This reverts commit 289920 (again).
I forgot to implement a Bitcode upgrade for the case where a DIGlobalVariable
has not DIExpression. Unfortunately it is not possible to safely upgrade
these variables without adding a flag to the bitcode record indicating which
version they are.
My plan of record is to roll the planned follow-up patch that adds a
unit: field to DIGlobalVariable into this patch before recomitting.
This way we only need one Bitcode upgrade for both changes (with a
version flag in the bitcode record to safely distinguish the record
formats).
Sorry for the churn!
llvm-svn: 289982
This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.
Currently, DIGlobalVariables holds a DIExpression. This is not the
best way to model this:
(1) The DIGlobalVariable should describe the source level variable,
not how to get to its location.
(2) It makes it unsafe/hard to update the expressions when we call
replaceExpression on the DIGLobalVariable.
(3) It makes it impossible to represent a global variable that is in
more than one location (e.g., a variable with multiple
DW_OP_LLVM_fragment-s). We also moved away from attaching the
DIExpression to DILocalVariable for the same reasons.
This reapplies r289902 with additional testcase upgrades.
<rdar://problem/29250149>
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31013
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769
llvm-svn: 289920
This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.
Currently, DIGlobalVariables holds a DIExpression. This is not the
best way to model this:
(1) The DIGlobalVariable should describe the source level variable,
not how to get to its location.
(2) It makes it unsafe/hard to update the expressions when we call
replaceExpression on the DIGLobalVariable.
(3) It makes it impossible to represent a global variable that is in
more than one location (e.g., a variable with multiple
DW_OP_LLVM_fragment-s). We also moved away from attaching the
DIExpression to DILocalVariable for the same reasons.
<rdar://problem/29250149>
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31013
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769
llvm-svn: 289902
This way it will be easier to expand DIFile (e.g., to contain checksum) without the need to modify the createCompileUnit() API.
Reviewers: llvm-commits, rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27762
llvm-svn: 289702
Summary:
This never really got implemented, and was very hard to test before
a lot of the refactoring changes to make things more robust. But now we
can test it thoroughly and cleanly, especially at the CGSCC level.
The core idea is that when an inner analysis manager proxy receives the
invalidation event for the outer IR unit, it needs to walk the inner IR
units and propagate it to the inner analysis manager for each of those
units. For example, each function in the SCC needs to get an
invalidation event when the SCC gets one.
The function / module interaction is somewhat boring here. This really
becomes interesting in the face of analysis-backed IR units. This patch
effectively handles all of the CGSCC layer's needs -- both invalidating
SCC analysis and invalidating function analysis when an SCC gets
invalidated.
However, this second aspect doesn't really handle the
LoopAnalysisManager well at this point. That one will need some change
of design in order to fully integrate, because unlike the call graph,
the entire function behind a LoopAnalysis's results can vanish out from
under us, and we won't even have a cached API to access. I'd like to try
to separate solving the loop problems into a subsequent patch though in
order to keep this more focused so I've adapted them to the API and
updated the tests that immediately fail, but I've not added the level of
testing and validation at that layer that I have at the CGSCC layer.
An important aspect of this change is that the proxy for the
FunctionAnalysisManager at the SCC pass layer doesn't work like the
other proxies for an inner IR unit as it doesn't directly manage the
FunctionAnalysisManager and invalidation or clearing of it. This would
create an ever worsening problem of dual ownership of this
responsibility, split between the module-level FAM proxy and this
SCC-level FAM proxy. Instead, this patch changes the SCC-level FAM proxy
to work in terms of the module-level proxy and defer to it to handle
much of the updates. It only does SCC-specific invalidation. This will
become more important in subsequent patches that support more complex
invalidaiton scenarios.
Reviewers: jlebar
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, mcrosier, mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27197
llvm-svn: 289317
so we can stop using DW_OP_bit_piece with the wrong semantics.
The entire back story can be found here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20161114/405934.html
The gist is that in LLVM we've been misinterpreting DW_OP_bit_piece's
offset field to mean the offset into the source variable rather than
the offset into the location at the top the DWARF expression stack. In
order to be able to fix this in a subsequent patch, this patch
introduces a dedicated DW_OP_LLVM_fragment operation with the
semantics that we used to apply to DW_OP_bit_piece, which is what we
actually need while inside of LLVM. This patch is complete with a
bitcode upgrade for expressions using the old format. It does not yet
fix the DWARF backend to use DW_OP_bit_piece correctly.
Implementation note: We discussed several options for implementing
this, including reserving a dedicated field in DIExpression for the
fragment size and offset, but using an custom operator at the end of
the expression works just fine and is more efficient because we then
only pay for it when we need it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27361
rdar://problem/29335809
llvm-svn: 288683
accept an Invalidator that allows them to invalidate themselves if their
dependencies are in turn invalidated.
Rather than recording the dependency graph ahead of time when analysis
get results from other analyses, this simply lets each result trigger
the immediate invalidation of any analyses they actually depend on. They
do this in a way that has three nice properties:
1) They don't have to handle transitive dependencies because the
infrastructure will recurse for them.
2) The invalidate methods are still called only once. We just
dynamically discover the necessary topological ordering, everything
is memoized nicely.
3) The infrastructure still provides a default implementation and can
access it so that only analyses which have dependencies need to do
anything custom.
To make this work at all, the invalidation logic also has to defer the
deletion of the result objects themselves so that they can remain alive
until we have collected the complete set of results to invalidate.
A unittest is added here that has exactly the dependency pattern we are
concerned with. It hit the use-after-free described by Sean in much
detail in the long thread about analysis invalidation before this
change, and even in an intermediate form of this change where we failed
to defer the deletion of the result objects.
There is an important problem with doing dependency invalidation that
*isn't* solved here: we don't *enforce* that results correctly
invalidate all the analyses whose results they depend on.
I actually looked at what it would take to do that, and it isn't as hard
as I had thought but the complexity it introduces seems very likely to
outweigh the benefit. The technique would be to provide a base class for
an analysis result that would be populated with other results, and
automatically provide the invalidate method which immediately does the
correct thing. This approach has some nice pros IMO:
- Handles the case we care about and nothing else: only *results*
that depend on other analyses trigger extra invalidation.
- Localized to the result rather than centralized in the analysis
manager.
- Ties the storage of the reference to another result to the triggering
of the invalidation of that analysis.
- Still supports extending invalidation in customized ways.
But the down sides here are:
- Very heavy-weight meta-programming is needed to provide this base
class.
- Requires a pretty awful API for accessing the dependencies.
Ultimately, I fear it will not pull its weight. But we can re-evaluate
this at any point if we start discovering consistent problems where the
invalidation and dependencies get out of sync. It will fit as a clean
layer on top of the facilities in this patch that we can add if and when
we need it.
Note that I'm not really thrilled with the names for these APIs... The
name "Invalidator" seems ok but not great. The method name "invalidate"
also. In review some improvements were suggested, but they really need
*other* uses of these terms to be updated as well so I'm going to do
that in a follow-up commit.
I'm working on the actual fixes to various analyses that need to use
these, but I want to try to get tests for each of them so we don't
regress. And those changes are seperable and obvious so once this goes
in I should be able to roll them out throughout LLVM.
Many thanks to Sean, Justin, and others for help reviewing here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23738
llvm-svn: 288077
analyses to have a common type which is enforced rather than using
a char object and a `void *` type when used as an identifier.
This has a number of advantages. First, it at least helps some of the
confusion raised in Justin Lebar's code review of why `void *` was being
used everywhere by having a stronger type that connects to documentation
about this.
However, perhaps more importantly, it addresses a serious issue where
the alignment of these pointer-like identifiers was unknown. This made
it hard to use them in pointer-like data structures. We were already
dodging this in dangerous ways to create the "all analyses" entry. In
a subsequent patch I attempted to use these with TinyPtrVector and
things fell apart in a very bad way.
And it isn't just a compile time or type system issue. Worse than that,
the actual alignment of these pointer-like opaque identifiers wasn't
guaranteed to be a useful alignment as they were just characters.
This change introduces a type to use as the "key" object whose address
forms the opaque identifier. This both forces the objects to have proper
alignment, and provides type checking that we get it right everywhere.
It also makes the types somewhat less mysterious than `void *`.
We could go one step further and introduce a truly opaque pointer-like
type to return from the `ID()` static function rather than returning
`AnalysisKey *`, but that didn't seem to be a clear win so this is just
the initial change to get to a reliably typed and aligned object serving
is a key for all the analyses.
Thanks to Richard Smith and Justin Lebar for helping pick plausible
names and avoid making this refactoring many times. =] And thanks to
Sean for the super fast review!
While here, I've tried to move away from the "PassID" nomenclature
entirely as it wasn't really helping and is overloaded with old pass
manager constructs. Now we have IDs for analyses, and key objects whose
address can be used as IDs. Where possible and clear I've shortened this
to just "ID". In a few places I kept "AnalysisID" to make it clear what
was being identified.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27031
llvm-svn: 287783
Change type of some missed DebugInfo-related alignment variables,
that are still uint64_t, to uint32_t.
Original change introduced in r284482.
llvm-svn: 285242
- Add alignment attribute to DIVariable family
- Modify bitcode format to match new DIVariable representation
- Update tests to match these changes (also add bitcode upgrade test)
- Expect that frontend passes non-zero align value only when it is not default
(was forcibly aligned by alignas()/_Alignas()/__atribute__(aligned())
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25073
llvm-svn: 284678
In futher patches we shall have alignment field added to DIVariable family
and switching from uint64_t to uint32_t will save 4 bytes per variable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25620
llvm-svn: 284482
LLVM's RandomNumberGenerator wasn't compatible with
the random distribution from <random>.
Fixes PR25105
Patch by: Serge Guelton <serge.guelton@telecom-bretagne.eu>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25443
llvm-svn: 283854
This change teaches getEquivalentICmp to be smarter about generating
ICMP_NE and ICMP_EQ predicates.
An earlier version of this change was landed as rL283057 which had a
use-after-free bug. This new version has a fix for that bug, and a (C++
unittests/) test case that would have triggered it rL283057.
llvm-svn: 283078
They've broken the sanitizer-bootstrap bots. Reverting while I investigate.
Original commit messages:
r283057: "[ConstantRange] Make getEquivalentICmp smarter"
r283058: "[SCEV] Rely on ConstantRange instead of custom logic; NFCI"
llvm-svn: 283062
This patch reverses the edge from DIGlobalVariable to GlobalVariable.
This will allow us to more easily preserve debug info metadata when
manipulating global variables.
Fixes PR30362. A program for upgrading test cases is attached to that
bug.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20147
llvm-svn: 281284
Use ADT/BitmaskEnum for DINode::DIFlags for the following purposes:
Get rid of unsigned int for flags to avoid problems on platforms with sizeof(int) < 4
Flags are now strongly typed
Patch by: Victor Leschuk <vleschuk@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23766
llvm-svn: 280700
Use ADT/BitmaskEnum for DINode::DIFlags for the following purposes:
* Get rid of unsigned int for flags to avoid problems on platforms with sizeof(int) < 4
* Flags are now strongly typed
Patch by: Victor Leschuk <vleschuk@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23766
llvm-svn: 280686
Split out a new, low-level intrusive list type with clear semantics.
Unlike iplist (and ilist), all operations on simple_ilist are intrusive,
and simple_ilist never takes ownership of its nodes. This enables an
intuitive API that has the right defaults for intrusive lists.
- insert() takes references (not pointers!) to nodes (in iplist/ilist,
passing a reference will cause the node to be copied).
- erase() takes only iterators (like std::list), and does not destroy
the nodes.
- remove() takes only references and has the same behaviour as erase().
- clear() does not destroy the nodes.
- The destructor does not destroy the nodes.
- New API {erase,remove,clear}AndDispose() take an extra Disposer
functor for callsites that want to call some disposal routine (e.g.,
std::default_delete).
This list is not currently configurable, and has no callbacks.
The initial motivation was to fix iplist<>::sort to work correctly (even
with callbacks in ilist_traits<>). iplist<> uses simple_ilist<>::sort
directly. The new test in unittests/IR/ModuleTest.cpp crashes without
this commit.
Fixing sort() via a low-level layer provided a good opportunity to:
- Unit test the low-level functionality thoroughly.
- Modernize the API, largely inspired by other intrusive list
implementations.
Here's a sketch of a longer-term plan:
- Create BumpPtrList<>, a non-intrusive list implemented using
simple_ilist<>, and use it for the Token list in
lib/Support/YAMLParser.cpp. This will factor out the only real use of
createNode().
- Evolve the iplist<> and ilist<> APIs in the direction of
simple_ilist<>, making allocation/deallocation explicit at call sites
(similar to simple_ilist<>::eraseAndDispose()).
- Factor out remaining calls to createNode() and deleteNode() and remove
the customization from ilist_traits<>.
- Transition uses of iplist<>/ilist<> that don't need callbacks over to
simple_ilist<>.
llvm-svn: 280107
In cases where .dwo/.dwp files are guaranteed to be available, skipping
the extra online (in the .o file) inline info can save a substantial
amount of space - see the original r221306 for more details there.
llvm-svn: 279650
was done to hopefully appease MSVC.
As an upside, this also implements the suggestion Sanjoy made in code
review, so two for one! =]
I'll be watching the bots to see if there are still issues.
llvm-svn: 279295
solve completely opaque MSVC build errors. It complains about lots of
stuff with this change without givin nearly enough information to even
try to fix.
llvm-svn: 279231
to run methods, both for transform passes and analysis passes.
This also allows the analysis manager to use a different set of extra
arguments from the pass manager where useful. Consider passes over
analysis produced units of IR like SCCs of the call graph or loops.
Passes of this nature will often want to refer to the analysis result
that was used to compute their IR units (the call graph or LoopInfo).
And for transformations, they may want to communicate special update
information to the outer pass manager. With this change, it becomes
possible to have a run method for a loop pass that looks more like:
PreservedAnalyses run(Loop &L, AnalysisManager<Loop, LoopInfo> &AM,
LoopInfo &LI, LoopUpdateRecord &UR);
And to query the analysis manager like:
AM.getResult<MyLoopAnalysis>(L, LI);
This makes accessing the known-available analyses convenient and clear,
and it makes passing customized data structures around easy.
My initial use case is going to be in updating the pass manager layers
when the analysis units of IR change. But there are more use cases here
such as having a layer that lets inner passes signal whether certain
additional passes should be run because of particular simplifications
made. Two desires for this have come up in the past: triggering
additional optimization after successfully unrolling loops, and
triggering additional inlining after collapsing indirect calls to direct
calls.
Despite adding this layer of generic extensibility, the *only* change to
existing, simple usage are for places where we forward declare the
AnalysisManager template. We really shouldn't be doing this because of
the fragility exposed here, but currently it makes coping with the
legacy PM code easier.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21462
llvm-svn: 279227
This is used to mark functions with the C++11 [[ noreturn ]] or C11 _Noreturn
attributes.
Patch by Victor Leschuk!
https://reviews.llvm.org/D23167
llvm-svn: 278940
Pattern match has some paths which can operate on constant instructions,
but not all. This adds a version of m_value() to return const Value* and
changes ICmp matching to use auto so that it can match both constant and
mutable instructions.
Tests also included for both mutable and constant ICmpInst matching.
This will be used in a future commit to constify ValueTracking.cpp.
llvm-svn: 278570
This is a fix for PR28697.
An MDNode can indirectly refer to a GlobalValue, through a
ConstantAsMetadata. When the GlobalValue is deleted, the MDNode operand
is reset to `nullptr`. If the node is uniqued, this can lead to a
hard-to-detect cache invalidation in a Metadata map that's shared across
an LLVMContext.
Consider:
1. A map from Metadata* to `T` called RemappedMDs.
2. A node that references a global variable, `!{i1* @GV}`.
3. Insert `!{i1* @GV} -> SomeT` in the map.
4. Delete `@GV`, leaving behind `!{null} -> SomeT`.
Looking up the generic and uninteresting `!{null}` gives you `SomeT`,
which is likely related to `@GV`. Worse, `SomeT`'s lifetime may be tied
to the deleted `@GV`.
This occurs in practice in the shared ValueMap used since r266579 in the
IRMover. Other code that handles more than one Module (with different
lifetimes) in the same LLVMContext could hit it too.
The fix here is a partial revert of r225223: in the rare case that an
MDNode operand is a ConstantAsMetadata (i.e., wrapping a node from the
Value hierarchy), drop uniquing if it gets replaced with `nullptr`.
This changes step #4 above to leave behind `distinct !{null} -> SomeT`,
which can't be confused with the generic `!{null}`.
In theory, this can cause some churn in the LLVMContext's MDNode
uniquing map when Values are being deleted. However:
- The number of GlobalValues referenced from uniqued MDNodes is
expected to be quite small. E.g., the debug info metadata schema
only references GlobalValues from distinct nodes.
- Other Constants have the lifetime of the LLVMContext, whose teardown
is careful to drop references before deleting the constants.
As a result, I don't expect a compile time regression from this change.
llvm-svn: 277625
Because of the goop involved in the EXPECT_EQ macro, we were getting the
following warning
expression with side effects has no effect in an unevaluated context
because the "I++" was being used inside of a template type:
switch (0) case 0: default: if (const ::testing::AssertionResult gtest_ar = (::testing::internal:: EqHelper<(sizeof(::testing::internal::IsNullLiteralHelper(Args[I++])) == 1)>::Compare("Args[I++]", "&A", Args[I++], &A))) ; else ::testing::internal::AssertHelper(::testing::TestPartResult::kNonFatalFailure, "../src/unittests/IR/FunctionTest.cpp", 94, gtest_ar.failure_message()) = ::testing::Message();
llvm-svn: 275291
Summary:
This represents the adjustment applied to the implicit 'this' parameter
in the prologue of a virtual method in the MS C++ ABI. The adjustment is
always zero unless multiple inheritance is involved.
This increases the size of DISubprogram by 8 bytes, unfortunately. The
adjustment really is a signed 32-bit integer. If this size increase is
too much, we could probably win it back by splitting out a subclass with
info specific to virtual methods (virtuality, vindex, thisadjustment,
containingType).
Reviewers: aprantl, dexonsmith
Subscribers: aaboud, amccarth, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21614
llvm-svn: 274325
This change is motivated by an upcoming change to the metadata representation
used for CFI. The indirect function call checker needs type information for
external function declarations in order to correctly generate jump table
entries for such declarations. We currently associate such type information
with declarations using a global metadata node, but I plan [1] to move all
such metadata to global object attachments.
In bitcode, metadata attachments for function declarations appear in the
global metadata block. This seems reasonable to me because I expect metadata
attachments on declarations to be uncommon. In the long term I'd also expect
this to be the case for CFI, because we'd want to use some specialized bitcode
format for this metadata that could be read as part of the ThinLTO thin-link
phase, which would mean that it would not appear in the global metadata block.
To solve the lazy loaded metadata issue I was seeing with D20147, I use the
same bitcode representation for metadata attachments for global variables as I
do for function declarations. Since there's a use case for metadata attachments
in the global metadata block, we might as well use that representation for
global variables as well, at least until we have a mechanism for lazy loading
global variables.
In the assembly format, the metadata attachments appear after the "declare"
keyword in order to avoid a parsing ambiguity.
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-June/100462.html
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21052
llvm-svn: 273336
pass manager passes' `run` methods.
This removes a bunch of SFINAE goop from the pass manager and just
requires pass authors to accept `AnalysisManager<IRUnitT> &` as a dead
argument. This is a small price to pay for the simplicity of the system
as a whole, despite the noise that changing it causes at this stage.
This will also helpfull allow us to make the signature of the run
methods much more flexible for different kinds af passes to support
things like intelligently updating the pass's progression over IR units.
While this touches many, many, files, the changes are really boring.
Mostly made with the help of my trusty perl one liners.
Thanks to Sean and Hal for bouncing ideas for this with me in IRC.
llvm-svn: 272978
Summary:
Now DISubroutineType has a 'cc' field which should be a DW_CC_ enum. If
it is present and non-zero, the backend will emit it as a
DW_AT_calling_convention attribute. On the CodeView side, we translate
it to the appropriate enum for the LF_PROCEDURE record.
I added a new LLVM vendor specific enum to the list of DWARF calling
conventions. DWARF does not appear to attempt to standardize these, so I
assume it's OK to do this until we coordinate with GCC on how to emit
vectorcall convention functions.
Reviewers: dexonsmith, majnemer, aaboud, amccarth
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21114
llvm-svn: 272197
Arrange to call verify(Function &) on each function, followed by
verify(Module &), whether the verifier is being used from the pass or
from verifyModule(). As a side effect, this fixes an issue that caused
us not to call verify(Function &) on unmaterialized functions from
verifyModule().
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21042
llvm-svn: 271956
This will be necessary to allow the global merge pass to attach
multiple debug info metadata nodes to global variables once we reverse
the edge from DIGlobalVariable to GlobalVariable.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20414
llvm-svn: 271358
Since r268966 the modern Verifier pass defaults to stripping invalid debug info
in nonasserts builds. This patch ports this behavior back to the legacy
Verifier pass as well. The primary motivation is that the clang frontend
accepts bitcode files as input but is still using the legacy pass pipeline.
Background: The problem I'm trying to solve with this sequence of patches is
that historically we've done a really bad job at verifying debug info. We want
to be able to make the verifier stricter without having to worry about breaking
bitcode compatibility with existing producers. For example, we don't necessarily
want IR produced by an older version of clang to be rejected by an LTO link just
because of malformed debug info, and rather provide an option to strip it. Note
that merely outdated (but well-formed) debug info would continue to be
auto-upgraded in this scenario.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D20629
<rdar://problem/26448800>
llvm-svn: 270768
allow the transformation to strip invalid debug info.
This patch separates the Verifier into an analysis and a transformation
pass, with the transformation pass optionally stripping malformed
debug info.
The problem I'm trying to solve with this sequence of patches is that
historically we've done a really bad job at verifying debug info. We want
to be able to make the verifier stricter without having to worry about
breaking bitcode compatibility with existing producers. For example, we
don't necessarily want IR produced by an older version of clang to be
rejected by an LTO link just because of malformed debug info, and rather
provide an option to strip it. Note that merely outdated (but well-formed)
debug info would continue to be auto-upgraded in this scenario.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19988
rdar://problem/25818489
This reapplies r268937 without modifications.
llvm-svn: 268966
Adrian Prantl