsafe.
This fixes Issue 54563.
Calling an ObjC method from a C function marked with the 'enforce_tcb'
attribute did not produce a warning. Now it does, and on top of that
Objective-C methods can participate in TCBs themselves.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122343
In C, assignment expressions result in an rvalue whose type is the type
of the lhs of the assignment after it undergoes lvalue to rvalue
conversion. lvalue to rvalue conversion in C strips all qualifiers
including _Atomic.
We used getUnqualifiedType() which does not strip the _Atomic qualifier
when we should have used getAtomicUnqualifiedType(). This corrects the
usage and adds some comments to getUnqualifiedType() to make it more
clear that it does not strip _Atomic and that's on purpose (see C11
6.2.5p27).
This addresses Issue 48742.
Clang fails to diagnose:
```
void test() {
int j = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++)
j++;
return;
}
```
Reason: Missing support for UnaryOperator.
We should not warn with volatile variables... so add check for it.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122271
Currently, Clang handles some qualifiers correctly for __auto_type, but
it does not handle the restrict or _Atomic qualifiers in the same way
that GCC does. This patch handles those qualifiers so that they attach
to the deduced type the same as const and volatile already do.
This fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53652
This patch extends the support for C/C++ operators for SVE
types to allow one of the arguments to be a scalar, in which
case a vector splat is performed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121829
GCC supports power-of-2 size structures for the arguments. Clang supports fewer than GCC. But Clang always crashes for the unsupported cases.
This patch adds sema checks to do the diagnosts to solve these crashes.
Reviewed By: jyu2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107141
These diagnostics were added to a diagnostic group, but that diagnostic
group was not under -Wgnu. I've now split them into their own
diagnostic group that is added both to the original group (so user's
currently opting in or out of these should not see a change) and under
the -Wgnu group so that -Wno-gnu can be used to disable all GNU
extension diagnostics. This fixes Issue 54444.
For the following code,
void test() {
volatile int j = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++)
j += 1;
return;
}
If compiled with
clang -g -Wall -Werror -S -emit-llvm test.c
we will see the following error:
test.c:2:6: error: variable 'j' set but not used [-Werror,-Wunused-but-set-variable]
volatile int j = 0;
^
This is not quite right since 'j' is indeed used due to '+=' operator.
gcc doesn't emit error either in this case.
Also if we change 'j += 1' to 'j++', the warning will disappear
with latest clang.
Note that clang will issue the warning if the volatile declaration
involves only simple assignment (var = ...).
To fix the issue, in function MaybeDecrementCount(), if the
operator is a compound assignment (i.e., +=, -=, etc.) and the
variable is volatile, the count for RefsMinusAssignments will be
decremented, similar to 'j++' case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121715
Previously, an attempt to declare an overload of a multiversion function
in C was not properly diagnosed. In some cases, diagnostics were simply
missing. In other cases the following assertion failure occured...
```
Assertion `(Previous.empty() || llvm::any_of(Previous, [](const NamedDecl *ND) { return ND->hasAttr(); })) && "Non-redecls shouldn't happen without overloadable present"' failed.
```
... or the following diagnostic was spuriously issued.
```
error: at most one overload for a given name may lack the 'overloadable' attribute
```
The diagnostics issued in some cases could be improved. When the function
type of a redeclaration does not match the prior declaration, it would be
preferable to diagnose the type mismatch before diagnosing mismatched
attributes. Diagnostics are also missing for some cases.
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121959
This change adds test cases to validate diagnostics for overloaded sets
that contain declarations of multiversion functions. Many of the added test
cases exercise declarations that are intended to be valid. Others are
intended to be valid if and when restrictions on multiversion functions
being declared with the overloadable attribute are lifted.
Several of the new test cases currently trigger the following assertion
failure in SemaDecl.cpp; the relevant test is therefore marked as an
expected failure pending a fix.
```
Assertion `(Previous.empty() || llvm::any_of(Previous, [](const NamedDecl *ND) { return ND->hasAttr(); })) && "Non-redecls shouldn't happen without overloadable present"' failed.
```
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121954
__builtin_memcpy_inline doesn't use the usual builtin argument validation code,
so it crashed when receiving wrong number of argument. Add the missing validation
check.
Open issue: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/52949
Reviewed By: gchatelet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121965
Committed by gchatelet on behalf of "Roy Jacobson <roi.jacobson1@gmail.com>"
PowerPC is lacking tests checking `_Atomic` alignment in cfe. Adding these tests since we're going to make change to align with gcc on Linux.
Reviewed By: hubert.reinterpretcast, jsji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121441
If we are equality comparing an FP literal with a value cast from a type
where the literal can't be represented, that's known true or false and
probably a programmer error.
Fixes issue #54222.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54222
Note - I added the optimizer change with:
9397bdc67e
...and as discussed in the post-commit comments, that transform might be
too dangerous without this warning in place, so it was reverted to allow
this change first.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121306
Pengxuan Zheng