Apparently the FIXME was overlooked when the source location information was
made available to the function.
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3058
llvm-svn: 203845
In the following code:
struct A { static const int sz; };
template<class T> void f() { T arr[A::sz]; }
the array 'arr' is represented as a variable size array in the template.
If 'A::sz' gets value below in the translation unit, the array in
instantiation can turn into constant size array.
This change fixes PR18633.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2688
llvm-svn: 200899
A return type is the declared or deduced part of the function type specified in
the declaration.
A result type is the (potentially adjusted) type of the value of an expression
that calls the function.
Rule of thumb:
* Declarations have return types and parameters.
* Expressions have result types and arguments.
llvm-svn: 200082
override for the type of 'this', also clear it out (unless we're entering the
context of a lambda-expression, where it should be inherited).
llvm-svn: 199962
Fix a perennial source of confusion in the clang type system: Declarations and
function prototypes have parameters to which arguments are supplied, so calling
these 'arguments' was a stretch even in C mode, let alone C++ where default
arguments, templates and overloading make the distinction important to get
right.
Readability win across the board, especially in the casting, ADL and
overloading implementations which make a lot more sense at a glance now.
Will keep an eye on the builders and update dependent projects shortly.
No functional change.
llvm-svn: 199686
Remove UnaryTypeTraitExpr and switch all remaining type trait related handling
over to TypeTraitExpr.
The UTT/BTT/TT enum prefix and evaluation code is retained pending further
cleanup.
This is part of the ongoing work to unify type traits following the removal of
BinaryTypeTraitExpr in r197273.
llvm-svn: 198271
There's nothing special about type traits accepting two arguments.
This commit eliminates BinaryTypeTraitExpr and switches all related handling
over to TypeTraitExpr.
Also fixes a CodeGen failure with variadic type traits appearing in a
non-constant expression.
The BTT/TT prefix and evaluation code is retained as-is for now but will soon
be further cleaned up.
This is part of the ongoing work to unify type traits.
llvm-svn: 197273
For an init capture, process the initialization expression
right away. For lambda init-captures such as the following:
const int x = 10;
auto L = [i = x+1](int a) {
return [j = x+2,
&k = x](char b) { };
};
keep in mind that each lambda init-capture has to have:
- its initialization expression executed in the context
of the enclosing/parent decl-context.
- but the variable itself has to be 'injected' into the
decl-context of its lambda's call-operator (which has
not yet been created).
Each init-expression is a full-expression that has to get
Sema-analyzed (for capturing etc.) before its lambda's
call-operator's decl-context, scope & scopeinfo are pushed on their
respective stacks. Thus if any variable is odr-used in the init-capture
it will correctly get captured in the enclosing lambda, if one exists.
The init-variables above are created later once the lambdascope and
call-operators decl-context is pushed onto its respective stack.
Since the lambda init-capture's initializer expression occurs in the
context of the enclosing function or lambda, therefore we can not wait
till a lambda scope has been pushed on before deciding whether the
variable needs to be captured. We also need to process all
lvalue-to-rvalue conversions and discarded-value conversions,
so that we can avoid capturing certain constant variables.
For e.g.,
void test() {
const int x = 10;
auto L = [&z = x](char a) { <-- don't capture by the current lambda
return [y = x](int i) { <-- don't capture by enclosing lambda
return y;
}
};
If x was not const, the second use would require 'L' to capture, and
that would be an error.
Make sure TranformLambdaExpr is also aware of this.
Patch approved by Richard (Thanks!!)
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2092
llvm-svn: 196454
Summary:
In general, this type node can be used to represent any type adjustment
that occurs implicitly without losing type sugar. The immediate use of
this is to adjust the calling conventions of member function pointer
types without breaking template instantiation.
Fixes PR17996.
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2332
llvm-svn: 196451
No Functionality change.
This refactoring avoids having to call getCurLambda right after PushLambdaScope, to obtain the LambdaScopeInfo that was created during the call to PushLambdaScope.
llvm-svn: 194438
A prior commit of this patch was reverted because it was within the blamelist's purview of a failing test. The failure of that test has been addressed here: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20131021/091546.html. Therefore I am recommitting this patch (all tests pass on windows, except for the usual modules & index suspects that never pass on my box).
Some background: Both Doug and Richard had asked me in Chicago to remove the circular reference in CXXRecordDecl to LambdaExpr by factoring out and storing the needed information from LambdaExpr directly into CXXRecordDecl.
In addition, I have added an IsGenericLambda flag - this makes life a little easier when we implement capturing, and are Sema-analyzing the body of a lambda (and the calloperator hasn't been wired to the closure class yet). Any inner lambdas can have potential captures that could require walking up the scope chain and checking if any generic lambdas are capture-ready. This 'bit' makes some of that checking easier.
No change in functionality.
This patch was approved by Doug with minor modifications (comments were cleaned up, and all data members were converted from bool/enum to unsigned, as requested):
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1856
Thanks!
llvm-svn: 193246
A previous attempt http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130930/090049.html resulted in PR 17476, and was reverted,
The original TransformLambdaExpr (pre generic-lambdas) transformed the TypeSourceInfo of the Call operator in its own instantiation scope via TransformType. This resulted in the parameters of the call operator being mapped to their transformed counterparts in an instantiation scope that would get popped off.
Then a call to TransformFunctionParameters would add the parameters and their transformed mappings (but newly created ones!) to the current instantiation scope. This would result in a disconnect between the new call operator's TSI parameters and those used to construct the call operator declaration. This was ok in the non-generic lambda world - but would cause issues with nested transformations (when non-generic and generics were interleaved) in the generic lambda world - that I somewhat kludged around initially - but this resulted in PR17476.
The new approach seems cleaner. We only do the transformation of the TypeSourceInfo - but we make sure to do it in the current instantiation scope so we don't lose the untransformed to transformed mappings of the ParmVarDecls when they get created.
Another attempt caused a test to fail (http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20131021/091533.html) and also had to be reverted - my apologies - in my haste, i did not run all the tests - argh!
Now all the tests seem to pass - but a Fixme has been added - since I suspect Richard will find the fix a little inelegant ;) I shall try and work on a more elegant fix once I have had a chance to discuss with Richard or Doug at a later date.
Hopefully the third time;s a charm *fingers crossed*
This does not yet include capturing.
Please see test file for examples.
This patch was LGTM'd by Doug:
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1784
llvm-svn: 193230
They were causing CodeGenCXX/mangle-exprs.cpp to fail.
Revert "Remove the circular reference to LambdaExpr in CXXRecordDecl."
Revert "Again: Teach TreeTransform and family how to transform generic lambdas nested within templates and themselves."
llvm-svn: 193226
Both Doug and Richard had asked me to remove the circular reference in CXXRecordDecl to LambdaExpr by factoring out and storing the needed information from LambdaExpr directly into CXXRecordDecl.
No change in functionality.
In addition, I have added an IsGenericLambda flag - this makes life a little easier when we implement capturing, and are Sema-analyzing the body of a lambda (and the calloperator hasn't been wired to the closure class yet). Any inner lambdas can have potential captures that could require walking up the scope chain and checking if any generic lambdas are capture-ready. This 'bit' makes some of that checking easier.
This patch was approved by Doug with minor modifications (comments were cleaned up, and all data members were converted from bool/enum to unsigned, as requested):
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1856
Thanks!
llvm-svn: 193223
lambdas nested within templates and themselves.
A previous attempt http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130930/090049.html resulted in PR 17476, and was reverted,
The original TransformLambdaExpr (pre generic-lambdas) transformed the TypeSourceInfo of the Call operator in its own instantiation scope via TransformType. This resulted in the parameters of the call operator being mapped to their transformed counterparts in an instantiation scope that would get popped off.
Then a call to TransformFunctionParameters would add the parameters and their transformed mappings (but newly created ones!) to the current instantiation scope. This would result in a disconnect between the new call operator's TSI parameters and those used to construct the call operator declaration. This was ok in the non-generic lambda world - but would cause issues with nested transformations (when non-generic and generics were interleaved) in the generic lambda world - that I somewhat kludged around initially - but this resulted in PR17476.
The new approach seems cleaner. We only do the transformation of the TypeSourceInfo - but we make sure to do it in the current instantiation scope so we don't lose the untransformed to transformed mappings of the ParmVarDecls when they get created.
This does not yet include capturing.
Please see test file for examples.
This patch was LGTM'd by Doug:
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1784
llvm-svn: 193216
If unqualified id lookup fails while parsing a class template with a
dependent base, clang with -fms-compatibility will pretend the user
prefixed the name with 'this->' in order to delay the lookup. However,
if there was a unary ampersand, Sema::ActOnDependentIdExpression() will
create a DependentDeclRefExpr, which is not what we wanted at all. Fix
this by building the CXXDependentScopeMemberExpr directly instead.
In order to be fully MSVC compatible, we would have to defer all
attempts at name lookup to instantiation time. However, until we have
real problems with system headers that can't be parsed, we'll put off
implementing that.
Fixes PR16014.
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1892
llvm-svn: 192727
We wouldn't transform the compound statement in any of these forms,
causing crashes when it got time to act on them. Additionally, we
wouldn't check to see if the handler was invalid before deciding whether
or not we should continue acting on the __try.
This fixes PR17584.
llvm-svn: 192682
This does not yet include capturing (that is next).
Please see test file for examples.
This patch was LGTM'd by Doug:
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1784http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130930/090048.html
When I first committed this patch - a bunch of buildbots were unable to compile the code that VS2010 seemed to compile. Seems like there was a dependency on Sema/Template.h which VS did not seem to need, but I have now added for the other compilers. It still compiles on Visual Studio 2010 - lets hope the buildbots remain quiet (please!)
llvm-svn: 191879
Alexey Bataev