Before:
template <bool B, bool C>
class A {
static_assert(B &&C, "Something is wrong");
};
After:
template <bool B, bool C>
class A {
static_assert(B && C, "Something is wrong");
};
(Note the spacing around '&&'). Also change the identifier table to always
understand all C++11 keywords (which seems like the right thing to do).
llvm-svn: 187589
With this patch, clang-format can be configured to:
* not indent in namespace at all (former behavior).
* indent in namespace as in other blocks.
* indent only in inner namespaces (as required by WebKit style).
Also fix alignment of access specifiers in WebKit style.
Patch started by Marek Kurdej. Thank you!
llvm-svn: 187540
New options:
* Break before the commas of constructor initializers and align
the commas with the colon.
* Break before binary operators
Additionally, for styles without column limit, don't just accept
linebreaks done by the user, but instead remove 'invalid' (according
to the current style) linebreaks and add 'required' ones.
llvm-svn: 187210
This is far from implementing all the rules given by
http://www.webkit.org/coding/coding-style.html
The important new feature is the support for styles that don't have a
column limit. For such styles, clang-format will (at the moment) simply
respect the input's formatting decisions within statements.
llvm-svn: 187033
The AlwaysBreakBeforeMultilineStrings rule does not really make sense
if it does not a column gain.
Before (in Google style):
f(
"aaaa"
"bbbb");
After:
f("aaaa"
"bbbb");
llvm-svn: 186515
Motivating example:
// column limit ------------------->
void ffffffffffff(int aaaaaa /* test */);
Formatting before the patch:
void ffffffffffff(int aaaaaa /* test
*/);
Formatting after the patch:
void
ffffffffffff(int aaaaaa /* test */);
llvm-svn: 186471
Summary:
These can appear when comments contain command lines with quoted line
breaks. As the text (including escaped newlines and '//' from consecutive lines)
is a single line comment, we used to break it even when it didn't exceed column
limit. This is a temporary solution, in the future we may want to support this
case completely - at least adjust leading whitespace when changing indentation
of the first line.
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
CC: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1146
llvm-svn: 186456
The fundamental concept is:
Format as if the braced init list was a function call (with parentheses
replaced by braces). If there is no name/type before the opening brace
(e.g. if the braced list is nested), assume a zero-length identifier
just before the opening brace.
This behavior is gated on a new style flag, which for now replaces the
SpacesInBracedLists style flag. Activate this style flag for Google
style to reflect recent style guide changes.
llvm-svn: 186433
This fixes an incorrect detection that led to a formatting error.
Before:
some_var = function (*some_pointer_var)[0];
After:
some_var = function(*some_pointer_var)[0];
llvm-svn: 186402
Fixed a test that by now passed for the wrong reason.
Before:
llvm::outs() << "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa: " << aaaaaaaaaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa);
After:
llvm::outs() << "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa: "
<< aaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa);
Also reformatted Format.cpp with the latest changes (1 formatting fix
and 1 layout change of a <<-chain).
llvm-svn: 186322
Before this patch, it did not cooperate with
Style::AlwaysBreakBeforeMultilineStrings. Thus, it would turn
aaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaa, "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa");
into:
aaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaa, "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa "
"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa");
and only a second format step would lead to the desired (with that
option):
aaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaa,
"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa "
"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa");
This could even lead to clang-format breaking the string at a different
character and thus leading to a completely different end result.
llvm-svn: 186154
clang-format used to treat array subscript expressions much like
function call (just replacing () with []). However, this is not really
appropriate especially for expressions with multiple subscripts.
Although it might seem counter-intuitive, the most consistent solution
seems to be to always (if necessary) break before a square bracket,
never after it. Also, multiple subscripts of the same expression should
be aligned if they are on subsequent lines.
Before:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa[aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa][
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb] = c;
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa[
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa][
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb] = ccccccccccc;
After:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa[aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa]
[bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb] = c;
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
[aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa]
[bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb] = ccccccccccc;
llvm-svn: 186153
Before:
int i; // indented 2 space more than clang-format would use.
SomeReturnType // clang-format invoked on this line.
SomeFunctionMakingLBraceEndInColumn80() {
} // This is the indent clang-format would prefer.
After:
int i; // indented 2 space more than clang-format would use.
SomeReturnType // clang-format invoked on this line.
SomeFunctionMakingLBraceEndInColumn80() {
}
llvm-svn: 186120
(if they are not function-like).
Before:
SomeFunction(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa)
OVERRIDE;
After:
SomeFunction(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa) OVERRIDE;
llvm-svn: 186117
This puts a slight penalty on the linebreak before the first "<<", so
that clang-format generally tries to keep things on the first line.
User feedback has shown that this is generally desirable.
Before:
llvm::outs()
<< "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa =" << aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa;
After:
llvm::outs() << "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ="
<< aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa;
llvm-svn: 186115
Trailing return types can only occur in declaration contexts.
Before:
void f() { auto a = b -> c(); }
After:
void f() { auto a = b->c(); }
llvm-svn: 186087
This is not activated for any style, might change or go away
completely.
For those that want to play around with it, set
ExperimentalAutoDetectBinPacking to true.
clang-format will then:
Look at whether function calls/declarations/definitions are currently
formatted with one parameter per line (on a case-by-case basis). If so,
clang-format will avoid bin-packing the parameters. If all parameters
are on one line (thus that line is "inconclusive"), clang-format will
make the choice dependent on whether there are other bin-packed
calls/declarations in the same file.
The reason for this change is that bin-packing in some situations can be
really bad and an author might opt to put one parameter on each line. If
the author does that, he might want clang-format not to mess with that.
If the author is unhappy with the one-per-line formatting, clang-format
can easily be convinced to bin-pack by putting any two parameters on the
same line.
llvm-svn: 186003
This fixes llvm.org/PR15170.
For now, the basic formatting rules are (based on the C++11 standard):
* Surround the "->" with spaces.
* Break before "->".
Also fix typo.
llvm-svn: 185938
Basically treat a function with a trailing call similar to a function
with multiple parameters.
Before:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa))
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa();
After:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa))
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa();
Also fix typo.
llvm-svn: 185930
Before:
someFunction(OtherParam, BracedList{
// comment 1 (Forcing intersting break)
param1, param2,
// comment 2
param3, param4
});
After:
someFunction(OtherParam, BracedList{
// comment 1 (Forcing intersting break)
param1, param2,
// comment 2
param3, param4
});
To do so, the UnwrappedLineParser now stores the information about the
kind of brace in the FormatToken.
llvm-svn: 185914
This adds a penalty for clang-format for each break that occurs in
a set of parentheses (including fake parenthesis that determine
the range of certain operator precendences) that have not yet been
broken. Thereby, clang-format prefers similar line breaks.
This fixes llvm.org/PR15506.
Before:
const int kTrackingOptions =
NSTrackingMouseMoved | NSTrackingMouseEnteredAndExited |
NSTrackingActiveAlways;
After:
const int kTrackingOptions = NSTrackingMouseMoved |
NSTrackingMouseEnteredAndExited |
NSTrackingActiveAlways;
Also removed ParenState::ForFakeParenthesis which has become unused.
llvm-svn: 185822
Summary:
Fixes problems that lead to incorrect formatting of these and similar snippets:
/*
**
*/
/*
**/
/*
* */
/*
*test
*/
Clang-format used to think that all the cases above use "* " decoration, and
failed to calculate insertion position properly. It also used to remove leading
"* " in the last line.
Reviewers: klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1113
llvm-svn: 185818
This is a better implementation of r183097. The main purpose is to
prevent certain constructs to be formatted "like a block of text".
Before:
aaaaaaaaaaaaa<
aaaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa>* aaaa = new aaaaaaaaaaaaa<
aaaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa>(bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb);
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa[
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb] = (*cccccccccccccccc)[
dddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd];
After:
aaaaaaaaaaaaa<aaaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa>* aaaa =
new aaaaaaaaaaaaa<aaaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa>(
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb);
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa[
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb] =
(*cccccccccccccccc)[
dddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd];
llvm-svn: 185687
Additionally, allow breaking after c-style casts, but with a high
penalty.
Before:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa *foo = (
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa *)bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb;
After:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa *foo = (aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa *)
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb;
This fixes llvm.org/PR16049.
llvm-svn: 185685
Summary:
Always breaking before multiline strings can help format complex
expressions containing multiline strings more consistently, and avoid consuming
too much horizontal space.
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
CC: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1097
llvm-svn: 185622
In general, clang-format breaks after an operator if the LHS spans
multiple lines. Otherwise, this can lead to confusing effects and
effectively hide the operator precendence, e.g. in
if (aaaaaaaaaaaaaa ==
bbbbbbbbbbbbbb && c) { ...
This patch removes this rule for comparisons, if the LHS is not a binary
expression itself as many users were wondering why clang-format inserts
an unnecessary linebreak.
Before:
if (aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa) >
5) { ...
After:
if (aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa) > 5) { ...
In the long run, we might:
- Want to do this for other binary expressions as well.
- Do this only if the RHS is short or even only if it is a literal.
llvm-svn: 185530
This lead to weird formatting.
Before:
DoSomethingWithVector({ {} /* No data */ }, {
{ 1, 2 }
});
After:
DoSomethingWithVector({ {} /* No data */ }, { { 1, 2 } });
llvm-svn: 185346
Summary:
Add penalty when an excessively long line in a block comment can not be
broken on a leading whitespace. Lack of this addition can lead to severe column
width violations when they can be easily avoided.
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
CC: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1071
llvm-svn: 185337
This is not all bad, but people are often surprised by it.
Before:
namespace {
int SomeVariable = 0; // comment
} // namespace
After:
namespace {
int SomeVariable = 0; // comment
} // namespace
llvm-svn: 185327
Daniel Jasper