This reverts commit 3ec88ca60b which reverted e386871e1d due to a asan build
failure.
This patch removes the new lines in the test case which seem to introduce the
failure.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104898
This patch replaces the `powerpc64` token with the `system-aix` one in
the UNSUPPORTED line of a test. The `powerpc64` token was originally
added temporarily in 71a0609a2b.
If AIX uses integrated-as by default and it works both for 32-bit and
64-bit objects, then the issues encountered so far (see comments in
D96033) would be mostly solved.
As it is, marking the test as expected-to-fail (as opposed to
unsupported) on AIX might cause more trouble in the form of 32-bit
versus 64-bit differences. I am not aware of other situations where LIT
tests are dependent on whether the LLVM build is 64-bit or 32-bit.
Reviewed By: jsji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102560
This test is failing on some builders (see [1]) with the following error:
error: Added modules have incompatible data layouts:
e-m:e-i64:64-n32:64-S128-v256:256:256-v512:512:512 (module) vs
E-m:a-i64:64-n32:64-S128-v256:256:256-v512:512:512 (jit)
The JIT layout is correct, but some IR module added to the JIT is using a
little-endian layout instead.
This commit disables the test on ppc64 until we can investigate further and
fix the bug.
[1] https://lab.llvm.org/staging/#/builders/126/builds/371
Original commit message:
In http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-July/143257.html we have
mentioned our plans to make some of the incremental compilation facilities
available in llvm mainline.
This patch proposes a minimal version of a repl, clang-repl, which enables
interpreter-like interaction for C++. For instance:
./bin/clang-repl
clang-repl> int i = 42;
clang-repl> extern "C" int printf(const char*,...);
clang-repl> auto r1 = printf("i=%d\n", i);
i=42
clang-repl> quit
The patch allows very limited functionality, for example, it crashes on invalid
C++. The design of the proposed patch follows closely the design of cling. The
idea is to gather feedback and gradually evolve both clang-repl and cling to
what the community agrees upon.
The IncrementalParser class is responsible for driving the clang parser and
codegen and allows the compiler infrastructure to process more than one input.
Every input adds to the “ever-growing” translation unit. That model is enabled
by an IncrementalAction which prevents teardown when HandleTranslationUnit.
The IncrementalExecutor class hides some of the underlying implementation
details of the concrete JIT infrastructure. It exposes the minimal set of
functionality required by our incremental compiler/interpreter.
The Transaction class keeps track of the AST and the LLVM IR for each
incremental input. That tracking information will be later used to implement
error recovery.
The Interpreter class orchestrates the IncrementalParser and the
IncrementalExecutor to model interpreter-like behavior. It provides the public
API which can be used (in future) when using the interpreter library.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96033
This reverts commit 44a4000181.
We are seeing build failures due to missing dependency to libSupport and
CMake Error at tools/clang/tools/clang-repl/cmake_install.cmake
file INSTALL cannot find
In http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-July/143257.html we have
mentioned our plans to make some of the incremental compilation facilities
available in llvm mainline.
This patch proposes a minimal version of a repl, clang-repl, which enables
interpreter-like interaction for C++. For instance:
./bin/clang-repl
clang-repl> int i = 42;
clang-repl> extern "C" int printf(const char*,...);
clang-repl> auto r1 = printf("i=%d\n", i);
i=42
clang-repl> quit
The patch allows very limited functionality, for example, it crashes on invalid
C++. The design of the proposed patch follows closely the design of cling. The
idea is to gather feedback and gradually evolve both clang-repl and cling to
what the community agrees upon.
The IncrementalParser class is responsible for driving the clang parser and
codegen and allows the compiler infrastructure to process more than one input.
Every input adds to the “ever-growing” translation unit. That model is enabled
by an IncrementalAction which prevents teardown when HandleTranslationUnit.
The IncrementalExecutor class hides some of the underlying implementation
details of the concrete JIT infrastructure. It exposes the minimal set of
functionality required by our incremental compiler/interpreter.
The Transaction class keeps track of the AST and the LLVM IR for each
incremental input. That tracking information will be later used to implement
error recovery.
The Interpreter class orchestrates the IncrementalParser and the
IncrementalExecutor to model interpreter-like behavior. It provides the public
API which can be used (in future) when using the interpreter library.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96033
Vassil Vassilev