This patch implements Clang support for an original OpenMP extension
we have developed to support OpenACC: the `ompx_hold` map type
modifier. The next patch in this series, D106510, implements OpenMP
runtime support.
Consider the following example:
```
#pragma omp target data map(ompx_hold, tofrom: x) // holds onto mapping of x
{
foo(); // might have map(delete: x)
#pragma omp target map(present, alloc: x) // x is guaranteed to be present
printf("%d\n", x);
}
```
The `ompx_hold` map type modifier above specifies that the `target
data` directive holds onto the mapping for `x` throughout the
associated region regardless of any `target exit data` directives
executed during the call to `foo`. Thus, the presence assertion for
`x` at the enclosed `target` construct cannot fail. (As usual, the
standard OpenMP reference count for `x` must also reach zero before
the data is unmapped.)
Justification for inclusion in Clang and LLVM's OpenMP runtime:
* The `ompx_hold` modifier supports OpenACC functionality (structured
reference count) that cannot be achieved in standard OpenMP, as of
5.1.
* The runtime implementation for `ompx_hold` (next patch) will thus be
used by Flang's OpenACC support.
* The Clang implementation for `ompx_hold` (this patch) as well as the
runtime implementation are required for the Clang OpenACC support
being developed as part of the ECP Clacc project, which translates
OpenACC to OpenMP at the directive AST level. These patches are the
first step in upstreaming OpenACC functionality from Clacc.
* The Clang implementation for `ompx_hold` is also used by the tests
in the runtime implementation. That syntactic support makes the
tests more readable than low-level runtime calls can. Moreover,
upstream Flang and Clang do not yet support OpenACC syntax
sufficiently for writing the tests.
* More generally, the Clang implementation enables a clean separation
of concerns between OpenACC and OpenMP development in LLVM. That
is, LLVM's OpenMP developers can discuss, modify, and debug LLVM's
extended OpenMP implementation and test suite without directly
considering OpenACC's language and execution model, which can be
handled by LLVM's OpenACC developers.
* OpenMP users might find the `ompx_hold` modifier useful, as in the
above example.
See new documentation introduced by this patch in `openmp/docs` for
more detail on the functionality of this extension and its
relationship with OpenACC. For example, it explains how the runtime
must support two reference counts, as specified by OpenACC.
Clang recognizes `ompx_hold` unless `-fno-openmp-extensions`, a new
command-line option introduced by this patch, is specified.
Reviewed By: ABataev, jdoerfert, protze.joachim, grokos
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106509
where should not.
Currently we are using QTy->isIncompleteType(&ND) to check incomplete
type. But before doing that, need to instantiate for a class template
specialization or a class member of a class template specialization,
or an array with known size of such..., so that we know it is really
incomplete type.
To fix this using RequireCompleteType instead.
The new test is added into "test/OpenMP/target_update_messages.cpp"
The different of using RequireCompleteType is when emit incomplete type,
an additional note is also emitted to point to where incomplete type
is declared. Because this change, many tests are needed to be fixed
by adding additional note.
This is to fix https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50508
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107200
OpenMP 5.0 removed a lot of restriction for overlapped mapped items
comparing to OpenMP 4.5. Patch restricts the checks for overlapped data
mappings only for OpenMP 4.5 and less and reorders mapping of the
arguments so, that present and alloc mappings are processed first and
then all others.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86119
This patch implements Clang front end support for the OpenMP TR8
`present` map type modifier. The next patch in this series implements
OpenMP runtime support.
This patch does not attempt to implement TR8 sec. 2.22.7.1 "map
Clause", p. 319, L14-16:
> If a map clause with a present map-type-modifier is present in a map
> clause, then the effect of the clause is ordered before all other
> map clauses that do not have the present modifier.
Compare to L10-11, which Clang does not appear to implement yet:
> For a given construct, the effect of a map clause with the to, from,
> or tofrom map-type is ordered before the effect of a map clause with
> the alloc, release, or delete map-type.
This patch also does not implement the `present` implicit-behavior for
`defaultmap` or the `present` motion-modifier for `target update`.
Reviewed By: ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83061
Summary:
According to OpenMP 5.0, the restrictions for mapping of overlapped data
apply only for explicitly mapped data, there is no restriction for
implicitly mapped data just like in OpenMP 4.5.
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Subscribers: yaxunl, guansong, sstefan1, cfe-commits, caomhin
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83398
Summary:
When -fopenmp option is specified then version 5.0 will be set as
default.
Reviewers: gregrodgers, jdoerfert, ABataev
Reviewed By: ABataev
Subscribers: pdhaliwal, yaxunl, guansong, sstefan1, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81098
Chen
Summary:
Base declaration in pointer arithmetic expression is determined by
binary search with type information. Take "int *a, *b; *(a+*b)" as an
example, we determine the base by checking the type of LHS and RHS. In
this case the type of LHS is "int *", the type of RHS is "int",
therefore, we know that we need to visit LHS in order to find base
declaration.
Reviewers: ABataev, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: ABataev
Subscribers: guansong, cfe-commits, sandoval, dreachem
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75077
Summary:
Added basic analysis of map clauses. Only map clauses with to and tofrom
map type must be analyzed since all other map types (alloc, delete, etc.) do not require to use the value of the initial variable, instead they create the new copy of the variable.
Reviewers: NoQ
Subscribers: guansong, cfe-commits, kkwli0, caomhin
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66668
llvm-svn: 370214
Without this patch, APSInt inherits APInt::isNegative, which merely
checks the sign bit without regard to whether the type is actually
signed. isNonNegative and isStrictlyPositive call isNegative and so
are also affected.
This patch adjusts APSInt to override isNegative, isNonNegative, and
isStrictlyPositive with implementations that consider whether the type
is signed.
A large set of Clang OpenMP tests are affected. Without this patch,
these tests assume that `true` is not a valid argument for clauses
like `collapse`. Indeed, `true` fails APInt::isStrictlyPositive but
not APSInt::isStrictlyPositive. This patch adjusts those tests to
assume `true` should be accepted.
This patch also adds tests revealing various other similar fixes due
to APSInt::isNegative calls in Clang's ExprConstant.cpp and
SemaExpr.cpp: `++` and `--` overflow in `constexpr`, evaluated object
size based on `alloc_size`, `<<` and `>>` shift count validation, and
OpenMP array section validation.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri, ABataev, hfinkel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59712
llvm-svn: 359012
This patch implements the parsing and sema support for OpenMP map
clauses with potential user-defined mapper attached. User defined mapper
is a new feature in OpenMP 5.0. A map clause can have an explicit or
implicit associated mapper, which instructs the compiler to generate
extra data mapping. An example is shown below:
struct S { int len; int *d; };
#pragma omp declare mapper(id: struct S s) map(s, s.d[0:s.len])
struct S ss;
#pragma omp target map(mapper(id) tofrom: ss) // use the mapper with name 'id' to map ss
Contributed-by: Lingda Li <lildmh@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58074
llvm-svn: 354347
A map clause with the close map-type-modifier is a hint to
prefer that the variables are mapped using a copy into faster
memory.
Patch by Ahsan Saghir (saghir)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55719
llvm-svn: 349551
If several member expressions are mapped and they reference the same
address as a base, but access different members, this must be allowed.
llvm-svn: 326212
only.
Added support for -fopenmp-simd option that allows compilation of
simd-based constructs without emission of OpenMP runtime calls.
llvm-svn: 321560
If the error is generated during analysis of implicitly or explicitly
mapped variables, it may cause compiler crash because of incorrect
analysis.
llvm-svn: 319774
directives.
If the variable is used in the target-based region but is not found in
any private|mapping clause, then generate implicit firstprivate|map
clauses for these implicitly mapped variables.
llvm-svn: 314205
According to OpenMP 5.0 at least one 'map' or 'use_device_ptr' clause
must be specified for 'target data' construct. Patch adds support for
this feature.
llvm-svn: 304216
https://reviews.llvm.org/D32807
This patch allows the map modifier 'always' to be separated by the map type (to, from, tofrom) only by a whitespace, rather than strictly by a comma as in current trunk.
llvm-svn: 302031
OpenMP 4.5 removed the restriction that array section lower bound must be non negative.
This change is to allow negative values for array section based on pointers.
For array section based on array type there is still a restriction: "The array section must be a subset of the original array."
Patch by David S.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22481
llvm-svn: 276177
Having the following code pattern will result in incorrect diagnostic
int main() {
int arr[10];
#pragma omp target data map(arr[:])
#pragma omp target map(arr)
{}
}
t.cpp:4:24: error: original storage of expression in data environment is shared
but data environment do not fully contain mapped expression storage
#pragma omp target map(arr)
^~~
t.cpp:3:29: note: used here
#pragma omp target data map(arr[:])
^~~~~~
1 error generated.
Patch by David S.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22075
llvm-svn: 275926
Summary:
The patch contains the parsing and sema support for the `to` clause.
Patch based on the original post by Kelvin Li.
Reviewers: carlo.bertolli, hfinkel, kkwli0, arpith-jacob, ABataev
Subscribers: caomhin, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18597
llvm-svn: 270880
This patch implements the following aspects:
It extends sema to check that a variable is not reference in both a map clause and firstprivate or private. This is needed to ensure correct functioning at codegen level, apart from being useful for the user.
It implements firstprivate for target in codegen. The implementation applies to both host and nvptx devices.
It adds regression tests for codegen of firstprivate, host and device side when using the host as device, and nvptx side.
Please note that the regression test for nvptx codegen is missing VLAs. This is because VLAs currently require saving and restoring the stack which appears not to be a supported operation by nvptx backend.
It adds a check in sema regression tests for target map, firstprivate, and private clauses.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D18203
llvm-svn: 263837
Summary: In some cases it can be proved statically that multidimensional array section refer to contiguous storage and can therefore be allowed in a map clause. This patch adds support for those cases in SEMA.
Reviewers: hfinkel, carlo.bertolli, arpith-jacob, kkwli0, ABataev
Subscribers: cfe-commits, fraggamuffin, caomhin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17547
llvm-svn: 263019
Summary:
Extend support in the map clause SEMA for the expressions supported in the OpenMP 4.5 specification, namely member expressions.
Fix some bugs in the previous implementation of SEMA related with expressions that do not consist of single variable references.
Fix bug in parsing when the expression in the map clause do not start with an identifier: accept any expression in the map clause and check for validity in SEMA instead of just ignoring it.
Reviewers: hfinkel, kkwli0, arpith-jacob, carlo.bertolli, ABataev
Subscribers: cfe-commits, fraggamuffin, caomhin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16385
llvm-svn: 258543
Joel E. Denny