In order to make an option value truly optional, both the ValueOptional
attribute and an empty-named value are required. Prior to this change,
this empty-named value appears in the command-line help text:
-some-option - some help text
=v1 - description 1
=v2 - description 2
= -
This change improves the help text for these sort of options in a number
of ways:
1) ValueOptional options with an empty-named value now print their help
text twice: both without and then with '=<value>' after the name. The
latter version then lists the allowed values after it.
2) Empty-named values with no help text in ValueOptional options are not
listed in the permitted values.
-some-option - some help text
-some-option=<value> - some help text
=v1 - description 1
=v2 - description 2
3) Otherwise empty-named options are printed as =<empty> rather than
simply '='.
4) Option values without help text do not have the '-' separator
printed.
-some-option=<value> - some help text
=v1 - description 1
=v2
=<empty> - description
It also tweaks the llvm-symbolizer -functions help text to not print a
trailing ':' as that looks bad combined with 1) above.
This is mostly a reland of r353048 which in turn was a reland of
r352750.
Reviewed by: ruiu, thopre, mstorsjo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57030
llvm-svn: 353053
The three switch fallthrough generate a warning with -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
Two are documented as fallthrough, one is not, but I think the intention is to also fallthrough in kmp_tasking.cpp.
Not sure whether kmp.h is the best place to define the macro.
Reviewers: jlpeyton, AndreyChurbanov, Hahnfeld
Reviewed By: jlpeyton
Tags: #openmp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56397
llvm-svn: 353052
For PCMPGT(0, X) patterns where we only demand the sign bit (e.g. BLENDV or MOVMSK) then we can use X directly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57667
llvm-svn: 353051
In order to make an option value truly optional, both the ValueOptional
attribute and an empty-named value are required. Prior to this change,
this empty-named value appears in the command-line help text:
-some-option - some help text
=v1 - description 1
=v2 - description 2
= -
This change improves the help text for these sort of options in a number
of ways:
1) ValueOptional options with an empty-named value now print their help
text twice: both without and then with '=<value>' after the name. The
latter version then lists the allowed values after it.
2) Empty-named values with no help text in ValueOptional options are not
listed in the permitted values.
-some-option - some help text
-some-option=<value> - some help text
=v1 - description 1
=v2 - description 2
3) Otherwise empty-named options are printed as =<empty> rather than
simply '='.
4) Option values without help text do not have the '-' separator
printed.
-some-option=<value> - some help text
=v1 - description 1
=v2
=<empty> - description
It also tweaks the llvm-symbolizer -functions help text to not print a
trailing ':' as that looks bad combined with 1) above.
This is mostly a reland of r352750.
Reviewed by: ruiu, thopre, mstorsjo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57030
llvm-svn: 353048
Summary:
These classes describe the details of the process we are about to
launch, and so they are naturally used by the launching code in the Host
module. Previously they were present in Target because that is the most
important (but by far not the only) user of the launching code.
Since the launching code has other customers, must of which do not care
about Targets, it makes sense to move these classes to the Host layer,
next to the launching code.
This move reduces the number of times that Target is included from host
to 8 (it used to be 14).
Reviewers: zturner, clayborg, jingham, davide, teemperor
Subscribers: emaste, mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56602
llvm-svn: 353047
Noticed while investigating PR40483, and fixes the basic test case from the bug - but not a more general case.
We're pretty weak at dealing with ADD/SUB combines compared to the SimplifyAssociativeOrCommutative/SimplifyUsingDistributiveLaws abilities that InstCombine can manage.
llvm-svn: 353044
This patch removes hidden codegen flag -print-schedule effectively reverting the
logic originally committed as r300311
(https://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=300311).
Flag -print-schedule was originally introduced by r300311 to address PR32216
(https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32216). That bug was about adding "Better
testing of schedule model instruction latencies/throughputs".
These days, we can use llvm-mca to test scheduling models. So there is no longer
a need for flag -print-schedule in LLVM. The main use case for PR32216 is
now addressed by llvm-mca.
Flag -print-schedule is mainly used for debugging purposes, and it is only
actually used by x86 specific tests. We already have extensive (latency and
throughput) tests under "test/tools/llvm-mca" for X86 processor models. That
means, most (if not all) existing -print-schedule tests for X86 are redundant.
When flag -print-schedule was first added to LLVM, several files had to be
modified; a few APIs gained new arguments (see for example method
MCAsmStreamer::EmitInstruction), and MCSubtargetInfo/TargetSubtargetInfo gained
a couple of getSchedInfoStr() methods.
Method getSchedInfoStr() had to originally work for both MCInst and
MachineInstr. The original implmentation of getSchedInfoStr() introduced a
subtle layering violation (reported as PR37160 and then fixed/worked-around by
r330615).
In retrospect, that new API could have been designed more optimally. We can
always query MCSchedModel to get the latency and throughput. More importantly,
the "sched-info" string should not have been generated by the subtarget.
Note, r317782 fixed an issue where "print-schedule" didn't work very well in the
presence of inline assembly. That commit is also reverted by this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57244
llvm-svn: 353043
This prevents Constant Hoisting from pulling the constant out of the block,
allowing us to still produce LDRH/UXTH nodes. LDRB/UXTB (255) is already cheap
by the default getIntImmCost, but I've added it for clarity.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57671
llvm-svn: 353040
Summary:
From https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40516
```
$ cat a.cpp
const NamespaceName::VeryLongClassName &NamespaceName::VeryLongClassName::myFunction() {
// do stuff
}
const NamespaceName::VeryLongClassName &NamespaceName::VeryLongClassName::operator++() {
// do stuff
}
$ ~/ll/build/opt/bin/clang-format -style=LLVM a.cpp
const NamespaceName::VeryLongClassName &
NamespaceName::VeryLongClassName::myFunction() {
// do stuff
}
const NamespaceName::VeryLongClassName &NamespaceName::VeryLongClassName::
operator++() {
// do stuff
}
```
What was happening is that the split penalty before `operator` was being set to
a smaller value by a prior if block. Moved checks around to fix this and added a
regression test.
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57604
llvm-svn: 353033
Summary:
... from 8.
`VALIGNDZ128rmbik XMM0 XMM0 K1 XMM3 RDI i_0x1 i_0x0 i_0x1` instruction already has 9 components.
It does not matter much in terms of performance, but avoiding allocation seems to come with low cost here..
Reviewers: courbet, gchatelet
Reviewed By: courbet
Subscribers: tschuett, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57654
llvm-svn: 353022
Summary:
Up until the point i have looked in the source, i didn't even understood that
i can disable 'cluster' output. I have always silenced it via ` &> /dev/null`.
(And hoped it wasn't contributing much of the run time.)
While i expect that it has it's use-cases i never once needed it so far.
If i forget to silence it, console is completely flooded with that output.
How about not expecting users to opt-out of analyses,
but to explicitly specify the analyses that should be performed?
Reviewers: courbet, gchatelet
Reviewed By: courbet
Subscribers: tschuett, RKSimon, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57648
llvm-svn: 353021
Summary: this commit adds support to a new dependence type introduced in OpenMP
5.0. The LLVM OpenMP RTL already supports this feature, so we only need to
modify CLANG to take advantage of them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57576
llvm-svn: 353018
Currently, SCEV creates SCEVUnknown for every node of unreachable code. If we
have a huge amounts of such code, we will be littering SE with these nodes. We could
just state that they all are undef and save some memory.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57567
Reviewed By: sanjoy
llvm-svn: 353017
We now print ST0 as 'st' when generating the clobber list for MS inline assembly in clang. This matches what the gcc reg name list expects.
Original commit message:
This fixes the test case in PR35982 by preventing MMX instructions that read MM0-7 from being moved below EMMS/FEMMS by the post RA scheduler.
Though as discussed in bugzilla, this is not a complete fix. There is still the possibility of reordering in IR or by the pre-RA scheduler.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57298
llvm-svn: 353016
Looking into gcc and objdump behavior more this was overly aggressive. If the register is encoded in the instruction we should print %st(0), if its implicit we should print %st.
I'll be making a more directed change in a future patch.
llvm-svn: 353013
In llvm-nm, the symbol size was being computed only with --print-size option,
even though it was being printed in other cases, such as with --format=posix.
This patch simply removes the guard, so that the size is computed
independently of the later decision to print it or not.
Fixes PR39997.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57599
llvm-svn: 353011
The description of what the various Expr::Ignore* do has drifted from the
actual implementation.
Inspection reveals that IgnoreParenImpCasts() is not equivalent to doing
IgnoreParens() + IgnoreImpCasts() until reaching a fixed point, but
IgnoreParenCasts() is equivalent to doing IgnoreParens() + IgnoreCasts()
until reaching a fixed point. There is also a fair amount of duplication
in the various Expr::Ignore* functions which increase the chance of further
future inconsistencies. In preparation for the next patch which will factor
out the implementation of the various Expr::Ignore*, do the following cleanups:
Remove Stmt::IgnoreImplicit, in favor of Expr::IgnoreImplicit. IgnoreImplicit
is the only function among all of the Expr::Ignore* which is available in Stmt.
There are only a few users of Stmt::IgnoreImplicit. They can just use instead
Expr::IgnoreImplicit like they have to do for the other Ignore*.
Move Expr::IgnoreImpCasts() from Expr.h to Expr.cpp. This made no difference
in the run-time with my usual benchmark (-fsyntax-only on all of Boost).
While we are at it, make IgnoreParenNoopCasts take a const reference to the
ASTContext for const correctness.
Update the comments to match what the Expr::Ignore* are actually doing.
I am not sure that listing exactly what each Expr::Ignore* do is optimal,
but it certainly looks better than the current state which is in my opinion
between misleading and just plain wrong.
The whole patch is NFC (if you count removing Stmt::IgnoreImplicit as NFC).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57266
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
llvm-svn: 353006
As discussed in D50222, this changes the vector types in tests required for that revision to ones legal for X86.
Patch by @hermord (Dmytro Shynkevych)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56372
llvm-svn: 353004
There is currently no way to distinguish implicit from explicit
CXXThisExpr in the AST dump output.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57649
Reviewed By: steveire
llvm-svn: 353003
There are 2 changes visible here:
1. There's no reason to limit this transform based on number
of condition registers. That diff allows PPC to produce
slightly better (dot-instructions should be generally good)
code.
Note: someone that cares about PPC codegen might want to
look closer at that output because it seems like we could
still improve this.
2. We (probably?) should not bother trying to form uaddo (or
other overflow ops) when there's no target support for such
an op. This goes beyond checking whether the op is expanded
because both PPC and AArch64 show better codegen for standard
types regardless of whether the op is legal/custom.
llvm-svn: 353001
Summary:
Enable tests that were previously disabled because they didn't work on
Windows.
Reviewers: morehouse
Reviewed By: morehouse
Subscribers: morehouse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57563
llvm-svn: 353000
James Henderson