T::template apply<U>), handling a few cases where we previously failed
and performing substitutions on such dependent names. Fixes a crash in
Boost.PropertyTree.
llvm-svn: 102490
of a class template or class template partial specialization. That is to
say, in
template <class T> class A { ... };
or
template <class T> class B<const T*> { ... };
make 'A<T>' and 'B<const T*>' sugar for the corresponding InjectedClassNameType
when written inside the appropriate context. This allows us to track the
current instantiation appropriately even inside AST routines. It also allows
us to compute a DeclContext for a type much more efficiently, at some extra
cost every time we write a template specialization (which can be optimized,
but I've left it simple in this patch).
llvm-svn: 102407
T::apply <U>::type
Fixes PR6899, although I want to dig a little deeper into the FIXME
for dependent template names that refer to operators.
llvm-svn: 102167
doesn't do this on any of the major platforms, and we don't really
support any of the platforms that do (nor will we actually handle
those headers well). Fixes PR6217; see PR6530 for details on what we
would need to do to support these platforms.
llvm-svn: 97899
category. Use this in a few places to eliminate unnecessary TST cases and
do some future-proofing. Provide terrible manglings for typeof. Mangle
decltype with some hope of accuracy.
Our manglings for some of the cases covered in the testcase are different
from gcc's, which I've raised as an issue with the ABI list.
llvm-svn: 97523
that is in an anonymous namespace, give that function or variable
internal linkage.
This change models an oddity of the C++ standard, where names declared
in an anonymous namespace have external linkage but, because anonymous
namespace are really "uniquely-named" namespaces, the names cannot be
referenced from other translation units. That means that they have
external linkage for semantic analysis, but the only sensible
implementation for code generation is to give them internal
linkage. We now model this notion via the UniqueExternalLinkage
linkage type. There are several changes here:
- Extended NamedDecl::getLinkage() to produce UniqueExternalLinkage
when the declaration is in an anonymous namespace.
- Added Type::getLinkage() to determine the linkage of a type, which
is defined as the minimum linkage of the types (when we're dealing
with a compound type that is not a struct/class/union).
- Extended NamedDecl::getLinkage() to consider the linkage of the
template arguments and template parameters of function template
specializations and class template specializations.
- Taught code generation to rely on NamedDecl::getLinkage() when
determining the linkage of variables and functions, also
considering the linkage of the types of those variables and
functions (C++ only). Map UniqueExternalLinkage to internal
linkage, taking out the explicit checks for
isInAnonymousNamespace().
This fixes much of PR5792, which, as discovered by Anders Carlsson, is
actually the reason behind the pass-manager assertion that causes the
majority of clang-on-clang regression test failures. With this fix,
Clang-built-Clang+LLVM passes 88% of its regression tests (up from
67%). The specific numbers are:
LLVM:
Expected Passes : 4006
Expected Failures : 32
Unsupported Tests : 40
Unexpected Failures: 736
Clang:
Expected Passes : 1903
Expected Failures : 14
Unexpected Failures: 75
Overall:
Expected Passes : 5909
Expected Failures : 46
Unsupported Tests : 40
Unexpected Failures: 811
Still to do:
- Improve testing
- Check whether we should allow the presence of types with
InternalLinkage (in addition to UniqueExternalLinkage) given
variables/functions internal linkage in C++, as mentioned in
PR5792.
- Determine how expensive the getLinkage() calls are in practice;
consider caching the result in NamedDecl.
- Assess the feasibility of Chris's idea in comment #1 of PR5792.
llvm-svn: 95216
that this is true when mangling, then fix up the various places in
Sema and/or CodeGen that need to remove qualifiers. Addresses a
linking issue when building LLVM with Clang.
llvm-svn: 92064
With this seemingly insignificant fix, we are now able to build and link clang using clang itself! (LLVM still has to be built with gcc for the time being).
llvm-svn: 91893
Alexis Hunt