so get rid of eh.selector.i64 and rename eh.selector.i32 to eh.selector.
Likewise for eh.typeid.for. This aligns us with gcc, which always uses a
32 bit value for the selector on all platforms. My understanding is that
the register allocator used to assert if the selector intrinsic size didn't
match the pointer size, and this was the reason for introducing the two
variants. However my testing shows that this is no longer the case (I
fixed some bugs in selector lowering yesterday, and some more today in the
fastisel path; these might have caused the original problems).
llvm-svn: 84106
While recording beginning of a function, use scope info from the first location entry instead of just relying on first location entry itself.
llvm-svn: 83684
from floating-point to integer first, and bitcast the result
back to floating-point. Previously, this test was passing by
falling back to SelectionDAG lowering. The resulting code isn't
as nice, but it's correct and CodeGen now stays on the fast path.
llvm-svn: 81171
This involves temporarily hard wiring some parts to use the global context. This isn't ideal, but it's
the only way I could figure out to make this process vaguely incremental.
llvm-svn: 75445
integer and floating-point opcodes, introducing
FAdd, FSub, and FMul.
For now, the AsmParser, BitcodeReader, and IRBuilder all preserve
backwards compatability, and the Core LLVM APIs preserve backwards
compatibility for IR producers. Most front-ends won't need to change
immediately.
This implements the first step of the plan outlined here:
http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/IntegerOverflow.txt
llvm-svn: 72897
code in preparation for code generation. The main thing it does
is handle the case when eh.exception calls (and, in a future
patch, eh.selector calls) are far away from landing pads. Right
now in practice you only find eh.exception calls close to landing
pads: either in a landing pad (the common case) or in a landing
pad successor, due to loop passes shifting them about. However
future exception handling improvements will result in calls far
from landing pads:
(1) Inlining of rewinds. Consider the following case:
In function @f:
...
invoke @g to label %normal unwind label %unwinds
...
unwinds:
%ex = call i8* @llvm.eh.exception()
...
In function @g:
...
invoke @something to label %continue unwind label %handler
...
handler:
%ex = call i8* @llvm.eh.exception()
... perform cleanups ...
"rethrow exception"
Now inline @g into @f. Currently this is turned into:
In function @f:
...
invoke @something to label %continue unwind label %handler
...
handler:
%ex = call i8* @llvm.eh.exception()
... perform cleanups ...
invoke "rethrow exception" to label %normal unwind label %unwinds
unwinds:
%ex = call i8* @llvm.eh.exception()
...
However we would like to simplify invoke of "rethrow exception" into
a branch to the %unwinds label. Then %unwinds is no longer a landing
pad, and the eh.exception call there is then far away from any landing
pads.
(2) Using the unwind instruction for cleanups.
It would be nice to have codegen handle the following case:
invoke @something to label %continue unwind label %run_cleanups
...
handler:
... perform cleanups ...
unwind
This requires turning "unwind" into a library call, which
necessarily takes a pointer to the exception as an argument
(this patch also does this unwind lowering). But that means
you are using eh.exception again far from a landing pad.
(3) Bugpoint simplifications. When bugpoint is simplifying
exception handling code it often generates eh.exception calls
far from a landing pad, which then causes codegen to assert.
Bugpoint then latches on to this assertion and loses sight
of the original problem.
Note that it is currently rare for this pass to actually do
anything. And in fact it normally shouldn't do anything at
all given the code coming out of llvm-gcc! But it does fire
a few times in the testsuite. As far as I can see this is
almost always due to the LoopStrengthReduce codegen pass
introducing pointless loop preheader blocks which are landing
pads and only contain a branch to another block. This other
block contains an eh.exception call. So probably by tweaking
LoopStrengthReduce a bit this can be avoided.
llvm-svn: 72276
checking for bcopy... no
checking for getc_unlocked... Assertion failed: (0 && "Unknown SCEV kind!"), function operator(), file /Volumes/Sandbox/Buildbot/llvm/full-llvm/build/llvmCore.roots/llvmCore~obj/src/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp, line 511.
/Volumes/Sandbox/Buildbot/llvm/full-llvm/build/llvmgcc42.roots/llvmgcc42~obj/src/libdecnumber/decUtility.c:360: internal compiler error: Abort trap
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL:http://developer.apple.com/bugreporter> for instructions.
make[4]: *** [decUtility.o] Error 1
make[4]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
Assertion failed: (0 && "Unknown SCEV kind!"), function operator(), file /Volumes/Sandbox/Buildbot/llvm/full-llvm/build/llvmCore.roots/llvmCore~obj/src/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp, line 511.
/Volumes/Sandbox/Buildbot/llvm/full-llvm/build/llvmgcc42.roots/llvmgcc42~obj/src/libdecnumber/decNumber.c:5591: internal compiler error: Abort trap
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL:http://developer.apple.com/bugreporter> for instructions.
make[4]: *** [decNumber.o] Error 1
make[3]: *** [all-stage2-libdecnumber] Error 2
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
llvm-svn: 71165
-Replace DebugLocTuple's Source ID with CompileUnit's GlobalVariable*
-Remove DwarfWriter::getOrCreateSourceID
-Make necessary changes for the above (fix callsites, etc.)
llvm-svn: 70520
Massive check in. This changes the "-fast" flag to "-O#" in llc. If you want to
use the old behavior, the flag is -O0. This change allows for finer-grained
control over which optimizations are run at different -O levels.
Most of this work was pretty mechanical. The majority of the fixes came from
verifying that a "fast" variable wasn't used anymore. The JIT still uses a
"Fast" flag. I'll change the JIT with a follow-up patch.
llvm-svn: 70343
use the old behavior, the flag is -O0. This change allows for finer-grained
control over which optimizations are run at different -O levels.
Most of this work was pretty mechanical. The majority of the fixes came from
verifying that a "fast" variable wasn't used anymore. The JIT still uses a
"Fast" flag. I'm not 100% sure if it's necessary to change it there...
llvm-svn: 70270
Insetad of doing ...
if (inlined_subroutine && known_location)
DW_TAG_inline_subroutine
else
DW_TAG_subprogram
do
if (inlined_subroutine) {
if (known_location)
DW_TAG_inline_subroutine
} else {
DW_TAG_subprogram
}
llvm-svn: 69300
Devang Patel