A new function getOpcodeForSpill should now be the only place to get
the opcode for a given spilled register.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43086
llvm-svn: 328556
This patch makes the following changes to the schedule of instructions in the
prologue and epilogue.
The stack pointer update is moved down in the prologue so that the callee saves
do not have to wait for the update to happen.
Saving the lr is moved down in the prologue to hide the latency of the mflr.
The stack pointer is moved up in the epilogue so that restoring of the lr can
happen sooner.
The mtlr is moved up in the epilogue so that it is away form the blr at the end
of the epilogue. The latency of the mtlr can now be hidden by the loads of the
callee saved registers.
This commit is almost identical to this one: r322036 except that two warnings
that broke build bots have been fixed.
The revision number is D41737 as before.
llvm-svn: 322124
This patch makes the following changes to the schedule of instructions in the
prologue and epilogue.
The stack pointer update is moved down in the prologue so that the callee saves
do not have to wait for the update to happen.
Saving the lr is moved down in the prologue to hide the latency of the mflr.
The stack pointer is moved up in the epilogue so that restoring of the lr can
happen sooner.
The mtlr is moved up in the epilogue so that it is away form the blr at the end
of the epilogue. The latency of the mtlr can now be hidden by the loads of the
callee saved registers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41737
llvm-svn: 322036
Currently we produce a bunch of unnecessary code when emitting the
prologue/epilogue for spills/restores. Namely, if the load from stack
slot/store to stack slot instruction is an X-Form instruction, we will
always produce an LIS/ORI sequence for the stack offset.
Furthermore, we have not exploited the P9 vector D-Form loads/stores for this
purpose.
This patch address both issues.
Specifying the D-Form load as the instruction to use for stack spills/reloads
should be safe because:
1. The stack should be aligned according to the ABI
2. If the stack isn't aligned, PPCRegisterInfo::eliminateFrameIndex() will
check for the offset being a multiple of 16 and will convert it to an
X-Form instruction if it isn't.
Differential Revision : https://reviews.llvm.org/D38758
llvm-svn: 315500
Stefan Pintilie