The goal of this is to fix a bug in modules where we'd merge
FunctionDecls that differed in their pass_object_size attributes. Since
we can overload on the presence of pass_object_size attributes, this
behavior is incorrect.
We don't represent `N` in `pass_object_size(N)` as part of
ExtParameterInfo, since it's an error to overload solely on the value of
N. This means that we have a bug if we have two modules that declare
functions that differ only in their pass_object_size attrs, like so:
// In module A, from a.h
void foo(char *__attribute__((pass_object_size(0))));
// In module B, from b.h
void foo(char *__attribute__((pass_object_size(1))));
// In module C, in main.c
#include "a.h"
#include "b.h"
At the moment, we'll merge the foo decls, when we should instead emit a
diagnostic about an invalid overload. We seem to have similar (silent)
behavior if we overload only on the return type of `foo` instead; I'll
try to find a good place to put a FIXME (or I'll just file a bug) soon.
This patch also fixes a bug where we'd not output the proper extended
parameter info for declarations with pass_object_size attrs.
llvm-svn: 296076
This patch makes use of the prefix/suffix ABI argument distinction that
was introduced in r295870, so that we now emit ExtParameterInfo at the
correct offset for member calls that have added ABI arguments. I don't
see a good way to test the generated param info, since we don't actually
seem to use it in CGFunctionInfo outside of Swift. Any
suggestions/thoughts for how to better test this are welcome. :)
This patch also fixes a small bug with inheriting constructors: if we
decide not to pass args into an base class ctor, we would still
generate ExtParameterInfo as though we did. The added test-case is for
that behavior.
llvm-svn: 296024
George Burgess IV