Much to my surprise, '-disable-llvm-optzns' which I thought was the
magical flag I wanted to get at the raw LLVM IR coming out of Clang
deosn't do that. It still runs some passes over the IR. I don't want
that, I really want the *raw* IR coming out of Clang and I strongly
suspect everyone else using it is in the same camp.
There is actually a flag that does what I want that I didn't know about
called '-disable-llvm-passes'. I suspect many others don't know about it
either. It both does what I want and is much simpler.
This removes the confusing version and makes that spelling of the flag
an alias for '-disable-llvm-passes'. I've also moved everything in Clang
to use the 'passes' spelling as it seems both more accurate (*all* LLVM
passes are disabled, not just optimizations) and much easier to remember
and spell correctly.
This is part of simplifying how Clang drives LLVM to make it cleaner to
wire up to the new pass manager.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28047
llvm-svn: 290392
This makes the C++ ABI depend entirely on the target: MS ABI for -win32 triples,
Itanium otherwise. It's no longer possible to do weird combinations.
To be able to run a test with a specific ABI without constraining it to a
specific triple, new substitutions are added to lit: %itanium_abi_triple and
%ms_abi_triple can be used to get the current target triple adjusted to the
desired ABI. For example, if the test suite is running with the i686-pc-win32
target, %itanium_abi_triple will expand to i686-pc-mingw32.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2545
llvm-svn: 199250
Summary:
MSVC destroys arguments in the callee from left to right. Because C++
objects have to be destroyed in the reverse order of construction, Clang
has to construct arguments from right to left and destroy arguments from
left to right.
This patch fixes the ordering by reversing the order of evaluation of
all call arguments under the MS C++ ABI.
Fixes PR18035.
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2275
llvm-svn: 196402
Summary:
RTTI is not yet implemented for the Microsoft C++ ABI and isn't expected
soon. We could easily add the mangling, but the error is what prevents
us from silently miscompiling code that expects RTTI.
Instead, add a new mangleTypeName entry point that simply forwards to
mangleName or mangleType to produce a string that isn't part of the ABI.
Itanium can continue to use RTTI names to avoid unecessary test
breakage.
This also seems like the right design. The fact that TBAA names happen
to be RTTI names is now an implementation detail of the mangler, rather
than part of TBAA.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2153
llvm-svn: 195168
Danil Malyshev