Summary:
Implicit functions are outside the control of source authors and should
be exempt from style restrictions.
Tested via running clang tools tests.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57207
llvm-svn: 352968
Summary:
The check `bugprone-exception-escape` does an AST-based analysis to determine
if a function might throw an exception and warns based on that information.
The analysis part is refactored into a standalone class similiar to
`ExprMutAnalyzer` that is generally useful.
I intent to use that class in a new check to automatically introduce `noexcept`
if possible.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh, hokein, baloghadamsoftware, lebedev.ri
Reviewed By: baloghadamsoftware, lebedev.ri
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, mgorny, xazax.hun, rnkovacs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57100
llvm-svn: 352741
Summary:
The `Acronyms` and `IncludeDefaultAcronyms` options were deprecated in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D51832. These options can be removed.
Tested by running the clang-tidy tests.
Reviewers: benhamilton, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56945
llvm-svn: 351921
The readability-else-after-return check should be smarter about cases where the
variable defined in the condition is used in the `else` branch. This patch makes
it just ignore such cases, but alternative solutions may be better (added a
FIXME).
llvm-svn: 351751
Summary: See rC351531 for the introduction of getStripPluginsAdjuster.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56902
llvm-svn: 351738
Otherwise we don't warn on a struct containing a single public int, but
we warn on a struct containing a single public std::string, which is
inconsistent.
llvm-svn: 351686
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
a stray single '\r' from one file. These are the last line ending issues
I can find in the files containing parts of LLVM's file headers.
llvm-svn: 351634
This installs the new developer policy and moves all of the license
files across all LLVM projects in the monorepo to the new license
structure. The remaining projects will be moved independently.
Note that I've left odd formatting and other idiosyncracies of the
legacy license structure text alone to make the diff easier to read.
Critically, note that we do not in any case *remove* the old license
notice or terms, as that remains necessary until we finish the
relicensing process.
I've updated a few license files that refer to the LLVM license to
instead simply refer generically to whatever license the LLVM project is
under, basically trying to minimize confusion.
This is really the culmination of so many people. Chris led the
community discussions, drafted the policy update and organized the
multi-year string of meeting between lawyers across the community to
figure out the strategy. Numerous lawyers at companies in the community
spent their time figuring out initial answers, and then the Foundation's
lawyer Heather Meeker has done *so* much to help refine and get us ready
here. I could keep going on, but I just want to make sure everyone
realizes what a huge community effort this has been from the begining.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56897
llvm-svn: 351631
Summary:
Previously, we weren't recognizing these as smart pointers and thus
weren't allowing non-dereference accesses as we should -- see new test
cases which fail without the fix.
Reviewers: alexfh, hokein, aaron.ballman, JonasToth
Reviewed By: JonasToth
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56585
llvm-svn: 351303
Summary:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D56509 changed the API of the
CXXMethodDecl::getThisType method. Adapt to the change (and re-apply
clang-format) to fix the clang-tidy build.
llvm-svn: 350916
Summary:
Correct the case of the local variables..
Rational:
I want to be able to run clang-tidy on new clang-tidy checker code prior to creating a review (to demonstrate we should dog food our own tools during development, not my suggestion but @Eugene.Zelenko)
To this end I am running the following in a script, prior to make a change.
```
tidy:
@for source in $$(git status -suno | grep ".cpp$$" | cut -c4-) ;\
do \
clang-tidy -quiet $$source -- $(TIDY_FLAGS);\
done
```
I then want to go through the checkers and see which checkers most closely match the review style of the reviewers
```
---
Checks: '
-clang-diagnostic-*,
readability-identifier-naming,
llvm-header-guard
'
WarningsAsErrors: ''
HeaderFilterRegex: ''
AnalyzeTemporaryDtors: false
FormatStyle: LLVM
CheckOptions:
- key: readability-identifier-naming.IgnoreFailedSplit
value: '0'
- key: readability-identifier-naming.VariableCase
value: 'CamelCase'
- key: readability-identifier-naming.LocalVariableCase
value: 'CamelCase'
...
```
Unfortunately in doing so, I have identified that my previous review {D55433} it violates what looks like to be the convention of local variables being in CamelCase.
Sending this small review in the hope it can be corrected.
Patch by MyDeveloperDay.
Reviewers: JonasToth, Eugene.Zelenko
Reviewed By: JonasToth
Subscribers: xazax.hun, Eugene.Zelenko
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56536
llvm-svn: 350814
Summary: Adds a checker to clang-tidy to warn when a non void const member function, taking only parameters passed by value or const reference could be marked as '[[nodiscard]]'
Patch by MyDeveloperDay.
Reviewers: alexfh, stephenkelly, curdeius, aaron.ballman, hokein, JonasToth
Reviewed By: curdeius, JonasToth
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, lefticus, lebedev.ri, mgorny, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55433
llvm-svn: 350760
And also enable it by default to be consistent with e.g.
modernize-use-using.
This helps e.g. when running this check on client code where the macro
is provided by the system, so there is no easy way to modify it.
Reviewed By: JonasToth, lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56025
llvm-svn: 350056
Summary:
Previously, we'd only match on literal floating or integral zeroes, but I've now also learned that some users spell that value as int{0} or float{0}, which also need to be matched.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56012
llvm-svn: 349953
Summary:
This change relaxes the requirements on the utility
`rewriteExprFromNumberToDuration` function, and introduces new checking
inside of the `abseil-duration-comparison` check to allow macro argument
expression transformation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55784
llvm-svn: 349636
It's included in a new header ClangTidyForceLinker.h and should not
be included the second time.
Follow up for the https://reviews.llvm.org/D55595
llvm-svn: 349132
Extract code that forces linking to the separate header and include it in both plugin and standalone tool.
Try 2: missing header guard and "clang/Config/config.h" are added to the new header.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55595
llvm-svn: 349131
Summary:
The diagnostics from google-objc-function-naming check will be more
actionable if they provide a brief description of the requirements from
the Google Objective-C style guide. The more descriptive diagnostics may
help clarify that functions in the global namespace must have an
appropriate prefix followed by Pascal case (engineers working previously
with static functions might not immediately understand the different
requirements of static and non-static functions).
Test Notes:
Verified against the clang-tidy tests.
Reviewers: benhamilton, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: benhamilton
Subscribers: MyDeveloperDay, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55482
llvm-svn: 349123
Summary:
This check uses the context of a subtraction expression as well as knowledge
about the Abseil Time types, to infer the type of the second operand of some
subtraction expressions in Duration conversions. For example:
absl::ToDoubleSeconds(duration) - foo
can become
absl::ToDoubleSeconds(duration - absl::Seconds(foo))
This ensures that time calculations are done in the proper domain, and also
makes it easier to further deduce the types of the second operands to these
expressions.
Reviewed By: JonasToth
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55245
llvm-svn: 349073
Extract code that forces linking to the separate header and include it in both plugin and standalone tool
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55595
llvm-svn: 349038
Summary: A new check came in over the weekend; it should use our existing infrastructure for matching `absl::Duration` factories.
Patch by hwright.
Reviewers: JonasToth
Reviewed By: JonasToth
Subscribers: astrelni
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55541
llvm-svn: 348842
Summary:
Almost all code review comments on new checkers {D55433} {D48866} {D54349} seem to ask for the release notes to be added alphabetically, plus I've seen commits by @Eugene.Zelenko reordering the lists
Make add_new_check.py add those release notes alphabetically based on checker name
If include-fixer section is seen add it at the end
Minor change in the message format to prevent double newlines added before the checker.
Do the tools themselves have unit tests? (sorry new to this game)
- Tested adding new checker at the beginning
- Tested on adding new checker in the middle
- Tested on empty ReleasesNotes.rst (as we would see after RC)
Patch by MyDeveloperDay.
Reviewers: alexfh, JonasToth, curdeius, aaron.ballman, benhamilton, hokein
Reviewed By: JonasToth
Subscribers: cfe-commits, xazax.hun, Eugene.Zelenko
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55508
llvm-svn: 348793
Patch by Alex Strelnikov.
Reviewed as D53830
Introduce a new check to upgrade user code based on upcoming API breaking changes to absl::Duration.
The check finds calls to arithmetic operators and factory functions for absl::Duration that rely on
an implicit user defined conversion to int64_t. These cases will no longer compile after proposed
changes are released. Suggested fixes explicitly cast the argument int64_t.
llvm-svn: 348633
Summary:
Implement a check for detecting if/else if/else chains where two or more
branches are Type I clones of each other (that is, they contain identical code)
and for detecting switch statements where two or more consecutive branches are
Type I clones of each other.
Patch by donat.nagy.
Reviewers: alexfh, hokein, aaron.ballman, JonasToth
Reviewed By: JonasToth
Subscribers: MTC, lebedev.ri, whisperity, xazax.hun, Eugene.Zelenko, mgorny, rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54757
llvm-svn: 348343
Summary:
bugprone-misplaced-widening-cast check
used to give a false warning to the
following example.
enum DaysEnum{
MON = 0,
TUE = 1
};
day = (DaysEnum)(day + 1);
//warning: either cast from 'int' to 'DaysEnum' is ineffective...
But i think int to enum cast is not widening neither ineffective.
Patch by dkrupp.
Reviewers: JonasToth, alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: rnkovacs, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55255
llvm-svn: 348341
Summary:
§1 Description
This changes the objc-property-declaration check to allow arbitrary acronyms and initialisms instead of using whitelisted acronyms. In Objective-C it is relatively common to use project prefixes in property names for the purposes of disambiguation. For example, the CIColor¹ and CGColor² properties on UIColor both represent symbol prefixes being used in proeprty names outside of Apple's accepted acronyms³. The union of Apple's accepted acronyms and all symbol prefixes that might be used for disambiguation in property declarations effectively allows for any arbitrary sequence of capital alphanumeric characters to be acceptable in property declarations. This change updates the check accordingly.
The test variants with custom configurations are deleted as part of this change because their configurations no longer impact behavior. The acronym configurations are currently preserved for backwards compatibility of check configuration.
[1] https://developer.apple.com/documentation/uikit/uicolor/1621951-cicolor?language=objc
[2] https://developer.apple.com/documentation/uikit/uicolor/1621954-cgcolor?language=objc
[3] https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/CodingGuidelines/Articles/APIAbbreviations.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/20001285-BCIHCGAE
§2 Test Notes
Changes verified by:
• Running clang-tidy unit tests.
• Used check_clang_tidy.py to verify expected output of processing objc-property-declaration.m
Reviewers: benhamilton, Wizard
Reviewed By: benhamilton
Subscribers: jfb, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51832
llvm-svn: 348331
Stephane Moore