This change will help Visual Studio resolve forward references to C++ lambda
routines used by captured variables.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45438
llvm-svn: 332975
Because the intrinsics in the headers are implemented as macros, we can't just use a select builtin and pternlog builtin. This would require one of the macro arguments to be used twice. Depending on what was passed to the macro we could expand an expression twice leading to weird behavior. We could maybe declare our local variable in the macro, but that would need to worry about name collisions.
To avoid that just generate IR directly in CGBuiltin.cpp.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47125
llvm-svn: 332891
I believe this is safe assuming default default FP environment. The conversion might be inexact, but it can never overflow the FP type so this shouldn't be undefined behavior for the uitofp/sitofp instructions.
We already do something similar for scalar conversions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46863
llvm-svn: 332882
If a variable has an initializer, codegen tries to build its value. If
the variable is large in size, building its value requires substantial
resources. It causes strange behavior from user viewpoint: compilation
of huge zero initialized arrays like:
char data_1[2147483648u] = { 0 };
consumes enormous amount of time and memory.
With this change codegen tries to determine if variable initializer is
equivalent to zero initializer. In this case variable value is not
constructed.
This change fixes PR18978.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46241
llvm-svn: 332847
in gcc by https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2018-04/msg00534.html.
The -mibt feature flag is being removed, and the -fcf-protection
option now also defines a CET macro and causes errors when used
on non-X86 targets, while X86 targets no longer check for -mibt
and -mshstk to determine if -fcf-protection is supported. -mshstk
is now used only to determine availability of shadow stack intrinsics.
Comes with an LLVM patch (D46882).
Patch by mike.dvoretsky
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46881
llvm-svn: 332704
The existing test for the AArch64 inline assembly constraint S uses the
A and L modifiers. These modifiers were implemented in the original
AArch64 backend but were not carried forward to the merged backend. The
A is associated with ADRP and does nothing, the L is associated with
:lo12: . Given that A and L are not supported by GCC and not supported
by the new implementation of constraint S in LLVM (see D46745) I've
altered the test to put :lo12: directly in the string so that A and L
are not needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46932
llvm-svn: 332606
As long as the destination type is a 256 or 128 bit vector with the same number of elements we can use __builtin_convertvector to directly generate trunc IR instruction which will be handled natively by the backend.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46742
llvm-svn: 332266
If we're using default rounding mode we can let __builtin_convertvector to generate an fpextend. This matches 128 and 256 bit.
If we're using the version that takes an explicit rounding mode argument we would need to look at the immediate to see if its CUR_DIRECTION.
llvm-svn: 332210
We can use direct C code for these that will use uitofp and insertelement instructions.
For the versions that take an explicit rounding mode we can't do this.
llvm-svn: 332203
These intrinsics work exactly as all other atomic_fetch_* intrinsics and allow to create *atomicrmw* with ordering.
Updated the clang-extensions document.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46386
llvm-svn: 332193
This is unnecessary for AVX512VL supporting CPUs like SKX. We can just emit a 128-bit masked load/store here no matter what. The backend will widen it to 512-bits on KNL CPUs.
Fixes the frontend portion of PR37386. Need to fix the backend to optimize the new sequences well.
llvm-svn: 331958
Previously we emitted something like
rotl(x, n) {
n &= bitwidth-1;
return n != 0 ? ((x << n) | (x >> (bitwidth - n)) : x;
}
We use a select to avoid the undefined behavior on the (bitwidth - n) shift.
The middle and backend don't really recognize this as a rotate and end up emitting a cmov or control flow because of the select.
A better pattern is (x << (n & mask)) | (x << (-n & mask)) where mask is bitwidth - 1.
Fixes the main complaint in PR37387. There's still some work to be done if the user writes that sequence directly on a short or char where type promotion rules can prevent it from being recognized. The builtin is emitting direct IR with unpromoted types so that isn't a problem for it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46656
llvm-svn: 331943
Summary:
This attribute tells clang to skip this function from stack protector
when -stack-protector option is passed.
GCC option for this is:
__attribute__((__optimize__("no-stack-protector"))) and the
equivalent clang syntax would be: __attribute__((no_stack_protector))
This is used in Linux kernel to selectively disable stack protector
in certain functions.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, rsmith, rnk, probinson
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: probinson, srhines, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46300
llvm-svn: 331925
It broke the Chromium build (see reply on the review).
> Generate DILabel metadata and call llvm.dbg.label after label
> statement to associate the metadata with the label.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45045
>
> Patch by Hsiangkai Wang.
This doesn't revert the change to backend-unsupported-error.ll
that seems to correspond to an llvm-side change.
llvm-svn: 331861
Summary:
An _Atomic of an empty struct is pretty silly. In general we just widen empty
structs to hold a byte's worth of storage, and we represent size and alignment
as 0 internally and let LLVM figure out what to do. For _Atomic it's a bit
different: the memory model mandates concrete effects occur when atomic
operations occur, so in most cases actual instructions need to get emitted. It's
really not worth trying to optimize empty struct atomics by figuring out e.g.
that a fence would do, even though sane compilers should do optimize atomics.
Further, wg21.link/p0528 will fix C++20 atomics with padding bits so that
cmpxchg on them works, which means that we'll likely need to do the zero-init
song and dance for empty atomic structs anyways (and I think we shouldn't
special-case this behavior to C++20 because prior standards are just broken).
This patch therefore makes a minor change to r176658 "Promote atomic type sizes
up to a power of two": if the width of the atomic's value type is 0, just use 1
byte for width and leave alignment as-is (since it should never be zero, and
over-aligned zero-width structs are weird but fine).
This fixes an assertion:
(NumBits >= MIN_INT_BITS && "bitwidth too small"), function get, file ../lib/IR/Type.cpp, line 241.
It seems like this has run into other assertions before (namely the unreachable
Kind check in ImpCastExprToType), but I haven't reproduced that issue with
tip-of-tree.
<rdar://problem/39678063>
Reviewers: arphaman, rjmccall
Subscribers: aheejin, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46613
llvm-svn: 331845
Generate DILabel metadata and call llvm.dbg.label after label
statement to associate the metadata with the label.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45045
Patch by Hsiangkai Wang.
llvm-svn: 331843
The error turns out to be:
Assertion failed: (Target.isCompatibleDataLayout(getDataLayout()) && "Can't create a MachineFunction using a Module with a " "Target-incompatible DataLayout attached\n"), function init, file /Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/clang-stage1-cmake-RA-incremental/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineFunction.cpp, line 180.
Add -target to address this. Also re-enable the test I had temporarily
commented, and move it further down in case there is still a failure
(since it pipes stderr to FileCheck).
llvm-svn: 331597
Summary:
Passes down the necessary code ge options to the LTO Config to enable
-fdiagnostics-show-hotness and -fsave-optimization-record in the ThinLTO
backend for a distributed build.
Also, remove warning about not having PGO when the input is IR.
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46464
llvm-svn: 331592
instrumentation codegeneration strategy of using a data structure and
a loop. Required some finesse to get the critical things being tested to
surface in a nice way for FileCheck but I think this preserves the
original intent of the test.
llvm-svn: 331411
Both sides of this #if #include the same file. Drop the #if, leaving only the #include.
Patch by Matt Glazar.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45779
llvm-svn: 331305
Teach AsmParser to check with Assembler for when evaluating constant
expressions. This improves the handing of preprocessor expressions
that must be resolved at parse time. This idiom can be found as
assembling-time assertion checks in source-level assemblers. Note that
this relies on the MCStreamer to keep sufficient tabs on Section /
Fragment information which the MCAsmStreamer does not. As a result the
textual output may fail where the equivalent object generation would
pass. This can most easily be resolved by folding the MCAsmStreamer
and MCObjectStreamer together which is planned for in a separate
patch.
Currently, this feature is only enabled for assembly input, keeping IR
compilation consistent between assembly and object generation.
Reviewers: echristo, rnk, probinson, espindola, peter.smith
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Subscribers: eraman, peter.smith, arichardson, jyknight, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45164
llvm-svn: 331218
As suggested in the post-commit thread for rL331056, we should match these
clang options with the established vocabulary of the corresponding sanitizer
option. Also, the use of 'strict' is well-known for these kinds of knobs,
and we can improve the descriptive text in the docs.
So this intends to match the logic of D46135 but only change the words.
Matching LLVM commit to match this spelling of the attribute to follow shortly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46236
llvm-svn: 331209
As discussed in the post-commit thread for:
rL330437 ( http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20180423/545906.html )
We need a way to opt-out of a float-to-int-to-float cast optimization because too much
existing code relies on the platform-specific undefined result of those casts when the
float-to-int overflows.
The LLVM changes associated with adding this function attribute are here:
rL330947
rL330950
rL330951
Also as suggested, I changed the LLVM doc to mention the specific sanitizer flag that
catches this problem:
rL330958
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46135
llvm-svn: 331041
The ACLE spec which describes these intrinsics hasn't been published yet, but
this is based on the final draft which will be published soon, and these have
already been implemented by GCC.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46109
llvm-svn: 331039
On AVX512F targets we'll produce an emulated sequence using 3 pmuludqs with shifts and adds. On AVX512DQ we'll use vpmulld.
Fixes PR37140.
llvm-svn: 330923
Passing the features in random order will lead to unpredictable results
when some of the features are related (like the architecture-version
features on ARM).
It might be possible to fix this particular case in the ARM target code,
to avoid adding overlapping target features. But we should probably be
sorting in any case: the behavior shouldn't depend on StringMap's
hashing algorithm.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46030
llvm-svn: 330861
The unmasked versions already didn't have this restrction. I don't think gcc or icc limit these to 64-bit mode so we shouldn't either.
llvm-svn: 330681
If an atomic variable is misaligned (and that suspicion is why Clang emits
libcalls at all) the runtime support library will have to use a lock to safely
access it, with potentially very bad performance consequences. There's a very
good chance this is unintentional so it makes sense to issue a warning.
Also give it a named group so people can promote it to an error, or disable it
if they really don't care.
llvm-svn: 330566
Sanjay Patel