When sampleFDO is enabled, people may expect they can use
-fno-profile-sample-use to opt-out using sample profile for a certain file.
That could be either for debugging purpose or for performance tuning purpose.
However, when thinlto is enabled, if a function in file A compiled with
-fno-profile-sample-use is imported to another file B compiled with
-fprofile-sample-use, the inlined copy of the function in file B may still
get its profile annotated.
The inconsistency may even introduce profile unused warning because if the
target is not compiled with explicit debug information flag, the function
in file A won't have its debug information enabled (debug information will
be enabled implicitly only when -fprofile-sample-use is used). After it is
imported into file B which is compiled with -fprofile-sample-use, profile
annotation for the outline copy of the function will fail because the
function has no debug information, and that will trigger profile unused
warning.
We add a new attribute use-sample-profile to control whether a function
will use its sample profile no matter for its outline or inline copies.
That will make the behavior of -fno-profile-sample-use consistent.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79959
This patch addresses two issues related to adding inline functions to the import list while recursively going through the profiling data.
1. For callsite samples, only add an inlined function to the import list if it's from outside of the module (i.e. only has a declaration inside the module).
2. For body samples, add each target function to the import list if it's from outside of the module (i.e. only has a declaration inside the module). Previously we were using getSubProgram() to check whether it has dbg info, which is inaccurate. This fix properly add imports and could improve the quality of the pass.
Added a few changes to the test to catch these cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79379
them in a special text section.
For sampleFDO, because the optimized build uses profile generated from
previous release, previously we couldn't tell a function without profile
was truely cold or just newly created so we had to treat them conservatively
and put them in .text section instead of .text.unlikely. The result was when
we persuing the best performance by locking .text.hot and .text in memory,
we wasted a lot of memory to keep cold functions inside.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D66374, we introduced profile symbol list to
discriminate functions being cold versus functions being newly added.
This mechanism works quite well for regular use cases in AutoFDO. However,
in some case, we can only have a partial profile when optimizing a target.
The partial profile may be an aggregated profile collected from many targets.
The profile symbol list method used for regular sampleFDO profile is not
applicable to partial profile use case because it may be too large and
introduce many false positives.
To solve the problem for partial profile use case, we provide an option called
--profile-unknown-in-special-section. For functions without profile, we will
still treat them conservatively in compiler optimizations -- for example,
treat them as warm instead of cold in inliner. When we use profile info to
add section prefix for functions, we will discriminate functions known to be
not cold versus functions without profile (being unknown), and we will put
functions being unknown in a special text section called .text.unknown.
Runtime system will have the flexibility to decide where to put the special
section in order to achieve a balance between performance and memory saving.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62540
Compbinary format uses MD5 to represent strings in name table. That gives smaller profile without the need of compression/decompression when writing/reading the profile. The patch adds the support in extbinary format. It is off by default but user can choose to enable it.
Note the feature of using MD5 in name table can bring very small chance of name conflict leading to profile mismatch. Besides, profile using the feature won't have the profile remapping support.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76255
Suppose an inline instance has hot total sample count but 0 entry count, and
it is an indirect call target. If the indirect call has no other call target
and inline instance associated with it and it is promoted, currently the
conditional branch generated by indirect call promotion will have invalid
branch profile which is !{!"branch_weights", i32 0, i32 0} -- because the
entry count of the promoted target is 0 and the total entry count of all
targets is also 0. This caused a SEGV in Control Height Reduction and may
cause problem in other passes.
Function entry count of an inline instance is computed by a heuristic --
using either the sample of the starting line or starting inner inline
instance. The patch changes the heuristic a little bit so that when total
sample count is larger than 0, the computed entry count will be at least 1.
Then the new branch profile will be !{!"branch_weights", i32 1, i32 0}.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72790
Summary: AutoFDO compilation has two places that do inlining - the sample profile loader that does inlining with context sensitive profile, and the regular inliner as CGSCC pass. Ideally we want most inlining to come from sample profile loader as that is driven by context sensitive profile and also retains context sensitivity after inlining. However the reality is most of the inlining actually happens during regular inliner. To track the number of inline instances from sample profile loader and help move more inlining to sample profile loader, I'm adding statistics and optimization remarks for sample profile loader's inlining.
Reviewers: wmi, davidxl
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70584
Summary:
Sample profile loader of AutoFDO tries to replay previous inlining using context sensitive profile. The replay only repeats inlining if the call site block is hot. As a result it punts inlining of small functions, some of which can be beneficial for size, and will still be inlined by CSGCC inliner later. The oscillation between sample profile loader's inlining and regular CGSSC inlining cause unnecessary loss of context-sensitive profile. It doesn't have much impact for inline decision itself, but it negatively affects post-inline profile quality as CGSCC inliner have to scale counts which is not as accurate as the original context sensitive profile, and bad post-inline profile can misguide code layout.
This change added regular Inline Cost calculation for sample profile loader, so we can inline small functions upfront under switch -sample-profile-inline-size. In addition -sample-profile-cold-inline-threshold is added so we can tune the separate size threshold - currently the default is chosen to be the same as regular inliner's cold call-site threshold.
Reviewers: wmi, davidxl
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70750
Summary:
AutoFDO's sample profile loader processes function in arbitrary source code order, so if I change the order of two functions in source code, the inline decision can change. This also prevented the use of context-sensitive profile to do specialization while inlining. This commit enforces SCC top-down order for sample profile loader. With this change, we can now do specialization, as illustrated by the added test case:
Say if we have A->B->C and D->B->C call path, we want to inline C into B when root inliner is B, but not when root inliner is A or D, this is not possible without enforcing top-down order. E.g. Once C is inlined into B, A and D can only choose to inline (B->C) as a whole or nothing, but what we want is only inline B into A and D, not its recursive callee C. If we process functions in top-down order, this is no longer a problem, which is what this commit is doing.
This change is guarded with a new switch "-sample-profile-top-down-load" for tuning, and it depends on D70653. Eventually, top-down can be the default order for sample profile loader.
Reviewers: wmi, davidxl
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits, tejohnson
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70655
Summary:
When sample profile loader decides not to inline a previously inlined call-site, we adjust the profile of outlined function simply by scaling up its profile counts by call-site count. This means the context-sensitive profile of that inlined instance will be thrown away. This commit try to keep context-sensitive profile for such cases:
- Instead of scaling outlined function's profile, we now properly merge the FunctionSamples of inlined instance into outlined function, including all recursively inlined profile.
- Instead of adjusting the profile for negative inline decision at the end of the sample profile loader pass, we do the profile merge right after processing each function. This change paired with top-down ordering of annotation/inline-replay (a separate diff) will make sure we recursively merge profile back before the profile is used for annotation and inline replay.
A new switch -sample-profile-merge-inlinee is added to enable the new profile merge for tuning. It should be the default behavior eventually.
Reviewers: wmi, davidxl
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70653
Summary:
When adjusting function entry counts after inlining, Funciton::setEntryCount is called without providing an import function list. The side effect of that is the previously set import function list will be dropped. The import function list is used by ThinLTO to help import hot cross module callee for LTO inlining, so dropping that during ThinLTO pre-link may adversely affect LTO inlining. The fix is to keep the list while updating entry counts for inlining.
Reviewers: wmi, davidxl, tejohnson
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, hiraditya, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69736
by ExtBinary format profile
Profile on-demand loading was added for ExtBinary format profile in rL374233,
but currently profile on-demand loading doesn't work well with profile
remapping. The patch adds the support.
Suppose a function in the current module has outline instance in the profile.
The function name in the module is different from the name of the outline
instance, but remapper knows the two names are equal. When loading profile
on-demand, the outline instance has to be loaded with remapper's help.
At the same time SampleProfileReaderItaniumRemapper is changed from a proxy
of SampleProfileReader to a helper member in SampleProfileReader.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68901
llvm-svn: 375295
in ExtBinary format
Currently for Text, Binary and ExtBinary format profiles, when we compile a
module with samplefdo, even if there is no function showing up in the profile,
we have to load all the function profiles from the profile input. That is a
waste of compile time.
CompactBinary format profile has already had the support of loading function
profiles on demand. In this patch, we add the support to load profile on
demand for ExtBinary format. It will work no matter the sections in ExtBinary
format profile are compressed or not. Experiment shows it reduces the time to
compile a server benchmark by 30%.
When profile remapping and loading function profiles on demand are both used,
extra work needs to be done so that the loading on demand process will take
the name remapping into consideration. It will be addressed in a follow-up
patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68601
llvm-svn: 374233
Previously ExtBinary profile format only supports compression using zlib for
profile symbol list. In this patch, we extend the compression support to any
section. User can select some or all of the sections to compress. In an
experiment, for a 45M profile in ExtBinary format, compressing name table
reduced its size to 24M, and compressing all the sections reduced its size
to 11M.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68253
llvm-svn: 373914
profile symbol list.
Currently many existing users using profile-sample-accurate want to reduce
code size as much as possible. Their use cases are different from the scenario
profile symbol list tries to handle -- the major motivation of adding profile
symbol list is to get the major memory/code size saving without introduce
performance regression. So to keep the behavior of profile-sample-accurate
unchanged, we think decoupling these two things and using a new flag to
control the handling of profile symbol list may be better.
When profile-sample-accurate and the new flag profile-accurate-for-symsinlist
are both present, since profile-sample-accurate is a user assertion we let it
have a higher precedence.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68047
llvm-svn: 373133
is available
In rL372232, we treated names showing up in profile as not cold when
profile-sample-accurate is enabled. This caused 70k size regression in
Chrome/Android. The patch put a guard and only enable the change when
profile symbol list is available, i.e., keep the old behavior when profile
symbol list is not available.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67931
llvm-svn: 372665
is enabled.
We can save memory and reduce binary size significantly by enabling
ProfileSampleAccurate. However when ProfileSampleAccurate is true,
function without sample will be regarded as cold and this could
potentially cause performance regression.
To minimize the potential negative performance impact, we want to be
a little conservative here saying if a function shows up in the profile,
no matter as outline instance, inline instance or call targets, treat
the function as not being cold. This will handle the cases such as most
callsites of a function are inlined in sampled binary (thus outline copy
don't get any sample) but not inlined in current build (because of source
code drift, imprecise debug information, or the callsites are all cold
individually but not cold accumulatively...), so that the outline function
showing up as cold in sampled binary will actually not be cold after current
build. After the change, such function will be treated as not cold even
profile-sample-accurate is enabled.
At the same time we lower the hot criteria of callsiteIsHot check when
profile-sample-accurate is enabled. callsiteIsHot is used to determined
whether a callsite is hot and qualified for early inlining. When
profile-sample-accurate is enabled, functions without profile will be
regarded as cold and much less inlining will happen in CGSCC inlining pass,
so we can worry less about size increase and be aggressive to allow more
early inlining to happen for warm callsites and it is helpful for performance
overall.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67561
llvm-svn: 372232
cold versus function being newly added.
This is the second half of https://reviews.llvm.org/D66374.
Profile symbol list is the collection of function symbols showing up in
the binary which generates the current profile. It is used to discriminate
function being cold versus function being newly added. Profile symbol list
is only added for profile with ExtBinary format.
During profile use compilation, when profile-sample-accurate is enabled,
a function without profile will be regarded as cold only when it is
contained in that list.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66766
llvm-svn: 370563
This is a patch split from https://reviews.llvm.org/D66374. It tries to add
a new format of profile called ExtBinary. The format adds a section header
table to the profile and organize the profile in sections, so the future
extension like adding a new section or extending an existing section will be
easier while keeping backward compatiblity feasible.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66513
llvm-svn: 369798
Removed extra parameter from !prof branch_weights metadata of
a call instruction according to the spec.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61932
llvm-svn: 360843
Summary:
Triple components in `XFAIL` lines are tested against the target triple.
Various tests that are expected to fail on big-endian hosts are marked
as being `XFAIL` for big-endian targets. This patch corrects these tests
by having them test against a new `host-byteorder-big-endian` feature.
Reviewers: xingxue, sfertile, jasonliu
Reviewed By: xingxue
Subscribers: jvesely, nhaehnle, fedor.sergeev, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60551
llvm-svn: 359689
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).
This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.
llvm-svn: 358546
Summary: Currently ProfileSummaryBuilder doesn't count into callsite samples when computing total samples. Considering that ProfileSummaryInfo is used to checked the hotness of not only body samples but also callsite samples (from SampleProfileLoader), I think the callsite sample counts should be considered when computing total samples.
Reviewers: eraman, danielcdh, wmi
Subscribers: hiraditya, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59835
llvm-svn: 357627
Summary: It is possible that multiple indirect call targets have been promoted for a single callsite from the profiled binary. Current implementation repeats promotion for all these targets as far as the callsite itself is hot (the callsite is assumed to be hot if any one of these targets was "hot" during the profiling). However, even when one of the ICPed target is hot other targets may not, and we should not repeat promotion for "cold" targets.
Reviewers: danielcdh, wmi
Subscribers: hiraditya, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59940
llvm-svn: 357484
Summary:
Profile sample files include the number of times each entry or inlined
call site is sampled. This is translated into the entry count metadta
on functions.
When sample data is being read, if a call site that was inlined
in the sample program is considered cold and not inlined, then
the entry count of the out-of-line functions does not reflect
the current compilation.
In this patch, we note call sites where the function was not inlined
and as a last action of the sample profile loading, we update the
called function's entry count to reflect the calls from these
call sites which are not included in the profile file.
Reviewers: danielcdh, wmi, Kader, modocache
Reviewed By: wmi
Subscribers: davidxl, eraman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52845
llvm-svn: 352001
If the sample profile has no inlining hierachy information included, we call
the sample profile is flattened. For flattened profile, in ThinLTO postlink
phase, SampleProfileLoader's hot function inlining and profile annotation will
do nothing, so it is better to save the effort to read in the profile and run
the sample profile loader pass. It is helpful for reducing compile time when
the flattened profile is huge.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54819
llvm-svn: 351476
Currently we have pgo options defined in PassManagerBuilder.cpp only for
instrument pgo, but not for sample pgo. We also have pgo options defined
in NewPMDriver.cpp in opt only for new pass manager and for all kinds of
pgo. They have some inconsistency.
To make the options more consistent and make tests writing easier, the
patch let old pass manager to share the same pgo options with new pass
manager in opt, and removes the options in PassManagerBuilder.cpp.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56749
llvm-svn: 351392
ProfileSampleAccurate is used to indicate the profile has exact match to the
code to be optimized.
Previously ProfileSampleAccurate is handled in ProfileSummaryInfo::isColdCallSite
and ProfileSummaryInfo::isColdBlock. A better solution is to initialize function
entry count to 0 when ProfileSampleAccurate is true, so we don't have to handle
ProfileSampleAccurate in multiple places.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55660
llvm-svn: 349088
This can be used to preserve profiling information across codebase
changes that have widespread impact on mangled names, but across which
most profiling data should still be usable. For example, when switching
from libstdc++ to libc++, or from the old libstdc++ ABI to the new ABI,
or even from a 32-bit to a 64-bit build.
The user can provide a remapping file specifying parts of mangled names
that should be treated as equivalent (eg, std::__1 should be treated as
equivalent to std::__cxx11), and profile data will be treated as
applying to a particular function if its name is equivalent to the name
of a function in the profile data under the provided equivalences. See
the documentation change for a description of how this is configured.
Remapping is supported for both sample-based profiling and instruction
profiling. We do not support remapping indirect branch target
information, but all other profile data should be remapped
appropriately.
Support is only added for the new pass manager. If someone wants to also
add support for this for the old pass manager, doing so should be
straightforward.
This is the LLVM side of Clang r344199.
Reviewers: davidxl, tejohnson, dlj, erik.pilkington
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51249
llvm-svn: 344200
The patch saves a function offset table which maps function name index to the
offset of its function profile to the start of the binary profile. By using
the function offset table, for those function profiles which will not be used
when compiling a module, the profile reader does't have to read them. For
profile size around 10~20M, it saves ~10% compile time.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51863
llvm-svn: 342283
The patch tries to make sample profile loader independent of profile format
change. It moves compact format related code into FunctionSamples and
SampleProfileReader classes, and sample profile loader only has to interact
with those two classes and will be unaware of profile format changes.
The cleanup also contain some fixes to further remove the difference between
compactbinary format and binary format. After the cleanup using different
formats originated from the same profile will generate the same binaries,
which we verified by compiling two large server benchmarks w/wo thinlto.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51643
llvm-svn: 341591
getOrCompHotCountThreshold/getOrCompColdCountThreshold introduced in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D45377 contain a bad mistake and will only return 1 or 0
instead of the true hot/cold cutoff value. The patch fixes the mistake. But the
mistake seems not causing big performance difference according to internal server
benchmarks testing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50370
llvm-svn: 339162
Name table occupies a big chunk of size in current binary format sample profile.
In order to reduce its size, the patch changes the sample writer/reader to
save/restore MD5Hash of names in the name table. Sample annotation phase will
also use MD5Hash of name to query samples accordingly.
Experiment shows compact binary format can reduce the size of sample profile by
2/3 compared with binary format generally.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47955
llvm-svn: 334447
We found current sampleFDO had a performance issue when triaging a regression.
For a callsite with inline instance in the profile, even if hot callsite inliner
cannot inline it, it may still execute enough times and should not be treated as
cold in regular inliner later. However, currently if such callsite is not inlined
by hot callsite inliner, and the BB where the callsite locates doesn't get
samples from other instructions inside of it, the callsite will have no profile
metadata annotated. In regular inliner cost analysis, if the callsite has no
profile annotated and its caller has profile information, it will be treated as
cold.
The fix changes the isCallsiteHot check and chooses to compare
CallsiteTotalSamples with hot cutoff value computed by ProfileSummaryInfo.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45377
llvm-svn: 332058
In order to set breakpoints on labels and list source code around
labels, we need collect debug information for labels, i.e., label
name, the function label belong, line number in the file, and the
address label located. In order to keep these information in LLVM
IR and to allow backend to generate debug information correctly.
We create a new kind of metadata for labels, DILabel. The format
of DILabel is
!DILabel(scope: !1, name: "foo", file: !2, line: 3)
We hope to keep debug information as much as possible even the
code is optimized. So, we create a new kind of intrinsic for label
metadata to avoid the metadata is eliminated with basic block.
The intrinsic will keep existing if we keep it from optimized out.
The format of the intrinsic is
llvm.dbg.label(metadata !1)
It has only one argument, that is the DILabel metadata. The
intrinsic will follow the label immediately. Backend could get the
label metadata through the intrinsic's parameter.
We also create DIBuilder API for labels to be used by Frontend.
Frontend could use createLabel() to allocate DILabel objects, and use
insertLabel() to insert llvm.dbg.label intrinsic in LLVM IR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45024
Patch by Hsiangkai Wang.
llvm-svn: 331841
Add powerpc- (32-bit) as XFAIL for tests that are documented either in-
line or via commit messages as expected to fail on big-endian systems.
Tests not documented in-line are documented in commit messages as
follows:
r211172 - test/tools/llvm-cov/llvm-cov.test
r247920 - test/Transforms/SampleProfile/gcc-simple.ll
llvm-svn: 322114
Summary:
In r277849, getEntryCount was changed to return None when the entry
count was 0, specifically for SamplePGO where it means no samples were
recorded. However, for instrumentation PGO a 0 entry count should be
returned directly, since it does mean that the function was completely
cold. Otherwise we end up treating these functions conservatively
in isFunctionEntryCold() and isColdBB().
Instead, for SamplePGO use -1 when there are no samples, and change
getEntryCount to return None when the value is -1.
Reviewers: danielcdh, davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41307
llvm-svn: 321018
Summary: When computing the SUM for indirect call promotion, if the callsite is already promoted in the profile, it will be promoted before ICP. In the current implementation, ICP only sees remaining counts in SUM. This may cause extra indirect call targets being promoted. This patch updates the SUM to include the counts already promoted earlier. This way we do not end up promoting too many indirect call targets.
Reviewers: tejohnson
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: llvm-commits, sanjoy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38763
llvm-svn: 317502
Summary: In the compile phase of SamplePGO+ThinLTO, ICP is not invoked. Instead, indirect call targets will be included as function metadata for ThinIndex to buidl the call graph. This should not only include functions defined in other modules, but also functions defined in the same module, otherwise ThinIndex may find the callee dead and eliminate it, while ICP in backend will revive the symbol, which leads to undefined symbol.
Reviewers: tejohnson
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39480
llvm-svn: 317118
Summary: In the current implementation, we only have accurate profile count for standalone symbols. For inlined functions, we do not have entry count data because it's not available in LBR. In this patch, we use the first instruction's frequency to estimiate the function's entry count, especially for inlined functions. This may be inaccurate due to debug info in optimized code. However, this is a better estimate than the static 80/20 estimation we have in the current implementation.
Reviewers: tejohnson, davidxl
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits, aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38478
llvm-svn: 315369
Summary: stripPointerCast is not reliably returning the value that's being type-casted. Instead it may look further at function attributes to further propagate the value. Instead of relying on stripPOintercast, the more reliable solution is to directly use the pointer to the promoted direct call.
Reviewers: tejohnson, davidxl
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: llvm-commits, sanjoy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38603
llvm-svn: 315077
Summary: In SamplePGO, when an indirect call is promoted in the profiled binary, before profile annotation, it will be promoted and inlined. For the original indirect call, the current implementation will not mark VP profile on it. This is an issue when profile becomes stale. This patch annotates VP prof on indirect calls during annotation.
Reviewers: tejohnson
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38477
llvm-svn: 315016
Summary: In SamplePGO ThinLTO compile phase, we will not invoke ICP as it may introduce confusion to the 2nd annotation. This patch extracted that logic and makes it clearer before profile annotation. In the mean time, we need to make function importing process both inlined callsites as well as not promoted indirect callsites.
Reviewers: tejohnson
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: sanjoy, mehdi_amini, llvm-commits, inglorion
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38094
llvm-svn: 314619
Summary: In the ThinLTO compilation, if a function is inlined in the profiling binary, we need to inline it before annotation. If the callee is not available in the primary module, a first step is needed to import that callee function. For the current implementation, if the call is an indirect call, which has been promoted to >1 targets and inlined, SamplePGO will only import one target with the largest sample count. This patch fixed the bug to import all targets instead.
Reviewers: tejohnson, davidxl
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36637
llvm-svn: 313678
Fangrui Song