GCC destroys temporary objects more aggressively than clang, so this
results in incorrect behavior when compiling GCC Release builds.
We could avoid this issue under C++11 by preventing getAs from being
called when 'this' is an rvalue:
template<class ElemTy> const ElemTy *getAs() const & { ... }
template<class ElemTy> const ElemTy *getAs() const && = delete;
Unfortunately, we do not have compatibility macros for this behavior yet.
This will hopefully fix PR13760 and PR13762.
llvm-svn: 163402
While the check itself should count 0-based for the parameter index,
the diagnostic should be 1-based (first, second, third, not start at 0).
Fixes <rdar://problem/12249569>.
llvm-svn: 163375
(as this previously was the case before this was refactored). We also shouldn't
need to specially handle BinaryOperators since the eagerly-assume heuristic tags
such nodes.
llvm-svn: 163374
implicit pointer-to-boolean conversions in condition expressions. This would
result in inconsistent diagnostic emission between C and C++.
A consequence of this is now ConditionBRVisitor and TrackConstraintBRVisitor may
emit redundant diagnostics, for example:
"Assuming pointer value is null" (TrackConstraintBRVisitor)
"Assuming 'p' is null" (ConditionBRVisitor)
We need to reconcile the two, and perhaps prefer one over the other in some
cases.
llvm-svn: 163372
With some particularly evil casts, we can get an object whose dynamic type
is not actually a subclass of its static type. In this case, we won't even
find the statically-resolved method as a devirtualization candidate.
Rather than assert that this situation cannot occur, we now simply check
that the dynamic type is not an ancestor or descendent of the static type,
and leave it at that.
This error actually occurred analyzing LLVM: CallEventManager uses a
BumpPtrAllocator to allocate a concrete subclass of CallEvent
(FunctionCall), but then casts it to the actual subclass requested
(such as ObjCMethodCall) to perform the constructor.
Yet another crash in PR13763.
llvm-svn: 163367
A bizarre series of coincidences led us to generate a previously-seen
node in the middle of processing an Objective-C message, where we assume
the receiver is non-nil. We were assuming that such an assumption would
never "cache out" like this, and blithely went on using a null ExplodedNode
as the predecessor for the next step in evaluation.
Although the test case committed here is complicated, this could in theory
happen in other ways as well, so the correct fix is just to test if the
non-nil assumption results in an ExplodedNode we've seen before.
<rdar://problem/12243648>
llvm-svn: 163361
are used in EH code. Right now the CFG doesn't support exceptions well,
so we need this hack to avoid bogus dead store warnings.
Fixes <rdar://problem/12147586>
llvm-svn: 163353
CXXDestructorCall now has a flag for when it is a base destructor call.
Other kinds of destructor calls (locals, fields, temporaries, and 'delete')
all behave as "whole-object" destructors and do not behave differently
from one another (specifically, in these cases we /should/ try to
devirtualize a call to a virtual destructor).
This was causing crashes in both our internal buildbot, the crash still
being tracked in PR13765, and some of the crashes being tracked in PR13763,
due to a assertion failure. (The behavior under -Asserts happened to be
correct anyway.)
Adding this knowledge also allows our DynamicTypePropagation checker to do
a bit less work; the special rules about virtual method calls during a
destructor only require extra handling during base destructors.
llvm-svn: 163348
While destructors will continue to not be inlined (unless the analyzer
config option 'c++-inlining' is set to 'destructors'), leaving them out
of the CFG is an incomplete model of the behavior of an object, and
can cause false positive warnings (like PR13751, now working).
Destructors for temporaries are still not on by default, since
(a) we haven't actually checked this code to be sure it's fully correct
(in particular, we probably need to be very careful with regard to
lifetime-extension when a temporary is bound to a reference,
C++11 [class.temporary]p5), and
(b) ExprEngine doesn't actually do anything when it sees a temporary
destructor in the CFG -- not even invalidate the object region.
To enable temporary destructors, set the 'cfg-temporary-dtors' analyzer
config option to '1'. The old -cfg-add-implicit-dtors cc1 option, which
controlled all implicit destructors, has been removed.
llvm-svn: 163264
If a region is binded to a symbolic value, we should track the symbol.
(The code I changed was not previously exercised by the regression
tests.)
llvm-svn: 163261
The problem is that the value of 'this' in a C++ member function call
should always be a region (or NULL). However, if the object is an rvalue,
it has no associated region (only a conjured symbol or LazyCompoundVal).
For now, we handle this in two ways:
1) Actually respect MaterializeTemporaryExpr. Before, it was relying on
CXXConstructExpr to create temporary regions for all struct values.
Now it just does the right thing: if the value is not in a temporary
region, create one.
2) Have CallEvent recognize the case where its 'this' pointer is a
non-region, and just return UnknownVal to keep from confusing clients.
The long-term problem is being tracked internally in <rdar://problem/12137950>,
but this makes many test cases pass.
llvm-svn: 163220
This turned out to have many implications, but what eventually seemed to
make it unworkable was the fact that we can get struct values (as
LazyCompoundVals) from other places besides return-by-value function calls;
that is, we weren't actually able to "treat all struct values as regions"
consistently across the entire analyzer core.
Hopefully we'll be able to come up with an alternate solution soon.
This reverts r163066 / 02df4f0aef142f00d4637cd851e54da2a123ca8e.
llvm-svn: 163218
SimpleSValBuilder processes a couple trivial identities, including 'x - x'
and 'x ^ x' (both 0). However, the former could appear with arguments of
floating-point type, and we weren't checking for that. This started
triggering an assert with r163069, which checks that a constant value is
actually going to be used as an integer or pointer.
llvm-svn: 163159
All clients of BasicValueFactory should be using QualTypes instead, and
indeed it seems they are. This caught the (fortunately harmless) bug
fixed in the previous commit.
No intended functionality change.
llvm-svn: 163069
The current logic would actually create a float- or double-sized signed
integer value of 1, which is not at all the same.
No test because the value would be swallowed by an Unknown as soon as it
gets added or subtracted to the original value, but it enables the cleanup
in the next patch.
llvm-svn: 163068
Any future exceptions need to go INSIDE the test that checks if the
IdentifierInfo is non-null!
No functionality change. Thanks for the review, Ted.
llvm-svn: 163067
This allows us to correctly symbolicate the fields of structs returned by
value, as well as get the proper 'this' value for when methods are called
on structs returned by value.
This does require a moderately ugly hack in the StoreManager: if we assign
a "struct value" to a struct region, that now appears as a Loc value being
bound to a region of struct type. We handle this by simply "dereferencing"
the struct value region, which should create a LazyCompoundVal.
This should fix recent crashes analyzing LLVM and on our internal buildbot.
<rdar://problem/12137950>
llvm-svn: 163066
Previously, we preferred to get a result type by looking at the callee's
declared result type. This allowed us to handlereferences, which are
represented in the AST as lvalues of their pointee type. (That is, a call
to a function returning 'int &' has type 'int' and value kind 'lvalue'.)
However, this results in us preferring the original type of a function
over a casted type. This is a problem when a function pointer is casted
to another type, because the conjured result value will have the wrong
type. AdjustedReturnValueChecker is supposed to handle this, but still
doesn't handle the case where there is no "original function" at all,
i.e. where the callee is unknown.
Now, we instead look at the call expression's value kind (lvalue, xvalue,
or prvalue), and adjust the expr's type accordingly. This will have no
effect when the function is inlined, and will conjure the value that will
actually be used when it is not.
This makes AdjustedReturnValueChecker /nearly/ unnecessary; unfortunately,
the cases where it would still be useful are where we need to cast the
result of an inlined function or a checker-evaluated function, and in these
cases we don't know what we're casting /from/ by the time we can do post-
call checks. In light of that, remove AdjustedReturnValueChecker, which
was already not checking quite a few calls.
llvm-svn: 163065
This is similar to how we divide up the StaticAnalyzer libraries to separate
core functionality to what is clearly associated with Frontend actions.
llvm-svn: 163050
Fixes a hard-to-reach crash when calling a non-member overloaded operator
with arguments that may be callbacks.
Future-proofing: don't make the same assumption in MallocSizeofChecker.
Aside from possibly respecting attributes in the future, it might be
possible to call 'malloc' through a function pointer.
I audited all other uses of FunctionDecl::getIdentifier() in the analyzer;
they all now correctly test to see if the identifier is present before
using it.
llvm-svn: 163012
More generally, this adds a new configuration option 'c++-inlining', which
controls which C++ member functions can be considered for inlining. This
uses the new -analyzer-config table, so the cc1 arguments will look like this:
... -analyzer-config c++-inlining=[none|methods|constructors|destructors]
Note that each mode implies that all the previous member function kinds
will be inlined as well; it doesn't make sense to inline destructors
without inlining constructors, for example.
The default mode is 'methods'.
llvm-svn: 163004
PathDiagnostics are actually profiled and uniqued independently of the
path on which the bug occurred. This is used to merge diagnostics that
refer to the same issue along different paths, as well as by the plist
diagnostics to reference files created by the HTML diagnostics.
However, there are two problems with the current implementation:
1) The bug description is included in the profile, but some
PathDiagnosticConsumers prefer abbreviated descriptions and some
prefer verbose descriptions. Fixed by including both descriptions in
the PathDiagnostic objects and always using the verbose one in the profile.
2) The "minimal" path generation scheme provides extra information about
which events came from macros that the "extensive" scheme does not.
This resulted not only in different locations for the plist and HTML
diagnostics, but also in diagnostics being uniqued in the plist output
but not in the HTML output. Fixed by storing the "end path" location
explicitly in the PathDiagnostic object, rather than trying to find the
last piece of the path when the diagnostic is requested.
This should hopefully finish unsticking our internal buildbot.
llvm-svn: 162965
Basically, do the correct thing to fix the XML generation error, rather
than making it even worse by unilaterally dereferencing a null pointer.
llvm-svn: 162964
(__builtin_* etc.) so that it isn't possible to take their address.
Specifically, introduce a new type to represent a reference to a builtin
function, and a new cast kind to convert it to a function pointer in the
operand of a call. Fixes PR13195.
llvm-svn: 162962
reanalyzed.
The policy on what to reanalyze should be in AnalysisConsumer with the
rest of visitation order logic.
There is no reason why ExprEngine needs to pass the Visited set to
CoreEngine, it can populate it itself.
llvm-svn: 162957
If the current path diagnostic does /not/ have files associated with it, we
were simply skipping on to the next diagnostic with 'continue'. But that
also skipped the close tag for the diagnostic's <dict> node.
Part of fixing our internal analyzer buildbot.
llvm-svn: 162939
inlined function.
This resolves retain count checker false positives that are caused by
inlining ObjC and other methods. Essentially, if we are passing an
object to a method with "delegate" in the selector or a function pointer
as another argument, we should stop tracking the other parameters/return
value as far as the retain count checker is concerned.
llvm-svn: 162876
This heuristic addresses the case when a pointer (or ref) is passed
to a function, which initializes the variable (or sets it to something
other than '0'). On the branch where the inlined function does not
set the value, we report use of undefined value (or NULL pointer
dereference). The access happens in the caller and the path
through the callee would get pruned away with regular path pruning. To
solve this issue, we previously disabled diagnostic pruning completely
on undefined and null pointer dereference checks, which entailed very
verbose diagnostics in most cases. Furthermore, not all of the
undef value checks had the diagnostic pruning disabled.
This patch implements the following heuristic: if we pass a pointer (or
ref) to the region (on which the error is reported) into a function and
it's value is either undef or 'NULL' (and is a pointer), do not prune
the function.
llvm-svn: 162863
a comma separated collection of key:value pairs (which are strings). This
allows a general way to provide analyzer configuration data from the command line.
No clients yet.
llvm-svn: 162827
In C++, objects being returned on the stack are actually copy-constructed into
the return value. That means that when a temporary is returned, it still has
to be destroyed, i.e. the returned expression will be wrapped in an
ExprWithCleanups node. Our "returning stack memory" checker needs to look
through this node to see if we really are returning an object by value.
PR13722
llvm-svn: 162817
Specifically, CallEventManager::getCaller was looking at the call site for
an inlined call and trying to see what kind of call it was, but it only
checked for CXXConstructExprClass. (It's not using an isa<> here to avoid
doing three more checks on the the statement class.)
This caused an unreachable when we actually did inline the constructor of a
temporary object.
PR13717
llvm-svn: 162792
When exiting a function, the analyzer looks for the last statement in the
function to see if it's a return statement (and thus bind the return value).
However, the search for "the last statement" was accepting statements that
were in implicitly-generated inlined functions (i.e. destructors). So we'd
go and get the statement from the destructor, and then say "oh look, this
function had no explicit return...guess there's no return value". And /that/
led to the value being returned being declared dead, and all our leak
checkers complaining.
llvm-svn: 162791
No test case since this is a debug option that we will never turn on by
default since it makes the leak checkers much less useful. (We'll only report
leaks at the end of analysis if -analyzer-purge=none.)
llvm-svn: 162772
This helper function (in the clang::ento::bugreporter namespace) may add more
than one visitor, but conceptually it's tracking a single use of a null or
undefined value and should do so as best it can.
Also, the BugReport parameter has been made a reference to underscore that
it is non-optional.
llvm-svn: 162720
As Anna pointed out to me offline, it's a little silly to walk backwards through
the graph to find the store site when BugReporter will do the exact same walk
as part of path diagnostic generation.
llvm-svn: 162719
Previously, if we were tracking stores to a variable 'x', and came across this:
x = foo();
...we would simply emit a note here and stop. Now, we'll step into 'foo' and
continue tracking the returned value from there.
<rdar://problem/12114689>
llvm-svn: 162718
The two callers are using this in order to be conservative, so let's just
clarify the information that's actually being provided here. This is not
related to inlining decisions in any way.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 162717
Because the CXXNewExpr appears after the CXXConstructExpr in the CFG, we don't
actually have the correct region to construct into at the time we decide
whether or not to inline. The long-term fix (discussed in PR12014) might be to
introduce a new CFG node (CFGAllocator) that appears before the constructor.
Tracking the short-term fix in <rdar://problem/12180598>.
llvm-svn: 162689
This allows us to better reason about status objects, like Clang's own
llvm::Optional (when its contents are trivially destructible), which are
often intended to be passed around by value.
We still don't inline constructors for temporaries in the general case.
<rdar://problem/11986434>
llvm-svn: 162681
This allows checkers (like the MallocChecker) to process the effects of the
bind. Previously, using a memory-allocating function (like strdup()) in an
initializer would result in a leak warning.
This does bend the expectations of checkBind a bit; since there is no
assignment expression, the statement being used is the initializer value.
In most cases this shouldn't matter because we'll use a PostInitializer
program point (rather than PostStmt) for any checker-generated nodes, though
we /will/ generate a PostStore node referencing the internal statement.
(In theory this could have funny effects if someone actually does an
assignment within an initializer; in practice, that seems like it would be
very rare.)
<rdar://problem/12171711>
llvm-svn: 162637
generated for a given diagnostic to another. Because PathDiagnostics
are specific to a give PathDiagnosticConsumer, store in
a FoldingSet a unique hash for a PathDiagnostic (that will be the same
for the same bug for different PathDiagnosticConsumers) that
stores a list of files generated. This can then be read by the
other PathDiagnosticConsumers.
This fixes breakage in the PLIST-HTML output.
llvm-svn: 162580
More generally, any time we try to track where a null value came from, we
should show if it came from a function. This usually isn't necessary if
the value is symbolic, but if the value is just a constant we previously
just ignored its origin entirely. Now, we'll step into the function and
recursively add a visitor to the returned expression.
<rdar://problem/12114609>
llvm-svn: 162563
This code has been added a while ago and removing it does not trigger
any test failures. The false positives it was trying to suppress are
probably handled by other logic (ex: special handling of delegates).
llvm-svn: 162529
With inlining, retain count checker starts tracking 'self' through the
init methods. The analyser results were too noisy if the developer
did not follow 'self = [super init]' pattern (which is common
especially in older code bases) - we reported self init anti-pattern AND
possible use-after-free. This patch teaches the retain count
checker to assume that [super init] does not fail when it's not consumed
by another expression. This silences the retain count warning that warns
about possibility of use-after-free when init fails, while preserving
all the other checking on 'self'.
llvm-svn: 162508
Until we have full support for pointers-to-members, we can at least
approximate some of their use by tracking null and non-null values.
We thus treat &A::m_ptr as a non-null void * symbol, and MemberPointer(0)
as a pointer-sized null constant.
This enables support for what is sometimes called the "safe bool" idiom,
demonstrated in the test case.
llvm-svn: 162495
This is trivial; the UserDefinedConversion always wraps a CXXMemberCallExpr
for the appropriate conversion function, so it's just a matter of
propagating that value to the CastExpr itself.
llvm-svn: 162494
A CXXDefaultArgExpr wraps an Expr owned by a ParmVarDecl belonging to the
called function. In general, ExprEngine and Environment ought to treat this
like a ParenExpr or other transparent wrapper expression, with the inside
expression evaluated first.
However, if we call the same function twice, we'd produce a CFG that contains
the same wrapped expression twice, and we're not set up to handle that. I've
added a FIXME to the CFG builder to come back to that, but meanwhile we can
at least handle expressions that don't need to be explicitly evaluated:
literals. This probably handles many common uses of default parameters:
true/false, null, etc.
Part of PR13385 / <rdar://problem/12156507>
llvm-svn: 162453
The checker adds assumptions that the return values from the known APIs
are non-nil. Teach the checker about NSArray/NSMutableArray/NSOrderedSet
objectAtIndex, objectAtIndexedSubscript.
llvm-svn: 162398
As part of this change, I discovered that a few of our tests were not testing
the RangeConstraintManager. Luckily all of those passed when I moved them
over to use that constraint manager.
llvm-svn: 162384
Also rename 'getCurrentBlockCounter()' to 'blockCount()'.
This ripples a bunch of code simplifications; mostly aesthetic,
but makes the code a bit tighter.
llvm-svn: 162349
No need to have the "get", the word "conjure" is a verb too!
Getting a conjured symbol is the same as conjuring one up.
This shortening is largely cosmetic, but just this simple changed
cleaned up a handful of lines, making them less verbose.
llvm-svn: 162348
Under -analyzer-ipa=basic-inlining, only C functions, blocks, and C++ static
member functions are inlined -- essentially, the calls that behave like simple
C function calls. This is essentially the behavior in Xcode 4.4.
C++ support still has some rough edges, and we don't want users to be worried
about them if they download and run their own checker. (In particular, the
massive number of false positives for analyzing LLVM comes from inlining
defensively-written code in contexts where more aggressive assumptions are
implicitly made. This problem is not unique to C++, but it is exacerbated by
the higher proportion of code that lives in header files in C++.)
The eventual goal is to be comfortable enough with C++ support (and simple
Objective-C support) to advance to -analyzer-ipa=inlining as the default
behavior. See the IPA design notes for more details.
llvm-svn: 162318
This reduces duplication across the Basic and Range constraint managers, and
keeps their internals free of dealing with the semantics of C++. It's still
a little unfortunate that the constraint manager is dealing with this at all,
but this is pretty much the only place to put it so that it will apply to all
symbolic values, even when embedded in larger expressions.
llvm-svn: 162313
By doing this in the constraint managers, we can ensure that ANY reference
whose value we don't know gets the effect, even if it's not a top-level
parameter.
llvm-svn: 162246
Generating a sink is significantly different behavior from generating a
normal node, and a simple boolean parameter can be rather opaque. Per
offline discussion with Anna, adding new generation methods is the
clearest way to communicate intent.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 162215
Forgetting to at least cast the result was giving us Loc/NonLoc problems
in SValBuilder (hitting an assertion). But the standard (both C and C++)
does actually guarantee that && and || will result in the actual values
1 and 0, typed as 'int' in C and 'bool' in C++, and we can easily model that.
PR13461
llvm-svn: 162209
Our current handling of 'throw' is all CFG-based: it jumps to a 'catch' block
if there is one and the function exit block if not. But this doesn't really
get the right behavior when a function is inlined: execution will continue on
the caller's side, which is always the wrong thing to do.
Even within a single function, 'throw' completely skips any destructors that
are to be run. This is essentially the same problem as @finally -- a CFGBlock
that can have multiple entry points, whose exit points depend on whether it
was entered normally or exceptionally.
Representing 'throw' as a sink matches our current (non-)handling of @throw.
It's not a perfect solution, but it's better than continuing analysis in an
inconsistent or even impossible state.
<rdar://problem/12113713>
llvm-svn: 162157
The CFG approximates @throw as a return statement, but that's not good
enough in inlined functions. Moreover, since Objective-C exceptions are
usually considered fatal, we should be suppressing leak warnings like we
do for calls to noreturn functions (like abort()).
The comments indicate that we were probably intending to do this all along;
it may have been inadvertantly changed during a refactor at one point.
llvm-svn: 162156
Anna Zaks