Commit Graph

373 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Craig Topper 9e8b5a20e9 [X86] Add MOVBE and RDRND features to BDVER4.
Only 6 years behind gcc. https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2014-08/msg00231.html

Found while working on improving how we define CPU features for
clang and auditing for correctness.
2020-06-26 23:32:17 -07:00
Craig Topper 12665f2812 [X86] Make XSAVEC/XSAVEOPT/XSAVES properly depend on XSAVE in both the frontend and the backend.
These features implicitly enabled XSAVE in the frontend, but not
the backend. Disabling XSAVE in the frontend disabled XSAVEOPT, but
not the other 2. Nothing happened in the backend.
2020-06-26 00:14:58 -07:00
Craig Topper 6673d69226 [X86] Don't imply -mprfchw when -m3dnow is specified. Enable prefetchw in the backend with 3dnow feature.
The PREFETCHW instruction was originally part of the 3DNow. But
it was given its own CPUID bit on later CPUs just before 3DNow
was deprecated.

We were setting the -mprfchw flag if -m3dnow was passed or the CPU
supported 3dnow unless -mno-prfchw was passed. But -march=native
on a CPU without the PRFCHW CPUID bit set will pass -mno-prfchw.
So -march=k8 will behave differently than -march=native on a K8
for example.

So remove this implicit setting from the frontend and instead
enable the backend to use PREFETCHW if 3dnow OR prfchw is enabled.

Also enable PRFCHW flag on amdfam10/barcelona which seems to be
where this CPUID bit was introduced. That CPU also supported
3dnow.
2020-06-25 12:46:52 -07:00
Craig Topper 01c18f9199 Revert "[X86] Don't imply -mprfchw when -m3dnow is specified. Enable prefetchw in the backend with 3dnow feature."
This is failing on the bots.

This reverts commit 636d31a5c3.
2020-06-25 11:43:02 -07:00
Craig Topper 636d31a5c3 [X86] Don't imply -mprfchw when -m3dnow is specified. Enable prefetchw in the backend with 3dnow feature.
The PREFETCHW instruction was originally part of the 3DNow. But
it was given its own CPUID bit on later CPUs just before 3DNow
was deprecated.

We were setting the -mprfchw flag if -m3dnow was passed or the CPU
supported 3dnow unless -mno-prfchw was passed. But -march=native
on a CPU without the PRFCHW CPUID bit set will pass -mno-prfchw.
So -march=k8 will behave differently than -march=native on a K8
for example.

So remove this implicit setting from the frontend and instead
enable the backend to use PREFETCHW if 3dnow OR prfchw is enabled.

Also enable PRFCHW flag on amdfam10/barcelona which seems to be
where this CPUID bit was introduced. That CPU also supported
3dnow.
2020-06-25 11:25:35 -07:00
Craig Topper bb1d8bf270 [X86] Add CLWB to Tremont CPU. Remove CLDEMOTE, MOVDIRI, MOVDIR64B, and WAITPKG to match gcc. 2020-06-02 22:38:51 -07:00
Scott Constable e97a3e5d9d [X86] Add a Pass that builds a Condensed CFG for Load Value Injection (LVI) Gadgets
Adds a new data structure, ImmutableGraph, and uses RDF to find LVI gadgets and add them to a MachineGadgetGraph.

More specifically, a new X86 machine pass finds Load Value Injection (LVI) gadgets consisting of a load from memory (i.e., SOURCE), and any operation that may transmit the value loaded from memory over a covert channel, or use the value loaded from memory to determine a branch/call target (i.e., SINK).

Also adds a new target feature to X86: +lvi-load-hardening

The feature can be added via the clang CLI using -mlvi-hardening.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75936
2020-05-11 13:08:35 -07:00
Simon Pilgrim f0903de1aa [x86] Enable bypassing 64-bit division on generic x86-64
This is currently enabled for Intel big cores from Sandy Bridge onward, as well as Atom, Silvermont, and KNL, due to 64-bit division being so slow on these cores. AMD cores can do this in hardware (use 32-bit division based on input operand width), so it's not a win there. But since the majority of x86 CPUs benefit from this optimization, and since the potential upside is significantly greater than the downside, we should enable this for the generic x86-64 target.

Patch By: @atdt

Reviewed By: @craig.topper, @RKSimon

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75567
2020-04-29 16:55:48 +01:00
Kazuaki Ishizaki 0312b9f550 [llvm] NFC: Fix trivial typo in rst and td files
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77469
2020-04-23 14:26:32 +09:00
WangTianQing a3dc949000 [X86] Add TSXLDTRK instructions.
Summary: For more details about these instructions, please refer to the latest ISE document: https://software.intel.com/en-us/download/intel-architecture-instruction-set-extensions-programming-reference

Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, LuoYuanke

Reviewed By: craig.topper

Subscribers: mgorny, hiraditya, cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77205
2020-04-09 13:17:29 +08:00
Craig Topper 1d42c0db9a Revert "[X86] Add a Pass that builds a Condensed CFG for Load Value Injection (LVI) Gadgets"
This reverts commit c74dd640fd.

Reverting to address coding standard issues raised in post-commit
review.
2020-04-03 16:56:08 -07:00
Scott Constable c74dd640fd [X86] Add a Pass that builds a Condensed CFG for Load Value Injection (LVI) Gadgets
Adds a new data structure, ImmutableGraph, and uses RDF to find LVI gadgets and add them to a MachineGadgetGraph.

More specifically, a new X86 machine pass finds Load Value Injection (LVI) gadgets consisting of a load from memory (i.e., SOURCE), and any operation that may transmit the value loaded from memory over a covert channel, or use the value loaded from memory to determine a branch/call target (i.e., SINK).

Also adds a new target feature to X86: +lvi-load-hardening

The feature can be added via the clang CLI using -mlvi-hardening.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75936
2020-04-03 13:02:04 -07:00
Scott Constable 5b519cf1fc [X86] Add Indirect Thunk Support to X86 to mitigate Load Value Injection (LVI)
This pass replaces each indirect call/jump with a direct call to a thunk that looks like:

lfence
jmpq *%r11

This ensures that if the value in register %r11 was loaded from memory, then
the value in %r11 is (architecturally) correct prior to the jump.
Also adds a new target feature to X86: +lvi-cfi
("cfi" meaning control-flow integrity)
The feature can be added via clang CLI using -mlvi-cfi.

This is an alternate implementation to https://reviews.llvm.org/D75934 That merges the thunk insertion functionality with the existing X86 retpoline code.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76812
2020-04-03 00:34:39 -07:00
WangTianQing d08fadd662 [X86] Add SERIALIZE instruction.
Summary: For more details about this instruction, please refer to the latest ISE document: https://software.intel.com/en-us/download/intel-architecture-instruction-set-extensions-programming-reference

Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, LuoYuanke

Reviewed By: craig.topper

Subscribers: mgorny, hiraditya, cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77193
2020-04-02 16:19:23 +08:00
Philip Reames 1b86ad27a7 Use 15 byte long nops on modern Intel processors
Back in D42616, we switched our default nop length from 15 to 10 bytes because some platforms have painful decode stalls when encountering multiple instruction prefixes. (10 byte long nops come from the fact that prefixes are used to pad after 8 bytes, and some platforms have issues w/more than two prefixes.)

Based on Agner's guides, it appears to be the case that modern Intel (SandyBridge and later) can decode an arbitrary number of prefixes without issue. Intel's guide only provides up to 9 bytes; I read that as providing a safe default for all their chips. Older chips and Atom series have serious decode stalls. I can't find a conclusive reference beyond those two.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75945
2020-03-13 10:51:09 -07:00
Simon Pilgrim 1e686d2689 [X86] Add FeatureFast7ByteNOP flag
Lets us remove another SLM proc family flag usage.

This is NFC, but we should probably check whether atom/glm/knl? should be using this flag as well...
2020-03-12 13:06:43 +00:00
Ganesh Gopalasubramanian 3408940f73 [X86] AMD Znver2 (Rome) Scheduler enablement
The patch gives out the details of the znver2 scheduler model.
There are few improvements with respect to execution units, latencies and
throughput when compared with znver1.
The tests that were present for znver1 for llvm-mca tool were replicated.
The latencies, execution units, timeline and throughput information are updated for znver2.

Reviewers: craig.topper, Simon Pilgrim

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66088
2020-01-10 00:44:59 +05:30
Craig Topper f688570d5c [X86] Remove ProcIntelGLM/ProcIntelGLP/ProcIntelTRM and replace them with a single feature flag covers the two places they were used.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71048
2019-12-05 10:58:57 -08:00
Craig Topper b2b6a54f84 [X86] Add support for -mvzeroupper and -mno-vzeroupper to match gcc
-mvzeroupper will force the vzeroupper insertion pass to run on
CPUs that normally wouldn't. -mno-vzeroupper disables it on CPUs
where it normally runs.

To support this with the default feature handling in clang, we
need a vzeroupper feature flag in X86.td. Since this flag has
the opposite polarity of the fast-partial-ymm-or-zmm-write we
used to use to disable the pass, we now need to add this new
flag to every CPU except KNL/KNM and BTVER2 to keep identical
behavior.

Remove -fast-partial-ymm-or-zmm-write which is no longer used.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69786
2019-11-04 11:03:54 -08:00
Craig Topper 83503ad119 [X86] Remove FeatureSSE3 from the implies list of HasFastHorizontalOps.
HasFastHorizontalOps is a tuning flag. It shouldn't imply an ISA flag.
2019-11-01 23:17:53 -07:00
David Zarzycki 11c920207a [X86] Prefer KORTEST on Knights Landing or later for memcmp()
PTEST and especially the MOVMSK instructions are slow on Knights Landing
or later. As a bonus, this patch increases instruction parallelism by
emitting:
    KORTEST(PCMPNEQ(a, b), PCMPNEQ(c, d)) == 0
Instead of:
    KORTEST(AND(PCMPEQ(a, b), PCMPEQ(c, d))) == ~0

https://reviews.llvm.org/D69157
2019-10-26 21:14:57 +03:00
Clement Courbet 44bfbcc28e [X86][NFC] Add a `use-aa` feature.
Summary:
This allows enabling useaa on the command-line and will allow enabling the
feature on a per-CPU basis where benchmarking shows improvements.

This is modelled after the ARM/AArch64 target.

Reviewers: RKSimon, andreadb, craig.topper

Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, ychen, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67266

llvm-svn: 371989
2019-09-16 14:05:28 +00:00
Craig Topper 635d383fad [X86] Enable -mprefer-vector-width=256 by default for Skylake-avx512 and later Intel CPUs.
AVX512 instructions can cause a frequency drop on these CPUs. This
can negate the performance gains from using wider vectors. Enabling
prefer-vector-width=256 will prevent generation of zmm registers
unless explicit 512 bit operations are used in the original source
code.

I believe gcc and icc both do something similar to this by default.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67259

llvm-svn: 371694
2019-09-11 23:54:36 +00:00
Craig Topper 8cfff1e1bc [X86] Add prefer-128-bit subtarget feature.
Summary:
Similar to the previous prefer-256-bit flag. We might want to
enable this by default some CPUs. This just starts the initial
work to implement and prove that it effects TTI's vector width.

Reviewers: RKSimon, echristo, spatel, atdt

Reviewed By: RKSimon

Subscribers: lebedev.ri, hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67311

llvm-svn: 371319
2019-09-07 19:54:22 +00:00
Craig Topper 5a43fdd313 [X86] Remove what little support we had for MPX
-Deprecate -mmpx and -mno-mpx command line options
-Remove CPUID detection of mpx for -march=native
-Remove MPX from all CPUs
-Remove MPX preprocessor define

I've left the "mpx" string in the backend so we don't fail on old IR, but its not connected to anything.

gcc has also deprecated these command line options. https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=GCC-Patch-To-Drop-MPX

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66669

llvm-svn: 370393
2019-08-29 18:09:02 +00:00
Pengfei Wang e28cbbd5d4 [X86] Support -march=tigerlake
Support -march=tigerlake for x86.
Compare with Icelake Client, It include 4 more new features ,they are
avx512vp2intersect, movdiri, movdir64b, shstk.

Patch by Xiang Zhang (xiangzhangllvm)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65840

llvm-svn: 368543
2019-08-12 01:29:46 +00:00
Craig Topper 9d55e2c85e [X86] Make CMPXCHG16B feature imply CMPXCHG8B feature.
This fixes znver1 so that it properly enables CMPXHG8B. We can
probably remove explicit CMPXCHG8B from CPUs that also have
CMPXCHG16B, but keeping this simple to allow cherry pick to 9.0.

Fixes PR42935.

llvm-svn: 368324
2019-08-08 18:11:17 +00:00
Roman Lebedev 213817327f [X86] Move CPU features for Barcelona/K10 out of line
Summary:
Cleans X86.td's Barcelona entry to be more like the others,
by moving the features out of the `Proc<>`, thus potentially
making it possible to inherit from them.
Split off from D63628

Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon

Reviewed By: craig.topper

Subscribers: hiraditya, jfb, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65791

llvm-svn: 368061
2019-08-06 17:04:02 +00:00
Pengfei Wang f8b28931a7 [X86] -march=cooperlake (llvm)
Support intel -march=cooperlake in llvm

Patch by Shengchen Kan (skan)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62836

llvm-svn: 362776
2019-06-07 08:31:35 +00:00
Pengfei Wang 2e67d0c842 [X86] Add VP2INTERSECT instructions
Support Intel AVX512 VP2INTERSECT instructions in llvm

Patch by Xiang Zhang (xiangzhangllvm)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62366

llvm-svn: 362188
2019-05-31 02:50:41 +00:00
Pengfei Wang 1f67d94279 [X86] Add ENQCMD instructions
For more details about these instructions, please refer to the latest
ISE document:
https://software.intel.com/en-us/download/intel-architecture-instruction-set-extensions-programming-reference.

Patch by Tianqing Wang (tianqing)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62281

llvm-svn: 362053
2019-05-30 03:59:16 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim c2d9cfd925 [X86] Disable shouldFoldConstantShiftPairToMask for scalar shifts on AMD targets (PR40758)
D61068 handled vector shifts, this patch does the same for scalars where there are similar number of pipes for shifts as bit ops - this is true almost entirely for AMD targets where the scalar ALUs are well balanced.

This combine avoids AND immediate mask which usually means we reduce encoding size.

Some tests show use of (slow, scaled) LEA instead of SHL in some cases, but thats due to particular shift immediates - shift+mask generate these just as easily.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61830

llvm-svn: 360684
2019-05-14 15:21:28 +00:00
Luo, Yuanke beec41c656 Enable AVX512_BF16 instructions, which are supported for BFLOAT16 in Cooper Lake
Summary:
1. Enable infrastructure of AVX512_BF16, which is supported for BFLOAT16 in Cooper Lake;
2. Enable VCVTNE2PS2BF16, VCVTNEPS2BF16 and DPBF16PS  instructions, which are Vector Neural Network Instructions supporting BFLOAT16 inputs and conversion instructions from IEEE single precision.
VCVTNE2PS2BF16: Convert Two Packed Single Data to One Packed BF16 Data.
VCVTNEPS2BF16: Convert Packed Single Data to Packed BF16 Data.
VDPBF16PS: Dot Product of BF16 Pairs Accumulated into Packed Single Precision.
For more details about BF16 isa, please refer to the latest ISE document: https://software.intel.com/en-us/download/intel-architecture-instruction-set-extensions-programming-reference

Author: LiuTianle

Reviewers: craig.topper, smaslov, LuoYuanke, wxiao3, annita.zhang, RKSimon, spatel

Reviewed By: craig.topper

Subscribers: kristina, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60550

llvm-svn: 360017
2019-05-06 08:22:37 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 5d6ef94c36 [X86][SSE] Disable shouldFoldConstantShiftPairToMask for btver1/btver2 targets (PR40758)
As detailed on PR40758, Bobcat/Jaguar can perform vector immediate shifts on the same pipes as vector ANDs with the same latency - so it doesn't make sense to replace a shl+lshr with a shift+and pair as it requires an additional mask (with the extra constant pool, loading and register pressure costs).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61068

llvm-svn: 359293
2019-04-26 10:49:13 +00:00
Clement Courbet 699dc025a6 [X86MacroFusion] Handle branch fusion (AMD CPUs).
Summary:
This adds a BranchFusion feature to replace the usage of the MacroFusion
for AMD CPUs.

See D59688 for context.

Reviewers: andreadb, lebedev.ri

Subscribers: hiraditya, jdoerfert, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59872

llvm-svn: 357171
2019-03-28 14:12:46 +00:00
Craig Topper 8d46403b8e [X86] Add CMPXCHG8B feature flag. Set it for all CPUs except i386/i486 including 'generic'. Disable use of CMPXCHG8B when this flag isn't set.
CMPXCHG8B was introduced on i586/pentium generation.

If its not enabled, limit the atomic width to 32 bits so the AtomicExpandPass will expand to lib calls. Unclear if we should be using a different limit for other configs. The default is 1024 and experimentation shows that using an i256 atomic will cause a crash in SelectionDAG.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59576

llvm-svn: 356631
2019-03-20 23:35:49 +00:00
Craig Topper 5c1177a68f [X86] Arrange more CPU features to inherit from earlier CPUs. NFCI
This makes SandyBridge inherit back to Westmere/Nehalem.

Make bdver1-4 inherit from each other and btver2 inherit from btver1.

llvm-svn: 355935
2019-03-12 16:35:30 +00:00
Craig Topper a958d40e78 [X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class.
ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs.

ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU.

Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules.

With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU.

Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags.

I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures.

llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-11 22:29:00 +00:00
Craig Topper 112ea336c3 [X86] Remove periods from the end of SubtargetFeature descriptions since the help printer adds a period.
Most features don't have periods already, but some did. When there is a period it causes llc -mattr=+help to print 2 periods.

llvm-svn: 355474
2019-03-06 02:36:48 +00:00
Ganesh Gopalasubramanian e172d7008d [X86] AMD znver2 enablement
This patch enables the following

1) AMD family 17h "znver2" tune flag (-march, -mcpu).
2) ISAs that are enabled for "znver2" architecture.
3) For the time being, it uses the znver1 scheduler model.
4) Tests are updated.
5) Scheduler descriptions are yet to be put in place.

Reviewers: craig.topper

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58343

llvm-svn: 354897
2019-02-26 16:55:10 +00:00
Craig Topper e4025c5eb1 [X86] Remove FeatureSlowIncDec from Sandy Bridge and later Intel Core CPUs
Summary:
Inc and Dec were at one point slow on Intel CPUs due to their tendency to cause partial flag stalls on P6 derived CPU cores. This is because these instructions are defined to preserve the carry flag. This partial flag stall issue persisted until Sandy Bridge when flag merging was changed to be handled as a data dependency instead of as a stall until retirement. Sandy Bridge and later CPUs rename the C flag separately from OSPAZ so there is no flag merge needed on INC/DEC to preserve the C flag.

Given these improvements I don't know why INC/DEC was ever considered slow on Sandy Bridge. If anything they should have been disabled on the earlier CPUs instead.

Note after this patch, INC/DEC are still considered slow on Silvermont, Goldmont, Knights Landing and our generic "x86-64" CPU.

Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, chandlerc

Reviewed By: chandlerc

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58412

llvm-svn: 354436
2019-02-20 05:39:11 +00:00
Craig Topper c81e0c67ba [X86] Remove command line strings from the ProcIntel* features.
These should always follow the CPU string. There's no reason to control them independently.

llvm-svn: 354304
2019-02-19 03:04:14 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 2946cd7010 Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636
2019-01-19 08:50:56 +00:00
Craig Topper 5fb34b5498 [X86] Add cascade lake arch in X86 target.
This is skylake-avx512 with the addition of avx512vnni ISA.

Patch by Jianping Chen

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54785

llvm-svn: 347681
2018-11-27 18:05:00 +00:00
Craig Topper 220fd33522 [X86] Add AES to KNL CPUs to match clang.
I believe this was lost from KNL when AES was pushed from Westmere to Skylake recently. KNL used to inherit from IVB.

llvm-svn: 345519
2018-10-29 18:17:01 +00:00
Roman Lebedev a5baf86744 AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
# Overview
This is somewhat partial.
* Latencies are good {F7371125}
  * All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky.
* NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158}
  * Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes
* Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there.
  They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2`
* Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left...

To be noted:
I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis!

# Benchmark
I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]].
Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch):
```
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark                                                                                        Time             CPU      Time Old      Time New       CPU Old       CPU New
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                             0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean                              -0.0607         -0.0604           234           219           233           219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median                            -0.0630         -0.0626           233           219           233           219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                            +0.2581         +0.2587             1             2             1             2
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                             0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean                              -0.0770         -0.0767           144           133           144           133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median                            -0.0767         -0.0763           144           133           144           133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                            -0.4170         -0.4156             1             0             1             0
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0271         -0.0270           463           450           463           450
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0093         -0.0093           453           449           453           449
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.7280         -0.7280            13             4            13             4
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0004          0.0004      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0065         -0.0065           569           565           569           565
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0077         -0.0077           569           564           569           564
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         +1.0077         +1.0068             2             5             2             5
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0220          0.0199      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           +0.0006         +0.0007           312           312           312           312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         +0.0031         +0.0032           311           312           311           312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.7069         -0.7072             4             1             4             1
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0004          0.0004      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0015         -0.0015           141           141           141           141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0010         -0.0011           141           141           141           141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.1486         -0.1456             0             0             0             0
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.6139          0.8766      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0008         -0.0005            60            60            60            60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0006         -0.0002            60            60            60            60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.1467         -0.1390             0             0             0             0
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0137          0.0137      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           +0.0002         +0.0002           275           275           275           275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0015         -0.0014           275           275           275           275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         +3.3687         +3.3587             0             2             0             2
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                     0.4041          0.3933      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean                                      +0.0004         +0.0004            67            67            67            67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median                                    -0.0000         -0.0000            67            67            67            67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                    +0.1947         +0.1995             0             0             0             0
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                              0.0074          0.0001      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean                               -0.0092         +0.0074           547           542            25            25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median                             -0.0054         +0.0115           544           541            25            25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                             -0.4086         -0.3486             8             5             0             0
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                        0.3320          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean                                         +0.0015         +0.0204           218           218            12            12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median                                       +0.0001         +0.0203           218           218            12            12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                       +0.2259         +0.2023             1             1             0             0
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                      0.0000          0.0001      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean                                       -0.0209         -0.0179            96            94            90            88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median                                     -0.0182         -0.0155            95            93            90            88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                     -0.6164         -0.2703             2             1             2             1
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                     0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean                                      -0.0098         -0.0098           176           175           176           175
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median                                    -0.0126         -0.0126           176           174           176           174
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                    +6.9789         +6.9157             0             2             0             2
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                 0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean                  -0.0237         -0.0238           474           463           474           463
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median                -0.0267         -0.0267           473           461           473           461
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                +0.7179         +0.7178             3             5             3             5
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                   0.6837          0.6554      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean                    -0.0014         -0.0013          1375          1373          1375          1373
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median                  +0.0018         +0.0019          1371          1374          1371          1374
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                  -0.7457         -0.7382            11             3            10             3
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                        0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                         -0.0080         -0.0289            22            22            10            10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median                                       -0.0070         -0.0287            22            22            10            10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                       +1.0977         +0.6614             0             0             0             0
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                       0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                        +0.0132         +0.0967            35            36            10            11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median                                      +0.0132         +0.0956            35            36            10            11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                      -0.0407         -0.1695             0             0             0             0
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                      0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                       +0.0331         +0.1307            13            13             6             6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median                                     +0.0430         +0.1373            12            13             6             6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                     -0.9006         -0.8847             1             0             0             0
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                            0.0016          0.0010      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean                                             -0.0023         -0.0024           395           394           395           394
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median                                           -0.0029         -0.0030           395           394           395           393
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                           -0.0275         -0.0375             1             1             1             1
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0232          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0047         +0.0039           114           113            28            28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0050         +0.0037           114           113            28            28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.0599         -0.2683             1             1             0             0
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                          0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean                           +0.0206         +0.0207           405           414           405           414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median                         +0.0204         +0.0205           405           414           405           414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev                         +0.2155         +0.2212             1             1             1             1
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                         0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean                          -0.0109         -0.0108           147           145           147           145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median                        -0.0104         -0.0103           147           145           147           145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev                        -0.4919         -0.4800             0             0             0             0
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                         0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean                                          -0.0149         -0.0147           220           217           220           217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median                                        -0.0173         -0.0169           221           217           220           217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                        +1.0337         +1.0341             1             3             1             3
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                         0.0001          0.0001      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean                                          -0.0019         -0.0019           194           193           194           193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median                                        -0.0021         -0.0021           194           193           194           193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                        -0.4441         -0.4282             0             0             0             0
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                0.0000          0.4263      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean                                 +0.0258         -0.0006            81            83            19            19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median                               +0.0235         -0.0011            81            82            19            19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev                               +0.1634         +0.1070             1             1             0             0
```
{F7443905}
If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`),
and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`);
Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%`
Looks good so far i'd say.

llvm-exegesis details:
{F7371117} {F7371125}
{F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158}

Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh

Reviewed By: andreadb

Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779

llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-27 20:46:30 +00:00
Craig Topper c10de9a37a [X86] Remove ProcIntelKNL and replace with a SlowPMADDWD flag to use in the one place it was checked.
llvm-svn: 345286
2018-10-25 17:29:00 +00:00
Craig Topper 5d787ac4be [X86] Remove some uarch tuning flags from KNL that look to have been inherited from SNB/IVB incorrectly
KNL is based on a modified Silvermont core so I don't think these features apply. I think the LEA flag is probably also wrong, but I'm less sure as I barely understand the 3 LEA flags we have currently.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53671

llvm-svn: 345285
2018-10-25 17:28:57 +00:00
Craig Topper 7bb8c2e6e5 [X86] Explicitly list all KNL features of inheriting from IVB. NFC
I'm not sure all the microarchitectural tuning flags that have been added to IVBFeatures are relevant for KNL. Separating will allow us to see and audit them. There might even be some simplification opportunities in the Sandy Bridge through Icelake inheritance line without KNL using the same chain.

llvm-svn: 345183
2018-10-24 19:24:44 +00:00
Craig Topper 96889b8b96 [X86] Remove unused entries from the X86ProcFamily enum. Add a note to discourage creation of new enum entries.
As we've learned multiple times, a coarse grained enum like this is not scalable and we should be migrating away from it.

llvm-svn: 344972
2018-10-22 23:14:55 +00:00