they're redeclarations. This is necessary in order for name lookup to correctly
find the most recent declaration of the name (which affects default template
argument lookup and cross-module merging, among other things).
llvm-svn: 275612
The problem is that the parameter pack in a function type type alias is not
reexpanded after being transformed. Also remove an incorrect comment in a
similar function. Fixes PR26017.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21030
llvm-svn: 274566
constructor would be; this is effectively required by P0136R1. This has the
effect of exposing the validity of the base class initialization steps to
SFINAE checks.
llvm-svn: 274088
Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into
C++ last year as a DR against C++11.
Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited
base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to
constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for
using-declarations.
For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived
class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow
constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the
actual initialization, and have a new expression node,
CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such
a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect
forwarding of arguments.)
In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls,
variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting
constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code
into the caller of the inherited constructor.
Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some
corner cases. In particular:
* if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to
construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B
befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and
* if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default
constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from
a base class
llvm-svn: 274049
Crash reported in PR28023 is caused by the fact that non-type template
parameters are found by tag name lookup. In the code provided in that PR:
template<int V> struct A {
struct B {
template <int> friend struct V;
};
};
the template parameter V is found when lookup for redeclarations of 'struct V'
is made. Latter on the error about shadowing of 'V' is emitted but the semantic
context of 'struct V' is already determined wrong: 'struct A' instead of
translation unit.
The fix moves the check for shadowing toward the beginning of the method and
thus prevents from wrong context calculations.
This change fixes PR28023.
llvm-svn: 272366
a base class via a using-declaration. If a class has a using-declaration
declaring either a constructor or an assignment operator, eagerly declare its
special members in case they need to displace a shadow declaration from a
using-declaration.
llvm-svn: 269398
* an unscoped enumerator whose enumeration is a class member is itself a class
member, so can only be the subject of a class-scope using-declaration.
* a scoped enumerator cannot be the subject of a class-scope using-declaration.
llvm-svn: 268594
if we are parsing a template specialization.
This commit makes changes to clear the TemplateParamScope bit and set
the TemplateParamParent field of the current scope to null if a template
specialization is being parsed.
Before this commit, Sema::ActOnStartOfLambdaDefinition would check
whether the parent template scope had any decls to determine whether
or not a template specialization was being parsed. This wasn't correct
since it couldn't distinguish between a real template specialization and
a template defintion with an unnamed template parameter (only template
parameters with names are added to the scope's decl list). To fix the
bug, this commit changes the code to check the pointer to the parent
template scope rather than the decl list.
rdar://problem/23440346
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19175
llvm-svn: 267975
Remove the floating point to bool conversion warnings. Some of these
conversions will be caught by -Wliteral-conversion and -Wfloat-conversion
llvm-svn: 267234
Restructure the implict floating point to integer conversions so that
interesting sub-groups are under different flags. Breakdown of warnings:
No warning:
Exact conversions from floating point to integer:
int x = 10.0;
int x = 1e10;
-Wliteral-conversion - Floating point literal to integer with rounding:
int x = 5.5;
int x = -3.4;
-Wfloat-conversion - All conversions not covered by the above two:
int x = GetFloat();
int x = 5.5 + 3.5;
-Wfloat-zero-conversion - The expression converted has a non-zero floating
point value that gets converted to a zero integer value, excluded the cases
falling under -Wliteral-conversion. Subset of -Wfloat-conversion.
int x = 1.0 / 2.0;
-Wfloat-overflow-conversion - The floating point value is outside the range
of the integer type, exluding cases from -Wliteral conversion. Subset of
-Wfloat-conversion.
char x = 500;
char x = -1000;
-Wfloat-bool-conversion - Any conversion of a floating point type to bool.
Subset of -Wfloat-conversion.
if (GetFloat()) {}
bool x = 5.0;
-Wfloat-bool-constant-conversion - Conversion of a compile time evaluatable
floating point value to bool. Subset of -Wfloat-bool-conversion.
bool x = 1.0;
bool x = 4.0 / 20.0;
Also add EvaluateAsFloat to Sema, which is similar to EvaluateAsInt, but for
floating point values.
llvm-svn: 267054
With this patch compiler emits warning if it tries to make implicit instantiation
of a template but cannot find the template definition. The warning can be suppressed
by explicit instantiation declaration or by command line options
-Wundefined-var-template and -Wundefined-func-template. The implementation follows
the discussion of http://reviews.llvm.org/D12326.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16396
llvm-svn: 266719
Summary: A program shall not declare an explicit instantiation (14.8.2), an explicit specialization (14.8.3), or a partial specialization of a concept definition.
Reviewers: rsmith, hubert.reinterpretcast, faisalv, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18221
llvm-svn: 265868
Implement lambda capture of *this by copy.
For e.g.:
struct A {
int d = 10;
auto foo() { return [*this] (auto a) mutable { d+=a; return d; }; }
};
auto L = A{}.foo(); // A{}'s lifetime is gone.
// Below is still ok, because *this was captured by value.
assert(L(10) == 20);
assert(L(100) == 120);
If the capture was implicit, or [this] (i.e. *this was captured by reference), this code would be otherwise undefined.
Implementation Strategy:
- amend the parser to accept *this in the lambda introducer
- add a new king of capture LCK_StarThis
- teach Sema::CheckCXXThisCapture to handle by copy captures of the
enclosing object (i.e. *this)
- when CheckCXXThisCapture does capture by copy, the corresponding
initializer expression for the closure's data member
direct-initializes it thus making a copy of '*this'.
- in codegen, when assigning to CXXThisValue, if *this was captured by
copy, make sure it points to the corresponding field member, and
not, unlike when captured by reference, what the field member points
to.
- mark feature as implemented in svn
Much gratitude to Richard Smith for his carefully illuminating reviews!
llvm-svn: 263921
If we import a module that has a complete array type and one that has an
incomplete array type, the declaration found by name lookup might be the one with
the incomplete type, possibly resulting in rejects-valid.
Now, the name lookup prefers decls with a complete array types. Also,
diagnose cases when the redecl chain has array bound, different from the merge
candidate.
Reviewed by Richard Smith.
llvm-svn: 262189
C++11 requires const objects to have a user-provided constructor, even for
classes without any fields. DR 253 relaxes this to say "If the implicit default
constructor initializes all subobjects, no initializer should be required."
clang is currently the only compiler that implements this C++11 rule, and e.g.
libstdc++ relies on something like DR 253 to compile in newer versions. This
change makes it possible to build code that says `const vector<int> v;' again
when using libstdc++5.2 and _GLIBCXX_DEBUG
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60284).
Fixes PR23381.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D16552
llvm-svn: 261297
diagnosing when 'concept' is specified on a function or template
specialization.
Since a concept can only be applied to a function or variable template,
the concept bit is stored in TemplateDecl as a PointerIntPair.
Reviewers: rsmith, faisalv, aaron.ballman, hubert.reinterpretcast
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13357
llvm-svn: 260074
Fix the issue discovered by fuzzing (PR23057, comment 18) by handling nullptr in Sema::ActOnCXXForRangeDecl
and correct delayed typos in for-range expression before calling Sema::ActOnCXXForRangeStmt. Also fixes PR26288.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16630
llvm-svn: 259532
Switch the evaluation from isIntegerConstantExpr to EvaluateAsInt.
EvaluateAsInt will evaluate more types of expressions than
isIntegerConstantExpr.
Move one case from -Wsign-conversion to -Wconstant-conversion. The case is:
1) Source and target types are signed
2) Source type is wider than the target type
3) The source constant value is positive
4) The conversion will store the value as negative in the target.
llvm-svn: 259271
Diagnose if the return type of a function concept or declaration type of a
variable concept is not bool.
Reviewers: hubert.reinterpretcast
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16163
llvm-svn: 259159
into IDNS_Tag in C++, because they conflict with redeclarations of tags. (This
doesn't affect elaborated-type-specifier lookup, which looks for IDNS_Type in
C++).
llvm-svn: 256985
endings, since the file is supposed to have them, according to its
comments. Also set its svn:eol-style property. Noticed by Nico Weber.
llvm-svn: 256742
Summary:
There are a number of files in the tree which have been accidentally checked in with DOS line endings. Convert these to native line endings.
There are also a few files which have DOS line endings on purpose, and I have set the svn:eol-style property to 'CRLF' on those.
Reviewers: joerg, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15849
llvm-svn: 256704
Richard Smith