The int instruction takes as an operand an 8-bit immediate value. Validate that
the input is valid rather than silently truncating the value.
llvm-svn: 225941
On X86, the Intel asm parser tries to match all memory operand sizes when
none is explicitly specified. For LEA, which doesn't really have a memory
operand (just a pointer one), this results in multiple successful matches,
one for each memory size. There's no error because it's same opcode, so
really, it's just one match. However, the tablegen'd matcher function
adds opcode/operands to the passed MCInst, and this results in multiple
duplicated operands.
This commit clears the MCInst in the tablegen'd matcher function.
We sometimes clear it when the match failed, so there's no expectation of
keeping the previous content anyway.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6670
llvm-svn: 224347
Fix a compact unwind encoding logic bug which would try to encode
more callee saved registers than it should, leading to early bail out
in the encoding logic and abusive use of DWARF frame mode unnecessarily.
Also remove no-compact-unwind.ll which was testing the wrong thing
based on this bug and move it to valid 'compact unwind' tests. Added
other few more tests too.
llvm-svn: 223676
The X86AsmParser intel handling was refactored in r216481, making it
try each different memory operand size to see which one matches.
Operand sizes larger than 80 ("[xyz]mmword ptr") were forgotten, which
led to an "invalid operand" error for code such as:
movdqa [rax], xmm0
llvm-svn: 223187
This reverts commit r222760.
It changed our behaviour on PIC so we don't match gas anymore. It also
included lots of unnecessary changes to tests.
If those changes are desirable, there should be an independent discussion
as they are out of scope for that patch.
I will recommit the other bits.
llvm-svn: 222896
and PIC:
Allow FDE references outside the +/-2GB range supported by PC relative
offsets for code models other than small/medium. For JIT application,
memory layout is less controlled and can result in truncations
otherwise.
Patch from Akos Kiss.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6079
llvm-svn: 222760
We were producing a relocation for
----------------
.section foo,bar
La:
Lb:
.long La-Lb
--------------
but not for
---------------------
.section foo,bar
zed:
La:
Lb:
.long La-Lb
----------------
This patch handles the case where both fragments are part of the first atom
in a section and there is no corresponding symbol to that atom.
This fixes pr21328.
llvm-svn: 221304
This is asm/diasm-only support, similar to AVX.
For ISeling the register variant, they are no different from 213 other than
whether the multiplication or the addition operand is destructed.
For ISeling the memory variant, i.e. to fold a load, they are no different
than the 132 variant. The addition operand (op3) in both cases can come from
memory. Again the ony difference is which operand is destructed.
There could be a post-RA pass that would convert a 213 or 132 into a 231.
Part of <rdar://problem/17082571>
llvm-svn: 220540
Summary:
Currently when emitting a label, a new data fragment is created for it if the
current fragment isn't a data fragment.
This change instead enqueues the label and attaches it to the next fragment
(e.g. created for the next instruction) if possible.
When bundle alignment is not enabled, this has no functionality change (it
just results in fewer extra fragments being created). For bundle alignment,
previously labels would point to the beginning of the bundle padding instead
of the beginning of the emitted instruction. This was not only less efficient
(e.g. jumping to the nops instead of past them) but also led to miscalculation
of the address of the GOT (since MC uses a label difference rather than
emitting a "." symbol).
Fixes https://code.google.com/p/nativeclient/issues/detail?id=3982
Test Plan: regression test attached
Reviewers: jvoung, eliben
Subscribers: jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5915
llvm-svn: 220439
In AVX512f we support 64x2 and 32x8 inserts via matching them to 32x4 and 64x4
respectively. These are matched by "Alt" Pat<>'s (Alt stands for alternative
VTs).
Since DQ has native support for these intructions, I peeled off the non-"Alt"
part of the baseclass into vinsert_for_size_no_alt. The DQ instructions are
derived from this multiclass. The "Alt" Pat<>'s are disabled with DQ.
Fixes <rdar://problem/18426089>
llvm-svn: 219874
Summary:
Currently an error is thrown if bundle alignment mode is set more than once
per module (either via the API or the .bundle_align_mode directive). This
change allows setting it multiple times as long as the alignment doesn't
change.
Also nested bundle_lock groups are currently not allowed. This change allows
them, with the effect that the group stays open until all nests are exited,
and if any of the bundle_lock directives has the align_to_end flag, the
group becomes align_to_end.
These changes make the bundle aligment simpler to use in the compiler, and
also better match the corresponding support in GNU as.
Reviewers: jvoung, eliben
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5801
llvm-svn: 219811
These derive from the new asm-only masking definitions.
Unfortunately I wasn't able to find a ISel pattern that we could legally
generate for the masking variants. The problem is that since the destination
is v4* we would need VK4 register classes and v4i1 value types to express the
masking. These are however not legal types/classes in AVX512f but only in VL,
so things get complicated pretty quickly. We can revisit this question later
if we have a more pressing need to express something like this.
So the ISel patterns are empty for the masking instructions and the next patch
will add Pat<>s instead to match the intrinsics calls with instructions.
llvm-svn: 219361
Nico Rieck added support for this 32-bit COFF relocation some time ago
for Win64 stuff. It appears that as an oversight, the assembly output
used "foo"@IMGREL32 instead of "foo"@IMGREL, which is what we can parse.
Sadly, there were actually tests that took in IMGREL and put out
IMGREL32, and we didn't notice the inconsistency. Oh well. Now LLVM can
assemble it's own output with slightly more fidelity.
llvm-svn: 218437
parsing (and latent bug in the instruction definitions).
This is effectively a revert of r136287 which tried to address
a specific and narrow case of immediate operands failing to be accepted
by x86 instructions with a pretty heavy hammer: it introduced a new kind
of operand that behaved differently. All of that is removed with this
commit, but the test cases are both preserved and enhanced.
The core problem that r136287 and this commit are trying to handle is
that gas accepts both of the following instructions:
insertps $192, %xmm0, %xmm1
insertps $-64, %xmm0, %xmm1
These will encode to the same byte sequence, with the immediate
occupying an 8-bit entry. The first form was fixed by r136287 but that
broke the prior handling of the second form! =[ Ironically, we would
still emit the second form in some cases and then be unable to
re-assemble the output.
The reason why the first instruction failed to be handled is because
prior to r136287 the operands ere marked 'i32i8imm' which forces them to
be sign-extenable. Clearly, that won't work for 192 in a single byte.
However, making thim zero-extended or "unsigned" doesn't really address
the core issue either because it breaks negative immediates. The correct
fix is to make these operands 'i8imm' reflecting that they can be either
signed or unsigned but must be 8-bit immediates. This patch backs out
r136287 and then changes those places as well as some others to use
'i8imm' rather than one of the extended variants.
Naturally, this broke something else. The custom DAG nodes had to be
updated to have a much more accurate type constraint of an i8 node, and
a bunch of Pat immediates needed to be specified as i8 values.
The fallout didn't end there though. We also then ceased to be able to
match the instruction-specific intrinsics to the instructions so
modified. Digging, this is because they too used i32 rather than i8 in
their signature. So I've also switched those intrinsics to i8 arguments
in line with the instructions.
In order to make the intrinsic adjustments of course, I also had to add
auto upgrading for the intrinsics.
I suspect that the intrinsic argument types may have led everything down
this rabbit hole. Pretty happy with the result.
llvm-svn: 217310
Instructions like 'fxsave' and control flow instructions like 'jne'
match any operand size. The loop I added to the Intel syntax matcher
assumed that using a different size would give a different instruction.
Now it handles the case where we get the same instruction for different
memory operand sizes.
This also allows us to remove the hack we had for unsized absolute
memory operands, because we can successfully match things like 'jnz'
without reporting ambiguity. Removing this hack uncovered test case
involving 'fadd' that was ambiguous. The memory operand could have been
single or double precision.
llvm-svn: 216604
The existing matcher has lots of AT&T assembly dialect assumptions baked
into it. In particular, the hack for resolving the size of a memory
operand by appending the four most common suffixes doesn't work at all.
The Intel assembly dialect mnemonic table has ambiguous entries, so we
need to try matching multiple times with different operand sizes, since
that's the only way to choose different instruction variants.
This makes us more compatible with gas's implementation of Intel
assembly syntax. MSVC assumes you want byte-sized operations for the
instructions that we reject as ambiguous.
Reviewed By: grosbach
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4747
llvm-svn: 216481
Added avx512_movnt_vl multiclass for handling 256/128-bit forms of instruction.
Added encoding and lowering tests.
Reviewed by Elena Demikhovsky <elena.demikhovsky@intel.com>
llvm-svn: 215536
Fixes PR18916. I don't think we need to implement support for either
hybrid syntax. Nobody should write Intel assembly with '%' prefixes on
their registers or AT&T assembly without them.
llvm-svn: 215031
This is similar to what I did with the two-source permutation recently. (It's
almost too similar so that we should consider generating the masking variants
with some tablegen help.)
Both encoding and intrinsic tests are added as well. For the latter, this is
what the IR that the intrinsic test on the clang side generates.
Part of <rdar://problem/17688758>
llvm-svn: 214890
This allows assembling the two new instructions, encls and enclu for the
SKX processor model.
Note the diffs are a bigger than what might think, but to fit the new
MRM_CF and MRM_D7 in things in the right places things had to be
renumbered and shuffled down causing a bit more diffs.
rdar://16228228
llvm-svn: 214460
Craig Topper