This is to simplify an upcoming change where we distinguish between
flavors of libc++ by adding an apple-libc++ Lit feature.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110870
The existing tests for transform_view::iterator weren't quite right,
and can be simplified now that we have more of C++20 available to us.
Having done that, let's use the same pattern for iota_view::iterator
as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110774
This adds the width estimation functions to the std-format-spec.
Implements parts of:
- P0645 Text Formatting
- P1868 width: clarifying units of width and precision in std::format
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, vitaut
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103413
Seems this section is not updated since we have transited to llvm-project monorepo.
At the start, we build libcxx under monorepo configuration but later try to make the separate configuration for libcxx build
and running benchmark.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110722
This reverts part of commit b82683b2eb.
I hadn't intended to remove the `// -*- C++ -*-` comment line
from `libcxx/include/version`, only from the generated tests.
Thanks to Raul Tambre for the catch.
Even if these comments have a benefit in .h files (for editors that
care about language but can't be configured to treat .h as C++ code),
they certainly have no benefit for files with the .cpp extension.
Discussed in D110794.
Even if these comments have a benefit in .h files (for editors that
care about language but can't be configured to treat .h as C++ code),
they certainly have no benefit for files with the .cpp extension.
Discussed in D110794.
This reverts commit 9f641c96cb.
The "python" command in gdb uses the python gdb is linked to,
not what "python" would give you if you used it directly in the shell.
As of e9564c3698, libcxx/gdb/gdb_pretty_printer_test.sh.cpp
fails locally for me because the REQUIRES check for host-has-gdb-with-python
uses python, which for me expands to python 2.7.18. This failure does not seem
to be caught on any upstream builders, potentially because they don't have gdb,
python, or a version of python that makes the test UNSUPPORTED (like python3).
This updates the check to use the python specified by the build (which should
be the python that runs this code), rather than just python.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110887
Apple's libc++ has a few differences with the LLVM libc++, and it is
necessary to use a custom configuration file to test it properly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110777
To reduce confusion, this commit makes sure that the name of the testing
configurations match the convention used for the stdlib= Lit parameter,
since those effectively correspond to each other.
Vendors take libc++ and ship it in various ways. Some vendors might
ship it differently from what upstream LLVM does, i.e. the install
location might be different, some ABI properties might differ, etc.
In the past few years, I've come across several instances where
having a place to test some of these properties would have been
incredibly useful. I also just got bitten by the lack of tests
of that kind, so I'm adding some now.
The tests added by this commit for Apple platforms have numerous
TODOs that capture discrepancies between the upstream LLVM CMake
and the slightly-modified build we perform internally to produce
Apple's system libc++. In the future, the goal would be to upstream
all those differences so that it's possible to build a faithful
Apple system libc++ with the upstream LLVM sources only.
But this isn't only useful for Apple - this lays out the path for
any vendor being able to add their own checks (either upstream or
downstream) to libc++.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110736
The Runtimes build is by far our longest CI configuration, so it makes
sense to run it earlier during CI. For consistency, move all the other
jobs from that "section" too.
Some of these were previously half-implemented in "ordering.h";
now they're all implemented, and tested.
Note that `constexpr` functions are implicitly `inline`, so the
standard wording omits `inline` on these; but Louis and I agree
that that's surprising and it's better to be explicit about it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110515
Instead of using a base class to store the members and the optional
size, use [[no_unique_address]] to achieve the same thing without
needing a base class.
Also, as a fly-by:
- Change subrange from struct to class (per the standard)
- Improve the diagnostic for when one doesn't provide a size to the ctor of a sized subrange
- Replace this->member by just member since it's not in a dependent base anymore
This change would be an ABI break due to [[no_unique_address]], but we
haven't shipped ranges anywhere yet, so this shouldn't affect anyone.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110370
Before this patch, we had features named 'libc++', 'libstdc++' and
'msvc' to describe the three implementations that use our test suite.
This patch renames them to 'stdlib=libc++', 'stdlib=libstdc++', etc
to avoid confusion between MSVC's STL and the MSVC compiler (or Clang
in MSVC mode).
Furthermore, this prepares the terrain for adding support for additional
"implementations" to the test suite. Basically, I'd like to be able to
treat Apple's libc++ differently from LLVM's libc++ for the purpose of
testing, because those effectively behave in different ways in some aspects.
There's really no reason to even have two different enums here,
but *definitely* we shouldn't have *three*, and they don't need
so many synonymous enumerator values.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110516
In reaction to the issues raised by Richard in https://llvm.org/D109066,
this commit does not apply P1951 as a DR in previous standard modes,
since it breaks valid code.
I do believe it should be applied as a DR, however ideally we'd get some
sort of statement from the Committee to this effect (and all implementations
would behave consistently). In the meantime, only implement P1951 starting
with C++23 -- we can always come back and apply it as a DR if that's what
the Committee says.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110347
Changes the style as requested by @ldionne in D103368.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109835
This enforces libcxx and its benchmarks are compiled by a C++20 capable
compiler. Based on review comments in D103413.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110338
This reverts commit 0c2a454845.
This was my mistake. When gdb can find its data directory it'll
import it automatically. If it can't (like when you're using a
version from a build folder) you need to give it the data
directory path.
We're safe to assume gdb is installed for testing purposes
so it'll import it for us.
I found this after upgrading from Ubuntu bionic (gdb 8.1.1) to
Focal (gdb 9.2). (where this test fails, but that's for a
different patch)
9.2 allows you to set breakpoint commands from
Python, which was added in 8.3.
(bintutils a913fffbdee21fdd50e8de0596358be425775678
"Allow breakpoint commands to be set from Python")
The reason this test never failed before was because it did so
silently. "source <python file>" doesn't fail even if that script
raises an Exception.
To fix this extend the gdb lit feature to check that:
* gdb exists
* has Python support
* allows you to set breakpoint commands
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110334
That macro was being defined but not used anywhere in libc++, so it
must be safe to remove it.
As a fly-by fix, also remove mentions of this macro in other places
in LLVM, to make sure they were not depending on the value defined in
libc++.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110289
Louis Dionne