Due to D79842, clang dirver would search possible tool name in both possible
locations, then moving to the next name. The gcc toolchain `llvm-project/clang/test/Driver/
Inputs/multilib_riscv_elf_sdk` don't have a `riscv64-unknown-elf-ld` executable in
`llvm-project/clang/test/Driver/Inputs/multilib_riscv_elf_sdk/bin/`. So when searching
`riscv64-unknown-elf-ld`, if there is a `riscv64-unknown-elf-ld` in `PATH`, the
test would fail.
This patch makes the `PATH` empty when testing it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122588
Resource folder[1] should include before sysroot[2] in general (Linux clang
toolchain, BareMetal clang toolchain, and GCC using that order), and that
prevent sysroot's header file override resource folder's one, this change is
reference from BareMetal::AddClangSystemIncludeArgs@BareMetal.cpp[3].
And also fix the behavior of `-nobuiltininc`.
[1] Include path from resource folder is something like this: `<toolchain-path>/lib/clang/13.0.0/include/`
[2] Include path from sysroot is something like this: `<toolchain-path>/riscv32-unknown-elf/include`
[3] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/llvmorg-13.0.1/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/BareMetal.cpp#L193
Reviewed By: asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119837
The recommit fixes the Windows build failure due to path issue.
Resource folder[1] should include before sysroot[2] in general (Linux clang
toolchain, BareMetal clang toolchain, and GCC using that order), and that
prevent sysroot's header file override resource folder's one, this change is
reference from BareMetal::AddClangSystemIncludeArgs@BareMetal.cpp[3].
And also fix the behavior of `-nobuiltininc`.
[1] Include path from resource folder is something like this: `<toolchain-path>/lib/clang/13.0.0/include/`
[2] Include path from sysroot is something like this: `<toolchain-path>/riscv32-unknown-elf/include`
[3] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/llvmorg-13.0.1/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/BareMetal.cpp#L193
Reviewed By: asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119837
The recommit fixes the Windows build failure due to path issue.
Resource folder[1] should include before sysroot[2] in general (Linux clang
toolchain, BareMetal clang toolchain, and GCC using that order), and that
prevent sysroot's header file override resource folder's one, this change is
reference from BareMetal::AddClangSystemIncludeArgs@BareMetal.cpp[3].
And also fix the behavior of `-nobuiltininc`.
[1] Include path from resource folder is something like this: `<toolchain-path>/lib/clang/13.0.0/include/`
[2] Include path from sysroot is something like this: `<toolchain-path>/riscv32-unknown-elf/include`
[3] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/llvmorg-13.0.1/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/BareMetal.cpp#L193
Reviewed By: asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119837
A significant number of our tests in C accidentally use functions
without prototypes. This patch converts the function signatures to have
a prototype for the situations where the test is not specific to K&R C
declarations. e.g.,
void func();
becomes
void func(void);
This is the sixth batch of tests being updated (there are a significant
number of other tests left to be updated).
By explicitly requesting the system linker with `-fuse-ld=`, the
tests are able to CHECK for the system linker even with
CLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld.
Alternative to D74704.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92291
I am working on a baremetal riscv toolchain using LLVM runtime and
LLD linker. Baremetal.cpp provides most of the things needed for such
toolchain. So I have modified it to also handle riscv64/32-unknown-elf
targets alongside arm-none-eabi.
Currently, targets like riscv64-unknown-elf are handled by RISCVToolChain
which mostly expects a gcc toolchain to be present. If you dont
want the dependency on gcc-toolchain/libgloss or want to use LLD, then
RISCVToolChain is not a good fit.
So in the toolchain selection code, I have made this dependency of
RISCVToolChain on gcc toolchain explicit. It is created if gcc-toolchain
option is present. Otherwise Baremetal toolchain is created. I will be
happy to hear if there is a better way to choose between these two
toolchains.
Reviewed By: jroelofs
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91442
Very few ELF platforms still use .ctors/.dtors now. Linux (glibc: 1999-07),
DragonFlyBSD, FreeBSD (2012-03) and Solaris have supported .init_array
for many years. Some architectures like AArch64/RISC-V default to
.init_array . GNU ld and gold can even convert .ctors to .init_array .
It makes more sense to flip the CC1 default, and only uses
-fno-use-init-array on platforms that don't support .init_array .
For example, OpenBSD did not support DT_INIT_ARRAY before Aug 2016
(86fa57a279)
I may miss some ELF platforms that still use .ctors, but their
maintainers can easily diagnose such problems.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71393
If a GCC installation is not detected, then this attempts to
use compiler-rt and the compiler-rt crtbegin/crtend
implementations as a fallback.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68407
1. Currently only support the set of multilibs same to riscv-gnu-toolchain.
2. Fix testcase typo causes fail on Windows.
3. Fix testcases to set empty sysroot.
Reviewers: espindola, asb, kito-cheng, lenary
Reviewed By: lenary
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67508
1. Currently only support the set of multilibs same to riscv-gnu-toolchain.
2. Fix testcase typo causes fail on Windows
Reviewers: espindola, asb, kito-cheng, lenary
Reviewed By: lenary
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67508
Currently only support the set of multilibs same to riscv-gnu-toolchain.
Reviewers: espindola, asb, kito-cheng, lenary
Reviewed By: lenary
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67508
When running clang as a native compiler in RISC-V Linux the flag
-mabi=ilp32d / -mabi=lp64d is always mandatory. This change makes it the
default there.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65634
llvm-svn: 371494
Summary: This ensures that libcalls aren't generated when the target supports atomics. Atomics aren't in the base RV32I/RV64I instruction sets, so MaxAtomicInlineWidth and MaxAtomicPromoteWidth are set only when the atomics extension is being targeted. This must be done in setMaxAtomicWidth, as this should be done after handleTargetFeatures has been called.
Reviewers: jfb, jyknight, wmi, asb
Reviewed By: asb
Subscribers: pzheng, MaskRay, s.egerton, lenary, dexonsmith, psnobl, benna, Jim, JohnLLVM, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, jrtc27, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, lewis-revill, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57450
llvm-svn: 370073
When setting up library and tools paths when detecting an accompanying GCC
installation only riscv32 was handled. As a consequence when targetting
riscv64 neither the linker nor libraries would be found. This adds handling
and tests for riscv64.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53392
Patch by Edward Jones.
llvm-svn: 357699
The difference from the previous try is that we no longer directly
access function declarations from position independent executables. It
should work, but currently doesn't with some linkers.
It now includes a fix to not mark available_externally definitions as
dso_local.
Original message:
Start setting dso_local in clang.
This starts adding dso_local to clang.
The hope is to eventually have TargetMachine::shouldAssumeDsoLocal go
away. My objective for now is to move enough of it to clang to remove
the need for the TargetMachine one to handle PIE copy relocations and
-fno-plt. With that it should then be easy to implement a
-fno-copy-reloc in clang.
This patch just adds the cases where we assume a symbol to be local
based on the file being compiled for an executable or a shared
library.
llvm-svn: 324535
This reverts commit r324500.
The bots found two failures:
ThreadSanitizer-x86_64 :: Linux/pie_no_aslr.cc
ThreadSanitizer-x86_64 :: pie_test.cc
when using gold. The issue is a limitation in gold when building pie
binaries. I will investigate how to work around it.
llvm-svn: 324505
It now includes a fix to not mark available_externally definitions as
dso_local.
Original message:
Start setting dso_local in clang.
This starts adding dso_local to clang.
The hope is to eventually have TargetMachine::shouldAssumeDsoLocal go
away. My objective for now is to move enough of it to clang to remove
the need for the TargetMachine one to handle PIE copy relocations and
-fno-plt. With that it should then be easy to implement a
-fno-copy-reloc in clang.
This patch just adds the cases where we assume a symbol to be local
based on the file being compiled for an executable or a shared
library.
llvm-svn: 324500
This starts adding dso_local to clang.
The hope is to eventually have TargetMachine::shouldAssumeDsoLocal go
away. My objective for now is to move enough of it to clang to remove
the need for the TargetMachine one to handle PIE copy relocations and
-fno-plt. With that it should then be easy to implement a
-fno-copy-reloc in clang.
This patch just adds the cases where we assume a symbol to be local
based on the file being compiled for an executable or a shared
library.
llvm-svn: 324107
RISCVABIInfo is implemented in terms of XLen, supporting both RV32 and RV64.
Unfortunately we need to count argument registers in the frontend in order to
determine when to emit signext and zeroext attributes. Integer scalars are
extended according to their type up to 32-bits and then sign-extended to XLen
when passed in registers, but are anyext when passed on the stack. This patch
only implements the base integer (soft float) ABIs.
For more information on the RISC-V ABI, see [the ABI
doc](https://github.com/riscv/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/blob/master/riscv-elf.md),
my [golden model](https://github.com/lowRISC/riscv-calling-conv-model), and
the [LLVM RISC-V calling convention
patch](https://reviews.llvm.org/D39898#2d1595b4) (specifically the comment
documenting frontend expectations).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40023
llvm-svn: 322494
As RV64 codegen has not yet been upstreamed into LLVM, we focus on RV32 driver
support (RV64 to follow).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39963
llvm-svn: 322276
luxufan