This commit improves the "must have C++ linkage" error diagnostics that are
emitted for C++ declarations like templates and literal operators by adding an
additional note that points to the appropriate extern "C" linkage specifier.
rdar://19021120
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26189
llvm-svn: 285823
Changes diagnostic options, language standard options, diagnostic identifiers, diagnostic wording to use c++14 instead of c++1y. It also modifies related test cases to use the updated diagnostic wording.
llvm-svn: 215982
up an elaborated type specifier in a friend declaration, only look for type
declarations, per [basic.lookup.elab]p2. If we know that the redeclaration
lookup for a friend class template in a dependent context finds a non-template,
don't delay the diagnostic to instantiation time.
llvm-svn: 155187
the injected-class-name of a class (or class template) to the
declaration that results from substituting the given template
arguments. Previously, we would actually perform a substitution into
the injected-class-name type and then retrieve the resulting
declaration. However, in certain, rare circumstances involving
deeply-nested member templates, we would get the wrong substitution
arguments.
This new approach just matches up the declaration with a declaration
that's part of the current context (or one of its parents), which will
either be an instantiation (during template instantiation) or the
declaration itself (during the definition of the template). This is
both more efficient (we're avoiding a substitution) and more correct
(we can't get the template arguments wrong in the member-template
case).
Fixes <rdar://problem/9676205>.
Reinstated, now that we have the fix in r143967.
llvm-svn: 143968
the injected-class-name of a class (or class template) to the
declaration that results from substituting the given template
arguments. Previously, we would actually perform a substitution into
the injected-class-name type and then retrieve the resulting
declaration. However, in certain, rare circumstances involving
deeply-nested member templates, we would get the wrong substitution
arguments.
This new approach just matches up the declaration with a declaration
that's part of the current context (or one of its parents), which will
either be an instantiation (during template instantiation) or the
declaration itself (during the definition of the template). This is
both more efficient (we're avoiding a substitution) and more correct
(we can't get the template arguments wrong in the member-template
case).
Fixes <rdar://problem/9676205>.
llvm-svn: 143551
be sure to consider all of the possible lookup results. We were
assert()'ing (but behaving correctly) for unresolved values. Fixes
PR11134 / <rdar://problem/10290422>.
llvm-svn: 142652
template<typename T> struct S { } f() { return 0; }
This case now produces a missing ';' diagnostic, since that seems like a much more likely error than an attempt to declare a function or variable in addition to the class template.
Treat this
llvm-svn: 135195
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
information about types. We often print diagnostics where we say
"foo_t" is bad, but the user doesn't know how foo_t is declared
(because it is a typedef). Fix this by expanding sugar when present
in a diagnostic (and not one of a few special cases, like vectors).
Before:
t.m:5:2: error: invalid operands to binary expression ('typeof(P)' and 'typeof(F)')
MAX(P, F);
^~~~~~~~~
t.m:1:78: note: instantiated from:
#define MAX(A,B) ({ __typeof__(A) __a = (A); __typeof__(B) __b = (B); __a < __b ? __b : __a; })
^
After:
t.m:5:2: error: invalid operands to binary expression ('typeof(P)' (aka 'struct mystruct') and 'typeof(F)' (aka 'float'))
MAX(P, F);
^~~~~~~~~
t.m:1:78: note: instantiated from:
#define MAX(A,B) ({ __typeof__(A) __a = (A); __typeof__(B) __b = (B); __a < __b ? __b : __a; })
^
llvm-svn: 65081
redeclarations. For example, checks that a class template
redeclaration has the same template parameters as previous
declarations.
Detangled class-template checking from ActOnTag, whose logic was
getting rather convoluted because it tried to handle C, C++, and C++
template semantics in one shot.
Made some inroads toward eliminating extraneous "declaration does not
declare anything" errors by adding an "error" type specifier.
llvm-svn: 63973
Alex Lorenz