The current cc1 CLANG_ENABLE_OPAQUE_POINTERS=on default difference is not ideal
in that people contribute %clang_cc1 tests may assume the default ON behavior,
which will cause failures on systems set to OFF.
cc1 option default dependent on CMake options should be used prudently
(generally avoided). We prefer to limit target differences to Driver.
Change the CLANG_ENABLE_OPAQUE_POINTERS_INTERNAL mechanism introduced in D123122
to use a driver default instead. This is similar to the mechanism used for the
-flegacy-pass-manager transition to new PM transition.
Reviewed By: #opaque-pointers, rsmith, aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123744
Or rather, error out if it is set to something other than ON. This
removes the ability to enable the legacy pass manager by default,
but does not remove the ability to explicitly enable it through
various flags like -flegacy-pass-manager or -enable-new-pm=0.
I checked, and our test suite definitely doesn't pass with
LLVM_ENABLE_NEW_PASS_MANAGER=OFF anymore.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123126
CLANG_TOOLS_DIR holds the the current bin/ directory, maybe with a %(build_mode)
placeholder. It is used to add the just-built binaries to $PATH for lit tests.
In most cases it equals LLVM_TOOLS_DIR, which is used for the same purpose.
But for a standalone build of clang, CLANG_TOOLS_DIR points at the build tree
and LLVM_TOOLS_DIR points at the provided LLVM binaries.
Currently CLANG_TOOLS_DIR is set in clang/test/, clang-tools-extra/test/, and
other things always built with clang. This is a few cryptic lines of CMake in
each place. Meanwhile LLVM_TOOLS_DIR is provided by configure_site_lit_cfg().
This patch moves CLANG_TOOLS_DIR to configure_site_lit_cfg() and renames it:
- there's nothing clang-specific about the value
- it will also replace LLD_TOOLS_DIR, LLDB_TOOLS_DIR etc (not in this patch)
It also defines CURRENT_LIBS_DIR. While I removed the last usage of
CLANG_LIBS_DIR in e4cab4e24d, there are LLD_LIBS_DIR usages etc that
may be live, and I'd like to mechanically update them in a followup patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121763
This reverts commit 049f4e4eab.
The problem was a stray dependency in CLANG_TEST_DEPS which caused cmake
to fail if clang-pseudo wasn't built. This is now removed.
The clang-analyzer plugins are not linked to a particular tool, so they
can only be compiled if plugins are broadly supported. We could opt
instead to decide whether to link them to specifically against clang or
with undefined symbols, depending on the value of LLVM_ENABLE_PLUGINS,
but we do not currently expect there to be a use case for that rather
niche configuration.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119591
Ensure CLANG_PLUGIN_SUPPORT is compatible with llvm_add_library.
Fixes an issue noted in D111100.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119199
Reland integrates build fixes & further review suggestions.
Thanks to @zturner for the initial S_OBJNAME patch!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43002
Also revert all subsequent fixes:
- abd1cbf5e5 [Clang] Disable debug-info-objname.cpp test on Unix until I sort out the issue.
- 00ec441253 [Clang] debug-info-objname.cpp test: explictly encode a x86 target when using %clang_cl to avoid falling back to a native CPU triple.
- cd407f6e52 [Clang] Fix build by restricting debug-info-objname.cpp test to x86.
Original commit message: "
Original commit message: "
Original commit message: "
Original commit message:"
The current infrastructure in lib/Interpreter has a tool, clang-repl, very
similar to clang-interpreter which also allows incremental compilation.
This patch moves clang-interpreter as a test case and drops it as conditionally
built example as we already have clang-repl in place.
"
This patch also ignores ppc due to missing weak symbol for __gxx_personality_v0
which may be a feature request for the jit infrastructure. Also, adds a missing
build system dependency to the orc jit.
"
Additionally, this patch defines a custom exception type and thus avoids the
requirement to include header <exception>, making it easier to deploy across
systems without standard location of the c++ headers.
"
This patch also works around PR49692 and finds a way to use llvm::consumeError
in rtti mode.
"
This patch also checks if stl is built with rtti.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107049
Currently we have a way to run a plugin if specified on the command line
after the main action, and ways to unconditionally run the plugin before
or after the main action, but no way to run a plugin if specified on the
command line before the main action.
This introduces the missing option.
This is helpful because -clear-ast-before-backend clears the AST before
codegen, while some plugins may want access to the AST.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112096
Original commit message: "
Original commit message: "
Original commit message:"
The current infrastructure in lib/Interpreter has a tool, clang-repl, very
similar to clang-interpreter which also allows incremental compilation.
This patch moves clang-interpreter as a test case and drops it as conditionally
built example as we already have clang-repl in place.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107049
"
This patch also ignores ppc due to missing weak symbol for __gxx_personality_v0
which may be a feature request for the jit infrastructure. Also, adds a missing
build system dependency to the orc jit.
"
Additionally, this patch defines a custom exception type and thus avoids the
requirement to include header <exception>, making it easier to deploy across
systems without standard location of the c++ headers.
"
This patch also works around PR49692 and finds a way to use llvm::consumeError
in rtti mode.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107049
Original commit message: "
Original commit message:"
The current infrastructure in lib/Interpreter has a tool, clang-repl, very
similar to clang-interpreter which also allows incremental compilation.
This patch moves clang-interpreter as a test case and drops it as conditionally
built example as we already have clang-repl in place.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107049
"
This patch also ignores ppc due to missing weak symbol for __gxx_personality_v0
which may be a feature request for the jit infrastructure. Also, adds a missing
build system dependency to the orc jit.
"
Additionally, this patch defines a custom exception type and thus avoids the
requirement to include header <exception>, making it easier to deploy across
systems without standard location of the c++ headers.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107049
Original commit message:"
The current infrastructure in lib/Interpreter has a tool, clang-repl, very
similar to clang-interpreter which also allows incremental compilation.
This patch moves clang-interpreter as a test case and drops it as conditionally
built example as we already have clang-repl in place.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107049
"
This patch also ignores ppc due to missing weak symbol for __gxx_personality_v0
which may be a feature request for the jit infrastructure. Also, adds a missing
build system dependency to the orc jit.
The current infrastructure in lib/Interpreter has a tool, clang-repl, very
similar to clang-interpreter which also allows incremental compilation.
This patch moves clang-interpreter as a test case and drops it as conditionally
built example as we already have clang-repl in place.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107049
Original commit message:
In http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-July/143257.html we have
mentioned our plans to make some of the incremental compilation facilities
available in llvm mainline.
This patch proposes a minimal version of a repl, clang-repl, which enables
interpreter-like interaction for C++. For instance:
./bin/clang-repl
clang-repl> int i = 42;
clang-repl> extern "C" int printf(const char*,...);
clang-repl> auto r1 = printf("i=%d\n", i);
i=42
clang-repl> quit
The patch allows very limited functionality, for example, it crashes on invalid
C++. The design of the proposed patch follows closely the design of cling. The
idea is to gather feedback and gradually evolve both clang-repl and cling to
what the community agrees upon.
The IncrementalParser class is responsible for driving the clang parser and
codegen and allows the compiler infrastructure to process more than one input.
Every input adds to the “ever-growing” translation unit. That model is enabled
by an IncrementalAction which prevents teardown when HandleTranslationUnit.
The IncrementalExecutor class hides some of the underlying implementation
details of the concrete JIT infrastructure. It exposes the minimal set of
functionality required by our incremental compiler/interpreter.
The Transaction class keeps track of the AST and the LLVM IR for each
incremental input. That tracking information will be later used to implement
error recovery.
The Interpreter class orchestrates the IncrementalParser and the
IncrementalExecutor to model interpreter-like behavior. It provides the public
API which can be used (in future) when using the interpreter library.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96033
This reverts commit 44a4000181.
We are seeing build failures due to missing dependency to libSupport and
CMake Error at tools/clang/tools/clang-repl/cmake_install.cmake
file INSTALL cannot find
In http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-July/143257.html we have
mentioned our plans to make some of the incremental compilation facilities
available in llvm mainline.
This patch proposes a minimal version of a repl, clang-repl, which enables
interpreter-like interaction for C++. For instance:
./bin/clang-repl
clang-repl> int i = 42;
clang-repl> extern "C" int printf(const char*,...);
clang-repl> auto r1 = printf("i=%d\n", i);
i=42
clang-repl> quit
The patch allows very limited functionality, for example, it crashes on invalid
C++. The design of the proposed patch follows closely the design of cling. The
idea is to gather feedback and gradually evolve both clang-repl and cling to
what the community agrees upon.
The IncrementalParser class is responsible for driving the clang parser and
codegen and allows the compiler infrastructure to process more than one input.
Every input adds to the “ever-growing” translation unit. That model is enabled
by an IncrementalAction which prevents teardown when HandleTranslationUnit.
The IncrementalExecutor class hides some of the underlying implementation
details of the concrete JIT infrastructure. It exposes the minimal set of
functionality required by our incremental compiler/interpreter.
The Transaction class keeps track of the AST and the LLVM IR for each
incremental input. That tracking information will be later used to implement
error recovery.
The Interpreter class orchestrates the IncrementalParser and the
IncrementalExecutor to model interpreter-like behavior. It provides the public
API which can be used (in future) when using the interpreter library.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96033
This primarily parses a different set of options and invokes the same
resource compiler as llvm-rc normally. Additionally, it can convert
directly to an object file (which in MSVC style setups is done with the
separate cvtres tool, or by the linker).
(GNU windres also supports other conversions; from coff object file back
to .res, and from .res or object file back to .rc form; that's not yet
implemented.)
The other bigger complication lies in being able to imply or pass the
intended target triple, to let clang find the corresponding mingw sysroot
for finding include files, and for specifying the default output object
machine format.
It can be implied from the tool triple prefix, like
`<triple>-[llvm-]windres` or picked up from the windres option e.g.
`-F pe-x86-64`. In GNU windres, that option takes BFD style format names
such as pe-i386 or pe-x86-64. As libbfd in binutils doesn't support
Windows on ARM, there's no such canonical name for the ARM targets.
Therefore, as an LLVM specific extension, this option is extended to
allow passing full triples, too.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100756
Allow opting out from preprocessing with a command line argument.
Update tests to pass -no-preprocess to make it not try to use clang
(which isn't a build level dependency of llvm-rc), but add a test that
does preprocessing under clang/test/Preprocessor.
Update a few options to allow them both joined (as -DFOO) and separate
(-D BR), as rc.exe allows both forms of them.
With the verbose flag set, this prints the preprocessing command
used (which differs from what rc.exe does).
Tests under llvm/test/tools/llvm-rc only test constructing the
preprocessor commands, while tests under clang/test/Preprocessor test
actually running the preprocessor.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100755
This allows us to use its value everywhere, rather than just clang. Some
other places, like opt and lld, will use its value soon.
Rename it internally to LLVM_ENABLE_NEW_PASS_MANAGER.
The #define for it is now in llvm-config.h.
The initial land accidentally set the value of
LLVM_ENABLE_NEW_PASS_MANAGER to the string
ENABLE_EXPERIMENTAL_NEW_PASS_MANAGER instead of its value.
Reviewed By: rnk, hans
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92072
This allows us to use its value everywhere, rather than just clang. Some
other places, like opt and lld, will use its value soon.
The #define for it is now in llvm-config.h.
Reviewed By: rnk, hans
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92072
The test needs an object file, which it currenty gets with
`-target x86_64-apple-darwin10`. Rather than adding `REQUIRES: X86`, create
the object file via yaml2obj. This way, the test runs and passes even if the
host arch isn't x86 and only the host arch is built.
Part of PR46644.
This adds the skeleton of the YAML Compiler for APINotes. This change
only adds the YAML IO model for the API Notes along with a new testing
tool `apinotes-test` which can be used to verify that can round trip the
YAML content properly. It provides the basis for the future work which
will add a binary serialization and deserialization format to the data
model.
This is based on the code contributed by Apple at
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project-staging/tree/staging/swift/apinotes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88859
Reviewed By: Gabor Marton
Rather than handling zlib handling manually, use find_package from CMake
to find zlib properly. Use this to normalize the LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB,
HAVE_ZLIB, HAVE_ZLIB_H. Furthermore, require zlib if LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB is
set to YES, which requires the distributor to explicitly select whether
zlib is enabled or not. This simplifies the CMake handling and usage in
the rest of the tooling.
This is a reland of abb0075 with all followup changes and fixes that
should address issues that were reported in PR44780.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79219
This patch adds the missing information to the LF_BUILDINFO record, which allows for rebuilding a .CPP without any external dependency but the .OBJ itself (other than the compiler).
Some external tools that we are using (Recode, Live++) are extracting the information to reproduce a build without any knowledge of the build system. The LF_BUILDINFO stores a full path to the compiler, the PWD (CWD at program startup), a relative or absolute path to the TU, and the full CC1 command line. The command line needs to be freestanding (not depend on any environment variables). In the same way, MSVC doesn't store the provided command-line, but an expanded version (somehow their equivalent of CC1) which is also freestanding.
For more information see PR36198 and D43002.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80833
Rather than handling zlib handling manually, use find_package from CMake
to find zlib properly. Use this to normalize the LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB,
HAVE_ZLIB, HAVE_ZLIB_H. Furthermore, require zlib if LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB is
set to YES, which requires the distributor to explicitly select whether
zlib is enabled or not. This simplifies the CMake handling and usage in
the rest of the tooling.
This is a reland of abb0075 with all followup changes and fixes that
should address issues that were reported in PR44780.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79219
Rather than handling zlib handling manually, use find_package from CMake
to find zlib properly. Use this to normalize the LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB,
HAVE_ZLIB, HAVE_ZLIB_H. Furthermore, require zlib if LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB is
set to YES, which requires the distributor to explicitly select whether
zlib is enabled or not. This simplifies the CMake handling and usage in
the rest of the tooling.
This is a reland of abb0075 with all followup changes and fixes that
should address issues that were reported in PR44780.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79219
This quietly disabled use of zlib on Windows even when building with
-DLLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB=FORCE_ON.
> Rather than handling zlib handling manually, use find_package from CMake
> to find zlib properly. Use this to normalize the LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB,
> HAVE_ZLIB, HAVE_ZLIB_H. Furthermore, require zlib if LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB is
> set to YES, which requires the distributor to explicitly select whether
> zlib is enabled or not. This simplifies the CMake handling and usage in
> the rest of the tooling.
>
> This is a reland of abb0075 with all followup changes and fixes that
> should address issues that were reported in PR44780.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79219
This reverts commit 10b1b4a231 and follow-ups
64d99cc6ab and
f9fec0447e.
Rather than handling zlib handling manually, use find_package from CMake
to find zlib properly. Use this to normalize the LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB,
HAVE_ZLIB, HAVE_ZLIB_H. Furthermore, require zlib if LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB is
set to YES, which requires the distributor to explicitly select whether
zlib is enabled or not. This simplifies the CMake handling and usage in
the rest of the tooling.
This is a reland of abb0075 with all followup changes and fixes that
should address issues that were reported in PR44780.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79219
Rather than handling zlib handling manually, use find_package from CMake
to find zlib properly. Use this to normalize the LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB,
HAVE_ZLIB, HAVE_ZLIB_H. Furthermore, require zlib if LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB is
set to YES, which requires the distributor to explicitly select whether
zlib is enabled or not. This simplifies the CMake handling and usage in
the rest of the tooling.
This is a reland of abb0075 with all followup changes and fixes that
should address issues that were reported in PR44780.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79219
Rather than handling zlib handling manually, use find_package from CMake
to find zlib properly. Use this to normalize the LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB,
HAVE_ZLIB, HAVE_ZLIB_H. Furthermore, require zlib if LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB is
set to YES, which requires the distributor to explicitly select whether
zlib is enabled or not. This simplifies the CMake handling and usage in
the rest of the tooling.
This is a reland of abb0075 with all followup changes and fixes that
should address issues that were reported in PR44780.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79219