structural comparison of non-dependent types. Otherwise, we end up
rejecting cases where the non-dependent types don't match due to
qualifiers in, e.g., a pointee type. Fixes PR12132.
llvm-svn: 152529
instead of having a special-purpose function.
- ActOnCXXDirectInitializer, which was mostly duplication of
AddInitializerToDecl (leading e.g. to PR10620, which Eli fixed a few days
ago), is dropped completely.
- MultiInitializer, which was an ugly hack I added, is dropped again.
- We now have the infrastructure in place to distinguish between
int x = {1};
int x({1});
int x{1};
-- VarDecl now has getInitStyle(), which indicates which of the above was used.
-- CXXConstructExpr now has a flag to indicate that it represents list-
initialization, although this is not yet used.
- InstantiateInitializer was renamed to SubstInitializer and simplified.
- ActOnParenOrParenListExpr has been replaced by ActOnParenListExpr, which
always produces a ParenListExpr. Placed that so far failed to convert that
back to a ParenExpr containing comma operators have been fixed. I'm pretty
sure I could have made a crashing test case before this.
The end result is a (I hope) considerably cleaner design of initializers.
More importantly, the fact that I can now distinguish between the various
initialization kinds means that I can get the tricky generalized initializer
test cases Johannes Schaub supplied to work. (This is not yet done.)
This commit passed self-host, with the resulting compiler passing the tests. I
hope it doesn't break more complicated code. It's a pretty big change, but one
that I feel is necessary.
llvm-svn: 150318
template without a corresponding parameter pack, don't immediately
substitute the alias template. This is under discussion in the C++
committee, and may become ill-formed, but for now we match GCC.
llvm-svn: 149697
template. Such pack expansions can easily fail at template
instantiation time, if the expanded parameter packs are of the wrong
length. Fixes <rdar://problem/10040867>, PR9021, and the example that
came up today at Going Native.
llvm-svn: 149685
Explicit instantiations following specializations are no-ops and hence have
no PointOfInstantiation. That was done correctly in most cases, but for a
specialization -> instantiation decl -> instantiation definition chain, the
definition didn't realize that it was a no-op. Fix that.
Also, when printing diagnostics for these no-ops, get the diag location from
the decl name location.
Add many test cases, one of them not yet passing (but it failed the same way
before this change). Fixes http://llvm.org/pr11558 and more.
llvm-svn: 147225
part of template argument deduction is ill-formed, we mark it as
invalid and treat it as a deduction failure. If we happen to find that
specialization again, treat it as a deduction failure rather than
silently building a call to the declaration.
Fixes PR11117, a marvelous bug where deduction failed after creating
an invalid specialization, causing overload resolution to pick a
different candidate. Then we performed a similar overload resolution
later, and happily picked the invalid specialization to
call... resulting in a silent link failure.
llvm-svn: 141809
We'd also like for "C++11" or "c++11" to be used for the warning
groups, but without removing the old warning flags. Patches welcome;
I've run out of time to work on this today.
llvm-svn: 141801
and DefaultFunctionArrayLvalueConversion. To prevent
significant regression for should-this-be-a-call fixits,
and to repair some such regression from the introduction of
bound member placeholders, make those placeholder checks
try to build calls appropriately. Harden the build-a-call
logic while we're at it.
llvm-svn: 141738
This makes the code duplication of implicit special member handling even worse,
but the cleanup will have to come later. For now, this works.
Follow-up with tests for explicit defaulting and enabling the __has_feature
flag to come.
llvm-svn: 138821
template<typename T> struct S { } f() { return 0; }
This case now produces a missing ';' diagnostic, since that seems like a much more likely error than an attempt to declare a function or variable in addition to the class template.
Treat this
llvm-svn: 135195
arithmetic into a couple of common routines. Use these to make the
messages more consistent in the various contexts, especially in terms of
consistently diagnosing binary operators with invalid types on both the
left- and right-hand side. Also, improve the grammar and wording of the
messages some, handling both two pointers and two (different) types.
The wording of function pointer arithmetic diagnostics still strikes me
as poorly phrased, and I worry this makes them slightly more awkward if
more consistent. I'm hoping to fix that with a follow-on patch and test
case that will also make them more helpful when a typedef or template
type parameter makes the type completely opaque.
Suggestions on better wording are very welcome, thanks to Richard Smith
for some initial help on that front.
llvm-svn: 133906
deducing template parameter types. Recently Clang began enforcing the
more strict checking that the argument type and the deduced function
parameter type (after substitution) match, but that only consideres
qualification conversions.
One problem with this patch is that we check noreturn conversions and
qualification conversions independently. If a valid conversion would
require *both*, perhaps interleaved with each other, it will be
rejected. If this actually occurs (I'm not yet sure it does) and is in
fact a problem (I'm not yet sure it is), there is a FIXME to implement
more intelligent conversion checking.
However, this step at least allows Clang to resume accepting valid code
we're seeing in the wild.
llvm-svn: 133327
checks that the deduced argument type for a function call matches the
actual argument type provided. The only place we've found where the
consistency checking should actually cause template argument deduction
failure is due to qualifier differences that don't fall into the realm
of qualification conversions (which are *not* checked when we
initially perform deduction). However, we're performing the full
checking as specified in the standard to ensure that no other cases
exist.
Fixes PR9233 / <rdar://problem/9039590>.
llvm-svn: 133163
specializations within an explicit instantiation to default to off
(enabled by -pedantic). Nobody else seem to implement C++
[temp.explicit]p3. Fixes PR10093.
llvm-svn: 132704
specializing a member of an unspecialized template, and recover from
such errors without crashing. Fixes PR10024 / <rdar://problem/9509761>.
llvm-svn: 132677
the template parameter, perform the checking as a "specified" template
argument rather than a "deduced" template argument; the latter implies
stricter type checking that is not permitted for default template
arguments.
Also, cleanup our handling of substitution of explicit template
arguments for a function template. We were actually performing some
substitution of default arguments at this point!
Fixes PR10069.
llvm-svn: 132529
nested-name-specifier, re-evaluate the nested-name-specifier as if we
were entering that context (which we did!), so that we'll resolve a
template-id to a particular class template partial
specialization. Fixes PR9913.
llvm-svn: 131383
nested of an out-of-line declaration, only require a 'template<>'
header for each enclosing class template that hasn't been previously
specialized; previously, we were requiring 'template<>' for enclosing
class templates and members of class templates that hadn't been
previously specialized. Fixes <rdar://problem/9422013>.
llvm-svn: 131207
the semantic context referenced by the nested-name-specifier rather
than the syntactic form of the nested-name-specifier. The previous
incarnation was based on my complete misunderstanding of C++
[temp.expl.spec]. The latest C++0x working draft clarifies the
requirements here, and this rewrite is intended to follow that.
Along the way, improve source location information in the
diagnostics. For example, if we report that a specific type needs or
doesn't need a 'template<>' header, we dig out that type in the
nested-name-specifier and highlight its range.
Fixes: PR5907, PR9421, PR8277, PR8708, PR9482, PR9668, PR9877, and
<rdar://problem/9135379>.
llvm-svn: 131138
parameters on the floor in certain cases:
class X {
template <typename T> friend typename A<T>::Foo;
};
This was parsed as a *non* template friend declaration some how, and
received an ExtWarn. Fixing the parser to actually provide the template
parameters to the freestanding declaration parse triggers the code which
specifically looks for such constructs and hard errors on them.
Along the way, this prevents us from trying to instantiate constructs
like the above inside of a outer template. This is important as loosing
the template parameters means we don't have a well formed declaration
and template instantiation will be unable to rebuild the AST. That fixes
a crash in the GCC test suite.
llvm-svn: 130772
weak linkage. Also, fix a problem where global weak variables
with non-trivial initializers were getting guard variables, or at
least were checking for them and then crashing.
llvm-svn: 129342
overload, so that we actually do the resolution for full expressions
and emit more consistent, useful diagnostics. Also fixes an IRGen
crasher, where Sema wouldn't diagnose a resolvable bound member
function template-id used in a full-expression (<rdar://problem/9108698>).
llvm-svn: 127747
of a C++0x inline namespace within enclosing namespaces, as noted in
C++0x [namespace.def]p8.
Fixes <rdar://problem/9006349>, a libc++ failure where Clang was
rejected an explicit specialization of std::swap (since libc++ puts it
into an inline, versioned namespace std::__1).
llvm-svn: 127162
of an expansion, and we have a paramameter that is not a parameter
pack, don't suppress substitution of parameter packs within this
context.
llvm-svn: 126819
parameter type to see what's behind it, so that we don't end up
printing silly things like "float const *" when "const float *" would
make more sense. Also, replace the pile of "isa" tests with a simple
switch enumerating all of the cases, making a few more obvious cases
use prefix qualifiers.
llvm-svn: 125729
it's okay for the following template parameters to not have default
arguments (since those template parameters can still be
deduced). Also, downgrade the error about default template arguments
in function templates to an extension warning, since this is a
harmless C++0x extension.
llvm-svn: 124855
argument but doesn't (because previous template parameters had default
arguments), clear out all of the default arguments so that we maintain
the invariant that a template parameter has a default argument only if
subsequence template parameters also have default arguments.
Fixes a crash-on-invalid <rdar://problem/8913649>.
llvm-svn: 124345
T) when taking the address of an overloaded function or matching a
specialization to a template (C++0x [temp.deduct.type]p10). Fixes
PR9044.
llvm-svn: 124197
call (C++0x [temp.deduct.call]p3).
As part of this, start improving the reference-binding implementation
used in the computation of implicit conversion sequences (for overload
resolution) to reflect C++0x semantics. It still needs more work and
testing, of course.
llvm-svn: 123966
together. In particular:
- Handle the use of captured parameter pack names within blocks
(BlockDeclRefExpr understands parameter packs now)
- Handle the declaration and expansion of parameter packs within a block's
parameter list, e.g., ^(Args ...args) { ... })
- Handle instantiation of blocks where the return type was not
explicitly specified. (unrelated, but necessary for my tests).
Together, these fixes should make blocks and variadic templates work
reasonably well together. Note that BlockDeclRefExpr is still broken
w.r.t. its computation of type and value dependence, which will still
cause problems for blocks in templates.
llvm-svn: 123849
a pack expansion, e.g., the parameter pack Values in:
template<typename ...Types>
struct Outer {
template<Types ...Values>
struct Inner;
};
This new implementation approach introduces the notion of an
"expanded" non-type template parameter pack, for which we have already
expanded the types of the parameter pack (to, say, "int*, float*",
for Outer<int*, float*>) but have not yet expanded the values. Aside
from creating these expanded non-type template parameter packs, this
patch updates template argument checking and non-type template
parameter pack instantiation to make use of the appropriate types in
the parameter pack.
llvm-svn: 123845
non-variadic function template over a variadic one. This matches GCC
and the intent of the C++0x wording, in a way that I think is likely
to be acceptable to the committee.
llvm-svn: 123581
template template parameter pack that cannot be fully expanded because
its enclosing pack expansion could not be expanded. This form of
TemplateName plays the same role as SubstTemplateTypeParmPackType and
SubstNonTypeTemplateParmPackExpr do for template type parameter packs
and non-type template parameter packs, respectively.
We should now handle these multi-level pack expansion substitutions
anywhere. The largest remaining gap in our variadic-templates support
is that we cannot cope with non-type template parameter packs whose
type is a pack expansion.
llvm-svn: 123521
that captures the substitution of a non-type template argument pack
for a non-type template parameter pack within a pack expansion that
cannot be fully expanded. This follows the approach taken by
SubstTemplateTypeParmPackType.
llvm-svn: 123506
expansion in it, we may end up instantiating to an empty
expression-list. In this case, the variable is uninitialized; tweak
the instantiation logic to handle this case. Fixes PR8977.
llvm-svn: 123449
expansion, when it is known due to the substitution of an out
parameter pack. This allows us to properly handle substitution into
pack expansions that involve multiple parameter packs at different
template parameter levels, even when this substitution happens one
level at a time (as with partial specializations of member class
templates and the signatures of member function templates).
Note that the diagnostic we provide when there is an arity mismatch
between an outer parameter pack and an inner parameter pack in this
case isn't as clear as the normal diagnostic for an arity
mismatch. However, this doesn't matter because these cases are very,
very rare and (even then) only typically occur in a SFINAE context.
The other kinds of pack expansions (expression, template, etc.) still
need to support optional tracking of the number of expansions, and we
need the moral equivalent of SubstTemplateTypeParmPackType for
substituted argument packs of template template and non-type template
parameters.
llvm-svn: 123448
involve template parameter packs at multiple template levels that
occur within the signatures members of class templates (and partial
specializations thereof). This is a work-in-progress that is deficient
in several ways, notably:
- It only works for template type parameter packs, but we need to
also support non-type template parameter packs and template template
parameter packs.
- It doesn't keep track of the lengths of the substituted argument
packs in the expansion, so it can't properly diagnose length
mismatches.
However, this is a concrete step in the right direction.
llvm-svn: 123425
when we're actually matching a template template argument to a
template template parameter. Otherwise, use strict matching.
Fixes <rdar://problem/8859985> clang++: variadics and out-of-line definitions.
llvm-svn: 123385
matching of variadic template template parameters to template
arguments. This paragraph was the subject of ISO C++ committee
document N2555: Extending Variadic Template Template Parameters.
llvm-svn: 123348
another pack expansion type. This can happen when rebuilding types in
the current instantiation.
Fixes <rdar://problem/8848837> (Clang crashing on libc++ <functional>).
llvm-svn: 123316
and function templates that contain variadic templates. This involves
three small-ish changes:
(1) When transforming a pack expansion, if the transformed argument
still contains unexpanded parameter packs, build a pack
expansion. This can happen during the substitution that occurs into
class template partial specialiation template arguments during
partial ordering.
(2) When performing template argument deduction where the argument
is a pack expansion, match against the pattern of that pack
expansion.
(3) When performing template argument deduction against a non-pack
parameter, or a non-expansion template argument, deduction fails if
the argument itself is a pack expansion (C++0x
[temp.deduct.type]p22).
llvm-svn: 123279
number of explicit call arguments. This actually fixes an erroneous
test for [temp.deduct.partial]p11, where we were considering
parameters corresponding to arguments beyond those that were
explicitly provided.
llvm-svn: 123244
parameters it expanded to, map exactly the number of function
parameters that were expanded rather than just running to the end of
the instantiated parameter list. This finishes the implementation of
the last sentence of C++0x [temp.deduct.call]p1.
llvm-svn: 123213
sentence of [temp.deduct.call]p1, both of which concern the
non-deducibility of parameter packs not at the end of a
parameter-type-list. The latter isn't fully implemented yet; see the
new FIXME.
llvm-svn: 123210
expression kinds. This is (indirectly) a test verifying that the
recursive AST visitor is visiting the children of these expression
nodes.
llvm-svn: 123198
pack expansions in template argument lists and function parameter
lists. The implementation of this paragraph should be complete
*except* for cases where we're substituting into one of the unexpanded
packs in a pack expansion; that's a general issue I haven't solved yet.
llvm-svn: 123188
allows an argument pack determines via explicit specification of
function template arguments to be extended by further, deduced
arguments. For example:
template<class ... Types> void f(Types ... values);
void g() {
f<int*, float*>(0, 0, 0); // Types is deduced to the sequence int*, float*, int
}
There are a number of FIXMEs in here that indicate places where we
need to implement + test retained expansions, plus a number of other
places in deduction where we need to correctly cope with the
explicitly-specified arguments when deducing an argument
pack. Furthermore, it appears that the RecursiveASTVisitor needs to be
auditied; it's missing some traversals (especially w.r.t. template
arguments) that cause it not to find unexpanded parameter packs when
it should.
The good news, however, is that the tr1::tuple implementation now
works fully, and the tr1::bind example (both from N2080) is actually
working now.
llvm-svn: 123163
tuple class template. This implementation is boosted directly from the
variadic templates proposal. N2080.
Note that one section is #ifdef'd out. I'll implement that aspect of
template argument deduction next.
llvm-svn: 123016
parameters into parameter types, so that substitution of
explicitly-specified function template arguments uses the same
path. This enables the use of explicitly-specified function template
arguments with variadic templates.
llvm-svn: 122986
template whose last parameter is a parameter pack. This allows us to
form a call to, e.g.,
template<typename ...Args1, typename ...Args2>
void f(std::pair<Args1, Args2> ...pairs);
given zero or more instances of "pair".
llvm-svn: 122973
1) Declaration of function parameter packs
2) Instantiation of function parameter packs within function types.
3) Template argument deduction of function parameter packs when
matching two function types.
We're missing all of the important template-instantiation logic for
function template definitions, along with template argument deduction
from the argument list of a function call, so don't even think of
trying to use these for real yet.
llvm-svn: 122926
expansions with something that is easier to use correctly: a new
template argment kind, rather than a bit on an existing kind. Update
all of the switch statements that deal with template arguments, fixing
a few latent bugs in the process. I"m happy with this representation,
now.
And, oh look! Template instantiation and deduction work for template
template argument pack expansions.
llvm-svn: 122896
for template template argument pack expansions. This allows fun such
as:
template<template<class> class ...> struct apply_impl { /*...*/ };
template<template<class> class ...Metafunctions> struct apply {
typedef typename apply_impl<Metafunctions...>::type type;
};
However, neither template argument deduction nor template
instantiation is implemented for template template argument packs, so
this functionality isn't useful yet.
I'll probably replace the encoding of template template
argument pack expansions in TemplateArgument so that it's harder to
accidentally forget about the expansion. However, this is a step in
the right general direction.
llvm-svn: 122890
specializations. We weren't dealing with any of the cases where the
type of the non-type template argument differs from the type of the
corresponding template parameter in the primary template. We would
think that the template parameter in the partial specialization was
not deducible (and warn about it, incorrectly), then fail to convert a
deduced parameter to the type of the template parameter in the partial
specialization (which may involve truncation, among other
things). Fixes PR8905.
llvm-svn: 122851
template argument (described by an expression, of course). For
example:
template<int...> struct int_tuple { };
template<int ...Values>
struct square {
typedef int_tuple<(Values*Values)...> type;
};
It also lays the foundation for pack expansions in an initializer-list.
llvm-svn: 122751
caused an assertion when dealing with non-type template parameter
packs. Add some tests for deduction and instantiation of non-type
template parameter packs.
llvm-svn: 122534
extract the appropriate argument from the argument pack (based on the
current substitution index, of course). Simple instantiation of pack
expansions involving non-type template parameter packs now works.
llvm-svn: 122532
packs, e.g.,
template<typename T, unsigned ...Dims> struct multi_array;
along with semantic analysis support for finding unexpanded non-type
template parameter packs in types, expressions, and so on.
Template instantiation involving non-type template parameter packs
probably doesn't work yet. That'll come soon.
llvm-svn: 122527
specialization's template arguments against the primary template's
template arguments using the obvious, correct method of checking the
injected-class-name type (C++ [temp.class.spec]p9b3). The previous
incarnation of this comparison attempted to use its own formulation of
the injected-class-name, which is redudant and, with the introduction
of variadic templates, became wrong (again).
llvm-svn: 122508
template argument corresponding to a template parameter pack is an
argument pack of a pack expansion of that template parameter
pack. Implements C++0x [temp.dep.type]p2 (at least, as much of it as
we can).
llvm-svn: 122498
parameter packs. In particular, a parameter pack not otherwise deduced
is deduced to an empty parameter pack.
The C++0x wording here is a bit unfortunate; this should really only
apply to function templates, and it mentions "trailing" parameter
packs, which doesn't really make sense in the context of function
templates. Will file a core issue separately.
llvm-svn: 122463
the presence of a pack expansion anywhere except at the end of a
template-argument-list causes the entire template-argument-list to be
a non-deduced context.
llvm-svn: 122461
single routine. Extend that routine to handle consistency
checking for template argument packs, so that we can compare the
deduced packs for template parameter packs across different pack
expansions.
llvm-svn: 122452
pattern is a template argument, which involves repeatedly deducing
template arguments using the pattern of the pack expansion, then
bundling the resulting deductions into an argument pack.
We can now handle a variety of simple list-handling metaprograms using
variadic templates. See, e.g., the new "count" metaprogram.
llvm-svn: 122439
dependent template specialization type, the number of template
arguments need not match precisely. Rather than checking the number of
arguments eagerly (which does not consider argument packs), let the
deduction routine for template argument lists cope with too many/too
few arguments.
llvm-svn: 122425
deduction. Unify all of the looping over template arguments for
deduction purposes into a single place, where argument pack expansion
occurs; this is also the hook for deducing from pack expansions, which
itself is not yet implemented.
For now, at least we can handle a basic "count" metafunction written
with variadics. See the new test for the formulation that works.
llvm-svn: 122418
whose patterns are template arguments. We can now instantiate, e.g.,
typedef tuple<pair<OuterTypes, InnerTypes>...> type;
where OuterTypes and InnerTypes are template type parameter packs.
There is a horrible inefficiency in
TemplateArgumentLoc::getPackExpansionPattern(), where we need to
create copies of TypeLoc data because our interfaces traffic in
TypeSourceInfo pointers where they should traffic in TypeLocs
instead. I've isolated in efficiency in this one routine; once we
refactor our interfaces to traffic in TypeLocs, we can eliminate it.
llvm-svn: 122278
a parameter pack, check the parameter pack against each of the
template arguments it corresponds to, then pack the converted
arguments into a template argument pack. Allows us to use variadic
class templates so long as instantiation isn't required, e.g.,
template<typename... Types> struct Tuple;
Tuple<int, float> *t2;
llvm-svn: 122251
pack expansions, e.g. given
template<typename... Types> struct tuple;
template<typename... Types>
struct tuple_of_refs {
typedef tuple<Types&...> types;
};
the type of the "types" typedef is a PackExpansionType whose pattern
is Types&.
This commit introduces support for creating pack expansions for
template type arguments, as above, but not for any other kind of pack
expansion, nor for any form of instantiation.
llvm-svn: 122223
declarations. This is a work in progress, as I go through the C++
declaration grammar to identify where unexpanded parameter packs can
occur.
llvm-svn: 121912
parameter packs within a statement, type, etc. Use this visitor to
provide improved diagnostics for the presence of unexpanded parameter
packs in a full expression, base type, declaration type, etc., by
highlighting the unexpanded parameter packs and providing their names,
e.g.,
test/CXX/temp/temp.decls/temp.variadic/p5.cpp:28:85: error: declaration type
contains unexpanded parameter packs 'VeryInnerTypes',
'OuterTypes', ...
...VeryInnerTypes, OuterTypes>, pair<InnerTypes, OuterTypes> > types;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
llvm-svn: 121883
whether the expression contains an unexpanded parameter pack, in the
same vein as the changes to the Type hierarchy. Compute this bit
within all of the Expr subclasses.
This change required a bunch of reshuffling of dependency
calculations, mainly to consolidate them inside the constructors and
to fuse multiple loops that iterate over arguments to determine type
dependence, value dependence, and (now) containment of unexpanded
parameter packs.
Again, testing is painfully sparse, because all of the diagnostics
will change and it is more important to test the to-be-written visitor
that collects unexpanded parameter packs.
llvm-svn: 121831
and TemplateArgument with an operation that determines whether there
are any unexpanded parameter packs within that construct. Use this
information to diagnose the appearance of the names of parameter packs
that have not been expanded (C++ [temp.variadic]p5). Since this
property is checked often (every declaration, ever expression
statement, etc.), we extend Type and Expr with a bit storing the
result of this computation, rather than walking the AST each time to
determine whether any unexpanded parameter packs occur.
This commit is deficient in several ways, which will be remedied with
future commits:
- Expr has a bit to store the presence of an unexpanded parameter
pack, but it is never set.
- The error messages don't point out where the unexpanded parameter
packs were named in the type/expression, but they should.
- We don't check for unexpanded parameter packs in all of the places
where we should.
- Testing is sparse, pending the resolution of the above three
issues.
llvm-svn: 121724
particular, we only add the implement object parameter type if only
one of the function templates is a non-static member function
template.
Moreover, since this DR differs from existing practice in C++98/03,
this commit implements the existing practice (which ignores the
first parameter of the function template that is not the non-static
member function template) in C++98/03 mode.
llvm-svn: 119145
in the order they occur within the class template, delaying
out-of-line member template partial specializations until after the
class has been fully instantiated. This fixes a regression introduced
by r118454 (itself a fix for PR8001).
llvm-svn: 118704
only keep deduction results for successful deductions, so that they
can be compared against each other. Fixes PR8462, from Richard Smith!
llvm-svn: 117983
themselves have no template parameters. This is actually a restriction
due to the grammar of template template parameters, but we choose to
diagnose it in Sema to provide better recovery.
llvm-svn: 117032
construct an unsupported friend when there's a friend with a templated
scope specifier. Fixes a consistency crash, rdar://problem/8540527
llvm-svn: 116786
that are suppressed during template argument deduction. This change
queues diagnostics computed during template argument deduction. Then,
if the resulting function template specialization or partial
specialization is chosen by overload resolution or partial ordering
(respectively), we will emit the queued diagnostics at that point.
This addresses most of PR6784. However, the check for unnamed/local
template arguments (which existed before this change) is still only
skin-deep, and needs to be extended to look deeper into types. It must
be improved to finish PR6784.
llvm-svn: 116373
of templated-scope friends by marking them invalid and white-listing all
accesses until such time as we implement them. Fixes a crash, this time
without a broken test case.
llvm-svn: 116364
argument deduction, make sure to check the correctness of deduced template
type arguments (which we had previously skipped) along with other
kinds of template arguments. This fixes part of PR6784, but we're
still swallowing the extension warning about unnamed/local template
arguments.
llvm-svn: 116327
error to a warning if we're in a case that would be allowed in
C++0x. This "fixes" PR8084 by making Clang accept more code than GCC
and (non-strict) EDG do.
Also, add the missing test case for the C++0x semantics, which should
have been in r113717.
llvm-svn: 113718
instantiating the parameters. In a perfect world, this wouldn't
matter, and compilers are free to instantiate in any order they
want. However, every other compiler seems to instantiate the return
type first, and some code (in this case, Boost.Polygon) depends on
this and SFINAE to avoid instantiating something that shouldn't be
instantiated.
We could fight this battle, and insist that Clang is allowed to do
what it does, but it's not beneficial: it's more predictable to
instantiate this way, in source order. When we implement
late-specified return types, we'll need to instantiate the return type
last when it was late-specified, hence the FIXME.
We now compile Boost.Polygon properly.
llvm-svn: 112561
deduction where the parameter is a function reference, function
pointer, or member function pointer and the argument is an overloaded
function. Fixes <rdar://problem/8360106>, a template argument
deduction issue found by Boost.Filesystem.
llvm-svn: 112523
templates when only the declaration is in scope. This requires deferring the
instantiation to be lazy, and ensuring the definition is required for that
translation unit. We re-use the existing pending instantiation queue,
previously only used to track implicit instantiations which were required to be
lazy. Fixes PR7979.
A subsequent change will rename *PendingImplicitInstantiations to
*PendingInstatiations for clarity given its broader role.
llvm-svn: 112037
just means "not a function type", not "not a function type or void". This
changes behavior slightly, but generally in a way which accepts more code.
llvm-svn: 110303
at -O0. The only change from the previous patch is that we don't try
to generate virtual method thunks for an available_externally
function.
llvm-svn: 108230
-O0, since we won't be using the definitions for anything anyway. For
lib/System/Path.o when built in Debug+Asserts mode, this leads to a 4%
improvement in compile time (and suppresses 440 function bodies).
<rdar://problem/7987644>
llvm-svn: 108156
This is more targeted, as it simply provides toggle actions for the parser to
turn access checking on and off. We then use these to suppress access checking
only while we parse the template-id (included scope specifier) of an explicit
instantiation and explicit specialization of a class template. The
specialization behavior is an extension, as it seems likely a defect that the
standard did not exempt them as it does explicit instantiations.
This allows the very common practice of specializing trait classes to work for
private, internal types. This doesn't address instantiating or specializing
function templates, although those apparently already partially work.
The naming and style for the Action layer isn't my favorite, comments and
suggestions would be appreciated there.
llvm-svn: 106993
template names. We were completely missing naming classes for many unqualified
lookups, but this didn't trigger code paths that need it. This removes part of
an optimization that re-uses the template name lookup done by the parser to
determine if explicit template arguments actually form a template-id.
Unfortunately the technique for avoiding the duplicate lookup lost needed data
such as the class context in which the lookup succeeded.
llvm-svn: 104117
Revert much of the implementation of C++98/03 [temp.friend]p5 in
r103943 and its follow-ons r103948 and r103952. While our
implementation was technically correct, other compilers don't seem to
implement this paragraph (which forces the instantiation of friend
functions defined in a class template when a class template
specialization is instantiated), and doing so broke a bunch of Boost
libraries.
Since this behavior has changed in C++0x (which instantiates the
friend function definitions when they are used), we're going to skip
the nowhere-implemented C++98/03 semantics and go straight to the
C++0x semantics.
This commit is a band-aid to get Boost up and running again. It
doesn't really fix PR6952 (which this commit un-fixes), but it does
deal with the way Boost.Units abuses this particular paragraph.
llvm-svn: 104014
within class templates be instantiated along with each class template
specialization, even if the functions are not used. Do so, as a baby
step toward PR6952.
llvm-svn: 103943
explicit instantiations of template. C++0x clarifies the intent
(they're ill-formed in some cases; see [temp.explicit] for
details). However, one could squint at the C++98/03 standard and
conclude they are permitted, so reduce the error to a warning
(controlled by -Wc++0x-compat) in C++98/03 mode.
llvm-svn: 103482
specific message that includes the template arguments, e.g.,
test/SemaTemplate/overload-candidates.cpp:27:20: note: candidate template
ignored: substitution failure [with T = int *]
typename T::type get_type(const T&); // expected-note{{candidate ...
^
llvm-svn: 103348
many/too few arguments, use the same diagnostic we use for arity
mismatches in non-templates (but note that it's a function template).
llvm-svn: 103341
conflicting deduced template argument values, give a more specific
reason along with those values, e.g.,
test/SemaTemplate/overload-candidates.cpp:4:10: note: candidate template
ignored: deduced conflicting types for parameter 'T' ('int' vs. 'long')
const T& min(const T&, const T&);
^
llvm-svn: 103339
specializations, substitute the deduced template arguments and check
the resulting substitution before concluding that template argument
deduction succeeds. This marvelous little fix makes a bunch of
Boost.Spirit tests start working.
llvm-svn: 102601
way that C does. Among other differences, elaborated type specifiers
are defined to skip "non-types", which, as you might imagine, does not
include typedefs. Rework our use of IDNS masks to capture the semantics
of different kinds of declarations better, and remove most current lookup
filters. Removing the last remaining filter is more complicated and will
happen in a separate patch.
Fixes PR 6885 as well some spectrum of unfiled bugs.
llvm-svn: 102164
Douglas Gregor