Syntactically means the function macro parameter names do not need to use the same
identifiers in order for the definitions to be considered identical.
Syntactic equivalence is a microsoft extension for macro redefinitions and we'll also
use this kind of comparison to check for ambiguous macros coming from modules.
rdar://13562254
llvm-svn: 178671
smarts so that it doesn't approve of keywords and/or type names when it
knows (based on its flags) that those kinds of corrections are not
wanted.
llvm-svn: 178668
For variables and functions clang used to store two storage classes. The one
"as written" in the code and a patched one, which, for example, propagates
static to the following decls.
This apparently is from the days clang lacked linkage computation. It is now
redundant and this patch removes it.
llvm-svn: 178663
This combines several related changes:
a) Don't break before after the variable types in for loops with a
single variable.
b) Better indent DeclStmts defining multiple variables.
Before:
bool aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa =
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa),
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb =
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb(bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb);
for (aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaa = aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa;
aaaaaaaaaaa != aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa; ++aaaaaaaaaaa) {
}
After:
bool aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa =
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa),
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb =
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb(bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb);
for (aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaa =
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa;
aaaaaaaaaaa != aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa; ++aaaaaaaaaaa) {
}
llvm-svn: 178641
Summary:
It turns out that we don't need to store CommentsBeforeNextToken in the
line state, but rather flush them before we start parsing preprocessor
directives. This fixes wrong comment indentation in code blocks in macro calls
(the test is included).
Reviewers: klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D617
llvm-svn: 178638
expressions are integer. It can also be ValueDecl expressions
Use the type information from the TemplateParameterList instead
Patch by Olivier Goffart!
llvm-svn: 178611
When support was added for declaration arguments, the case of variadic
declaration arguments was not supported. This patch fixes that problem by
not crashing when certain ValueDecl's are null.
Patch by Olivier Goffart!
llvm-svn: 178610
Value depenedent expressions for default arguments cannot be evaluated.
Instead, use the desugared template type to get an argument expression that
can be used. This is needed for both integer and declaration arguements.
Also, move this common code into a separate function.
Patch by Olivier Goffart!
llvm-svn: 178609
however, it doesn't do that unless we're optimizing. Change
that and haul out to a helper function. Also make this a driver
test appropriate rather than an assembly test.
llvm-svn: 178606
Doxygen treats "@command" the same as "\command" in a doc comment, so
whenever we talk about Objective-C things like "@interface" we have to
make sure to escape them.
Let's try to keep Clang -Wdocumentation-clean!
llvm-svn: 178603
- Find the correct region to represent the first array element when
constructing a CXXConstructorCall.
- If the array is trivial, model the copy with a primitive load/store.
- Don't warn about the "uninitialized" subscript in the AST -- we don't use
the helper variable that Sema provides.
<rdar://problem/13091608>
llvm-svn: 178602
a normal cleanup when entering a @try or @synchronized to
ensure that we clean that up if an exception is triggered.
Apparently GCC did this, so it's hard to argue that we shouldn't
do at least as much.
rdar://12364847
llvm-svn: 178599
This reverts commit r178497 since the backend has been fixed.
Also add a test to ensure that we're emitting template information for unions.
llvm-svn: 178587
overriding a non-deleted virtual function. The existing check for this doesn't
catch this case, because it fires before we mark the method as deleted.
llvm-svn: 178563
Summary:
This makes it possible to share code between lib/AST/MicrosoftCXXABI.cpp
and lib/CodeGen/MicrosoftCXXABI.cpp. No functionality change.
Also adds comments about the layout of the member pointer structs as I
currently understand them.
Reviewers: rjmccall
CC: timurrrr, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D590
llvm-svn: 178548
Basically we have always special-cased the top-level statement of an
unwrapped line (the one with ParenLevel == 0) and that lead to several
inconsistencies. All added tests were formatted in a strange way, for
example:
Before:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa();
if (aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa()) {
}
After:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa();
if (aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa()) {
}
llvm-svn: 178542
variable in a C99 inline (but not static-inline or extern-inline)
function definition.
The standard doesn't actually say that this doesn't apply to
"extern inline" definitions, but that seems like a useful extension,
and it at least doesn't have the obvious flaw that a static
mutable variable in an externally-available definition does.
rdar://13535367
llvm-svn: 178520
Refactor invalidateRegions to take SVals instead of Regions as input and teach RegionStore
about processing LazyCompoundVal as a top-level “escaping” value.
This addresses several false positives that get triggered by the NewDelete checker, but the
underlying issue is reproducible with other checkers as well (for example, MallocChecker).
llvm-svn: 178518
This is a heuristic to make up for the fact that the analyzer doesn't
model C++ containers very well. One example is modeling that
'std::distance(I, E) == 0' implies 'I == E'. In the future, it would be
nice to model this explicitly, but for now it just results in a lot of
false positives.
The actual heuristic checks if the base type has a member named 'begin' or
'iterator'. If so, we treat the constructors and destructors of that type
as opaque, rather than inlining them.
This is intended to drastically reduce the number of false positives
reported with experimental destructor support turned on. We can tweak the
heuristic in the future, but we'd rather err on the side of false negatives
for now.
<rdar://problem/13497258>
llvm-svn: 178516
Certain properties of a function can determine ahead of time whether or not
the function is inlineable, such as its kind, its signature, or its
location. We can cache this value in the FunctionSummaries map to avoid
rechecking these static properties for every call.
Note that the analyzer may still decide not to inline a specific call to
a function because of the particular dynamic properties of the call along
the current path.
No intended functionality change.
llvm-svn: 178515
The summaries lasted for the lifetime of the map anyway; no reason to
include an extra allocation.
Also, use SmallBitVector instead of BitVector to track the visited basic
blocks -- most functions will have less than 64 basic blocks -- and
use bitfields for the other fields to reduce the size of the structure.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 178514
This is controlled by the 'suppress-c++-stdlib' analyzer-config flag.
It is currently off by default.
This is more suppression than we'd like to do, since obviously there can
be user-caused issues within 'std', but it gives us the option to wield
a large hammer to suppress false positives the user likely can't work
around.
llvm-svn: 178513
Rafael Espindola