The earlier change added hotness attribute to missed-optimization
remarks. This follows up with the analysis remarks (the ones explaining
the reason for the missed optimization).
llvm-svn: 276192
We can replace the return values with undef if we replaced all
the call uses with a constant/undef.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22336
llvm-svn: 276174
Summary:
Previously we wouldn't move loads/stores across instructions that had
side-effects, where that was defined as may-write or may-throw. But
this is not sufficiently restrictive: Stores can't safely be moved
across instructions that may load.
This patch also adds a DEBUG check that all instructions in our chain
are either loads or stores.
Reviewers: asbirlea
Subscribers: llvm-commits, jholewinski, arsenm, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22547
llvm-svn: 276171
Summary:
Previously if we had a chain that contained a side-effecting
instruction, we wouldn't vectorize it at all. Now we'll vectorize
everything that comes before the side-effecting instruction.
Reviewers: asbirlea
Subscribers: arsenm, jholewinski, llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22536
llvm-svn: 276170
Summary: In r275989 we enabled the folding of `logic(cast(icmp), cast(icmp))` to `cast(logic(icmp, icmp))`. Here we add more test cases to assure this folding works for all logical operations `and`/`or`/`xor`.
Reviewers: grosser
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22561
Contributed-by: Matthias Reisinger
llvm-svn: 276105
This patch adds costs for the vectorized implementations of CTPOP, the default values were seriously underestimating the cost of these and was encouraging vectorization on targets where serialized use of POPCNT would be much better.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22456
llvm-svn: 276104
Summary:
getVectorizablePrefix previously didn't work properly in the face of
aliasing loads/stores. It unwittingly assumed that the loads/stores
appeared in the BB in address order. If they didn't, it would do the
wrong thing.
Reviewers: asbirlea, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22535
llvm-svn: 276072
Revert "[LoopSimplify] Update LCSSA after separating nested loops."
This reverts commit r275891.
Revert "[LCSSA] Post-process PHI-nodes created by SSAUpdate when constructing LCSSA form."
This reverts commit r275883.
llvm-svn: 276064
We just set PreserveLCSSA to always true since we don't have an
analogous method `mustPreserveAnalysisID(LCSSA)`.
Also port LoopInfo verifier pass to test LoopUnrollPass.
llvm-svn: 276063
Summary:
Previously, the insertion point for stores was the last instruction in
Chain *before calling getVectorizablePrefixEndIdx*. Thus if
getVectorizablePrefixEndIdx didn't return Chain.size(), we still would
insert at the last instruction in Chain.
This patch changes our internal API a bit in an attempt to make it less
prone to this sort of error. As a result, we end up recalculating the
Chain's boundary instructions, but I think worrying about the speed hit
of this is a premature optimization right now.
Reviewers: asbirlea, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22534
llvm-svn: 276056
Summary:
This helps keep us honest -- there were a number of ways we could screw
up and still have passed this test.
Reviewers: asbirlea
Subscribers: llvm-commits, arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22531
llvm-svn: 276053
The pattern may look more obviously like a sext if written as:
define i32 @g(i16 %x) {
%zext = zext i16 %x to i32
%xor = xor i32 %zext, 32768
%add = add i32 %xor, -32768
ret i32 %add
}
We already have that fold in visitAdd().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22477
llvm-svn: 276035
We skipped over ReturnInsts which didn't return an argument which would
lead us to incorrectly conclude that an argument returned by another
ReturnInst was 'returned'.
This reverts commit r275756.
This fixes PR28610.
llvm-svn: 276008
Summary:
Currently, InstCombine is already able to fold expressions of the form `logic(cast(A), cast(B))` to the simpler form `cast(logic(A, B))`, where logic designates one of `and`/`or`/`xor`. This transformation is implemented in `foldCastedBitwiseLogic()` in InstCombineAndOrXor.cpp. However, this optimization will not be performed if both `A` and `B` are `icmp` instructions. The decision to preclude casts of `icmp` instructions originates in r48715 in combination with r261707, and can be best understood by the title of the former one:
> Transform (zext (or (icmp), (icmp))) to (or (zext (cimp), (zext icmp))) if at least one of the (zext icmp) can be transformed to eliminate an icmp.
Apparently, it introduced a transformation that is a reverse of the transformation that is done in `foldCastedBitwiseLogic()`. Its purpose is to expose pairs of `zext icmp` that would subsequently be optimized by `transformZExtICmp()` in InstCombineCasts.cpp. Therefore, in order to avoid an endless loop of switching back and forth between these two transformations, the one in `foldCastedBitwiseLogic()` has been restricted to exclude `icmp` instructions which is mirrored in the responsible check:
`if ((!isa<ICmpInst>(Cast0Src) || !isa<ICmpInst>(Cast1Src)) && ...`
This check seems to sort out more cases than necessary because:
- the reverse transformation is obviously done for `or` instructions only
- and also not every `zext icmp` pair is necessarily the result of this reverse transformation
Therefore we now remove this check and replace it by a more finegrained one in `shouldOptimizeCast()` that now rejects only those `logic(zext(icmp), zext(icmp))` that would be able to be optimized by `transformZExtICmp()`, which also avoids the mentioned endless loop. That means we are now able to also simplify expressions of the form `logic(cast(icmp), cast(icmp))` to `cast(logic(icmp, icmp))` (`cast` being an arbitrary `CastInst`).
As an example, consider the following IR snippet
```
%1 = icmp sgt i64 %a, %b
%2 = zext i1 %1 to i8
%3 = icmp slt i64 %a, %c
%4 = zext i1 %3 to i8
%5 = and i8 %2, %4
```
which would now be transformed to
```
%1 = icmp sgt i64 %a, %b
%2 = icmp slt i64 %a, %c
%3 = and i1 %1, %2
%4 = zext i1 %3 to i8
```
This issue became apparent when experimenting with the programming language Julia, which makes use of LLVM. Currently, Julia lowers its `Bool` datatype to LLVM's `i8` (also see https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/17225). In fact, the above IR example is the lowered form of the Julia snippet `(a > b) & (a < c)`. Like shown above, this may introduce `zext` operations, casting between `i1` and `i8`, which could for example hinder ScalarEvolution and Polly on certain code.
Reviewers: grosser, vtjnash, majnemer
Subscribers: majnemer, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22511
Contributed-by: Matthias Reisinger
llvm-svn: 275989
D20859 and D20860 attempted to replace the SSE (V)CVTTPS2DQ and VCVTTPD2DQ truncating conversions with generic IR instead.
It turns out that the behaviour of these intrinsics is different enough from generic IR that this will cause problems, INF/NAN/out of range values are guaranteed to result in a 0x80000000 value - which plays havoc with constant folding which converts them to either zero or UNDEF. This is also an issue with the scalar implementations (which were already generic IR and what I was trying to match).
This patch changes both scalar and packed versions back to using x86-specific builtins.
It also deals with the other scalar conversion cases that are runtime rounding mode dependent and can have similar issues with constant folding.
A companion clang patch is at D22105
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22106
llvm-svn: 275981
This patch updates MemorySSA's use-optimizing walker to be more
accurate and, in some cases, faster.
Essentially, this changed our core walking algorithm from a
cache-as-you-go DFS to an iteratively expanded DFS, with all of the
caching happening at the end. Said expansion happens when we hit a Phi,
P; we'll try to do the smallest amount of work possible to see if
optimizing above that Phi is legal in the first place. If so, we'll
expand the search to see if we can optimize to the next phi, etc.
An iteratively expanded DFS lets us potentially quit earlier (because we
don't assume that we can optimize above all phis) than our old walker.
Additionally, because we don't cache as we go, we can now optimize above
loops.
As an added bonus, this patch adds a ton of verification (if
EXPENSIVE_CHECKS are enabled), so finding bugs is easier.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21777
llvm-svn: 275940
For instructions in uniform set, they will not have vector versions so
add them to VecValuesToIgnore.
For induction vars, those only used in uniform instructions or consecutive
ptrs instructions have already been added to VecValuesToIgnore above. For
those induction vars which are only used in uniform instructions or
non-consecutive/non-gather scatter ptr instructions, the related phi and
update will also be added into VecValuesToIgnore set.
The change will make the vector RegUsages estimation less conservative.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D20474
The recommit fixed the testcase global_alias.ll.
llvm-svn: 275936
For instructions in uniform set, they will not have vector versions so
add them to VecValuesToIgnore.
For induction vars, those only used in uniform instructions or consecutive
ptrs instructions have already been added to VecValuesToIgnore above. For
those induction vars which are only used in uniform instructions or
non-consecutive/non-gather scatter ptr instructions, the related phi and
update will also be added into VecValuesToIgnore set.
The change will make the vector RegUsages estimation less conservative.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D20474
llvm-svn: 275912
Summary:
Usually LCSSA survives this transformation, but in some cases (see
attached test) it doesn't: values from the original loop after
separating might be used from the outer loop. Before the transformation
it was the same loop, so LCSSA phis were not required.
This fixes PR28272.
Reviewers: sanjoy, hfinkel, chandlerc
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21665
llvm-svn: 275891
Summary:
The direct motivation for the port is to ensure that the OptRemarkEmitter
tests work with the new PM.
This remains a function pass because we not only create multiple loops
but could also version the original loop.
In the test I need to invoke opt
with -passes='require<aa>,loop-distribute'. LoopDistribute does not
directly depend on AA however LAA does. LAA uses getCachedResult so
I *think* we need manually pull in 'aa'.
Reviewers: davidxl, silvas
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22437
llvm-svn: 275811
While debugging GVNHoist, I found it confusing that the entries in a
VNtoInsns were not always value numbers. They _usually_ were except for
StoreInst in which case they were a hash of two different value numbers.
This leads to two observations:
- It is more difficult to debug things when the semantic contents of
VNtoInsns changes over time.
- Using a single value number is not much cheaper, the value of
VNtoInsns is a SmallVector.
- It is not immediately clear what the algorithm would do if there were
hash collisions in the StoreInst case.
Using a DenseMap of std::pair sidesteps all of this.
N.B. The changes in the test were due their sensitivity to the
iteration order of VNtoInsns which has changed.
llvm-svn: 275761
This reverts also r275029, "Update Clang tests after adding inference for the returned argument attribute"
It broke LTO build. Seems miscompilation.
llvm-svn: 275756
Summary:
To enable profile-guided indirect call promotion in ThinLTO mode, we
simply add call graph edges for each profitable target from the profile
to the summaries, then the summary-guided importing will consider the
callee for importing as usual.
Also we need to enable the indirect call promotion pass creation in the
PassManagerBuilder when PerformThinLTO=true (we are in the ThinLTO
backend), so that the newly imported functions are considered for
promotion in the backends.
The IC promotion profiles refer to callees by GUID, which required
adding GUIDs to the per-module VST in bitcode (and assigning them
valueIds similar to how they are assigned valueIds in the combined
index).
Reviewers: mehdi_amini, xur
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, davidxl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21932
llvm-svn: 275707
Adam Nemet