This changes loop unrolling to use the same mechanism for trip count
computation as indvars. This is a stronger check that tends to unroll
more loops. A very common side-effect is that many single iteration
loops will be removed sooner. The real goal was simply to remove
dependence on canonical IVs.
x86 is break even.
ARM performance changes to expect (+ is good):
External/SPEC/CFP2000/183.equake/183.equake +13%
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Dhrystone/fldry +21%
MultiSource/Applications/spiff/spiff +3%
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Puzzle -14%
The Puzzle regression is actually an improvement in loop optimization
that defeats GVN: rdar://problem/10065079.
llvm-svn: 139009
The landingpad instruction is required in the landing pad block. Because we're
not deleting terminating instructions, the invoke may still jump to here (see
Transforms/SCCP/2004-11-16-DeadInvoke.ll). Remove all uses of the landingpad
instruction, but keep it around until code-gen can remove the basic block.
llvm-svn: 138890
In theory this could be extended to other instructions, eg. division by zero, but it's likely that it will "miscompile" some code because people depend on div by zero not trapping. NULL pointer dereference usually leads to a crash so we should be on the safe side.
This shrinks the size of a Release clang by 16k on x86_64.
llvm-svn: 138618
We have to be careful when splitting the landing pad block, because the
landingpad instruction is required to remain as the first non-PHI of an invoke's
unwind edge. To retain this, we split the block into two blocks, moving the
predecessors within the loop to one block and the remaining predecessors to the
other. The landingpad instruction is cloned into the new blocks.
llvm-svn: 138015
SplitLandingPadPredecessors is similar to SplitBlockPredecessors in that it
splits the current block and attaches a set of predecessors to the new basic
block. However, it differs from SplitBlockPredecessors in that it's specifically
designed to handle landing pad blocks.
Two new basic blocks are created: one that is has the vector of predecessors as
its predecessors and one that has the remaining predecessors as its
predecessors. Those two new blocks then receive a cloned copy of the landingpad
instruction from the original block. The landingpad instructions are joined in a
PHI, etc. Like SplitBlockPredecessors, it updates the LLVM IR, AliasAnalysis,
DominatorTree, DominanceFrontier, LoopInfo, and LCCSA analyses.
llvm-svn: 138014
PRE needs the landing pads to have their critical edges split. Doing this for a
landing pad is non-trivial. Abandon the attempt to perform PRE when we come
across a landing pad. (Reviewed by Owen!)
llvm-svn: 137876
One way to exit the loop is through an unwind edge. However, that may involve
splitting the critical edge of the landing pad, which is non-trivial. Prevent
the transformation from rewriting the landing pad exit loop block.
llvm-svn: 137871
making random bad assumptions about instructions which are not explicitly listed.
Includes fix for rdar://9956541, a version of "undef ^ undef should return
0 because it's easier than arguing with users".
llvm-svn: 137777
This commit includes a mention of the landingpad instruction, but it's not
changing the behavior around it. I think the current behavior is correct,
though. Bill, can you double-check that?
llvm-svn: 137691
This builds off of the current scheme, but instead of llvm.eh.exception and
llvm.eh.selector, it uses the landingpad instruction. And instead of
llvm.eh.resume, it uses the resume instruction.
Because of the invariants in the landing pad instruction, a lot of code that's
currently needed to find the appropriate intrinsic calls for an invoke
instruction won't be needed once we go to the new EH scheme. The "FIXME"s tell
us what to remove after we switch.
llvm-svn: 137576
This implements the 'landingpad' instruction. It's used to indicate that a basic
block is a landing pad. There are several restrictions on its use (see
LangRef.html for more detail). These restrictions allow the exception handling
code to gather the information it needs in a much more sane way.
This patch has the definition, implementation, C interface, parsing, and bitcode
support in it.
llvm-svn: 137501
the retains and releases all use the same SSA pointer value.
Also, don't let CFG hazards disrupt nested retain+release pair
optimizations.
llvm-svn: 137399
SCEV unrolling can unroll loops with arbitrary induction variables. It
is a prerequisite for -disable-iv-rewrite performance. It is also
easily handles loops of arbitrary structure including multiple exits
and is generally more robust.
This is under a temporary option to avoid affecting default
behavior for the next couple of weeks. It is needed so that I can
checkin unit tests for updateUnloop.
llvm-svn: 137384
based on ScalarEvolution without changing the induction variable phis.
This utility is the main tool of IndVarSimplifyPass, but the pass also
restructures induction variables in strange ways that are sensitive to
pass ordering. This provides a way for other loop passes to simplify
new uses of induction variables created during transformation. The
utility may be used by any pass that preserves ScalarEvolution. Soon
LoopUnroll will use it.
The net effect in this checkin is to cleanup the IndVarSimplify pass
by factoring out the SimplifyIndVar algorithm into a standalone utility.
llvm-svn: 137197
These are not individual bug fixes. I had to rewrite a good chunk of
the unroller to make it sane. I think it was getting lucky on trivial
completely unrolled loops with no early exits. I included some fairly
simple unit tests for partial unrolling. I didn't do much stress
testing, so it may not be perfect, but should be usable now.
llvm-svn: 137190
The 'unwind' instruction was acting essentially as a placeholder, because it
would be replaced at the end of this function by a branch to the "unwind
handler". The 'unwind' instruction is going away, so use 'unreachable' instead,
which serves the same purpose as a placeholder.
llvm-svn: 137098
recurrence, the initial values low bits can sometimes be ignored.
To take advantage of this, added FoldIVUser to IndVarSimplify to fold
an IV operand into a udiv/lshr if the operator doesn't affect the
result.
-indvars -disable-iv-rewrite now transforms
i = phi i4
i1 = i0 + 1
idx = i1 >> (2 or more)
i4 = i + 4
into
i = phi i4
idx = i0 >> ...
i4 = i + 4
llvm-svn: 137013
Duncan Sands