Previously, there were two different scripts for generating VCS headers:
one used by LLVM and one used by Clang. They were both similar, but
different. They were both broken in their own ways, for example the one
used by Clang didn't properly handle monorepo resulting in an incorrect
version information reported by Clang.
This change unifies two the scripts by introducing a new script that's
used from both LLVM and Clang, ensures that the new script supports both
monorepo and standalone SVN and Git setups, and removes the old scripts.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57063
llvm-svn: 352729
Currently SCEV attempts to limit transformations so that they do not work with
big SCEVs (that may take almost infinite compile time). But for this, it uses heuristics
such as recursion depth and number of operands, which do not give us a guarantee
that we don't actually have big SCEVs. This situation is still possible, though it is not
likely to happen. However, the bug PR33494 showed a bunch of simple corner case
tests where we still produce huge SCEVs, even not reaching big recursion depth etc.
This patch introduces a concept of 'huge' SCEVs. A SCEV is huge if its expression
size (intoduced in D35989) exceeds some threshold value. We prohibit optimizing
transformations if any of SCEVs we are dealing with is huge. This gives us a reliable
check that we don't spend too much time working with them.
As the next step, we can possibly get rid of old limiting mechanisms, such as recursion
depth thresholds.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35990
Reviewed By: reames
llvm-svn: 352728
Rather than guessing whether to use static or shared version of
unwinder and c++abi when using linking against the in-tree versions,
provide a CMake option to control this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57492
llvm-svn: 352723
This change reverts r351626.
The changes in r351626 cause quadratic work in several cases. (See r351626 thread on llvm-commits for details.)
llvm-svn: 352722
Support for -fsanitize-coverage=trace-pc[-guard] was removed from
libFuzzer, which makes this currently fail.
This commit aligns this Darwin-specific test with its Linux counterpart
which changed in this commit:
3a94519a77
llvm-svn: 352721
Also fix an alignment bug getMachineMemOperand. If the
tracked value is null, the offset isn't tracked so the
base alignment needs to be reduced.
llvm-svn: 352716
Summary:
Set default `ASAN_OPTIONS` when running libFuzzer tests. This allows us
to remove special casing in code for Darwin where we usually pass
`abort_on_error=0` to override platform defaults for tests.
A previous commit changed the code to make the tests pass:
7764a04af0
Adapted a few tests to use `%env_asan_opts=` instead of directly setting
the environment variable.
rdar://problem/47515276
Reviewers: kcc, george.karpenkov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57465
llvm-svn: 352711
One considers it integer division, the other doesn't.
Move to `//` (floor division) so that this test passes
independently from the version.
llvm-svn: 352706
LLVMConfig.with_environment() uses os.path.normcase(os.path.normpath(x)) to
normalize temporary env vars. LLVMConfig.use_clang() uses with_environment() to
temporarily set PATH and then look for clang there. This means that on Windows,
clang will be run with a path like c:\foo\bin\clang.EXE (with a lower-case
"C:").
lit.util.which() used to not do this, which means the executables added in
clang/test/lit.cfg.py (e.g. c-index-test) were run with a path like
C:\foo\bin\c-index-test.EXE (because both CMake and GN happen to write
clang_tools_dir with an upper-case C to lit.site.cfg.py).
clang/test/Index/pch-from-libclang.c requires that both c-index-test and clang
use _exactly_ the same resource dir path (same case and everything), because a
hash of the resource directory is used as module cache path.
This patch is necessary but not sufficient to make pch-from-libclang.c pass on
Windows.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57343
llvm-svn: 352704
Summary:
Fixes PR40267, in which the removed assertion was triggering on
perfectly valid IR. As far as I can tell, constant out of bounds
indices should be allowed when splitting extract_vector_elt, since
they will simply be propagated as out of bounds indices in the
resulting split vector and handled appropriately elsewhere.
Reviewers: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57471
llvm-svn: 352702
These can be triggered by mistakenly using a 64-bit mode only intrinsics with a -mtriple=i686. Using report_fatal_error gives a better experience for this mistake in release builds instead of probably crashing.
We already do this for some of the vector type legalization handles.
llvm-svn: 352699
I believe this was there to handle avx512bw intrinsics that returned i64 type in 32-bit mode. But all those intrinsics have since been changed to v64i1 results or replaced with generic IR.
llvm-svn: 352698
Summary:
We planned to delete this intrinsic and do custom lowering from
`wasm.get.exception`, which has a token argument, to
`EXTRACT_EXCEPTION`, a wasm pseudo instruction that simulates popping a
value from the wasm stack.
To do that, we need to introduce a new `WebAssemblyISD` node for this,
which itself is not a problem, but also have to introduce the
`WebAssemblyISD` namespace in SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp. I don't think any
other targets are doing that in the file. And also putting a
target-specific intrinsic in the common file is a little weird too. (All
other intrinsic functions in this `visitIntrinsicCall` functions are not
target-specific ones. Other target-specific intrinsics are usually
handled in `lib/Target/[TargetName]/[TargetName]ISelLowering.cpp`. The
reason we can't do this is it has a token argument.
Anyway, so I think I prefer the current code with one redundant
intrinsic more than adding one more `WebAssemblyISD` node and
also introducing the `WebAssemblyISD` namespace into
SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp. What do you think?
Reviewers: dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, sunfish, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57480
llvm-svn: 352695
ELF sections allow 0 for the alignment, which is specified to
be the same as 1. However many clients do not expect this and
will behave poorly in the presence of a 0-aligned section (for
example by trying to modulo something by the section alignment).
We can be more polite by making sure that we always pass a
non-zero value to clients.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57482
llvm-svn: 352694
This teaches the legalizer to handle G_FEXP in AArch64. As a result, it also
allows us to select G_FEXP.
It...
- Updates the legalizer-info tests
- Adds a test for legalizing exp
- Updates the existing fp tests to show that we can now select G_FEXP
https://reviews.llvm.org/D57483
llvm-svn: 352692
Summary:
UBSan wants to detect when unreachable code is actually reached, so it
adds instrumentation before every unreachable instruction. However, the
optimizer will remove code after calls to functions marked with
noreturn. To avoid this UBSan removes noreturn from both the call
instruction as well as from the function itself. Unfortunately, ASan
relies on this annotation to unpoison the stack by inserting calls to
_asan_handle_no_return before noreturn functions. This is important for
functions that do not return but access the the stack memory, e.g.,
unwinder functions *like* longjmp (longjmp itself is actually
"double-proofed" via its interceptor). The result is that when ASan and
UBSan are combined, the noreturn attributes are missing and ASan cannot
unpoison the stack, so it has false positives when stack unwinding is
used.
Changes:
Clang-CodeGen now directly insert calls to `__asan_handle_no_return`
when a call to a noreturn function is encountered and both
UBsan-unreachable and ASan are enabled. This allows UBSan to continue
removing the noreturn attribute from functions without any changes to
the ASan pass.
Previously generated code:
```
call void @longjmp
call void @__asan_handle_no_return
call void @__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable
```
Generated code (for now):
```
call void @__asan_handle_no_return
call void @longjmp
call void @__asan_handle_no_return
call void @__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable
```
rdar://problem/40723397
Reviewers: delcypher, eugenis, vsk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57278
llvm-svn: 352690
When linking library dependencies, we shouldn't need to export linked
libraries to dependents. We should be explicit about this in
target_link_libraries, otherwise other targets that depend on these such
as sanitizers get repeated (and possibly even conflicting) dependencies.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57456
llvm-svn: 352688
objc_alloc and objc_allocWithZone may throw exceptions if the
underlying method does. If we're in a @try block, then make sure we
emit an invoke instead of a call.
rdar://47610407
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57476
llvm-svn: 352687
This adds instruction selection support for G_FABS in AArch64. It also updates
the existing basic FP tests, adds a selection test for G_FABS.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D57418
llvm-svn: 352684
Summary:
After the staack is unwound due to a thrown exxception,
`__stack_pointer` global can point to an invalid address. So
a `global.set` to restore `__stack_pointer` should be inserted right
after `catch` instruction.
But after r352598 the `global.set` instruction is inserted not right
after `catch` but after `block` - `br-on-exn` - `end_block` -
`extract_exception` sequence. This CL fixes it.
While doing that, we can actually move ReplacePhysRegs pass after
LateEHPrepare and merge EHRestoreStackPointer pass into LateEHPrepare,
and now placing `global.set` to `__stack_pointer` right after `catch` is
much easier. Otherwise it is hard to guarantee that `global.set` is
still right after `catch` and not touched with other transformations, in
which case we have to do something to hoist it.
Reviewers: dschuff
Subscribers: mgorny, sbc100, jgravelle-google, sunfish, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57421
llvm-svn: 352681
This extends the existing transform for:
add X, 0/1 --> sub X, 0/-1
...to allow the sibling subtraction fold.
This pattern could regress with the proposed change in D57401.
llvm-svn: 352680
Summary:
When we are creating a ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl in ParseTypeFromDWARF(...) we are not handling the case where variadic pack is empty in the specialization. This patch handles that case and adds a test to prevent future regressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57363
llvm-svn: 352677
Dmitry Venikov