This is just the basic groundwork for supporting DW_TAG_imported_module but I
wanted to commit this before pushing support further into Clang or LLVM so that
this rather churny change is isolated from the rest of the work. The major
churn here is obviously adding another field (within the common DIScope prefix)
to all DIScopes (files, classes, namespaces, lexical scopes, etc). This should
be the last big churny change needed for DW_TAG_imported_module/using directive
support/PR14606.
llvm-svn: 178099
This is the first step to making all DIScopes have a common metadata prefix (so
that things (using directives, for example) that can appear in any scope can be
added to that common prefix). DIFile is itself a DIScope so the common prefix
of all DIScopes cannot be a DIFile - instead it's the raw filename/directory
name pair.
llvm-svn: 177239
This is the next step towards making the metadata for DIScopes have a common
prefix rather than having to delegate based on their tag type.
llvm-svn: 176913
These cases were found by further work to remove support for debug info
versioning. Common cleanups (other than changing the version info in the tag
field) included adding the last parameter to compile_units (recently added for
fission support) and other cases of trailing fields in lexical blocks, compile
units, and subprograms.
llvm-svn: 176834
Mostly this is just changing the named metadata (llvm.dbg.sp, llvm.dbg.gv,
llvm.dbg.<func>.lv, etc -> llvm.dbg.cu), adding a few fields to older records
(DIVariable: flags/inlined-at, DICompileUnit: sp/gv/types,
DISubprogram: local variables list)
The tests to update were discovered by a change I'm working on to remove debug
info version support - so any tests using old debug info versions I haven't
updated probably are bad tests or just not actually designed to test debug
info.
llvm-svn: 176671
The count attribute is more accurate with regards to the size of an array. It
also obviates the upper bound attribute in the subrange. We can also better
handle an unbound array by setting the count to -1 instead of the lower bound to
1 and upper bound to 0.
llvm-svn: 169312
The count field is necessary because there isn't a difference between the 'lo'
and 'hi' attributes for a one-element array and a zero-element array. When the
count is '0', we know that this is a zero-element array. When it's >=1, then
it's a normal constant sized array. When it's -1, then the array is unbounded.
llvm-svn: 169218
If lower bound is more then upper bound then consider it is an unbounded array.
An array is unbounded if non-zero lower bound is same as upper bound.
If lower bound and upper bound are zero than array has one element.
llvm-svn: 129156
David Blaikie