Avoid reuse of operand variables, keep them local to a particular lowering - the operand collection is unique to each case anyhow.
Renamed from V to Ops to more closely match their purpose.
llvm-svn: 261078
__msan_unpoison uses intercepted memset which currently leads to a SEGV
when linking with libc++ under CentOS 7.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17263
llvm-svn: 261073
This patch detects vector reductions before instruction selection. Vector
reductions are vectorized reduction operations, and for such operations we have
freedom to reorganize the elements of the result as long as the reduction of them
stay unchanged. This will enable some reduction pattern recognition during
instruction combine such as SAD/dot-product on X86. A flag is added to
SDNodeFlags to mark those vector reduction nodes to be checked during instruction
combine.
To detect those vector reductions, we search def-use chains starting from the
given instruction, and check if all uses fall into two categories:
1. Reduction with another vector.
2. Reduction on all elements.
in which 2 is detected by recognizing the pattern that the loop vectorizer
generates to reduce all elements in the vector outside of the loop, which
includes several ShuffleVector and one ExtractElement instructions.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15250
llvm-svn: 261070
Previously, we added garbage-collected symbols to the symbol table
and filter them out when we were writing symbols to the file. In
this patch, garbage-collected symbols are filtered out from beginning.
llvm-svn: 261064
This reverts commit r261030 and r261036.
(The revision was marked "approved" on phabricator, but some concerns
were raised on the mailing list. Thanks D. Blaikie for notifying me.)
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 261055
This appears to be passing '-Wl,-order_file' to Linux link commands,
which then causes the linker to silently, behind the scenes, write the
output to 'rder_file' instead of somewhere else. Will work with Chris to
figure out the proper support for this, but so far there are numerous
people who can't get Clang to update when they build because of this.
llvm-svn: 261054
This fixes very slow compilation on
test/CodeGen/Generic/2010-11-04-BigByval.ll . Note that MaxStoresPerMemcpy
and friends are not yet carefully tuned so the cutoff point is currently
somewhat arbitrary. However, it's important that there be a cutoff point
so that we don't emit unbounded quantities of loads and stores.
llvm-svn: 261050
Summary: Use the new pipeline implemented in D17115
Reviewers: tejohnson
Subscribers: joker.eph, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17272
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 261045
reference-edge SCCs.
This essentially builds a more normal call graph as a subgraph of the
"reference graph" that was the old model. This allows both to exist and
the different use cases to use the aspect which addresses their needs.
Specifically, the pass manager and other *ordering* constrained logic
can use the reference graph to achieve conservative order of visit,
while analyses reasoning about attributes and other properties derived
from reachability can reason about the direct call graph.
Note that this isn't necessarily complete: it doesn't model edges to
declarations or indirect calls. Those can be found by scanning the
instructions of the function if desirable, and in fact every user
currently does this in order to handle things like calls to instrinsics.
If useful, we could consider caching this information in the call graph
to save the instruction scans, but currently that doesn't seem to be
important.
An important realization for why the representation chosen here works is
that the call graph is a formal subset of the reference graph and thus
both can live within the same data structure. All SCCs of the call graph
are necessarily contained within an SCC of the reference graph, etc.
The design is to build 'RefSCC's to model SCCs of the reference graph,
and then within them more literal SCCs for the call graph.
The formation of actual call edge SCCs is not done lazily, unlike
reference edge 'RefSCC's. Instead, once a reference SCC is formed, it
directly builds the call SCCs within it and stores them in a post-order
sequence. This is used to provide a consistent platform for mutation and
update of the graph. The post-order also allows for very efficient
updates in common cases by bounding the number of nodes (and thus edges)
considered.
There is considerable common code that I'm still looking for the best
way to factor out between the various DFS implementations here. So far,
my attempts have made the code harder to read and understand despite
reducing the duplication, which seems a poor tradeoff. I've not given up
on figuring out the right way to do this, but I wanted to wait until
I at least had the system working and tested to continue attempting to
factor it differently.
This also requires introducing several new algorithms in order to handle
all of the incremental update scenarios for the more complex structure
involving two edge colorings. I've tried to comment the algorithms
sufficiently to make it clear how this is expected to work, but they may
still need more extensive documentation.
I know that there are some changes which are not strictly necessarily
coupled here. The process of developing this started out with a very
focused set of changes for the new structure of the graph and
algorithms, but subsequent changes to bring the APIs and code into
consistent and understandable patterns also ended up touching on other
aspects. There was no good way to separate these out without causing
*massive* merge conflicts. Ultimately, to a large degree this is
a rewrite of most of the core algorithms in the LCG class and so I don't
think it really matters much.
Many thanks to the careful review by Sanjoy Das!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16802
llvm-svn: 261040
__chkstk clobbers EAX. If EAX is live across the prologue, then we have
to take extra steps to save it. We already had code to do this if EAX
was a register parameter. This change adapts it to work when shrink
wrapping is used.
llvm-svn: 261039
Summary: Loading IR with debug info improves MDString::get() from 19ms to 10ms.
Reviewers: dexonsmith
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16597
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 261030
Summary:
On the contrary to Full LTO, ThinLTO can afford to shift compile time
from the frontend to the linker: both phases are parallel (even if
it is not totally "free": projects like clang are reusing product
from the "compile phase" for multiple link, think about
libLLVMSupport reused for opt, llc, etc.).
This pipeline is based on the proposal in D13443 for full LTO. We
didn't move forward on this proposal because the LTO link was far too
long after that. We believe that we can afford it with ThinLTO.
The ThinLTO pipeline integrates in the regular O2/O3 flow:
- The compile phase perform the inliner with a somehow lighter
function simplification. (TODO: tune the inliner thresholds here)
This is intendend to simplify the IR and get rid of obvious things
like linkonce_odr that will be inlined.
- The link phase will run the pipeline from the start, extended with
some specific passes that leverage the augmented knowledge we have
during LTO. Especially after the inliner is done, a sequence of
globalDCE/globalOpt is performed, followed by another run of the
"function simplification" passes. It is not clear if this part
of the pipeline will stay as is, as the split model of ThinLTO
does not allow the same benefit as FullLTO without added tricks.
The measurements on the public test suite as well as on our internal
suite show an overall net improvement. The binary size for the clang
executable is reduced by 5%. We're still tuning it with the bringup
of ThinLTO and it will evolve, but this should provide a good starting
point.
Reviewers: tejohnson
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17115
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 261029
It is intended to contains the passes run over a function after the
inliner is done with a function and before it moves to its callers.
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 261028
Currently, we sometimes miscompile this vector pattern:
(c ? -v : v)
We lower it to (because "c" is <4 x i1>, lowered as a vector mask):
(~c & v) | (c & -v)
When we have SSSE3, we incorrectly lower that to PSIGN, which does:
(c < 0 ? -v : c > 0 ? v : 0)
in other words, when c is either all-ones or all-zero:
(c ? -v : 0)
While this is an old bug, it rarely triggers because the PSIGN combine
is too sensitive to operand order. This will be improved separately.
Note that the PSIGN tests are also incorrect. Consider:
%b.lobit = ashr <4 x i32> %b, <i32 31, i32 31, i32 31, i32 31>
%sub = sub nsw <4 x i32> zeroinitializer, %a
%0 = xor <4 x i32> %b.lobit, <i32 -1, i32 -1, i32 -1, i32 -1>
%1 = and <4 x i32> %a, %0
%2 = and <4 x i32> %b.lobit, %sub
%cond = or <4 x i32> %1, %2
ret <4 x i32> %cond
if %b is zero:
%b.lobit = <4 x i32> zeroinitializer
%sub = sub nsw <4 x i32> zeroinitializer, %a
%0 = <4 x i32> <i32 -1, i32 -1, i32 -1, i32 -1>
%1 = <4 x i32> %a
%2 = <4 x i32> zeroinitializer
%cond = or <4 x i32> %a, zeroinitializer
ret <4 x i32> %a
whereas we currently generate:
psignd %xmm1, %xmm0
retq
which returns 0, as %xmm1 is 0.
Instead, use a pure logic sequence, as described in:
https://graphics.stanford.edu/~seander/bithacks.html#ConditionalNegate
Fixes PR26110.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17181
llvm-svn: 261023
We're going to stop generating PSIGN, so calling a test "psign"
isn't ideal. Instead, call these tests what they really are:
variable blends using logic.
Also add a test to exhibit a case we're currently missing in
the PSIGN combine.
llvm-svn: 261022
When emitting the source filename, the encoding of the string
was checked against the name instead of the filename.
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 261019
ptxas optimizations are disabled if we need to generate debug info
as ptxas does not accept '-g' otherwise.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17111
llvm-svn: 261018
This apparently comes up when the register allocator decides that a
variable will become undef along a certain path.
Also improve the error message we emit when we can't map from LLVM
register number to CV register number.
llvm-svn: 261016
Simon Pilgrim