cleans up and improves a few things:
- We get rid of the ugly dance of computing all of the captures in
data structures that clone those of CapturingScopeInfo, centralizing
the logic for accessing/updating these data structures
- We re-use the existing capture logic for 'this', which actually
works now.
Cleaned up some diagnostic wording in minor ways as well.
llvm-svn: 149516
- Actually building the var -> capture mapping properly (there was an off-by-one error)
- Keeping track of the source location of each capture
- Minor QoI improvements, e.g, highlighing the prior capture if
there are multiple captures, pointing at the variable declaration we
found if we reject it.
As part of this, add standard citations for the various semantic
checks we perform, and note where we're not performing those checks as
we should.
llvm-svn: 149462
Fix some review comments.
Add a test for deduction when std::initializer_list isn't available yet.
Fix redundant error messages. This fixes and outstanding FIXME too.
llvm-svn: 148735
No new unit tests yet as there is no behavioral change
(except for slightly more specific filtering in
Sema::ActOnStartOfLambdaDefinition). Tests will be added
as the code paths are traced in greater depth to determine
how to improve the results--there are at least one or two
known bugs that require those improvements. This commit
lays the groundwork for those changes.
llvm-svn: 148382
expression for an Objective-C object or pointer type, so that we don't
attempt to treat the member name as a template. Fixes
<rdar://problem/10672501>.
llvm-svn: 148028
expressions: expressions which refer to a logical rather
than a physical l-value, where the logical object is
actually accessed via custom getter/setter code.
A subsequent patch will generalize the AST for these
so that arbitrary "implementing" sub-expressions can
be provided.
Right now the only client is ObjC properties, but
this should be generalizable to similar language
features, e.g. Managed C++'s __property methods.
llvm-svn: 142914
Microsoft __if_exists/__if_not_exists statement. Also note that we
weren't traversing DeclarationNameInfo *at all* within the
RecursiveASTVisitor, which would be rather fatal for variadic
templates.
llvm-svn: 142906
statements. As noted in the documentation for the AST node, the
semantics of __if_exists/__if_not_exists are somewhat different from
the way Visual C++ implements them, because our parsed-template
representation can't accommodate VC++ semantics without serious
contortions. Hopefully this implementation is "good enough".
llvm-svn: 142901
analysis to separate dependent names from non-dependent names. For
dependent names, we'll behave differently from Visual C++:
- For __if_exists/__if_not_exists at class scope, we'll just warn
and then ignore them.
- For __if_exists/__if_not_exists in statements, we'll treat the
inner statement as a compound statement, which we only instantiate
in templates where the dependent name (after instantiation)
exists. This behavior is different from VC++, but it's as close as
we can get without encroaching ridiculousness.
The latter part (dependent statements) is not yet implemented.
llvm-svn: 142864
Douglas Gregor